iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter S. Goodman

GET UPDATES FROM Peter S. Goodman
 

Why Romney's Video Comments Have Killed His Candidacy

Posted: 09/18/2012 11:45 am

The reason the Romney campaign is now curtains is not the tone of those disdainful things he said about struggling Americans when he was behind closed doors with campaign contributors in Florida. We already knew that Romney views less fortunate people as losers and parasites.

The reason the video kills what remains of his bid for the White House is because of what it tells us about his understanding of the basic facts of the American situation: He thinks there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the economy, and there are plenty of lucrative opportunities out there for anyone willing to work for them.

That misunderstanding collides too directly with nearly every perspective a voter might bring to the polls, regardless of their partisan identification, their age, their gender, their race or their ideology.

Until now, the campaign has featured a sharp divide over policy prescriptions but not so much over descriptions of the state of play. Romney has sought to hand Obama responsibility for a bleak economy. Obama has argued that Romney would take us back to worse. But the basic inadequacy of economic opportunity has not been challenged.

But what Romney just got caught saying on video is that everything is pretty much fine. If it's not fine for you and your family, that's your own whiny fault. Publicly, he blames Obama for monkey-wrenching free enterprise, as if it's the president's fault that the economy is such a mess. Privately -- in front of people who own yachts and humidors -- he blames those who are not doing well for their own struggles.

Given how many are not doing well -- 80 percent of the workforce has seen their wages decline in real terms over the last quarter-century, and the average household has seen 40 percent of its wealth disappear during the Great Recession -- this is politically incendiary stuff. It lumps together people who have never missed a day of work in their lives with the worst stereotypical version of a welfare queen living on the public dole. Goodbye, Mitt. Go and pursue your own opportunities in the private sector.

Ezra Klein has adroitly handled the factual vacuity of Romney's claim that roughly half the country pays no taxes, noting that almost two-thirds of these people were working last year and handed over payroll taxes, making their effective tax burden -- 15.3 percent -- higher than Romney's 13.9 percent.

But forget those facts for a second and focus on the implications of Romney's message. In an America where nearly half the population is content to mooch off the government -- paying no taxes while using their food stamps for caviar and their Section 8 vouchers for suites at the Four Seasons -- the policy solution is straightforward: Yank the safety net and make those parasites go get one of those fabulous jobs just lying around for the taking.

By selecting as his vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan, who wants to gut Medicaid, and by broadcasting a fact-free attack on Obama that centers on claims that the president wants to unleash welfare checks like confetti, Romney has already let us know that he regards the poor as deadbeats. These toxic comments at the fundraiser in Florida tell us that he sees the middle class in similar terms.

He simply does not grasp that tens of millions of Americans make so little from their jobs that they pay no federal income taxes. He does not get that many people are saturated in debt and require help to get housing, health care and groceries -- not because they are lazy or morally degenerate or carry a sense of entitlement, but because their paychecks are inadequate.

For Romney's campaign, the video has produced a fatal narrative, one that adds momentum to others of its type in crucial pieces of the geography.

Those people who used to work in factories in Michigan and Ohio, where they earned enough to support their families but who now work at Walmart earning enough to qualify for food stamps, Romney just branded them lazy.

Those homeowners who are upside-down in Florida and Nevada and Colorado because someone lost a job that had health benefits and took another that doesn't, which forced them to tap their home equity to cover an unplanned illness: They think society owes them happy days, Romney just said.

Those students whose parents do not earn enough to pay for college, so they have to borrow from a federally backed program to finance higher education: Romney just called them societal leeches.

We just got a glimpse of the America that Mitt Romney sees from his privileged perch, one where anyone unable to attend a $50,000-a-plate fundraiser simply hasn't tried hard enough. That's too much of a contrast from the America in which most people live. It's going to be hard to explain to regular people.

Which is why this is the end of the Romney candidacy.

 
 
 

Follow Peter S. Goodman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/petersgoodman

