iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

I am a sucker for a meaningful gathering on the mall in Washington. Every year I come to the Fourth of July concert on the West Lawn of the Capitol and never fail to get choked up during the playing of the national anthem against the backdrop of the Capitol dome and the American flag. My family did not at first believe me when I said that we had to be at Obama's inauguration given the cold temperatures and the predictions of the size of the crowd, but we made it and were glad we did.

In the same vein, the Jon Stewart rally felt important even though the purpose seemed obscure in the days leading up to it. I got to the middle of the mall at 7th Street before being paralyzed by human gridlock. The stage was at 3rd street and the nearest Jumbotron was about a block ahead of me. Because the screens were not well elevated it was hard to get a visual. Even worse, except for the musical acts, the audio was insufficient for the size of the crowd. Periodically a chant went up from the crowd: "louder, louder". From what I could tell, with as many people behind me as in front of me, a good half of the audience saw and heard little of what was happening on stage.

Yet despite the problems in amplification, I was not sorry that I attended. People were excited to be there and it felt like America at its best. In my section there were young and old alike, mostly white but a smattering of people of color as well. We were packed in so tightly that I feared someone would get hurt or, at the very least, see tempers flare when some more aggressive people tried to move up in the crowd. It did not happen. Kindness was contagious. A few people in our section fainted and the crowd miraculously parted like the Red Sea to let emergency personnel through.

Yet never have so many people gathered for so little. Don't get me wrong. I love Jon Stewart. When I could hear him and other parts of the program, I got some laughs. It would not be fair to say that Stewart under-delivered. Neither he nor his partner, Steve Colbert, promised anything. Most of what took place on stage was an extended version of their respective TV shows.

But the crowd clearly wanted more. Each time there was an introduction of the next part of the program, I could see the anticipation in the faces of the people around me. They wanted to hear a message. They wanted to be inspired. Just a week ago a poll conducted of over half a million people online voted Jon Stewart the most influential man in America. At a time when everything in our country seems to be going wrong, those who came to the rally expected comedy but secretly hoped for inspiration and guidance.

One telling moment in the rally came when Yusef Islam (the former Cat Stevens) was brought on stage to sing his classic song, "Peace Train." It was a message song and it created a hush over the immense crowd that reflected the desire to come together around something. Two stanzas in, Colbert interrupted the song and brought on a competing band (Ozzie Osbourne). For the next few minutes the two acts "competed" for air time. The crowd booed the interruption loudly. They came for a "I Have a Dream" moment, but Stewart and Colbert were serving up their version of Soupy Sales.

The closest the rally ever got to a message was in the final minutes when Jon Stewart donned a suit and tie and took on a serious tone. At this point, the crowd had been spoofed so often by a message turning into a joke that much of my section had stopped paying attention. I didn't take a poll, but I was feeling let down and I think that others shared my disappointment.

In what was a not so subtle dig at the excessive partisan rhetoric on Capitol Hill in this election cycle from the media pundits and from cable newscasters, Stewart declared: "If we amplify everything, we hear nothing."

That was it. That was the message. Everything else was irony, parody or comedy. It was not enough.

The breakdown of civil discourse in this country is a serious problem. It is eroding our confidence that our democracy can work. We hope that elected officials, pundits, NGO leaders, academics and intellectuals might engage in the kind of inquiry and purposeful conversation that could help find solutions to the very serious issues facing our country and the world. Instead we get the intellectual equivalent of 5th graders engaged in a spitball fight. If you want to understand why, in the space of 25 years, the United States has fallen behind so much of the rest of the developed world in key areas like education, technology, ecological responsibility and the like, look no further than the failure of our leaders to lead.

Jon Stewart did not ask to be the leader of the free world and never claimed that he was. But history has a way serving up opportunities when we least expect it. Saturday's rally was one of those moments. Half a million people were eager to be galvanized. Jon Stewart: "We never heard you."

