More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Leadership in the Time of Obama

What's Your Reaction:

President Obama is today negotiating for his political life. The pundits claim he is "all-in" on the health care bill, and that its defeat would be the practical end to his presidency. So here's a pop-quiz.

Should Obama:

  • A. Command and control - Use every ounce of his power, information and authority to threaten, coerce, demand, bully, expose and publicly humiliate resistant members of Congress to get them to pass the bill;

  • B. Take the high road - Model exemplary, collaborative, win-win leadership by listening carefully to the needs and concerns of the bill's opponents, finding common ground on the priority objectives, and uniting both parties and the country around a common vision and purpose;

  • C. Build bottom-up support - Reach-out to as many constituent groups as possible, including his base, his younger internet community, his allies in business, media and politics, as well as his opponents, and plead, barter, beg, and ingratiate himself in order to mobilize them and secure their support for the bill;


  • D. Appease his opponents - Simply tolerate the attacks, inflammatory rhetoric and hyperbole of his opponents for now, give-in to them on their key demands, suck-up to them as much as possible, and quietly lay-in-wait for conditions to change and opportunities to present themselves where he can blithely sabotage them and derail their agenda.


  • E. Develop a strong BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) - Spend a considerable amount of time and energy developing a good Plan B, where he can still achieve his principle goals of insuring the uninsured, cutting healthcare costs, and improving standards, but he can do so without going through the legislature (i.e. working directly with the medical industry) and ideally lessen his dependence on Congress in these matters.


  • F. None of the above.

  • G. All of the above.


Of course, the correct response to this is D. And B. And A, C and E (in other words, G). President Obama must employ every strategy available to him -- hard and soft, public and private, short-term and long-term -- to achieve his objectives on healthcare. It is both a practical and moral imperative.

This is smart power. Harvard Professor Joseph Nye has been advocating the use of smart power, a combination of hard power (military, economic, etc.) and soft power (moral, cultural, etc.) in our foreign policy for years. And both President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have taken to this idea recently. But now is the time to employ a similar strategy on important domestic issues -- like healthcare.

Research has found that, although many of our leaders tend to get stuck in one approach when negotiating conflict (usually domination), our more effective leaders are more nimble. They read situations more carefully, consider their short and longer-term objectives, and then employ a variety of different strategies in order to increase the probabilities that their agenda will succeed. They know the difference between a temporary dispute and a long-term war. They know when to stay the course and when to change strategies. They recognize that good leadership requires both -- a sense of stability, vision and purpose, and the capacity to respond effectively to important changes in the landscape.

And this is what is needed to address our country's healthcare deficiencies today. President Obama must pressure, even coerce Democrats in congress to pass the bill, continue to model the high-road leadership he displayed at the healthcare summit, return to the assertive bottom-up coalition-building tactics of his campaign, tolerate and appease his opponents when necessary, and all the while be thinking long-term and developing alternative venues to advance healthcare reform if need be.

An environment as complex, volatile, and polarized as Washington is today requires adaptive leaders who employ smart power. Leaders who are masters at combining A through E above and employing networks of agents skilled in them all to move us forward. Here's hoping that our President, who is all-in, is using all of the above.

Peter T. Coleman, PhD, is Associate Professor of Psychology and Education in the Department of Organization and Leadership at Teachers College, Columbia University, Director of the International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, and on faculty of The Earth Institute at Columbia University. He is currently working on a book with Dr. Ferguson on Smart Power.

Robert Ferguson, PhD, is a psychologist, executive coach and author.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:58 AM on 03/31/2010
It is high time that everyone in Congress who has the benefit of the best healthcare insurance in the country recognizes that our country will be more successful if we support preventative health coverage for everyone in America. The hidden costs of urgent care and the decline of our trauma centers is the biggest risk we face as a country. Healthcare for all is for our safety as a nation. It is fear of change that is at the root of this debate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyworry
Proud Liberal
03:54 PM on 03/21/2010
I'm so glad that reconciliation wasn't used to pass the entire bill because reconciliation is not "permanent" I like the idea of the up and down vote. Reconciliation is great for the fixes-- that would be appropriate and what it's actually used for.

The President has been advocating “B” from the on set with “numerous” attempts of bi-partisanship offered to Republicans. He has “C”…he hasn’t lost that support and the age limit restriction for young adults in college to remain on their parents insurance covers them. We mustn’t miss the primary focus – “we are actually accomplishing a historic beginning for further expansion of HCO” and we must also remember that the fight for Medicare was far worse than it has been for this bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TxAnna
12:30 PM on 03/21/2010
I submit that Pres Obama might've had to employ fewer of these tactics IF he'd set a goal to actually reform our health care system instead of trying to reform the health insurance industry. Had he tried to achieve the former the solution was/is simple - Medicare for all who want to buy into it. No convoluted explanations,because we've had Medicare for decades and we've expanded it on other occasions without sinking the Ship of State. Pretty much everyone is familiar with Medicare -- they're either on it or have someone in their immediate family that is on it or was on it. CBO scoring shows the positive benefits of this idea to our national bottom line to be greater than the benefits of any other idea so far presented. It could take effect pretty much immediately as Medicare is already in place and functioning. We probably could've done this by reconcialation when passing the 2011 budget. Makes you wonder why the Pres chose the more difficult, convoluted path where he had to expend so much of his political capital, doesn't it?
12:08 PM on 03/21/2010
Swell. Except C should include: Sell out his platform and base to corporate overlords, to the detriment of real reform.
10:52 AM on 03/21/2010
I find it interesting that the few psychologist we have heard from are more concerned with Presient Obama than with the lies, misinformation, distortion, fear, sociopathology exhibited by the right.