FOLLOW BUSINESS
The reason the Romney campaign is now curtains is not the tone of those disdainful things he said about struggling Americans when he was behind closed doors with campaign contributors in Florida. We a...
The reason the Romney campaign is now curtains is not the tone of those disdainful things he said about struggling Americans when he was behind closed doors with campaign contributors in Florida. We a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,884
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
01:37 PM on 09/26/2012
Peter Goodman's writing style is designed to mislead. 47% of Americans are not going to vote for Romney no matter what was uncovered about Obama. They represent the base and they will never say a nice word about Romney neither as a candidate or as President (sound familiar). Who are all of the liberals trying to kid. The 47% are Democrats, Liberals, love Nancy Pelosi, Love Harry Reid, Love Bill CLinton, love the idea of abortion, love the idea of same sex marriage, government involvement especially when it's about taking from the rich and giving to the poor. That's 47% of America. There's another 47% that are polar opposites and they are just as blinded by their own ideology. I don't think the right cry or get upset in knowing they are not represented by a liberal president, nor will they ever be represented by a liberal president. That's just the way it is. There will always be a president that only caters to half of his constituency. I'm used to it, all of my conservative friends are used to it, why isn't every on the left used to it? Grandstanding? Disingenuous posturing? Do tell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DuffyShort
Born in in a segregated world..
10:20 AM on 09/26/2012
or maybe there is another problem.....
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81618.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WeAlwaysKnewIt
Give Snout To It
08:00 PM on 09/25/2012
You make the correct argument. Share it with those folks without a computer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
12:50 PM on 09/28/2012
I did. I dropped 100 millions flyers all over America on Thursday, using old B52 Bombers. Did you hear about it?
11:51 AM on 09/25/2012
I hope you are correct, Mr Goodman. I'm a Brit, so can't vote, but like everyone else in the free world, I will be directly affected by whoever is elected President. Mr Obama has not been an unqualified success - although to a large extent his hands have been tied by the economic crisis and by a right-wing Congress - but he seems infinitely preferable to Romney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
02:31 PM on 09/25/2012
Welcome Mr. Wilson. The Senate and House of Representatives comprise "Congress", or The Legislative Branch of Government. We currently have a Liberal, or Democratic controlled Senate, where Harry Reed is the Majority Leader, a very liberal politician. The House of Representatives is currently controlled by Conservatives, or the Republican Party. So, in fact, Congress is not right winged, it is split between Left and Right. In Obama's first two years, his party, the Democratic, Liberal, Left wing party controlled both the House and the Senate, but nothing of import to the Left wing agenda was legislated. Best of luck to you with your left wing politics but I just want to keep your properly and accurately informed since the spin from the left most likely wouldn't correct your incorrect assertion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:37 PM on 09/25/2012
Since you claim to be concerned with accuracy, you should note that Senator Kennedy passed away in August of 2009, just 6 months after President Obama took office. Since that time, The Democratic party has not had 'control' of the Senate because 60 votes are required if the minority invokes the filibuster -- something the Republicans have done habitually in pursuit of their number one goal according to Minority Leader Mitch McConnell: Make sure Obama is a one-term President.

So, while the Democratic majority was able the pass important laws such as the Affordable Care Act and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, Republican obstructionism gained the necessary proportion need to shut down any Democratic legislation in the Senate six months after President Obama became president.
12:40 PM on 09/26/2012
Thanks, Mr Sandore. My politics are not left wing - if I were asked, I would describe myself as a centrist. My post was fairly simplistic, I know, but I am not sure I would describe the Democrats as left-wing either, which is why there was a limit on the amount of liberal legislation passed during Mr Obama's first two years in office. One hopes that in his second term he can finally develop a European-style healthcare system: I have a number of American friends who are fed up with me talking about the one here in France.
11:38 AM on 09/25/2012
Sadly there's not a word to change in this piece. These Presidential Elections have lost contact with democracy, because people from the moderate right presently have no candidate for whom they really want to vote. The two principal parties, Republican and Democrat, have the patriotic duty to represent the principal mass of Americans, moderate conservatives and moderate liberals alike.

Those of the NRC who have served up this presidential ticket need to read what is written above the door: NATIONAL Republican Party, not ELITIST Republican Party.
10:13 AM on 09/25/2012
Can't wait to see Mitt defend himself against the leaked video during the debate(s).
03:50 AM on 09/25/2012
yeah... sure.... but what about Diebold...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dodsworth Fandango
The wages of gin is breath
02:31 PM on 09/25/2012
Good point... That one name."Diebold" scares me to death. I really believe they are going to try to pull another fast one too. (fanned)
12:59 AM on 09/25/2012
I do very much like this article. He explains simply, and clearly, the difference between what Romney sees, and actual life. Those of you who say there's no difference between the parties, surely need either some medication or to get off of something. Maybe Infowars, Glenn Beck and Fox News. I do hope that Peter isn't TOO optimistic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jo Hargis
12:29 AM on 09/25/2012
Here is an enormous insight into the real Willard. From an article about the book on Romney's life.

"....one of Romney’s sons, knowing that his father was a hard worker, said that next to him, “Everyone else was lazy.”

This ties in perfectly with my gut perception of Willard from the very beginning....that he sees absolutely NO value in another human being if they aren't rich or on the way to being rich. To him, money is everything, it's how he measures success.

All he ever talks about is "small businesses and entrepreneurs". It's as if the other 99.9 percent of us simply don't even blip on his radar. In his world, there is no value to bus drivers, teachers, firemen, restaurant workers, the lady who sells you your tags at the county courthouse. This article really hit the nail on the head too, about the fact that Willard seems to think there are just opportunities laying around for the taking, if only the pesky lazy moochers would get up off their lazy moocher arses and take them.

