iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Philip Radford
 
GET UPDATES FROM Daryl Hannah
 

Obama Stands up to Big Oil and Polluter Politicians

Posted: 01/19/2012 3:50 pm

President Obama stood up to Big Oil and its puppets in Congress and denied a permit for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline yesterday. This is encouraging news for the communities whose air and water would have been directly threatened by this pipeline, from Canada to Nebraska to the Gulf Coast. And it's an important piece of the struggle to avert a runaway climate catastrophe. But since the Keystone XL has become a pitched political battle, this announcement is also an encouraging affirmation of the power of people, creative protest, and grassroots organizing in the face of the entrenched power and big bucks of the oil industry.

Earlier this month, American Petroleum Institute CEO Jack Gerard, the oil industry's top lobbyist, directly threatened President Obama with "huge political consequences" if he rejected Keystone XL. Speaker of the House John Boehner has been pushing the tar sands pipeline at every opportunity. Like most of the members of Congress that support Keystone XL, Boehner has taken piles of campaign cash from the very oil companies that were hoping to boost their profits with this scheme to pipe Canadian tar sands through America's heartland to the Gulf of Mexico and overseas markets.

This immense pressure from the oil industry came after months of grassroots organizing against the pipeline, weeks of creative protest in Washington DC where we and more than 1200 others were arrested in front of the White House, and a broad, diverse coalition mobilizing all around the United States and Canada to stop this pipeline.

Faced with a clear choice between Big Oil and all its money, threats, and politicians on the one hand, and a people powered movement determined to stop this enormous threat to our air, water, food security, and climate on the other, President Obama made the right call.

Of course, this does not mean the end of the oil industry's efforts to expand production of the tar sands. TransCanada and other oil companies will continue to seek other ways to exploit the tar sands, and the politicians who do their bidding will devise new bills to push tar sands pipelines. No doubt the American Petroleum Institute will take out even more astroturf "Vote 4 Energy" ads slamming the President for his decision.

When that happens, we hope President Obama remembers how good it feels to stand up to the oil industry's political threats, and keep working to make good on his promise to "end the tyranny of oil" and move America to a clean energy future.

 

Follow Philip Radford on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Phil_Radford

