More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ramon Nuez

Ramon Nuez

Google Must Stem the Flow of Android Fragmentation

Posted: 09/14/10 04:39 PM ET

Google's mobile operating system (OS) -- Android -- is one of the most successful mobile OS' in recent memory. According to Gartner -- Android sales for 2010 are 47 million devices worldwide and by 2014 we will be looking at 264 million Android devices. This is not a bad figure for an OS that had its initial released on October 21, 2008. Since then Google has rapidly deployed updates of the OS:


  • Android 1.1 -- February 09, 2009

  • Android 1.5 -- Cupcake on April 30, 2009

  • Android 1.6 -- Donut on September 15, 2009

  • Android 2.0/2/1 -- Éclair on October 26, 2009

  • Android 2.2 -- Froyo on May 20, 2010


Android 3.0 - Gingerbread - will be the latest installation of the popular OS. Gingerbread is expected to be release Q4 2010. In lock-step with the various updates there has been a rash of Android handsets and tablets.

Handsets:


Tablets:

  • Samsung Tab - Android 2.2  (Froyo)

  • Toshiba Folio 100 - Android 2.2 (Froyo )

  • Viewsonic ViewPad - Android 2.2 (Froyo)


These tablets are not yet available in the U.S. but are rumored to be released Q4 2010. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), mobile network operators (MNOs) and semi-conductor makers can't get enough of Android.
Symbian will remain at the top of Gartner's worldwide OS ranking due to Nokia's volume and the push into more mass market price points. However, by the end of the forecast period, the No. 1 spot will be contested with Android, which will be at a very similar share level.

--Gartner


Unfortunately, Android's explosive growth has caused issues within the space and confused consumers. is realizing that the viral adoption of its mobile OS has a side-effect -- fragmentation. According to Gartner -- Android 2.2 (Froyo) is on about 29% of active devices and Android 2.0/2.1 (Éclair) is on 41.7% as of September 1. Additionally, there appears to be no minimum hardware standard with handsets or tablets. This seems to be translating into a mixed user experience.

One of the pillars of Apple's success in the mobility space is its congruency. Google need not be a dictator -- the company should simply support minimum requirements. Perhaps - Google could tap the Open Handset Alliance to help it draft a list of minimum industry standards. Google is showing signs of bringing the industry into alignment with Gingerbread. Unfortunately, much of the logistics are being kept close to the vest. Why -- I am assuming that Schmidt simply does not want to upset the various OEMs, MNOs, semi-conductor makers and Android developers. After all -- this is an ecosystem and the most minor change could adversely affect Android's adoption.

 

Follow Ramon Nuez on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ramonbnuezjr

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
01:27 AM on 09/16/2010
Man, the Windows Trolls are out in force tonight. I just slammed someone in "Internet Evolution" rehashing the tired old line about "so many versions" Linux. As usual, we FLOSS supporters pointed out the 20 different flavors and service pack versions of WinDOS.

When are you trollers going to learn. For every canned argument on your boiler room play book, we Open Source Guys have an answer. And that answer is being learned...by the public.
06:46 PM on 09/15/2010
Minimum requirements should be set. That is one of the disadvantages of selling the software rather than the hardware. Microsoft knows this. Windows can have completely different user experiences depending on the machine and manufaturer. That is one advantage Apple has. iOS4 will be the same on all iPhone 4s, while Android 2.2 could be different on a Samsung, or HTC or Motorola. There are some Android phones that have gotten bad, or less than enthusiastic reviews, while some have gotten great reviews. With different hardware, it isn't consistent.
photo
JasonMcl
8(Na) + 8(Na) = BACHMAN
04:04 PM on 09/15/2010
Android 3.0 is rumored to have a variety of hardware requirements. Most speculations say that it will require exactly what the current top-end phones already posses and what future tablets may.

The biggest difficulty with fragmentation, comes from the third party interface skins such as Sense, Motoblur, Dell Design UX, Touchwiz. The most obtrusive of these is currently Sense.

Initially the manufacturers created these UI's in order to fill in missing features of older Android versions and give their devices some kind of unique identity. Now, they have begun to realize that stock Android is the way to go and they have been a bit embarassed by having to chase Google's tail on recent updates.

The G2 and the Nexus One are both pure phones and highly favored by those deep in the development community. They are often called the "Godphones" because of the absolute speed at which they can run when unhindered by any kind of external interface.

Motorola and Samsung have scaled back their third party UI's tremendously. The Droid X has no visual evidence of third party tinkering, and the Galaxy S touchwiz leaves only a few useful and subtle tweaks and features.

Now that the core OS has really caught up, you can look forward to seeing these third party skins totally vanish in the future, and when update time comes it won't just be the Nexus One and the G2 getting them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uansari1
07:11 PM on 09/14/2010
Android was actually released in September 2008, on the G1 on T-mobile.