Willard has no understanding of that good old standby, Mazlow's hierarchy of needs. Millions of us right now are just trying to survive at the bottom of the pyramid on basic physiological needs and safety. Many are one mini-disaster away from major disaster.

Read more at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2012/01/18/The-Real-Mitt-Romney-What-You-Didnt-Know.aspx#XBufeszpl0PRO6FM.99
11:04 PM on 09/24/2012
I knew it. I did. I baked cakes, for the celebration. And steamed lobster, and invited my fellow 47 percenters. We thought we'd get trashed and spray paint "Romney sucks AND blows" on everything immobile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dodsworth Fandango
The wages of gin is breath
02:35 PM on 09/25/2012
To suck, and blow, at the same time violate most scientific laws to be sure.. Then there's Romney.........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raejeanowl
10:35 PM on 09/24/2012
Glad y'all think you're already in a position to call the election. Wishful thinking on your part. Bet you want everyone, especially the Romney voters, to stay home, right?

Wait...isn't that disenfranchisement, and isn't it what the libs are accusing the cons of doing when they support voter I.D.?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
03:06 PM on 09/24/2012
This should be titled "Why wishful thinking will never elect a president". Imagine, we haven't arrived at the first debate and some far left blogger thinks he can wishful think his incumbent candidate back into the white house without a fight. A conservative could have written an article "Why Obama's lack of a Foreign Policy caused the death of US Ambassador Stevens and 3 others, and will deprive him of a 2nd Term in the White House"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pam Pendergraft
12:10 AM on 09/25/2012
Mark? you will never learn...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
11:37 AM on 09/25/2012
it must be because my teachers are so awful. oh, I learned how to blame everyone for my shortcomings and mistakes from Obama. I take no responsibility for anything I do wrong or say wrong anymore, my blame assignment role model is Obama. So, yeah, you're all bad teachers here and that's why I'll never learn.
01:31 AM on 09/25/2012
Sorry John, your republican house did that by blocking Obama from taking action on Libia last year and cutting off all funds, calling him a war monger. Better get your facts stright!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
01:21 PM on 09/25/2012
Did John ever get this message?
02:27 PM on 09/24/2012
As I was beginning this post a Romney ad came on the tube saying he represented the middle class. I began laughing out loud. ‘We gotta balance the budget’ he says. ‘We gotta this, we gotta that.’ One of the things that strikes you about moguls, like Romney, is how they have the uncanny ability to ride the backs of common folk to arrive at their goals and if/when it becomes necessary they quickly flush you down the toilet, as Bain did to so many workers to ‘turnaround’ their companies. Their main goal seems to be profits not people – or in Romney’s case, the Presidency and the power it brings to spread his brand of colonialism and his fake religious beliefs. Not this time Romney.

That 47% tape was the final straw. You can spin it however much you want but WE KNOW WHAT YOU MEANT. You see you now have a record. You wanted the American car industry to go bankrupt. You are two-faced, robotic and cynical and would say anything to become president. This is evidenced by the fact that you rejected ObamaCare then last week you said you will keep most or parts of ObamaCare. See what I mean? Nobody knows where you stand on anything. It's one thing one day, another thing another day. Our economy is not a business or a balance sheet. It is lives and people working toward a common goal, justice. We won’t get fooled again!
photo
Groucho Raygun
You were serious about that?
02:26 PM on 09/24/2012
$50,000 a plate .... I can't afford $5,000 a plate for leftovers ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Giovanni Sandore
03:08 PM on 09/24/2012
I guess I'll have to take you off the list of Obama's $100,000 a plate dinner with the Hollywood crowd he's so fond of doing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen Tahir
11:40 PM on 09/24/2012
You sure are disrespectful to our President. Don't worry...he will be re-elected for a second term. Then you will have four more years to complain..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
millerbeach
12:07 AM on 09/25/2012
Yeah, but I'll bet I wouldn't get indigestion at his dinner. Hate gives me indigestion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roman238
Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
03:25 AM on 09/25/2012
Wow! You're rich! I can't afford $50 a plate! LOL
10:20 AM on 09/24/2012
Mitt Romney views life from a comfortable seat at the top of the financial food chain. It's understandable that he cannot see all the way down to the rest of us scrambling around for his crumbs at the bottom. Unfortunately the trickle down theory doesn't really work that well. Somehow it manages to trickle up just fine. There are no shortages at the top. There are no difficult decisions at the top such as do I eat today or pay for my medicine. Romney only has to choose which of his houses he will sleep in tonight, not will he have a roof over his head tonight. Romney will have an elevator to move his cars around in one of his houses. Many people have the choice of sleeping in their cars because they lost their homes to financial shenanigans that eventually cost them their job or their home or both.

Mitt Romney wants to lead America --but how can he do that when he really doesn't even see it.