President Obama stood up to Big Oil and its puppets in Congress and denied a permit for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline yesterday. This is encouraging news for the communities whose air and wate...
President Obama stood up to Big Oil and its puppets in Congress and denied a permit for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline yesterday. This is encouraging news for the communities whose air and wate...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 114
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickish Knave
Both sides suck, but neither will admit it.
06:00 PM on 01/22/2012
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. I wonder if BP is considered to part of this "Big Oil" cadre. Ironic since Obama took millions from them in capaign monies.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36783.html
09:52 AM on 01/22/2012
The XL stands for export line. They want to deface our pristine land for their benefit just like the coal companies are tearing up my state of WV to sell coal to China.
JEP57
To the right of Genghis Khan
09:21 PM on 01/21/2012
There are already hundreds of existing pipelines crisscrossing this country and you never hear about any major leaks or environmental disasters taking place through the years. So why is a brand new well built (union labor by the way) pipeline a cause for concern? What all the protesting is actually part of is the anti-capitalism being pushed by the left and very little to do with environmentalism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gebby
artist gebhardtart advocate for a better world
04:17 PM on 01/21/2012
XL pipeline would have raised the cost of gasoline in the upper midwest. Costing the very people Bonheur represents. Why dont they vote him out of office? A democrat represents the people over corporations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
09:15 AM on 01/21/2012
Did he stand up to big oil or just cave to big "environment" special interest ?
Then if he wins the election project back on.
This American
An end to all this nonsense
07:38 AM on 01/21/2012
The headline should read "Obama bends over for Iranian Mullahs, Internal collectivists, Putin, and others enemies of the American people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gebby
artist gebhardtart advocate for a better world
04:18 PM on 01/21/2012
He stood up for green energy.
This American
An end to all this nonsense
05:41 PM on 01/21/2012
This decision was Solyndra X 10,000
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Phil Radford
Greenpeace Executive Director, poker player, h
03:38 PM on 01/30/2012
Wow - this is truly funny. The only way, of course, to stand up is to get off of all oil. Even the Tar Sands pipeline oil was going to be exported. Oil is a global commodity, and any oil in your tank is a mix of oil from all over the world. The only way to get off of foreign oil is to get off of oil, period. Environmentalists are fighting for a safe America where we don't need to be dependent on forces that hate America as well. We just don't believe the hype and want an end to oil entirely for our country, security, and for clean air for our kids. It starts with changing car engines to electrics.
04:45 PM on 01/20/2012
There are a lot of American people who care about the quality of the air they breathe and the water they drink. I used to sit on my porch and watch the deer in the meadow and listen to the birds sing. Now that I have a frac well about a mile from me. I hear mostly annoying noise. I have had clouds of gas(I presume) roll across the meadow in front of my house. The first was a lovely lavendar followed by a white cloud of gas. That was the first time I'd seen such a thing in the over twenty years I've lived here. Once the air, soil, and water are contaminated, there is little you can do. I recently had my well water tested ($1417) so I'll be able to prove that it was clean, before the next well is drilled. When my well is spoiled, I may be unlucky enought to have city water come out my way. Riverwater may be made potable but you can't remove medications and other chemicals excreted or flushed.My 4.5 acres were given to me by my father when I moved back from Minneapolis. Everyone around my brother's farm and my land have leased to the gas company, so I see little hope.
04:13 PM on 01/20/2012
You can't trust either political side in looking out for the Average american, thier home or livelyhood. The standard of living is dropping off a cliff for the average american, and thier children and grandchildren,they do not have much to look forward too.
Keysone XL tar sands crude is and will be lobbied till is gets thru, no matter who will be President in 2012. Money talks, and if the Rich and Corporation don't get their way throught lobbying, they move elsewhere, and usual leave the super fund mess for the taxpayers to take care of.
Another threat is will Congress cut funding of the VA, so insurance companies make more money on vets and wounded soliders of the last 10 years!
Another threat is will Congress let even another war happen with Iran, that benefit defense contractors and corporate america again.
Last but not least why hasn't even one Wall street CEO or Bank CEO, been chargred with white collar crime, for destroying the American economy?
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT TAX PAYER'S THAT PAY THE MOST THINK.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gebby
artist gebhardtart advocate for a better world
04:20 PM on 01/21/2012
Dont say it doesnt matter which side. It does. The two sides are distinctly different. Maybe you just dont like admitting it is only the R side?
05:23 PM on 01/21/2012
If it's only the "R side", then why didn't the D side vote for the global warming bill (cap & Trade) when they had full control of both houses and the presidency? Could it be that both sides are equally guilty??
12:43 PM on 01/23/2012
Obama if re-elected will allow this pipeline with very minor path corrections to be built. The only reason there is any debate about this is it's an election year and he wants all hands on deck to help with his re-election, every vote is important. Once he's in and has no more elections to face he'll cave on this just watch.....
12:46 PM on 01/20/2012
