I am currently in Israel leading a Birthright trip where the consumption of alcohol by the participants is largely discouraged. It's a policy that Israel should perhaps enforce among its members of Parliament because whatever Labor MK Binyamin Ben-Eliezer has been drinking lately, it's got to be some powerful stuff. As the Arab world applauds the spectacle of Egyptian tyrant Hosni Mubarak being tried for crimes against his people, including mowing down peaceful demonstrators, Ben-Eliezer seems to be shedding tears for his buddy Hosni.
In a bizarre interview with the Jerusalem Post, Ben-Eliezer said:
It really pained me to see him the way he was today. He was the leader of the Arab world. The Middle East after Mubarak is a different Middle East, a worse region. His people who he fought for showed him their back. He loves his people. I think he is a great Egyptian patriot. I hope he comes out of the trial alive. He is facing the pressure of the masses seeking revenge. But such a great leader deserves to be treated respectfully and not as the lowest criminal in a cage.
Aha.
Are we talking about the same guy who ruled Egypt with an iron fist and used secret police and the military to quash all democratic movements and stay in power for four decades? When Ben-Eliezer calls Mubarak a great patriot, is he perhaps conflating the term with despot?
We welcome Mr. Ben-Eliezer to pray explain how he, as an elected representative of a flourishing democracy committed to the highest ideals of human rights, can praise a man who brutalized his people and robbed them of their freedom -- not to mention their money -- for four decades.
A short history lesson for Mr. Ben-Eliezer's edification is in order.
It was George Washington who was the patriot and George III who was the tyrant. It was Martin Luther King, Jr. who was the patriot and Bull Connor who was the persecutor. It was Nelson Mandela who was the patriot and P. W. Botha, 'the big crocodile,' who was the oppressor.
What Mr. Ben-Eliezer and other misguided Israeli leaders who are currently lamenting the fall of Mr. Mubarak misunderstand is that the Egyptian leader loved power rather than his people. George Washington, who in 1783 resigned his commission as the most powerful man in the newly formed United States -- thus liberating his people from the possibility of yet another tyranny -- was motivated by principle rather than ego. Mandela, who refused to run for reelection as South Africa's president and risk becoming another Robert Mugabe, loved his people more than power. But Mubarak had contempt for Egyptians and took them to the cleaners to make himself and his children rich.
That a former deputy Prime Minister of Israel can praise an autocrat like Mubarak is embarrassing and points to the incredible error that Israel is currently making in these unprecedented Arab uprisings.
Israel's voice has largely failed to blossom during the Arab Spring. As Mubarak shot protestors, Gaddafi bombed cities, and Assad flattened his people with tanks, Israel's protests have for the most part been missing. Like President Obama of the United States, who has a curious relationship with other people's freedom, Israel has kept a low profile throughout the Arab protests. It's no secret why. Israel is banking on the belief that the devil you know is better than the devil you don't. And this fear that something worse is going to come after Mubarak or Assad, like the Muslim brotherhood, is causing Israel to violate all its most deeply cherished beliefs.
For decades Israel's argument has been that it is the sole democracy in a sea of Arab tyranny. That the principal cause of Middle East war was that tyrants were scapegoating Israel in order to distract from their ongoing suppression of their citizens' rights and that good times would come to Israel and the Arabs if these countries would finally democratize.
I heard Binyamin Netanyahu make this argument passionately and eloquently when he delivered a lecture that I organized at Oxford University in 1992 while he served as deputy Foreign Minister. Bibi argued that in the history of the world, no two democracies had ever gone to war against each other and challenged his student audience to name a single instance. The Arabs had to taste the economic and political benefits of freedom if there was to be peace. Yet now, as Prime Minister, Netanyahu, Israel's most persuasive spokesman, has seemingly chosen not to openly champion Arab freedom, partly out of fear of what comes next and partly out of trepidation that his voice will give credence to those Arab tyrants and enemies of Israel who argue that the Jewish state is the secret instigator behind the unrest.
