In the years after World War II, Americans' love affair with the car reached full flower.
To the post-war generation, cars were a symbol of maturity, prosperity and freedom. Acquiring a driver's license was a "rite of passage" for young people -- something that was ideally done as close to one's sixteenth birthday as possible. Having access to a car was a young person's ticket to freedom, friends and adventure. For American families, a car was also a ticket to the "good life" in the suburbs, away from crowded and increasingly troubled cities.
America's post-war leaders -- and those in the generations that followed -- satisfied Americans' demand for mobility by car by engaging in the greatest road-building endeavor the world had ever seen, at great public expense. They embarked on the largest public works project in human history up until that point, the construction of more than 40,000 miles of Interstate highways. And that grand road-building project has continued even up to the present day; since 1980, American road builders have constructed an average of more than 22,000 new lane-miles every year.
Times have changed.
The open road that once beckoned to an earlier generation of young people has been slowly replaced by congested highways traversing a landscape of suburban sprawl. Once a symbol of freedom and America's can-do spirit, the automobile has become for many a financial straitjacket that limits life options, as well as a symbol of the nation's enduring dependence on oil. Urban living - whether in cities, older suburbs, or new mixed-use neighborhoods - is getting a serious look by many young people anxious to avoid long commutes, be close to friends and activities, and lessen their environmental impact. Meanwhile, the emergence of the Internet, mobile technologies and social networking has upended the way Americans, especially younger Americans, interact with each other and the world.
There is now little room for doubt: many Americans' transportation needs and desires are changing. And they are changing fastest among the people who have the most to gain or lose from the investments we make in new transportation infrastructure: the young. A new report from the Frontier Group and U.S. PIRG this month, which I co-authored, shows:
There are several reasons to believe this trend is here to stay. A major factor behind the change is the spread of digital technology. Americans, and especially youth, tend increasingly to connect with one another through social media. Driving while surfing the web or texting just isn't safe. Thirty-five states have outlawed texting behind the wheel and the National Transportation Safety Board recommends banning all portable communication devices by drivers. The more people are connected by information technology, the less they may want to drive.
The report also shows that young people in particular say that they prefer to live in walkable smart growth communities than sprawl. More than older generations, they say that they will sometimes choose to take alternative transportation as a way to help the environment.
Will our leaders notice this important trend? You wouldn't know it looking at Congress. This year the House almost passed a transportation bill that would have eliminated dedicated funding for public transportation. The Senate passed a bill that would have done little to change federal priorities. Without finding agreement, the federal government defaulted to continuing with the dysfunctional transportation law that was written in 2005 -- before data from these new trends were even published. America will keep building tens of thousands of new highway miles every year, while neglecting public transit and infrastructure for biking and walking.
America's transportation preferences appear to be changing. Our elected officials need to wake up and make transportation decisions based on the real needs of Americans in the 21st century.
Copies of the report, released on April 5, 2012, can be viewed here.
Follow Phineas Baxandall on Twitter: www.twitter.com/uspirg
In 2008, with gas in SC almost at $4, I was laughing all the way to the bank getting $.55 per mile allowance for every mile I drove to 22 courthouses for work at 54 mpg.
My neighbors and friends saw my Prius perform and I let them drive it. Priuses started sprouting in my neighborhood. One of my neighbors--who also had owned a BMW--got pulled over for doing 97 mph on I95 in his new Prius. He got away with only a warning from the HP because they said they didn't know a Prius could do that and started a friendly conversation about performance.
There are many reasons gas guzzlers are going the way of the dodo. My engineer husband waited patiently for a hybrid retrofit for his beloved 1998 flairside Ford F150. Since no one came up with one before he retired, he now spends inordinate amounts of time in the garage working on his version.
It is not just young people, guys.
The fact is that suburban and exurban life and automobile use is ridiculously subsidized (to some extent almost everywhere) in North America and particularly in the United States. All those people whinging about low taxes and government spending aren't paying enough to maintain their own basic infrastructure (roads, highways, sewers, etc....) and it's having a spillover effect to senior levels of government.
Automobile dependence and sprawl goes right to the heart of many of the problems facing Americans today, whether it's government spending and debt, to health care, to the environment. It's a system that is massively subsidizing the same people who want to kill "entitlements." But we all know, they are always entitled to their entitlements and small government nirvanas are for other people, not them.