He has said he does not oppose it on merit but on timeliness. It will be back next year and it will be approved in December 2012.
12:50 PM on 01/20/2012
Sorry "next year" wrong. Reapplication will be made within weeks. TransCanada is certainly not releasing right of way.
10:14 AM on 01/20/2012
How about nuclear power instead? That's a good idea. Wind/solar will never provide the electricity America needs. Is our society willing to go w/o AC and our comfortable way of life? I doubt it.
If you believe democrats don't accept oil money I have other items to sell to you. Who makes the biggest profit from oil? THE US GOVERNMENT. Tyranny of oil, right. How about tyranny of the Feds?
Oh, how did all 1200 arrested get to Washington?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
12:23 PM on 01/20/2012
Bill Gates agrees with you. Wind/Solar can't get the jobs done. He likes nuclear too.
photo
banana republican
Next in line for crumbs from the King's Table
07:41 PM on 01/20/2012
Yeah, but we need to inject our money into what won't work (wind/solar) cause it makes the Left feel warm and fuzzy and they just love themselves when they're feeling warm and fuzzy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
11:53 PM on 01/20/2012
Full speed ahead with Wind and Solar, it will provide significant portion of electricity. New nuclear plants will take years to get on line and a successful commercial thorium reactor doesn't exist yet. Let independent scientists prove that thorium reactors are safe and feasible before we go ahead with them, but let's not wait on renewable power sources that are available now.
04:00 AM on 01/21/2012
How much can wind and solar supply? Not much in the whole scheme of it. I have looked into having it for my home. Way too expensive. Furthermore, when the wind won't blow or solar can't provide enough, there has to be fossil fuel back-up. If not the whiners will be after the government for not supplying it and their AC/heater isn't working. Light the fireplace!! Oops, the whiners don't like that either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pat Knapp
MOLON LABE
10:13 AM on 01/20/2012
He stood up to big oil because he gets more contributions from the super rich enviromentalist elites. This all comes down to who gives him more money plain and simple. The working people this hurts the most whether it be the unemployed construction or the family sacraficing because of high fuel cost. Don't have the means to funnel money into Obama's campaign like his rich elitist friends, so they get screwed. This is the pattern of this administrtation, Sold to highest bidder with a leftiost twist.
SpikeGCHjr
conservative warrior
09:14 AM on 01/20/2012
Yeah, he stood up to big Oil, but against the will and the needs of the American people. Such a stance didnt save good old mother earth in any way. Canada will still process their sands, still make and ship the oil, and it will still get used. And here in America, where Obama has killed this economy and jobs, we badly needed this pipeline, lower gas and oil prices, thousands of jobs, and increased national security by purchasing oil from allys, not enemies. Now, he has also further wasted hundreds of millions more dollars on the pipeline already built and pipes already bought when Obama was thinking clearer, not politically.Yeah he stood up to big oil, and against all of us not drinking to environmental coolaid. The 2012 elections are coming, hopefully when we elect Obama out, it wont be too late to fix this catastrophy!
11:10 AM on 01/20/2012
Well said!!
09:11 AM on 01/21/2012
There are lots of things being done wrong with the enviornment in China etc. does that mean we should do them quick to beat them? These tar sands are way worse to process and use than regular oil....nothing is said about this....from the media...he was brave to stall this....maybe it will go elsewhere but it is wrong and horrible for the enviornment...even more brave to do it in an election year where it was thought it could be bullied through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gebby
artist gebhardtart advocate for a better world
04:27 PM on 01/21/2012
sorry we dont need XL . the oil will go onto the world market. It would not necessarily stay here. solar and wind can replace the equivalent energy in less time. And cheaper.
08:57 AM on 01/20/2012
Obama says no to jobs, is a more accurate assessment.
07:18 AM on 01/20/2012
He postposed the inevitable for political reasons. Coverage on AlJazeera stated straight out the deal would still a sure go The depths of denial ofl those so desperate for a scrap or a shred are willing scrape the bottom for is a study in delusion .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laurent Wagner
06:40 AM on 01/20/2012
Domestic oil production is already up 11% under Obama.Canadian oil production
continues to grow quickly.
US is a gasoline EXPORTER…

But oil is 3 times more expensive and the average price of regular gasoline is $3.36 per gallon, according to the Lundberg Survey. Diesel price is $3.8 per gallon.
Because, with the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline and with shale oil, oil prices are unlikely to fall under $70.

Former BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward said the plentiful deep water oil resources in areas such as the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil, as well as Canada's oil sands need an oil prices above $60-$70 to attract investors.
12:15 PM on 01/20/2012
The US is a gas exporter because of our huge refining capacity in the face of decreased demand here. We still import huge amounts of oil to produce that gasoline. The price of shale oil will not dictate the world price for oil. If oil produced by more conventional means can meet demand at a lower price, then shale oil will fail. But we are probably past that point permanently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laurent Wagner
04:15 AM on 01/21/2012
In North Dakota and in Texas, oil compagnies are spending $7 billion a year in order to produce 100 million barrels of oil with hydraulic fracturing.

So, a barrel of oil must cost at least $70 to make this business profitable.
05:29 PM on 01/21/2012
It takes many years from the start of leasing thru drilling thru increased oil production. The 11% increase you mention is most likely the result of permits issued during the Bush admin.