 
 
 
I am a sucker for a meaningful gathering on the mall in Washington. Every year I come to the Fourth of July concert on the West Lawn of the Capitol and never fail to get choked up during the playing o...
I am a sucker for a meaningful gathering on the mall in Washington. Every year I come to the Fourth of July concert on the West Lawn of the Capitol and never fail to get choked up during the playing o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:20 PM on 11/03/2010
They really made the difference in this election...
storeysound
Zippy the Patriot?
09:34 PM on 11/03/2010
It was not a political rally. The point was not to be a competition. The point was to show that there is another method of discourse aside from yelling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jill Irish
O seclum insipiens et inficetum!
06:00 PM on 11/03/2010
Since she will never join this forum, I'm posting for my mother: "In Tudor England, the monarchs often kept a 'fool' who, as seen in Shakespeare, was allowed to comment on political events with impunity. And the fool usually said what everybody was thinking and said it in a way that was considered funny. Guess we still need our fools!"

Stewart is so on-target, intelligent, and eloquent when he assumes a serious tone...he wouldn't be Jon Stewart anymore if he did it all the time, but sometimes I wish he could.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
11:50 PM on 11/02/2010
Zen moment of the Rally - My daughter and I are coming out of the Metro and walking toward the Mall following someone in a Gumby suit. Suddenly Gumby sees another costumed participant; they push through the crowd toward each other, meet, and Gumby and Pokey hug.
02:43 PM on 11/02/2010
Yes... who knows exactly what Stewart wanted, but dumbing down America is not going to make it more sane, Jon. And continuing to tell the lie that "all sides" need to take it down a notch thus putting Repubs and Dems and MSNBC and FOX NOISE in the same corner to be punished only hurts the cause of democracy. It's also disrespecting the best president of our lifetime, not to mention Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and all they have accomplished in the face of stupidity and insanity. And today, we're going to pay for all that dumbing down and Stewart not seizing the occasion to do something better for the country. A hundred Stewarts are not worth a single Obama, so I say: how dare he!?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jill Irish
O seclum insipiens et inficetum!
06:15 PM on 11/03/2010
Basically you are saying something daring here with which I happen to agree - or a few somethings. However, perhaps what Stewart is criticizing - and he is correct - is that whereas Fox Noise most definitely "started it," the other outlets have followed Fox's model far more than they have repudiated it. As for Obama, Reid, and Pelosi, as valuable as their work has been, they have done an absolutely *awful* job of communicating the benefits of what they have accomplished. Compared to the Republican Spin Machine, that aspect of their work is pathetic, and like it or not, making sure you're in control of the narrative is fundamental in politics. That is the frustration Stewart expresses, and a frustration I share as I listen to Obama blaming *his* failings for the election results, and vowing to work even harder to reach across the aisle to a group of people sitting on their hands!
storeysound
Zippy the Patriot?
09:37 PM on 11/03/2010
Well put. Cooperation takes two sides. And when one side consistently fails to even try, it is time to call them out and expose them for what they are - obstructionists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
11:12 AM on 11/02/2010
Television and radio have blurred the line between politics and entertainment. Since so many American voters aren't interested in anything more complex than a football game or soap opera, the press now presents politics in those formats. And politicians, trusting their own media-minded staffers, go with the flow, turning Washington into a three-ring circus of melodrama, intrigue, and crisis.

So it's come to this. One of the professional clowns has enough wisdom and integrity to say, "You know, you really shouldn't pay so much attention to the entertainers on TV, it's not helping our political system." And the reaction is disappointment; "Why didn't he step up and lead us?"

Jon Stewart is a good guy, but why would anyone expect political leadership from him? I think it's because we don't get much leadership (and integrity) from real politicians. Stewart's TV persona looks like what we want our real leaders to do.

If you want politicians who act sensibly and lead wisely, why not spend as much time watching them as you spend watching The Daily Show? Maybe that kind of scrutiny would force them to behave like leaders.