But there is an equal fear that Israel, in its silence, or worse, in the case of the open encouragement given to Arab autocrats by people like Ben-Eliezer, will be seen as sympathizing with dictators who brutalized their people for decades.
Indeed, few if any of these people were friends of Israel, especially Mubarak. It was Sadat who made peace with Israel, which Mubarak inherited, transforming it into an ice-cold peace. For many years the Egyptian Ambassador to Israel remained permanently recalled in Cairo while state-sponsored media organs under Mubarak became some of the foremost purveyors of anti-Semitic propaganda in the world, including an infamous TV miniseries promoting the validity of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which was broadcast throughout the Arab world. For those who argue that at least Mubarak kept the peace, what choice did he have, dependent as he was on $2.5 billion in annual American aid and risking losing the Sinai peninsula, with its considerable oil and natural gas fields, had he gone back to war.
But regardless, the unseemly spectacle of the Middle East's sole democracy failing to support a revolutionary freedom movement sprouting in Arab countries is a stark omission that the Arabs are not likely to forget.
The ancient Jewish toast of 'L'Chaim,' to life, connotes a universal Jewish commitment to every human life. And rather than elected officials like Ben-Eliezer getting drunk on their own pro-dictatorial rhetoric, Israel's voice should be loud and clear that it denounces tyranny in every form.
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, founder of This World: The Values Network, will be publishing his newest books, 'Ten Conversations You Need to Have with Yourself' and 'Kosher Jesus' in October and December respectively. Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.
Follow Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RabbiShmuley
Mira Sucharov: Israel's Tent Protests: Whose 'Social Justice'?
Michael Hughes: US on Wrong Side of History in Arab Spring
Israel Protests Press Netanyahu
Israel TA-25 Closes Shy of Bear Market on Global Growth Concern
Israeli FM says Palestinians planning 'bloodshed'
Israel electricity rates to rise by 'only' 9%
'Knesset may not complete its tenure due to Israel's social protests'
The future of peace and of a just solution to the Palestinian statehood depends on Israel democratically firing Bibi. He has singlehandedly taken the process back decades.
HP, please make WORLD easier to click on to.thanks.
And that's when Israel does nothing. This poor nation can't catch a break!
Israel probably held her collective breath since the "Arab uprisings" ("Arab Spring" sounds much better) out of fear that the 30-year peace with Egypt--that undoubtedly saved untold lives--will be broken. Another llikely reason for Israel's silence is the concern that more "uprisings" will spill over into her country. Peaceful protesting is one thing, but it's the peaceful part that has been difficult for some to manage.
It is true that Israel is a great scapegoat for Arab dictators that are glad Israel is there to blame. What we are seeing now is that Mubarak was a great scapegoat for Israel it deflect criticism with as well.
Obama has hardly been non-involved in the Arab Spring, I am not sure how Boteach missed Libya for example. But Israel is wise to not make the Arab Spring about them. If that was the approach it would be praiseworthy. That they are foolish enough to praise the deposed dictator is another matter. That does justify Boteach's mystification.
The only long-term solution and the direct path to world peace imo is abandonment of theocracy, and global adoption of a policy of formal separation between state and religion. Religious mythologies are wonderful but it's beyond ridiculous to try to run countries and base civil laws according to them.
"The only long-term solution and the direct path to world peace" is obliterating hatred, not safeguarding a group of people who have been persecuted for centuries and still are. The need for a Jewish state is as important today as it was in Herzl's time, and it probably always will be.
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/demowar.htm
The war with Lebanon was against Hebollah who kidnapped Israels. Hezbollah wanted a confrontation, why else would they do that? They care nothing for the problems they cause Lebanon, who should have kicked them out years ago. Hezbollah has brought nothing but de.ath and destruction to Lebanon, just as Hamas has done for Gaza.
Get your facts straight before you post.
Assad currently has no risk of being chased from office. He has all the guns. That may change. But until the reformers pose a real threat instead of a nuisance, it would be stupid for israel to say anything.
Nor was this former official the only one to do so. Strange he was singled out.
This has everything to do with democracy.