More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Raymond J. Learsy

Raymond J. Learsy

Posted: March 31, 2010 09:33 AM

Obama's Brave Decison to Drill Offshore

What's Your Reaction:

In an act of vision and courage, given the hostage the nation has become to the oil industry, oil interests, and the likes of OPEC, the Obama administration is proposing opening vast expanses along the Atlantic coastline, the Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling.

This is a momentous moment and brings to mind the leadership of another time and another president. In the depth of the depression, President Roosevelt, with courage and imagination, sought different solutions to confront the crippling economic conditions that had descended on the nation. He petitioned Congress to mandate the creation of "a corporation clothed with the power of government but possessed of the flexibility and initiative of private enterprise". In May 1933 Congress passed the TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) Act to revitalize the economically stricken Tennessee Valley in areas of power generation, river navigation, flood control, reforestation and erosion control. It became outstandingly successful in each category.

During the war years the TVA set upon perhaps the largest hydroelectric construction program ever undertaken in the United States, building 12 major hydroelectric plants to provide power to critical war industries. To this day the TVA has an aggressive clean air program and in this and many other areas as well, has set a standard for public responsibility against which private companies can be measured.

Given the massive rise in oil prices over the last decade and the distortions we have experienced in the oil markets, we as a nation have lost virtually all vestige of trust in the oil industry to develop our resources on federal lands or at sea in a way that benefits all Americans. As presently constituted, the oil-concession system is an abomination that has benefited virtually no one but the oil companies at great expense to the nation as a whole.

Clearly this aberration of a loaded system benefiting just one element of society -- the oil industry -- with its powerful and moneyed interests and influence must stop. Drilling offshore on federally controlled areas is the place to start.

We are at a crossroads for President Obama to seize the moment by establishing our own National Oil Trust. It could be modeled after our own experience with the TVA and that of the world's third largest energy exporter, Norway's National Oil Trust.

Norway's Oil Trust's stated objective is to contribute and create the greatest public value for Norwegian society from Norway's oil and gas deposits. Profits from the Norway's oil and gas operations accrue to the Norwegian Government's Pension Fund and is invested in conservative bonds and investments.

Were we to have a similar program, the trust could be mandated to direct its revenues toward developing alternative energy programs and to expand mass transportation, thereby becoming a cornerstone for energy independence and combating climate change.

Norway's Oil Trust is a source of national pride and accomplishment. So too would a sense of pride and accomplishment accrue to us with our own National Oil Trust. President Obama, now is the moment to build on Roosevelt's legacy!

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 303
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
12:53 PM on 04/01/2010
Mr Learsy you've got to be kidding! If this were the 1930's I could understand your logic but calling off shore drilling another ATV is simply perplexing when it comes to carbon based energy and the impacts on the environment. It won't lower overall gas and oil prices either, nor will it remove our dependence from foreign oil which leads us to more warfare. You cannot get off of dangerous carbon based energy by going after more of it. What it will do is give us a neglible amount of gas and oil at a terrible expense to the envionment.This new move by the president is yet another giveaway to corporate campaign financiers in the energy industry. If you want a new ATV then do it the way it needs to be done by giving solar energy and wind power to all of America just as Germany is doing. It would solve all of our employment troubles too by putting millions of unemployed Americans back to work, rebuilding the infrastructure without destroying what's left of the environment. All the events we've been witnessing, the flooding, the droughts and the major "natural" disasters around the world are the result of carbon emissions and yet in the midst of Rhode Island underwater, Obama says just like Bush, drill-drill-drill!
09:50 AM on 04/01/2010
It seems not to matter what the subject of legislation is; commerce, environment, school lunches or immigration the oil industry will always benefit. Now we will begin to see what concessions the president has made in order to pass health care legislation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nosybear
Liar, damned liar and statistician
09:27 AM on 04/01/2010
At peak production, it will produce a fraction of our oil consumption. It will go on a world market where prices are determined by producers much farther up the Pareto chart than we are. I don't say drilling for this oil, as long as it is very carefully regulated and producers are held responsible for any damage they do, you know, that externality thing economists employed in an industry like to forget, is bad. We just need to get something from it much more valuable than the pitifully small amount of black gold that will be pumped from these holes (and hopefully not end up in a black mat on Myrtle Beach). If we can get sensible environmental regulation out of it, great; however, Republicans have a tendency not to stay bought for very long. It will eventually be drilled, burned, converted into components of the garbage gyre in the Pacific ocean so if we can get something valuable for it, why not. I suspect all we'll get is more carbon dioxide and plastic fouling up our ecosystems as people use it as an excuse to put off difficult decisions.
08:24 AM on 04/01/2010
My uncle worked for the dept of Interior regulating oil production and said that the oil companies stole as much as they paid for. How can we get meaningful profits for public oil when that has to happen through the government which is owned, lock, stock, and barrel by the companies themselves?
11:18 AM on 04/01/2010
Your Uncle, geez that's solid evidence........How exactly did they steal?
01:48 PM on 04/05/2010
Oil companies OWN a big chunk of the government when they write the Energy Plans for the USA and get their DEPENDENT (on oil money for their campaigns) legislators of BOTH parties to agree to them, as it happened when Chenney did it during the Republican 8 disastrous years. The minutes of that meeting, PAID BY THE TAX PAYER have NEVER been made available publicly. Yes WE who paid for all of it are not allowed to see what they agreed to using our money.

