iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Philip Radford

Philip Radford

Posted: September 21, 2010 04:23 PM

Going Beyond Oil

What's Your Reaction:

Despite the overwhelming evidence that Big Oil's reckless pursuit of the last remaining oil reserves (and ever-more exorbitant profits) is disastrous for the planet, governments of the world are still greenlighting dangerous deepwater drilling projects.

That's why this morning two Greenpeace activists locked down the anchor chain of Chevron's drill ship the Stena Carron, which was scheduled to depart for a deepwater drilling site north of Scotland's Shetland Islands. While our activists physically prevent one more irresponsible drilling project from getting underway, we're calling on all governments to ban deepwater drilling once and for all.

Greenpeace activists lock down anchor chain of Chevron drill ship
© Will Rose / Greenpeace

The action was launched from the Greenpeace ship Esperanza, which was also the base of operations for the activists who staged a 40-hour occupation of Cairn Energy's Stena Don oil rig off the coast of Greenland earlier this month. There is real danger that the Stena Don could spark an Arctic oil rush, which would pose a huge threat to the climate and put the fragile Arctic environment at risk. So, for nearly two days, Greenpeace activists prevented this dangerous drilling operation from proceeding to threaten any more marine life and coastal ecosystems with catastrophic oil spills.

Greenpeace climber on Cairn Energy's Stena Don oil rig
© Greenpeace

This is as much a moral issue as an environmental issue. We don't fully understand the long-term effects of oil spills like the BP Deepwater Disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. We need independent science to find out what those will be. All we do know for certain is that the oil and its impacts will persist for decades. Surely we can all agree that we owe our children a healthy planet to live on? And unfortunately, as is now all-too clear, expanding offshore drilling operations is incompatible with keeping our planet healthy enough to support future generations.

That's why we're not only working to stop more dangerous drilling, we're also seeking to get to the truth about the impacts of oil spills. Our ship, the Arctic Sunrise, is now halfway through its three-month expedition in the Gulf and has hosted several teams of independent scientists who are working to understand where all of BP's oil has gone and what it's doing to marine wildlife and ecosystems in the Gulf. You can stay up do date with the crew's findings via our Google Earth map, which is tracking blog posts, pictures, and videos coming from the crew onboard the ship.

Greenpeace: Go Beyond OilIf you want to know even more about the long-term effects of oil spills and how we can prevent future oil spills from happening, tune in this Friday to the blogger briefing Greenpeace is hosting as part of UN Week. Greenpeace USA's Kert Davies is onboard the Arctic Sunrise in the Gulf right now and will be participating in the briefing as well as answering your questions live via video Skype.

We're not just against oil, we're for clean, sustainable energy. Sven Teske, the author of our Energy [R]evolution report, will be taking part in the briefing to discuss how expanding our offshore drilling operations is not only dangerous, but unnecessary. We can get to 80 percent renewable energy globally by 2050, and we'd be creating 12 million jobs by 2030 in the process.

A clean energy revolution would not only help stop global warming and get our ailing economy back on track, but it is also the only 100 percent fail-safe method for preventing oil spills. That's because the only way to stop oil spills is to leave the oil in the ground (or hundreds of feet under the sea, as the case may be). We can't do that until we move beyond oil and other fossil fuels as our primary energy sources.

Greenpeace will continue to confront reckless new oil drilling operations and bring attention to the issue, but we need to build a widespread movement that demands we go beyond oil as soon as possible. Join us on the blogger briefing this Friday to find out how you can help get us there.

 

Follow Philip Radford on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Phil_Radford

Despite the overwhelming evidence that Big Oil's reckless pursuit of the last remaining oil reserves (and ever-more exorbitant profits) is disastrous for the planet, governments of the world are still...
Despite the overwhelming evidence that Big Oil's reckless pursuit of the last remaining oil reserves (and ever-more exorbitant profits) is disastrous for the planet, governments of the world are still...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
12:36 PM on 09/23/2010
Clean sustainable energy - like nuclear, which already provides most of the low-carbon electricity in the world today. When Greenpeace starts supporting that, I'll know that they have turned the corner from dogma to reality. Until then they're just throwing tantrums.

