More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Raymond J. Learsy

Raymond J. Learsy

Posted: February 22, 2011 08:47 AM

The price of oil has jumped to the highest level in the past two years in reaction to concerns over the events in Libya. The concerns about Libya are real and there is no assurance that the flow of oil from that source will not be disrupted.

Yet in the greater scheme of things what would that mean? Libya produces some 1.7 million barrels per day (bpd). That is far less than the idle capacity of Saudi Arabia alone and it is but a tiny fraction of the 4.1 billion barrels of oil of public and industry strategic reserves held by the International Energy Agency and its member countries.The United State's Strategic Petroleum reserve alone holds near 750 million barrels of oil.

Today, in a welcome example of supplier responsibility, Saudi Arabia, through the comments of the Saudi Deputy Oil Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salam, made it known that Saudi Arabia will not allow any supply disruptions from the Middle East to impact oil supply. Saudi Arabia's spare unused capacity exceeds more than 4 million bpd, more than twice Libya's 1.7 millions bpd output.

World supplies are ample and well positioned to handle the additional steaming time from Saudi Arabia even should matters escalate in the Middle East, making passage through the Suez Canal problematical. The additional cost of the longer supply line would be minimal, in the cents per barrel, as compared to the near $7.00 per barrel increase being registered in today's oil market trading (please see "Risk to the Suez Canal Sets The Stage For Falsely Hyping The Price of Oil" 02.02.11).

Commentators today are repeatedly referring to the level of oil reserves held by the Libyan oil fields, projecting concerns that these reserves are in danger of being cut off from the world market. That concern is spurious to say the least. Irrespective whatever the outcome of events in Libya, it will be in the interest of this regime or successor regimes to tap those reserves as quickly as they can. Temporary interruptions are certainly a possibility; long term stoppage, hardly.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 PM on 02/23/2011
So Raymond, what will you say when (ooppsie!) the Saudis don't have spare capacity?
Your thesis of cornucopia has been inextricable with the assumption of "spare capacity".
from theoildrum.com:
"Jeffrey Brown, a Dallas-area petroleum engineer, questions the assumption that the Saudis can meet the world's needs.
He notes that Saudi production has declined in three of the four years since it peaked at middlecade (2005)– including an 11% plunge in 2009. At the same time, Saudi oil consumption has soared, making it the 15th-biggest petroleum consumer as of 2008, according to U.S. government data."
Just trying to keep you current.
:-)
11:00 AM on 02/23/2011
I spoke to my state senator about the topic of lowering the state speed limits on the Interstate. In Nebraska it's 75 MPH. Basically, he laughed in my face. As a matter of fact, the state's department of roads has been investigating state speed limits to INCREASE the speed limits on state highways. The reason? It has nothing to do with oil and gas consumption, but the fact that we have one of the lowest accident fatality rates in the U. S.

I guess our highways are so safe, that not enough people are dieing on them. But it doesn't phase the legislature in this state that gas prices are so high. As a matter of fact, they have even raised gasoline taxes in this state to add to the increase. Nebraska has one of the ten highest gasoline taxes in the U.S. They seem to have a see-if-I-care attitude about speeding. The 75 MPH speed limit along the interstate is actually 81 MPH due to "Officer Discretion." Speeders are rarely stopped until they are 7 MPH over the speed limit. This is partly because they don't have enough patrolmen (outside the 2 metropolitan areas of Lincoln and Omaha) to enforce the speeds along I-80, except during special statewide "projects." They would much rather stop vehicles that look suspiciously like drug traffickers, which is their forte. But they don't care if you're using lots of gasoline ... it adds to the local economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aprilglaspie
10:35 AM on 02/23/2011
This is all a typical load of oil/financial industry profiteering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Amschler
on the edge
12:14 AM on 02/23/2011
Since when do speculators need anything backed by real logic for a reason to panic? At the right they've been going, the excuse could be something like a blue butterfly was seen by my kindergarten best friend's boyfriend's daughter's cousin on the way to school and the cousin USUALLY sees yellow butterflies or no butterflies therefore we should all panic. Or rain was spotted in Saudi or my psychic said or I got the following tip from my bartender/hairdresser/guy at the gym...

It's pure rampant speculation and ANY excuse for a price change works. Logic is never part of the equation any more. It hasn't been for a long time.

If anything it's past time to reform the commodities market.
07:27 AM on 02/23/2011
I agree with you on the need to reform the commodoties market. Seems to me only refiners or those that actually do something with crude oil should be allowed to buy futures. Since there are few alternatives to oil and it's rise in value hurts world economies, we need to take speculation by investors out of the equation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
10:57 PM on 02/22/2011
I think Congress should revisit speed limit reductions. People didn't like the 'double nickel', but 55MPH still gets you where you're going, whether it's a freighter or a private car. Also, if shipping companies did more to try and use rail and lower their cost-per-mile, that would help take the edge off, too, because rail services might be better able to make use of alternative fuels than standard freight trucks. 

