iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rep. Alan Grayson

Rep. Alan Grayson

Posted: June 22, 2010 02:02 PM

Fire General McChrystal

What's Your Reaction:

From today's Washington Post -

"Are you asking me about Vice President Biden?" McChrystal asks the [Rolling Stone] reporter at one point, laughing. "Who's that?"

"Biden?" an unnamed aide is quoted as saying. "Did you say 'Bite Me'?"

And this is what General McChrystal has to say about Richard Holbrooke, the President's senior envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan: "Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke. I don't even want to read it." McChystal described Holbrooke as "a wounded animal."

McChrystal on U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry: "Here's one [who] covers his flank."

McChrystal's aide on National Security Advisor James Jones: "a clown."

McChrystal is supposed to be working with these people. Instead, he's stabbing them in the back.

Fire him.

That's what I wished for last year on MSNBC, when McChrystal publicly demanded more troops in Afghanistan before the President had made that decision. This is what I said then:

"McChrystal is way out of line. He should remember what happened between Truman and MacArthur, another 'Big Mac.' He's pushing his luck here, because Obama needs to be the Commander in Chief. That's what the Constitution says - Article II, Section 2, that's what it says. He's the boss, not McChrystal. McChrystal should have known better. He saw what happened [to MacArthur], and I think history may repeat itself."

Let's face it. McChrystal has destroyed his working relationship with everyone who is not actually under his command. (And maybe those under his command, too; the Post quotes one as plaintively informing McChrystal, "sir, some of the guys, sir, think we're losing, sir.") For that alone, he should be fired.

But the problem goes deeper than that. The Constitution says that Congress has the power to declare war and fund (or de-fund) war, and that the President is Commander-in-Chief. Not Stanley A. McChrystal. No one elected him.

It is fundamentally wrong to set policy on war by asking the generals, "do you want more troops?" That's like asking Wall Street, "do you want more money?" That's like asking my five-year-old twins, "do you want more candy?"

McChrystal has to go. But after that, we have to make our decisions on war and peace based on what's right for America, not what's right for the generals, or Halliburton, or Blackwater. Not what's right for the military-industrial complex. But rather, what's right for us.

 

Follow Rep. Alan Grayson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/alangrayson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 817
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
05:08 PM on 06/25/2010
"McChrystal is supposed to be working with these people. Instead, he's stabbing them in the back."

Record level debt ... sky high unemployment ... collapsed housing market ... oil flooding out Gulf coast region. Yes, Congressman, I know the feeling of that "knife in the back" from those who are supposed to be working for me. Know it well ....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
12:20 AM on 07/03/2010
Oh, pfft, wkb2texans. You were no Debt Reducer prior to 01/20/09. The housing bubble had arlready burst, remember? Republicans want NO REGULATION, remember? The BP Explosion was preventable.

So, get a grip - McChrystal had two heavy strikes, this was an out, and he knew it. The problem is that negativity is contageous - and if your men don't have confidence in their country, then of course we've lost the war. It's not the "mean" language, it's the sabatage.

The President waived the time remaining for Gen McChrystal to retain is Four Stars for retirement.

McChristal got off both from his Mission, and his disgrace.

Go read the WaPo story on the Nighthawks - the people working to keep you and me safe - writing those Emails Gen. McChrystal "doesn't even want to read."

You're feeling the knife of the Bush Administration and the TeapartyRepublicans, not our President's Administration.

Can't fan.
photo
KickstandCat
Christian, therefore Liberal
12:24 AM on 06/25/2010
Good thing I'm not the President. McWisecrack would be court marshalled any way I could.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
12:29 AM on 07/03/2010
Had to fan for realizing McWisecrack was aware of that possibility, but took the risk - well-aware of the President's and Gate's dilema for a court marshall.

But I bet a lot of people dream about the final arguments...

Faved too, KickstandCat. Let's watch - and see if McWC spends time on FixedNews - blabbing about 'what we should be doing' - or 'mean' adjectives for our public and military men and women serving who are *not* retired, but trying they're damnest to protect us.

Not that I'm for war. I'm not. But we can't let the Military undermine our Civilian Governance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Koulouris
12:09 AM on 06/24/2010
What isn’t mentioned is how ignorant to history Republicans can be. If you don’t believe me, just ask Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Britain, and Russia how easy Afghanistan is.

http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2010/06/the-fallout-of-general-mcchrystals-screw-up/
02:33 PM on 06/23/2010
Now McCHrystal is free to tour the circuit, write the memoir, and speak ever more freely about his old boss.

BRILLIANT move by Obama. He's made McChrystal a millionaire a few times over, made an enemy, and empowered the enemy with civilian freedoms.

GENIUS.
photo
KickstandCat
Christian, therefore Liberal
12:26 AM on 06/25/2010
Partially true. But what McChrystal really values is his ego. Wealth won't compensate for that.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
12:36 AM on 07/03/2010
I'm not so sure. Let's see. If he's a TeapartyRepublican, and starts running his mouth before the dust is off his boots? That's asking for bigger headlines of the very dangerous sort. Dangerous as in National Security...