Learsy's article is a mere joke.

This foolish Obama's decision smells like a dead rat, all of it being politics, just like the stupid wall between Mexico and the US which today has been stopped.

The same will happen to this BS probably, and it's just a gimmick for Obama win some Republican votes for the next elections, while he loses even more with progressives.

In any case we won't see a drop of oil from those still inexistent oil wells for at least ten years, and if we do, they mean nothing for the total consumption of the country.

It's a red hearing.
11:31 PM on 03/31/2010
Yes, our do nothing useless President should get behind solar towers. We could run the whole USA on non polluting electricity. Of course the coal people will be pissed off, the nuclear people would be pissed off and the giant polluting natural gas people will be pissed off. But wouldn't it better for all if the only carbon emissions came from race cars or an occasional bond fire.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
12:38 AM on 04/01/2010
I'm with you here 99% --i.e., I could pass on NASCAR,

But in addition, let's not forget our cattle craze, which is a huge gaseous problem: that is, methane = a major greenhouse gas. And though I loved hunting in my younger years, I must admit the slaughter house is not something we can really take pride in (but no, I still eat bugers and bacon, even though my blood chem says don't).

Point is: We just need to think beyond the horizons we were conditioned by in our youth, and sometimes that means facing tough decisions, like maybe planet overwarmth is going to be a problem for your kids and grandkids, or maybe even you.

We're all in this together--right?
09:54 AM on 04/01/2010
Solar to run all the USA what a great idea well that is as soon as we figure out that darn rotation of the Earth thing you know that night and day thing.
01:16 PM on 04/01/2010
during the day energy is collected, then stored in batteries for the evening. We now have the technology to do it right and the sun is an inexhaustable supply. The only obstacle to going solar is the stranglehold the big energy corporations have on Washington. If we continue on the carbon path, our newest generation will be witnessing in real time the destruction of the entire planet. Food sources will literally dry up from droughts and floods and ocean levels will rise around the globe. Our drinking water will be dwindled and contaminated and eventually oil and gas, which are finite, will be exhausted. If we don't work right now on this, in the future we won't be able to transport food, equipment or even the military. Just imagine the chaos that will ensue from that!
11:29 PM on 03/31/2010
The brave decision would have been to initiate a massive alternative energy initiative instead of the wimpy pilot projects with miniscule funding he has started to date.
08:26 AM on 04/01/2010
Yeah! What if he put a trillion dollars into alternative energy instead of the banking industry?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wethepeople3884
10:35 PM on 03/31/2010
That must be why oil execs are so thrilled about off-shore drilling and have been lobbying for it forever. This article literally makes zero sense. We need the government to push the country towards clean energy, not increased reliance on fossil fuels whether that be domestic or foreign. Wind, water, solar, biofuels, electric even nuclear over fossil fuels and utilize our current oil production and expenditure more efficiently.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:31 PM on 03/31/2010
Oil use represents an opportunity cost that is not correctly calculated in this simplistic world.

Why spend $1 on oil when you can leverage that dollar further on energy efficiency or renewable sources.
10:10 PM on 03/31/2010
For anyone who is not familiar with the effects of exponential growth, below is a link which will open your eyes and make you look at the energy crisis in a way that you have never looked at it before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY&NR=1

Most people do not realize how close we are to a total energy collapse. I urge all to listen closely to this lecture. This guy knows what he is talking about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:46 PM on 03/31/2010
I just saw this. It is good. I agree everyone should watch it. Even if you think you understand exponential growth (as I thought I did), it is a terrific refresher course.