Also, no time like the present to work on switchovers and redesigns of standard commercial vehicles. 

Maybe they should also consider fuel rationing, meaning that you basically get to buy say, 10 gallons per month at a set nationalized price, X% below retail, so that working families can get a little break from the Wall St. commodities roulette table.  We don't all have Civics that can get 65MPG...but Harley Davidson and other motorcycle manufacturers may end up developing a new high-efficiency product line if this price speculation stuff keeps up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
10:37 PM on 02/22/2011
Big bucks from fears,...Speculative gain and most Americans loss
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
10:59 PM on 02/22/2011
Follow-on thought, shut things down on the weekends. Do your business Monday through Friday. Maybe run stores on Saturday, but on Sunday, button everything down and we'll all save a bunch of fuel that way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneTop
Uh, is that a beer hall?
10:25 PM on 02/22/2011
The invisible hand at work again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
10:02 PM on 02/22/2011
Speculators getting rich.
09:11 PM on 02/22/2011
This is just another attempt to eek more profits for the oil companies. It's not driven by supply and demand, but by market speculators and CEO's. When gas reached $4.50/gal. demand dropped dramatically. So the powers that be, weren't achieving the profits they desired. For how many quarters were Mobil-Exxon's profits breaking world records??? If you analyze the time series (I did), you'll find, as they did, that their profits were maximized by keeping gas prices ~~$270-$3.10/gal. Now, with the Egypt and Libiya frays, they're trying to push prices to the $3.20-$3.70/gal. levels and increase profits. It will work, so long as people keep buying at these levels. The rationale- speculated by the mainstream media and many economists- that the increase is due to fear, is as absurd as the rationales given for stock exchange movements. Stock prices are tied much more to insider scheming and bundling than they are to GM's quarterly reports. The same vapid hype- just a different channel.
08:44 PM on 02/22/2011
what's new? that's exactly what happened during the Bush era and at that time we blamed anybody but the real culprit: speculators and the commodities trade. European countries get most of the Libyan oil so can someone explain to me how it is affecting us.I do believe in free enterprise but i can not stand speculators who will take advantage of any rumors or innuendo to push prices up at the expenses of the common man who has to make drastic decisions to survive and that 's what drove Egyptian and Tunisians ( beside the political factor)to take to the street. they ought to be more oversight of wall street .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notalwaysfittoprint
07:17 PM on 02/22/2011
Using the uprising in Libya to push up the price of gasoline? Why not. It's another quick way to make a buck!
08:45 PM on 02/22/2011
well said kudos
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:38 PM on 02/22/2011
The "oil market" reacted exactly as one would expect - the speculators took the ball and ran as far as they could with it. Nobody with any knowledge of the industry anywhere would've been panicked by a disruption of Libyan production.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notalwaysfittoprint
07:18 PM on 02/22/2011
Oil market speculation should not be allowed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
08:59 PM on 02/22/2011
Fanned earlier today.  I love reading the chinadaily

Probably in this order for sources

Zerohedge
Survivalblog
DollarCollapse
Bussiness Insider
chinadaily
and "When genius prevailed" or something like that.  I like the humor and pics too.  Sometimes linked to stuff I can't get out of my mind. 

Thanks, but this crowd doesn't think outside the box.  Mostly Daily Kos, Think Progress.  They won't ask themselves what is the ground truth, Is it going to be bad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:30 AM on 02/23/2011
OSCPJ you got that right! The truth is hard to swallow but its most important to have full understanding of the worlds geo-politics on a Macro scale. I'm beginning to believe that very few issues facing the people of the world are actually coincidence or mistakes, rather part of a plan that has been in the works for some time. One of the biggest obstacles standing in front of our progress is lack of leadership and the fact that there are many people with vastly more education and intelligence than myself who are compartmentalized in conventional "left" "right" groupthink. The good news is that people are waking up faster then at any time during history due to increased access to information.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:16 PM on 02/22/2011
Russia and China just signed a few large deals regarding energy and currency this past fall 2010. When the US dollar fails due to excessive printing, both the U.S and the MIddle east will collapse leaving Russia (the largest supplier of oil to europe and now china) on top. Everything we are witnessing today has been in the works for over 50 years. When oil reaches 150-200 a barrel, we will be interestingly surprised to find out how much oil still exists in our country in capped wells in the north slope and around Prudhoe Bay Alaska.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:31 PM on 02/22/2011
Another rape of our citizens by Big Oil to fill their bonus pockets.