Tick tock tick tock
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
02:21 PM on 06/23/2010
Insubordination, disloyalty, disrespect for one's boss should get anyone fired.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
01:38 PM on 06/23/2010
Mc is history. Now go after another one Prez, you've got a list of criminal Republican cronies lil' Bush installed all over our country. Start swinging that ax!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dazzle59
12:12 PM on 06/24/2010
I second that! Fanned & faved.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
12:38 AM on 07/03/2010
So faved, satanlite. Fanned long ago.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
01:34 PM on 06/23/2010
Mc don't know Dk.

President Obama sorely needs to man up in his oval office and stop talking about kiking *ss and show us some hides on the fence.
11:56 AM on 06/23/2010
The General pulled a Napoleon and may have met his Waterloo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlisonCarnie
I am unique ... just like everyone else
11:45 AM on 06/23/2010
Wow I love smart men!
Bladernr1001
Vote Libertarian
11:25 AM on 06/23/2010
Yea I hope Obama does fire him. Then that will free him up to expose Obama for the boob he really is.

Books, speaking tours..Stan would clean up.

You know its funny....while Stan used poor judgement in talking to the RS reporter...nothing he said seemed wrong or innaccurate.
01:38 PM on 06/23/2010
How would you know Bladermouth?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
12:40 AM on 07/03/2010
Uh, he's long gone, fluffy. You have any idea who took his place?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
12:43 AM on 07/03/2010
Sorry, just looked at the date. My apologies.
11:11 AM on 06/23/2010
Memo to Grayson: Obama doesn't do accountability or responsiblity. No matter how many crimes you commit whether it's torture, illegal wars, spying illegally on Americans, you will not be held accountable. No matter how low you brought the American economy with your risky trading, you will not be brought to accountability.

You can spit on Obama, kick Obama, slander Obama, lie about Obama, and even yell at him during his State of the Union speech and you will not be held accountable. By now, the political establishment realizes that this man never comes back after you. Instead he prattles on about bipartisanship even when the opposition has united and stonewalled him at every turn.

No, Obama doesn't do accountability so McChrystal will stay and those who care about justice, accountability, responsiblity, law, respect and honor will once again groan as the underpinnings of our civiliation; responsibility and accountability just melt away.
11:17 AM on 06/23/2010
But "not doing accountability" is endemic in our whole corporate, political and social structure. It didn't originate with Obama and arguably reached its height with Shrub. The easy way out has become the American way - unless you're in uniform fighting for ill-conceived objectives.
01:11 PM on 06/23/2010
Sorry Jazman you may be correct about the corrupt cesspool in D.C. but Article 88 of UCMJ REQUIRES Obama to immediate relieve McChrystal of his command.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IntelligentDiscussion
I chase the truth, not ideology.
10:50 AM on 06/23/2010
His comments may have been inappropriate but that doesn't change the facts that they were correct. The Obama administration has failed as a wartime president. And one of the brightest military minds in our army said so, just in a bad way.
10:39 AM on 06/23/2010
President Obama calls Afghanistan the "Right" war and says it is vital to our security
President Obama names McCrystal to lead the war in Afghanistan
President Obama waits three months to discuss the situation on the ground with McCrystal
President Obama authorizes 10,000 fewer troops than was requested by McCrystal
President Obama dictates an arbitrary withdrawal time line without considering McCrystal's plea to the contrary.

I agree that an active General must respect the Commander in Chief, but I can't recall a Commander in Chief who has shown less respect for a war time General.
11:30 AM on 06/23/2010
I agree with everything you said and do think that more than anything this shows that the problem is biggest at the top of the ladder, ie. Obama. However, there is a code of conduct for the military to follow and McChrystal was dead wrong. For that he needs to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deb Mac
10:02 AM on 06/23/2010
This guy is a MOUNTAIN of problems. It's not just this incident. Mr. Grayson is right, he had already stepped over the line before. And there's still the matter of his involvement in the Tillman fratracide cover-up. And Cheney's assassination squad. If the General was any kind of man, he would resign. Obama shouldn't have to fire him. He should just admit that he's been wrong on many occasions and retire.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dnalpahs
10:01 AM on 06/23/2010
It would be great if Obama fired McChrystal and he went out on the road speaking the truth about this administration, and then ran for president in 2012.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
10:15 AM on 06/23/2010
McChrystal is head and shoulders above the rest of the losers lining up for the GOP. Let him run
11:10 AM on 06/23/2010
If he would run on a Mid-East war platform, I don't think he will do so well. Sadly, the military has mismanaged its purview as abominably as Wall St. has manged its own when the nation's well-being is concerned.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
01:33 PM on 06/23/2010
Mc don't know dk. Being military in no way qualifies you to be President.