The occupation of the Chevron drilling rig is a risky move. It summons up memories of the lies Greenpeace told about the Brent Spar in the mid eighties, when they occupied that prior to its disposal.
09:28 PM on 09/24/2010
And hydro. I originally hail from the Pacific Northwest where a large percentage of the electricity is generated by hydropower. Too bad Greenpeace and their ilk don't like that source of no-carbon, renewable energy either.
09:38 AM on 09/23/2010
Alternatively one could do the right thing and work for the changes you want through legal means. What's so wrong with that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 09/23/2010
have you tried it? it doesn't work. i have been working for a fair feed in tariff for 3 years and NOBODY WILL LISTEN because i don't have a giant bribe check or a giant press surge - which is what you get when you do stuff like this.

if the media would occasionally print the truth because it's true and legislators would occasionally do the right thing because it's right, nobody would need to pull outrageous stunts just to get attention on their issue.

don't hate the players, hate the game...
09:34 PM on 09/24/2010
Bull. I do hate the players when they break the rule of the game so outrageously and persistently. The more so since Greenpeace really has no rational sense whatsoever.

Seriously, I have no patience for people who act so ridiculously. Back in the day, Francois Mitterand knew how to respond to Greenpeace in language they could understand. I'd not be unhappy to see another Rainbow Warrior at the bottom of the sea...
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:42 PM on 09/22/2010
Go Greenpeace! Bio fuels from the waste bio mass can replace or nearly replace fossil oil.
02:33 PM on 09/29/2010
In 2005, the world consumed 1-cubic mile of oil. I'm curious, how many billions of tons of grass clippings, tree trimmings, hog guts, and dinner time left overs will it take just to be within an order of magnitude of that much oil? How many ton-miles will there be transporting the waste to processing centers? I'm not poo-pooing the idea, just trying to get an idea what it will take to convert to fossil oil infrastructure to a waste-bio one.
08:52 PM on 09/22/2010
Greenpeace turns out to be the unsustainable entity around here - they need $250 million per year to keep the lights on in their offices, fly their people all over the world to push junk science, run their diesel powered monster ships... and generally create a massive carbon footprint of their own - while giving the real polluters in China, India, Venezuela and Russia a pass (because there would be lots of Greenpeace heads floating in the sea if they tried to take on these nations).

Keep going for the soft option, Greenpeace, irrelevance is on the way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:05 PM on 09/22/2010
Please tell me you are not planning on supporting the millions of acres of permanent ecosystem destruction and enormous GHG emissions of the Big Solar and Big Wind boondoggles when clean, democratically-owned efficiency and solar power - within the built environment - is cheaper, faster, cleaner and fairer?

There's no point in chaining up Chevron Oil just to unleash Chevron Solar. They have the exact same business model - kill the wilderness for profit. It is incredibly ignorant and unethical to prop up their greenwashed solar and wind boondoggles with our tax dollars, our public lands or our vague support.

Please - be specific when you chatter about "renewables." It isn't renewable if it destroys the ecosystem, depletes the scarce groundwater and creates more GHGs than it prevents (assuming it prevents any, which is highly unlikely). You need to make it clear that the BUILT ENVIRONMENT is the only place we can site renewable energy, otherwise, it's just killing peter to "save" paul.
08:20 AM on 09/22/2010
thanks to everone thats helping to stop these people and spread the word. and im gona do what i can to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
08:42 PM on 09/21/2010
Time to consider a new strategy that can open a workable political path to attacking Global Warming!

The game changer is a little recognized potential impact of rising solar flare activity, as the sunspot cycle moves towards a projected peak in 2013.

A huge solar flare missed earth earlier this month. If one hits the geomagnetic field surrounding the earth, according to NASA, 130 million Americans live in areas that may lose power for protracted periods of time - at a cost the first year of between $1 trillion and $2 trillion.

Similar to the cost to date of both wars!

See: http://www.aesopinstitute.org

The strategy outlined there reflects the need to pursue cheap green power.

Due to the solar flare emergency it can be done and will have enormous positive impact. We can open a new door to broadly supported political action to minimize the damage from a possible solar storm.

It will be clear we should encourage development of decentralized cheap green energy to reduce the dangerous dependence on the power grid.

This approach will neutralize political opposition and restore American leadership in the energy field.

It also opens the door to a less military foreign policy, as it allows us to start to truly supersede oil dependency.

Since grid failure may happen all across the planet, it points to a program to decentralize energy production in the industrialized world.

That can create a huge number of both private and public sector jobs. And change the ballgame!
07:39 PM on 09/21/2010
I'm glad you folks are covering this story,.

Thank You.
The Gulf Residents want everyone to know that their situation is being ignored by mass media.

They have been poisoned with corexit, and are ill.

Please put the pressure on major broadcast stations to cover the story.

Many are claiming corexit is being used nightly/daily.

They are saying the sea food is not safe to eat.

They are telling us that they are not being paid and are going hungry.

These people are desperate.

Please share this story, and call your local representatives.