iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rabbi David Wolpe

GET UPDATES FROM Rabbi David Wolpe
 

The Religious Meaning of Malick's 'Tree of Life'

Posted: 05/31/11 12:20 PM ET

Terrence Malick's new film "Tree of Life" opens with a quotation from Job. That quotation holds the key to the film and in some sense, the key to our attitude toward life.

In Job 38: 4,7 God asks Job "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth ... when the morning stars sang together?" These verses are part of a difficult puzzle that has preoccupied believers and scholars about the book of Job. In his film, Malick is offering us a powerful answer.

Job, despite his righteousness, loses everything -- his wealth and his children. In despair he wishes to know why such things have befallen him. God does not exactly answer Job -- rather at the end of the book, God appears from the whirlwind and plies Job with a string of rhetorical questions. The questions seem designed to prove to Job that he lacks both power and insight. Curiously, however, God never directly addresses Job's agonized question.

Why does God not simply say to Job "This is why you suffer?" What is the larger point God is making? There are endless, powerful and provocative speculations about this question. The one that Malick is proposing is presaged in the opening quotation.

God's recounting of the wonders of nature can be seen in one of two ways. One possibility is that the immensity of the natural world, in its merciless indifference, has nothing to do with the concerns of human beings. The desert does not care if you pray, and the rushing cataract will not pause for pity. Nature shows its blank, grand face to us, and we are nothing. Indeed Job recants of his protest, proclaiming "for I am but dust and ashes."

In the wake of the terrible loss depicted in the film, the loss of a child, Malick offers coruscating images to remind us of this indifference. In their sweep and range they awaken us anew to our insignificance. But gradually we see that each image, from the cell to the cosmos, is not only grand, it is beautiful. The second half of the quote from Job, how the morning stars sing, remind us that the appreciation of wonder and beauty is also possible. We may lose our ego in nature's indifference, but we may also lose it in nature's magnificence. Do we see the world as heartless or as sublime? The drama of our life and death is fleeting, but it is played out on a stage of unparalleled wonder. Pain which can be so consuming, is not all; part of the secret of life is enlarging our hearts.

The agony of the parents, the periodic cruelty of the father -- all are the powerful but passing dramas that for the moment entirely preoccupy us as we watch the movie. But then we are drawn back to a world so much bigger than our hour upon the stage that we know again how essentially small is each human story.

The great Dutch writer Harry Mulisch died this past year. Once asked the secret of life, he responded "make the puzzle bigger." Malick makes the puzzle bigger, and so expands our sense of the intricacy and beauty of the world. In reworking Job for the 21st century, he teaches us anew of the grandeur of the world, and the grandeur of God.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Wes Isley
Writer and interfaith minister
04:04 PM on 06/01/2011
Sounds like a wonderfully thought-provoking film, and I can't wait to discuss with everyone!
03:20 PM on 06/01/2011
Insightful article. Thanks.

In some religious traditions, suffering is recognized as part of a path to liberation, or, if you will, a way God "prunes" our ego so that it will give way and allow our spirit-soul to grow and thrive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MilesToGo
06:16 PM on 06/01/2011
Good observation. An ancient Sufi aphorism translates as "When the heart weeps for what it has lost, the spirit laughs for what it has gained."
photo
AntithiChrist
Rhymes with Grist
02:11 PM on 06/01/2011
I can't wait to see this film; it sounds amazing.

Regarding the J/C god's dancing around Job's angst-ridden plea for understanding, methinks it's because any truthful answer (as depicted at the beginning of Job) would have been, well, just too embarrassing.

Try this: Well Job, it's like this. I was palling around with some old friends last about this time last year, when Satan, you know, my big rival? The arch-fiend? Well Satan made a bet that you only liked me because your life was so great, and so told him to go ahead and ruin your entire life, you know, just to prove to Satan how cool you really are. You know, that you'd still be my BFF. Anyway sorry about all that, but thanks for winning me that dollar!"

I only embellished on the dollar amount of the bet, and took a mild guess at the timeline of Job's travails. Otherwise that's a pretty solid paraphrasing of this story so many of us hold up to glorify blind faith. That is all.
photo
Jelle NL
Unity in Diversity
04:29 AM on 06/01/2011
Rabbis, popes, ayatollahs ... I do not like the clergy. But after this blog post I am willing to reconsider.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gal416
is a Bible verse † † †
08:12 PM on 05/31/2011
"The drama of our life and death is fleeting, but it is played out on a stage of unparalleled wonder."

This is so true and what a beautiful thought!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
08:06 PM on 05/31/2011
I am still trying to figure out why after Job's family and wealth were restored, he named his daughters but not the sons.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DianaLynn1967
It's a great life if you don't weaken!
12:22 AM on 06/06/2011
Given that in the Bible, it is normally the women who go unnamed while the men get names, maybe naming the daughters (and mentioning the fact that they got in on the inheritance!) was the author's way of showing that Job valued his daughters as much as his sons (I doubt that the sons were actually unnamed--their names just weren't mentioned by the author.)
05:58 PM on 05/31/2011
The point of Job, which was written during the Hellenistic period of Judea which introduced a humanistic perspective into Judaism, is that suffering, loss, death are part of the fabric of life, and God does not interfere with that causality. God does not reward and punish. God is -- well, the book does not answer that, leaving it to the future for people to come up with new images and understandings.
photo
Uncle Bob
Darwin loves you.
07:34 PM on 05/31/2011
huh? All of Job's suffering was caused by a wager between satan and god. I'm not sure how you translate that into god being neutral.
08:50 AM on 06/01/2011
God and Satan are literary devices. The author of Job is moving away from the traditional literal belief of YHVH as the ruler of the world, and accepting that man is subject to the vicitudes of nature from which no God can offer prevention or protection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanity Inspector
He who laughs, lasts.
04:24 PM on 05/31/2011
The Book of Job casts God in a most unfavorable light: an Almighty five-year-old. I read somewhere once that it had been heavily revised down through the centuries.
photo
AntithiChrist
Rhymes with Grist
02:25 PM on 06/01/2011
I don't know. Do 5 year olds play cards with demons from hell?
02:02 PM on 05/31/2011
Thats for the spoiler. So brutal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kirk Job-Sluder
12:24 PM on 05/31/2011
An interesting review, thank you. This is on my must-see list for the summer.