iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Phil Bronstein

Phil Bronstein

Posted: August 18, 2009 02:13 PM

Robert Novak, the Prince of Darkness for better or worse...


Criticizing the recently deceased is as rude as punking the Queen of England at an official event: it's bad form both in terms of timing and reasonable respect.

As a journalist, I know I should revere Bob Novak, whose death from brain cancer was announced this morning, almost as much as the genuflecting and genuinely saddened colleagues are now doing on his alma mater, CNN. I doubt this mourning will reach Cronkite proportions, but Mr. Novak did have lots of influence over many years, was seemingly fearless in his views, straddled print and broadcast reporting successfully and made it nearly fashionable for TV guys to have combovers (see: David Gergen.)

Someone noted in one of the black-bordered eulogy TV segments this morning that he was called "The Prince of Darkness," not by his enemies but by his friends because of his contacts and his power to move the D.C. discussion. I remember once being at dinner in a capital steak house when Bob Novak came in. He had that invisible wake around him that surrounds celebrities, that sense that the molecules in the room bend when someone famous arrives.

There was a line-up to shake his hand, adulation he accepted graciously but that seemed to make him grow larger and more luminescent with each fawning comment.

But the Darkness thing reminds me of a very different Novak moment.

I was covering the bloody conflict in El Salvador in the late '80s. I'm not an either/or person, generally, and I had good relations with colonels on the right and guerrillas on the left. As in most of real life, the situation was more complicated than slogans or sound bites.

So I go to a disinterment of a couple of murder victims on the dusty outskirts of town. The grave re-diggers were, as they mostly were for these things, drunk, so it took a painfully long time. The few of us who were witnesses had to put some kind of cloth over our noses and mouths because there's nothing as horribly ripe as a decomposing human body.

The two dead men had been buried hastily in a shallow grave. Their thumbs were tied together behind their backs and there were other infamous signatures of a Salvadoran death squad hit that are too gruesome to describe even for this blog. The fact that the victims were seen being hustled into a Cherokee Chief with smoked windows, the signature Death Squad vehicle of choice, and that they were leftist labor organizers made it clear what was up. (The guerrillas had their own killing apparatus, but it was mostly aimed at mayors in rural villages.)

Once they were dug up and carted off for more examination, I left, the stench of the grim, hazy afternoon event still in my nostrils. I was sure it was also on my clothes and in my pores. How could such a vital and vile thing not be?

I went to my rented house in the Escalon district of Salvador and slumped in a chair in front of an old TV set with rabbit ears. At certain times in the late afternoon, if the weather was just right and you fiddled with the antennae, we could get a few minutes of CNN.

There was Robert Novak, screaming at someone -- probably Michael Kinsley on "Crossfire" -- like an enraged health care town hall meeting participant: "Death squads in El Salvador is a liberal MYTH!"

I haven't been accused of being a liberal all that much, and, as Christiane Amanpour said so wonderfully in Iraq, "Wolf, I can only tell you what I can see," but I can tell you reliably that Salvadoran death squads were as real as Scooter Libby and Evans and Novak.

At the time, I wanted to reach through the TV screen and strangle the guy into sensibility. Or have the two tragic dead men delivered, without benefit of makeup, on his front lawn.

It wasn't a liberal-conservative thing. Death squads were a fact.

Whatever else Bob Novak did well, even superbly in his professional life -- a great deal, I don't doubt -- at that moment he did a huge disservice to the truth and to the memory of thousands of people who died violently, painfully and without justification in El Salvador.

Now, please let's return to our ritual of respectful remembrance.

Follow Phil Bronstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PhilBronstein

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
situationcritical
SuperMegaUltraUberLiberal
02:10 AM on 08/21/2009
Have some courtesy
Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse
Or Ill lay your soul to waste, um yeah
Pleased to meet you
Hope you guessed my name

-- aka Robert Novak.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:58 PM on 08/19/2009
The 'moderation' on these blog posts is a joke. If you stray too far from the liberal orthodoxy of the HP, you can't get through. If you dutifully flog a liberal whipping-boy, even upon the announcement of his death, your post is hustled to the front of the queue. Truly disappointing, for a site that purports to report honestly and revere freedoms of expression.
photo
sparky09
Proud Gay Navy Vet...He wOn, get Over it!
02:38 PM on 08/19/2009
Robert Novak doesn't deserve our respect.
01:56 PM on 08/19/2009
Robert Novak's legacy will be his outing of Valerie Plame as a CIA agent for selfish political reasons. The fact that he had no shame in doing so only proves how vile a being he was.

Let his family grieve for him. I don't feel saddened by his departure.
06:40 PM on 08/18/2009
Journalist? Ya right - he was an extremely right wing and partisan Republican - actually it was like free strategy and advertising for the GOP.

And, Swift Boat - his son marketing director.

Sorry for his family, but that's about it.
04:57 PM on 08/18/2009
Robert Novak was an interesting character but intellectually dishonest. i don't know how many times I would listen to him making comments about this and that and later find out that he was outright distorting the facts. Facts were just things that got in his way and he shoved them aside with ease. I am sorry for his family. Everyone deserves to live longer on this Earth, but his time is passed. He is NOT a reporter that anyone coming into this business should look up to and emulate. He let his political bias affect almost every story he reported and as a result, made those stories suspect. The new reporters on the beat today would do well to stick to their ethics and cast aside their political bias and the loss of Mr. Novak from the scene will not matter very much.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
04:37 PM on 08/18/2009
What a disgusting story to publish today. Can we please let the Novak family have their time of peace? There will be plenty of time to rip him apart afterwards.
01:53 PM on 08/19/2009
Is it time, NOW?????
04:09 PM on 08/18/2009
We are so dishonest in our eulogies.
Novak sided with evil too many times. Burning Valerie Plame was just one of last acts that reminded us of his eagerness to side with power.

We should not forget how he embraced Ian Smith of Rhodesia and fanned opposition to African liberation movements by smearing them as Communist. The same red smear was applied liberally to Martin Luther King Jr. by him and his co-conspirator Robert Evans.

His knee-jerk support for the right-wing in Latin America was typical of the role he played.
For the next three days, we'll be hearing all the b.s. about how nice a guy he was and how charming he was at Washington cocktail parties. Please. Let's not glide over his nasty acts and nasty positions in some ritual of final niceness. Evil is evil and I hope he burns in hell.
03:53 PM on 08/18/2009
Just because he was "seemingly fearless in his views" doesn't mean he wasn't an evil lying SOB. He made Dick Cheney look benign.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:49 PM on 08/18/2009
Robert Novak did what lots of “journalists” including your very own Carla Marinucci do today, convey beltway wisdom (via stenography) as fact.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jane
03:10 PM on 08/18/2009
Don't respect him. Glad he's dead. Wish he'd died in 2000 so that he could have done less damage.
02:48 PM on 08/18/2009
novak and people like him are a cancer upon society and i refuse to play along and say "oh well he was just somebody with a different view" he was not just somebody with a different view. he was a festering boil among many festering boils intent on causing as much damage to society as they can.

i have no idea what motivated him or any of the other monsters currently feeding on this country and frankly i dont care. good riddance to bad rubbish. there are plenty of actually wonderful people actually harmed by novak and the rest.

i would rather hear about michael jackson and i am ... not a fan of him either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 PM on 08/18/2009
I will remember. I'm afraid the outing of Valerie Plame will prevent my respect.