Better yet: turn off the TV and read something.
photo
LintLass
"When you can balance a tackhammer on your head...
09:49 AM on 11/02/2010
The way I saw the rally was really in the terms presented: A rally to restore sanity: if you think of it in ritual terms, it did this well: the primary purpose was to get people together, not to try to be 'Woodstock,' but to dispel some of the divisions and the senses of hyperbole out there.

At this, it did just fine. :)

I think it's telling how much of the media was scared away by the Right, claiming it was some 'leftist rally' before anyone even could *find out* what it was.

Except maybe a threat to the ants-on-fire business. :)
03:15 AM on 11/02/2010
"A few people in our section fainted and the crowd miraculously parted like the Red Sea to let emergency personnel through." OK...
10:08 PM on 11/01/2010
Free World? How about the former Free World before it was enslaved by the banks and turned into the menacing world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
H P
Citizen
09:19 PM on 11/01/2010
Rabbi- I have to disagree with you. I was there with 2 friends, one of my sons was there. AND there were a LOT of people there 200,000 or 500,000.. what ever the number. brought together by the idea we can be the change. True we don't have anybody really 'leading' us. We have to lead ourselves. Did you not feel the energy of the people coming and going, on the subway? I have been on many subway rides in DC and I have NEVER seen or felt such positive energy for every body. Talking on the subway.. it NEVER happens to strangers it did on Saturday. People were polite, respectful of the signs, a LOT funny, a LOT made similar satirist points that Stewart and Colbert make. We heard Jon, he brought us all together for one day. I am glad I went. AND I WILL vote AGAINST Eric Cantor tomorrow! Get out and vote!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
12:12 AM on 11/02/2010
You're suffering from the Woodstock fantasy of significance all over again. A solid majority of American young people, much less their elders, were opposed to the values of Woodstock, despite the fantasy that Woodstock "represented" the whole Boomer generation in some lovefest. The same is true, alas, of Colbert and Stewart's Rally for Irony on the Mall, which was a nice bookend of narcissism for historians of America's decline and fall to put up against Woodstock's bookend of the same. "Progressives" were nice and mellow and ironic at Woodstock, and they haven't changed a bit since. Too bad they are such lousy politicians, however, and too bad they have therefore been crushed in the real world of political power for the past forty plus years, and are apparently about to be crushed for a few decades more, at a minimum. I hate that this is true, since I'm still an Obama supporter. But even those who've spent their lives trying never to leave their yellow submarine are soon going to have to face the fact that their submarine has been irrelevant for all these decades as America itself was totally dominated by Conservatives who have driven the ship of state right onto the rocks while the Boomers and their kids stayed nice and mellow (and utterly ineffectual) for the whole ride to disaster.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
taijiredlion
sic itur ad astra
03:06 AM on 11/02/2010
Excuse me, I have to go find my hip waders...
04:56 AM on 11/02/2010
Confused much?
photo
Luke Goldstein
Doing my best to read between the lines.
08:04 PM on 11/01/2010
You heard the point, it just wasn't the one you wanted. Stewart and Colbert, as they have always done, made their points with levity and sincerity in a mildly subtle mix. Stewart has forever fought off the mantle of "next great political leader" and this was not his secret stage to suddenly change that course. His speech at the end was heartfelt, meaningful and extremely apropos for the times we are in. I am sorry that it didn't match the moving nature you were hoping for, but I sincerely hope more people heard the message in and between the music and laughter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
12:15 AM on 11/02/2010
The sad part, of course, is that such a pitiful minority of Americans gloried in (or even noticed) Stewart's message, compared with the majority who now groove to Beck's con jobs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
taijiredlion
sic itur ad astra
03:25 AM on 11/02/2010
How do you know how many noticed either rally? Twice as many showed up for Jon as for Glenn -- which might be some real-world data to indicate the sane are anything but "a pitiful minority." True, they are not so hysterically loud as Glenn's troops... but then that's the point, isn't it? We're used to being shouted down by the loud, the ignorant and the fearful. But still, we make progress, slow and difficult as it is -- slavery is dead, women now vote, minorities are at least nominally equal (and in many cases actually), we are now aware of the world's environmental problems, however loud the denials, according to all the demographic polls gays will soon secure their full human rights -- etc, etc, etc. It is never anything but an ongoing struggle for justice, equality and common sense progressive values. And yet, in every one of your posts, you are a complete, if subtle, downer. One might even suspect you are nothing more than a "concern troll," a pseudo-progressive wolf in sheep's clothing, spreading gloom and doom like any good subversive propagandist. If so -- well, hi there, Mr. Wolff! If not, all I can say is, you must be a ball of laughs at a party -- and eroding spirit through such constant snide cynicism accomplishes nothing positive whatsoever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogden192
07:12 PM on 11/01/2010
It must have been your position in the crowd that caused you to miss the extended metaphor running throughout the program. Sorry you missed it.
06:00 PM on 11/01/2010
Sometimes when my wife is telling me about a movie, I will say "Was it a comedy or a tragedy?" Typically her response will be something like "Neither, it was a chick flick" or "It was action adventure." Then I repeat my question by saying "Did it have a happy ending or a sad ending?"

