Out with the old and in with the new? That's the question that the movies in 2011 will have to answer. Do more of the same and expect a different result? After all, 2010 domestic attendance is markedly down. Or, will they take a risk and become a challenger to their own incumbency? Incumbents, and movie studios are truly incumbents, never challenge their incumbency. They're habituated to the lens of the past. It's only when their performance becomes so god awful or a challenger eats their lunch, that they find a new way. We will have to wait a bit.
However, if you're stuck as to what movie to see this weekend, either on the big screen (some of the 2010 movies are still playing) or the home screen, be warned, many don't get better with age. And for some, only a hangover will get you through them.
Follow Peter Guber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@PeterGuber
Al Norman: The Wal-Mart/Netflix Conspiracy: Bad Movie
Scott Mendelson: 2010 in Review: The 'Worst' Films of the Year
2010: The Year in Music and Movies
happy to see you here! I appreciate your understanding.
Cheers,
Ed
It's much like seeing "Chateaux Pierre de la Deceptionaire" on a bottle of French wine makes it a "quality French wine."
Au contraire!
I saw "The Rabbit Hole." Depression-City/Never again!
Took three cups of caffeinated French Vanillia coffee to set me right.
FYI: "Chateaux Pierre de la Deceptionaire"="Sneaky Pete."
It's an old 50's term for stuff we know today as MD 20/20 or Cisco.
Yuk!
--RKJ
If you want me back - this kind of cynicism has to stop. Hollywood, you know what to do. Or perhaps - once upon a time you did.