Huffpost Impact
THE BLOG

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Raymond C. Offenheiser Headshot

Consensus On Inequality: So What's the Plan?

Posted: Updated:
Print

If we continue down the same path of austerity, tax policies, and investment opportunities written by and for the wealthy, we will continue to undermine the best efforts of people trying to work their way out of poverty.

World leaders gathered in Washington, DC at the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) spring meetings earlier this month to discuss the state of the global economy. The good news is that the leaders of these iconic institutions are on record acknowledging that growing inequality is a threat to economic growth and to serious efforts to eliminate extreme poverty. Yet neither institution offered concrete steps to address it.

In two major plenary panels, it was undisputed that we live in a world of extremes. About 67 people now own approximately half of the world's wealth -- assets equal to those of 3.5 billion of the world's poorest people.

What's becoming clear is that in today's global financial system the rules are rigged in favor of the very rich, and hard working poor families around the globe are finding it impossible to make ends meet. If we continue down the same path of austerity, tax policies and investment opportunities written by and for the wealthy, we will continue to undermine the best efforts of people trying to work their way out of poverty, limit social mobility and restrain growth.

In a session "Sharing Prosperity, Delivering Results" with World Bank President Jim Kim, Director of Earth Institute Jeffrey D. Sachs, and World Bank Economist Kaushik Basu, the overall message was clear that moral conscience to address inequality is finally lining up with the economic proof. As Dr Sachs put it, "morals are not mush, there is no excuse for extreme poverty" and we need to view addressing inequality as a serious moral challenge.

Addressing inequality, as Dr. Jim Kim suggested we that we should recruit more people pinstriped suits to talk about money in the billions and even trillions of dollars as only a small portion of income the world's wealthiest could invest wisely in health and education programs. This would have an enormous positive impact on the most poor. Simply by employing measures that would shut down off-shore tax havens and end corporate tax dodging, which costs developing nations $100 billion per year, we could make a difference.

The World Bank's willingness to focus on the bottom 40 percent is more than welcomed, but I could not help but noticing that the Bank refuses to say anything about the top 10 percent. Taxes, for example, were completely missing from the discourse. The assumption is that if we can measure progress among the bottom 40 percent, it means that we are intervening successfully to affect inequality. Not all would agree.

As Oxfam showed in our January report, "Working for the Few," we cannot address inequality by only focusing on the "have-nots." It is essential to include the "haves." Focusing only on the bottom 40 percent would not address the wider impacts of inequality like political capture and its impact on democratic governance.

While the IMF has, for the moment, overtaken the Bank in terms of proposing concrete actions to tackle inequality and talking about the top 10 percent, this new IMF narrative still requires, among other things, a solid action plan signal the end of austerity policies. A recent report by our friends from the European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad) on IMF conditionality shows there is still a discrepancy between positions held by the IMF in Washington, DC and its practices on the ground.

With the right policy initiatives in place, the IMF and World Bank can easily leverage trillions of dollars to narrow the gap, and achieve great steps to end extreme poverty by 2030, a goal President Kim seeks. We could do this by:

• Putting inequality and poverty at the center of discussions on the state of the global economy;
• Measuring the gap between the richest 10 percent and the poorest 40 percent in each country;
• Advising countries to invest more in free and public health and education and to make their fiscal system more progressive;
• Supporting a goal on inequality in the new post-2015 global development framework;
• Reforming the World Bank's private sector lending practice to ensure they prioritize results for the most vulnerable and not just wealthy investors;
• Ending support for the IMF's austerity measures that cut public services for the poor; and
• Finding a role for the IMF in helping to address unfair domestic and international tax policies that favor the rich and cause developing nations to lose an estimated $100 billion a year to corporate tax dodging.

Given past history, witnessing these two institutions charged with worrying about the state of the global economy and the welfare of the world's poorest clearly advocating for policy interventions to address the threat of accelerating inequality is pretty amazing. But as we have seen, rhetoric will only take us so far. The social and political forces that sustain the current system are powerful and will resist change. We need action, discipline and political will to stay on track and make progress.

The path we take today will make a huge difference in the state of the economy 15 years from now. We can build a fairer world but it needs to start today.