More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Raymond J. Learsy

Raymond J. Learsy

Posted: February 2, 2010 08:51 AM

Did the Huffington Post Bring J.P. Morgan Chase to Heel?

What's Your Reaction:

As far as one could tell the financial press and its many commentators were absent. Yet on January 20 the Huffington Post printed on its web site "Our Banks Becoming Casinos While Washington Yawns". The post dealt with the advanced negotiations between JP Morgan and RBS Sempra a commodities trading firm active in oil, gas, agricultural commodities, base metals and on. It would have been a classic extension by a chartered bank (JPMorgan) using government protected deposits and myriad Fed programs including near zero cost money, to up the ante in plunging ever more deeply into casino like proprietary trading. The post questioned why our regulators were allowing it to happen.

The next day, coincidently, the yawning stopped. President Obama made known in a major policy pronouncement that henceforward it would become government policy to limit the risk taking of banks. JP Morgan was not mentioned by name, but the focus of the President's pronouncement was exactly aimed at such steps that JPMorgan was taking to expand its exposure to the proprietary trading field by taking over RBS Sempra.

Undeterred by the President's stance JPMorgan proceeded in its negotiations permitting Reuters to report on Monday January 25th that JP Morgan was about to close on the Sempra deal by paying $4 Billion to the Royal Bank of Scotland (European Regulators had forced RBS to divest itself of the Sempra trading subsidiary).

Early the next morning the following post was found on Huffington, "JP Morgan Chase Throws Down The Gauntlet at President Obama" citing JP Morgan's pending purchase of Sempra a "blatant disregard of President Obama's interdiction".

Later that day Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase had lunch with President Obama, a meeting labeled as "ongoing dialogue with the business community" by White House spokesmen. Today, February 2nd the Wall Street Journal European edition carried the following article datelined London,

"J.P. Morgan changes its approach to Sempra".

The article went on to report, "J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is withdrawing its interest in the North American operations of RBS Sempra Commodities... The decision resulted from new proposals by U.S. President Barack Obama that would force institutions to choose between commercial banking and proprietary trading".

The article went on to inform that JP Morgan would continue in talks to buy Sempra's metal business headquartered in London as well as its European oil, power and gas divisions. How clever. As though, the relevant government agencies and President Obama were born yesterday. As though, in this interconnected world, trading out of London was in essence at variance than executing trades out of Wall Street. That the money to which the bank had access through myriad US government programs wasn't fungible.

And by the way, where was the divsion headquartered whose trading in insurance/derivatives contracts did more than any other division to bring down all of AIG, but for the US Government's bailout? I'm sure you know the answer. London.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:58 AM on 02/03/2010
Yes. The title should be

"Huffington Post Shines Light on SEMPRA Deal; Obama Advises Bankers to Hide it in Shadows"
photo
knosiswar
Major General Smedley Butler - get to know him
10:33 AM on 02/03/2010
Just keep pluggin away at JP Morgan. There's a lot of bodies buried there. They invented the financial instrument of Mass Destruction - the Credit Default Swap. JP Morgan the man invented the financial panics that preceeded the 'need' for the Federal Reserve.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimk3
02:03 AM on 02/03/2010
Well, I'm confused. Did the Huffington Post Bring J.P. Morgan Chase to Heel? Sort of... but then in the end not really if they're just going to do the same thing through London. I guess ball's in Obama's court again? It looks to me like they're thumbing their nose at O -- but then without regulations, why shouldn't they?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
10:06 PM on 02/02/2010
Obama's approach to stemming outrageous conduct is to jawbone the outlaws. But the problem is omnipresent. The problem is systemic resulting from conflicting ambitions and functions and unbound power. Obama lacks subordinates that can draw or fill in a picture. He doesn't understand that the President must see beyond the narrow interests of the powerful and bankers and search for policies that benefit the ordinary people first and unwonted wealth last, if ever. And he must ask how allowing foreign interests to undermine the American economy is helpful for any chance of an American future.
No President can amount to a dime with the corrupt bunch that President Obama has surrounded himself. A President is no better than his staff. President Obama is going to walk into a trap based upon his despicable subordinate directives. Then he will know too late his own failure in selecting loyal and competent Americans to advise him.
11:16 AM on 02/02/2010
Aaaaghhhhh the 'financial press'.

Why anyone listens to the spoken of the Wall Street/City of London empire is beyond me.

It's hard for my stomach to hold down its content sometimes when I read headlines that still respect criminal operations like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.

It seems like this country is lusting for an oligarchy and an aristocratc class of people like they have in Europe where no government has the power to remove them from society.

No matter how many trillions of worthless and dangeroust derivatives and credit-default swaps are on the books of JP Morgan, we give a special pass to allow them to 'mark-to-fantasy' their losses so the taxpayer can eat them.

It's disgusting.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
10:42 AM on 02/02/2010
JPM is no stranger to stretching the law into the realm of unethical behavior. Just remember Enron. That is why no well intentioned regulation will have a controling impact on JPM. It is better to make them irrelevant in the whole scheme of US finance than try to manipulate them into sensible low risk behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebtNavigation
Attorney and Author
03:55 PM on 02/02/2010
How can you make vampire squid like Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan Chase irrelevant?

Well, Mexicans did it with the "el Barzon" movement and there's one growing here courtesy of YouTube phenom Ann Minch (http://www.debtorsrevoltnow.com).

But if you personally have debt troubles, you need help and you need it now, not when a movement gets cranked up. You can read this book for free: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25443175/Debt-Hope-Down-and-Dirty-Survival-Strategies-Evaluation-Version-Complete
10:01 AM on 02/02/2010
Raymond... your posts be ON POINT! I've referred so many regular folks to HuffPo because of the information that you and others like you provide.

Though I have a degree in Finance, I've never worked in the industry. But I can still follow what's going on 'cuz you break it down and make it easier to follow!

I just wanna write *Thank You* from all us regular folks out here!

byDesign