It was an incredibly ambitious and risky proposition and the gentlemen from Comedy Central had a huge outpouring. From a media event numbers perspective, it could not have been a bigger success. It clearly shows how hungry people are to fill the void created within the narrative of our times. Although I don't agree with many of their ideas, I completely respect their Chutzpah including Sumner Redstone of Viacom. It's a tall order to ask anyone to remove the jester's mask and to be taken seriously regardless of the amplification. They put their hearts into this and risked their pocketbooks and it paid off for their business. I'm sure they are changed people for having taken up the rally.

I felt like this photograph from the rally captured a lot of the feeling that we are facing as a country interrupted with an idea that we believe may not allow room for our nation's story of liberty to continue to be told. Here's the link to the photo: http://tradewithdave.com/?p=3118
03:05 AM on 11/02/2010
"They put their hearts into this and risked their pocketbooks and it paid off for their business." √
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:53 PM on 11/01/2010
Rabbi,

Were you really there? Did you completely miss the part about people working together in everyday, mundane ways? And how the occasional jerk is and should be scorned for not knowing better? And that (by implication) the media does just the opposite, embraces the jerk, and so insults us all?

bvf
02:49 PM on 11/02/2010
"THE MEDIA". Jesus! They are not all the same. Some stink. Some don't. And not being able to see this and point this out is one of the reasons why we're unable to dig ourselves out of today's hole. Beck/Palin absolutely do not equal Olbermann?Maddow!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:34 AM on 11/08/2010
OK, 95% of the media--how's that? I agree completely that Beck/Palin do not equal Olbermann/Maddow and honestly didn't expect my comment to be taken that way.

MSNBC provides a thin, critical slice of what our *entire* political punditry *should* provide: fact-based, straightforward commentary supported by ample research. It really doesn't bother me that Stewart lumps them in with the others--I believe that he knows that his *audience* knows the score.

bvf
05:29 PM on 11/01/2010
Did you attend the Rally to Restore Sanity? If so, researchers and students within the department of Sociology at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania want to know your opinions concerning the intersection of American media and politics. Please visit our website to complete a 5-10 minute survey: http://surveys.edinboro.edu/rally/rally.htm
05:28 PM on 11/01/2010
way to completely miss the point, dude.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
12:25 AM on 11/02/2010
The rabbi GOT the point. He was just noting how irrelevant the point was to changing America. The point felt as good as a shared joint to those who shared it. But that's the trouble with "progressives": they can only talk to each other. And there are way too few of them to elect anyone the "progressives" would want to elect in DC. (Electing Obama was a fluke, much as I like him to this day. Obama was not elected by "progressives" but by the threat of Depression.)