According to The Wall Street Journal, JPMorgan's losses on what has been reported as big directional bets on credit derivatives, but never fully disclosed by JPMorgan, could reach $5 billion and counting. Along with credit derivatives and other commodities such as copper JPMorgan Chase is a behemoth trader in crude oil and petroleum products, both as physical product and its financial derivatives. Since April the price of WTI crude on the commodity exchanges has eroded for a plethora of reasons by some 14 percent a barrel from near $105/bbl to just over $91/bbl, a massive decline in short order.
Now I do not know JPMorgan's current oil trading book, nor their positions being held in physical crude oil and derivative futures contracts. But past history shows that JPMorgan is a major player risking hundreds of millions, if not billions, in oil trading positions. JPMorgan has a history not only of massive trading in oil futures but also taking title to enormous volumes of physical product held in shore storage as well in chartered VLCC's to sit for months at a time at anchor at sea (VLCC's-enormous tankers able to hold over 200,000 tons of cargo, some three times the size of the HMS Queen Mary.)
Given past trading practices, JPMorgan may be holding speculative cargoes of crude oil valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars (each ton contains 7.4 barrels of crude x 200,000 tons purchased say at hypothetical level as the recent price of $105/bbl would value such a cargo at $155,400,000. This compared to a current price (close of trading Friday, May 18) of $91/barrel or $134,680,000 plus per diem chartering and holding charges resulting in a paper loss of at least $20,720,000 -- a significant sum but without the current credit derivatives imbroglio, could well have been handled with equanimity by JPMorgan Chase. But that is the point, given the building losses in its other trading operations JPMorgan may not reasonably be able to tolerate further deterioration in value in its proprietary commodity trading positions and one could venture that the pressure to liquidate such positions is mounting, especially as prices erode. The question becomes how large are their crude oil physical and derivative positions, and under how much pressure is JPMorgan now under to liquidate?
JPMorgan has been a major player in pushing the price of oil up in their speculative position taking, prices that have played out in the price of gasoline we are all paying at the pump. Perhaps this is the turnaround moment and JPMorgan's current travails in trading will lead to lower gas prices. Please remember the testimony given by Rex Tillerson, chairman and CEO of ExxonMobil (if ever a personage should know, he should) just a year ago, before a Senate committee, that the then quoted price of $100/barrel incorporated $30-$40/barrel attributable to speculation. JPMorgan was not mentioned but when it comes to oil speculation, JPMorgan is among the leaders of the pack.
One further point: JPMorgan, as a supposed bank holding company has ready access to the Federal Reserve cash window and its diminutive interest rates, in other words, taxpayer money. This, while simultaneously holding Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) secured deposits for which the government is the backstop of last resort. Thus, taxpayers are helping JPMorgan Chase run up the price of oil and gasoline at little cost to JPMorgan and to their enormous profit. Yet should all the trades blow up and the bank collapses the government is left holding the tab. All the while we pay for it a second time at elevated prices for gasoline at the pump.
Lastly, it's the irony of ironies -- this cozy relationship with the Federal Reserve is memorialized by JPMorgan Chase Bank Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon sitting on the board of the New York Federal Reserve (JPMorgan's Piggy Bank). It is a grotesque symbol of how the Wall Street banks control our government.
Mr. Dimon, sir, out of respect to our waning confidence in government institutions, your resignation from the Fed Board is well past due.
Follow Raymond J. Learsy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/raymondLearsy
Barrel Meter charts: http://trendlines.ca/free/peakoil/BarrelMeter/BarrelMeter.htm
I hope so too bluedog24,... BUT they will only re-evalute the risks they take if they are forced to eat some real crow, and some significant losses to their bottom line WITHOUT being bailed out.
Otherwise we - the taxpayers - socialize a large chunk of their speculative losses,... again.
So what now? Elect Obama again? Elect Romney? support which party?
It places us citizens in a weird spot. We have to think far beyond Dimon and Obama and Romney. We are stuck with a nation that has as its current motto: "never give a sucker and even break"-W.C. Fields comedian
It is not capitalism, it is not democracy, it is a condition of general fraud and abuse so bad there is nothing to do for it. Equity and fairness and law enforcement and such are made into a joke by this enviroment.
Oil? How about medical costs and insurance for homes and cars and cable TV bills and Internet fees and on and on and on? A fair normal capitalism is not even a part of this. We are being robbed blind a thousand ways at once by the entire system and our politics refuses to protect us.
We need new political parties and new laws and a new set of ideas up from the most basic notion and there is not even a public discussion for this at all. Romney versus Obama? Please! What garbage this election is this time.
If the price of oil collapses, I hope the oil speculators won't ask for a government handout. The Dodds-Frank law does include provisions that will limit speculation, but they won't go into effect until October. President Obama has asked for additional legislation, but the GOP refused, since the GOP is run by the Koch Brothers.
Truth told. We need to phase out fossil fuels and replace them with clean, renewable energy. The future of our planet depends on how fast we can lower carbon emissions.
President Obama understands that. The GOP does not. If we value our planet, we must re-elect President Obama and fire the GOP.
However, I think a more realistic question is, "Is Dimon someone you want to halt or run your party?"