A little analysis of the pathology, might be helpful to the nation. The personality disorders alone, would keep you busy for weeks.
07:33 AM on 03/21/2010
Doctors,
You are presenting the problems that are being exhibited by this Administration, not the Solutions. Obama and his Administration are following the advise above and it is killing his Presidency. What he should do is "Stop following these Techniques and start following the ideals of LEADERSHIP." Leaders do not compromise their positions. The minute you start to compromise, you lose your Footing and send a signal to your people that you are losing the Battle. It is the same as stabbing your followers in the Back. The people will forgive you for losing a Battle but they will not forgive poor Leadership. Nothing will destroy a Leader faster than a compromise in Principals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
12:34 AM on 03/21/2010
I was going for "all of the above" until I came to D. He needed to appease, and he has done so, but the time for appeasement on this issue is not now.

And when you've got "none of the above" above "all of the above" ... .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN60
I Hope You'll Dance
07:34 AM on 03/21/2010
Appeasement has come and gone. It flew out the window when Republicans met and decided to stall Obama's agenda, BEFORE Obama came to Capitol Hill ( a few hours later) to address them and to prod them into a bipartisan mode of rolling up their sleeves and helping this country and the ones that were jobless and suffering. They bit his hand up to his elbows. He invited the Republicans to the WH time and time again. Still got a "NO".

The Republicans stalled everything, by sending their people to committee meetings and dangled maybes. in the Dems face's, to act like they would help, while their party was never going to vote for a Dem bill, no matter what it was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
11:49 AM on 03/21/2010
Yes. He couldn't just tell the country that the Republicans weren't going to negotiate in good faith. He had to show it. I'm sure he pretty much knew what they were going to do. But if he hadn't let them do it, it would have been his word (and anyone's reasonable prognostication) against theirs (and the right-wing echo chamber's noise).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WIpatriot
I've seen enough to make me Progressive
01:20 PM on 03/21/2010
"And when you've got "none of the above" above "all of the above" ... ."

I thought I was the only one to notice that until I saw your comment. I recall a couple of times in school trying to explain the logic of my "wrong answer" to teachers who couldn't fathom my insubordination.
11:23 PM on 03/20/2010
The problem of the president is that not all party members are solidly behind him whereas the Republicans are all united and focused on a single goal and that is to bring him down. The Dems may be more in numbers but they have different agenda and interests. These weaken the whole party and paint the president as spineless and lacking in leadership. Why can't they sit down together and have a united voice when facing issues as important as health care? Those Dems who will sacrifice the party's interest for their own selfish, political or otherwise motives should be replaced by those who Obama can count on in times of crisis like this. It's a shame they are the majority but can't have anything done due to bickering, posturing and wavering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EminemsRevenge
12:23 PM on 03/20/2010
The answer is H-->VETO the bill and have Michelle write up a new one!

The bill out there now is like the Patriot Act--OBVIOUSLY it's been in the works for so many decades that it's too cumbersome to understand, AND HALF THE COUNTRY thinks it's gonna ruin their lives.

Michelle Obama COULD draft a two page bill--written so that a third-grader could understand it--and it could be amended as need demands. Alas, our POTUS is trying to be GREAT in a country that idolizes MEDIOCRITY [ see Reagan & GW ].

In another ten years America is gonna REALIZE how UNFAIR their beloved health insurers really are, and THEN the time will be ripe for total eradication of that industry...so let Fox "news" and the teabaggers THINK they won
09:57 AM on 03/20/2010
So how was Bush able to bet the ranch on WMD and still get re-elected?
10:34 AM on 03/20/2010
Karl Rove.
Stole OH.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:01 AM on 03/21/2010
Because the stupid Democrats picked John Kerry over Howard Dean in the primaries, thereby handing the race to Bush. And if Kerry had won, then that now-known-to-be timebomb John Edwards would have been the Vice President.
09:47 AM on 03/20/2010
quite simply, I am for anything fox news is against. I don`t waste my time justifying my reason, I just know they are the cuckoo in the nest.
08:21 AM on 03/20/2010
Don't forget the content of the bill actually matters more than all the games being played and although the media and the party diehards will hail it as a great accomplishment it isn't a progressive bill as Bernie Sanders , Howard Dean and Dennis Kucinich have made very clear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
07:08 AM on 03/20/2010
The President has already tried B and D, and thrown the possibility of C away. Everything seems easy to a mind convinced of its own superiority.
01:55 AM on 03/20/2010
Obama is succeeding beyond the right's wildest nightmares. This is a glorious moment for the people of the United States, and not Obama's bogus "Waterloo".

The only people fighting for their "political life" are those whose attempts at fomenting fear, uncertainty and doubt have failed.
09:03 PM on 03/20/2010
Fanned.

PO is negotiating the BEGINNING of changes in the complex and perplexing area of health care. Politicians have tried for decades to counter the inertia of this behemoth problem for our country with little success. He is accomplishing this with amazing persistence, moral imperative, and professionalism, along with a variety of skills and adaptive behaviors. Sounds like success to me, too.

The screams of outrage are coming from the fear-mongering troglodytes who feel the boot on the back of their necks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BobsNotWorking
02:52 AM on 03/21/2010
Exactly. Fanned.
MThomasNC
Retired, Sassy, Senior Citizen
04:16 PM on 03/19/2010
I have seen Obama do a little of each. For the HCR process, he mainly employed B, D, E. I wished he would have employed A (command & control) just like Bush43 did until the economic crisis. But that's not his style.

Obama is more of a B (take the high road), D (appease his opponents, then zapped them), E (develop a strong BATNA).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:21 PM on 03/20/2010
MThomas, I agree