I don't think it in anyway justifies the decision to allow offshore drilling, but it does remind us that we need to deal more seriously with population growth and increasing energy consumption.

Thanks for posting!
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
01:33 AM on 04/01/2010
this is great! .. over the years i have subjected some of my friends to dvd propaganda bundle-bombs.. i NEVER make a dvd about peak-oil/energy/sustainable culture without including "arithmetic, population, and energy" i LOVE this wonky professor's ability to communicate this VITAL subject matter in a meaningful and understandable way.
since i had first seen this, some years ago,.. i have noted that.. if this population folds in an ugly way, "they never quite grasped the exponential function.:" could be appropriately carved on their tombstone.

particularly the bacteria/bottles over doubling time exercise.. brilliant.

this is definite MUST SEE.. don't hate the lo-fi!,.. the payoff is in the DATA for this one, consume it.

thx write4u for sharing this link here. good stuff.
08:01 PM on 03/31/2010
IF there is oil off the US East Coast, why should it not be used? There certainly is natual gas there which can help in many ways. IF alternate energy was ready to replace all the uses of oil, we wouldn't need this oil or any oil, but that's not the case. And coulda/shoulda/woulda about the past doesn't change the fact that we need some sort of energy, and petro is what it is now, until alternates come through. While we transition NOW, we need to use all resources at hand. Let's hope we can last the way things are with imports until this oil comes in, if it ever does. And if we have not made technological advances since the Valdez, we need to just pack it all up and go away. Maybe Ariana was right.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
09:08 PM on 03/31/2010
As a biologist who witnessed first-hand the disaster in Prince William Sound, let's not be too cavalier and ignore the human and animal life that perished here.

And remember that technology does little to overcome human failure -- such as a drunk asleep at the helm of a very large vessel.

Let's also recall that the compensation paid out 30 years later to the devastated community and fishing industry was a drop in the proverbial oil barrel, and many of those receiving compensation were already -- you guessed it -- dead.
10:13 PM on 03/31/2010
Oh, and by the way, as long as we are talking about global warming, let's not forget this relationship. Trees return sequestered carbon with a roughly 20 to 100 year period; coal returns sequestered carbon from 100-300 million years or so; but nuclear energy returns energy in the form of heat that was sequestered in fissionable material from 4.5 billion years ago.

So please fill me in as to exactly where the benefit of further oil burning is going to help the global warming problem ............. unless it was a corporate bottom line issue all along.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
07:51 PM on 03/31/2010
There's been talk today over whether Barack is playing chess again, aimming to checkmate the Republicans into supporting a much broader and greener energy package.

The last time we watched his chess playing it turned into a lackluster draw at best. Maybe he's learning? Hope so, but I'm not too comfortable.

He gives a good speech, as they say, but Bobby Fisher? Doubt it -- not bettin' my money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nosybear
Liar, damned liar and statistician
09:28 AM on 04/01/2010
Problem is those dang Republicans just don't stay bought long.
07:29 PM on 03/31/2010
Sorry, Mr. President. There's a typo on your strategy sheet. See where it says "Play your base"? That should be "Play to your base."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Cause Endures
07:19 PM on 03/31/2010
A. There will be no National Oil Trust. Please.

B. This is no "new idea" as Roosevelt had, this is the same old Republican talking point from decades past. There's nothing brave about embarking on this voyage.

Tis all.
07:08 PM on 03/31/2010
I'm still wondering if this proposal is even sincere. There is absolutely NO indication that the Obama Administration is supportive of drilling for, or mining, fossil fuels. Pushing aside nuclear, too, they fixate on boutique energy sources that are unbelievably uneconomical, even with gaudy subsidies.

My prediction is that proposal this will be pulled off the table in an orchestrated huff when Republicans do not support Cap-And-Tax, or some other freedom-starving efforts. Mark this down.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derk Pippin
big heart; tough skin
07:01 PM on 03/31/2010
Off-shore drilling an act of bravery?! Maybe, in Supid-topia, but not on this planet.

The day I take energy advice from a commodities trader and Regan-appointee, please, hang me from a tree like the traitor that I have become.