iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alan Grayson

GET UPDATES FROM Alan Grayson
 

... And the Poor Get Poorer

Posted: 06/14/2012 1:16 pm

The Federal Reserve just released its Survey of Consumer Finances, the only government survey of wealth in America. The Survey is conducted every three years. This survey, conducted in 2010, is the first one to reflect the effects of the Wall Street Meltdown in 2008.

How does it look? Bad. Really, really bad.

The median wealth of American families (meaning half above and half below) dropped from $126,400 in 2007 all the way down to $77,300 in 2010. That's a 39% slide. It puts the median net worth of American families at its lowest level since 1995, fifteen years earlier.

About 12% of American families have a negative net worth. Meaning that they're broke.

Among Americans with no high school diploma (15 percent of the adult population), median wealth plunged from $34,800 in 2007 to $16,100 in 2010, a 54% drop. That is the lowest level since at least the Fed's 1983 survey, maybe earlier. So three decades of progress have been wiped out.

Among minorities, median wealth plunged from $29,700 to $20,400. That is the lowest level since 1992. White median wealth is now 540% higher than minority median wealth.

The median value of American homes dove from $209,500 in 2007 to $170,000 in 2010. But the median mortgage was almost completely unchanged: $74,700 in 2007, $74,100 in 2010. So debt payments increased from 7% of income to 11% of income.

In 2007, the bottom 25% had a net worth of $14,800 or less. In 2010, the bottom 25% had a net worth of $8,300 or less, a 44% decline.

In 2007, the top 10% had a net worth of $955,600 or more. In 2010, the top 10% had a net worth of $952,500, a decline of less than 1%.

Let me sum it up for you: In the greatest economic crisis that the United States has faced since the Great Depression, the rich barely lost a nickel. But the poor definitely got poorer. And people in the middle were crushed.

If this continues any longer, then we can invite a priest to administer last rites to the American middle class.

 

Follow Alan Grayson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/alangrayson

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
11:26 PM on 06/15/2012
The top 10% of income earners in the USA makes close to 50% of the income and own 85% of stocks and, as of 2007, the top 1% of households owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth (the next 19% had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80%). In terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one's home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%.

From 1979 to 2009, the top 1 percent of earners saw their income grow by 275 percent. It grew 65 percent for the next 19 percent of earners and just 18 percent for the bottom 20 percent.

Of all the new financial wealth created by the American economy from 1983-2004 42% of it went to the top 1%. A whopping 94% went to the top 20%, which of course means that the bottom 80% received only 6% of all the new financial wealth generated in the United States during the '80s, '90s, and early 2000s.
"In 2009, if you were to add up the total fortune of America's richest 400 people, that amount—$1.27 trillion—would be more than the holdings of the bottom 50 percent of Americans, less than $1.22 trillion." http://www.good.is/post/the-400-richest-americans-are-now-richer-than-the-bottom-50-percent-combined/
photo
artgardenr
GOP..Greed Opulence Prevarication
12:35 AM on 06/16/2012
Don't worry. Mitt Romney has a plan to redistribute the wealth. He'll make sure we all get a piece of the pie...pie hole that is!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
02:25 AM on 06/16/2012
He sure does, but it's the same plan the GOP has had and implemented for most of the last 30 plus years...It's unbelievable that people are willing to double down on that failed policy...
12:03 PM on 06/15/2012
Part of the problem of the middle class is its belief in the myth that if one owns 100, or a 1,000 shares shares of IBM - they own a piece of the company. The issue is the ownership is so minute and, depending on the company, so risky, one might be better off going to the track - at least horses have a substantial track record and they won't try to break you - at least not on purpose.

The middle class is bombarded by advertising from all sorts of companies that put fine print into their ads in print and on television. On TV one barely can read the fine print within the time that the disclaimer is posted.

The big banks do the same thing even in person. Usually the bank will precede the sales pitch with a smile and say: "The law says I have to read this to you..." then they proceed to read quickly through legalese doublespeak. Mean while the applicant's mind is not on what's being said but rather on wondering if the application will be approved.

So if middle class folks watched their 401k's crash and burn, or suddenly they are a month behind on their mortgage because of job loss, the thinking must be changed.

Keep money out of the stock market and bank with a local institution. Maybe you'll keep from sinking.
09:20 AM on 06/15/2012
I work in a shop full o f skilled labor making higher middle income wages.. Next door a sister company mostly unskilled makes lower median wage.. Out of a hundred our shop we have 7 smokers.. Next door I don't think they have 7 that don't smoke and they have twice the people.. My point being that we all make choices through life and there's consequences good and bad.. And no guarentee of anything..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allene Stucki
04:00 PM on 06/14/2012
The wealth of the middle class always consists primarily of their homes. Home values took a huge hit when the government tried to move millions of poor into the middle class thru the medium of home ownership, and in the process created six million new houses for which there were no qualified buyers. That overhand of excess of supply over demand will depress the real estate market for years to come. The most praiseworthy program fell victim to the law of unintended consequences, plus a mass amount of greed.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
The trouble vine keeps growing.
12:27 AM on 06/16/2012
Rubber stamp raters and robo signers caused that....not the people who bought the homes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allene Stucki
08:34 AM on 06/16/2012
Correct on the "rubber-stamp raters", wrong on the "robosigners". The "robosigners" were only involved in the foreclosures, trying to expedite a process that is cumbersome and loaded with red tape. But by the time the banks started foreclosing, the bubble had long since burst and the damage to the wealth of the middle class, in the form of depreciated home values, was a done deal. It was all over but the crying by the time the robosigners got involved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Facts instead of Faux
03:25 PM on 06/14/2012
Corporations have reaped in approximately 88 percent of the national income growth since the economic recovery began. A report, "The 'Jobless and Wageless Recovery' from the Great Recession of 2007-2009," outlines the most corporate-friendly recovery in more than a generation. Worker's wages and salaries have only accounted for slightly more than one percent of all income growth. "The lack of any net job growth in the current recovery combined with stagnant real hourly and weekly wages is responsible for this unique, devastating outcome," states the report. 70% of GDP is consumer spending.

Since the second quarter of 2009, real GDP has increased for seven consecutive quarters. By the fourth quarter of 2010, real GDP had finally surpassed its pre-recession level in the fourth quarter of 2007. By the second quarter of 2011, after-tax corporate earnings were 12 percent higher than when the recession began and the highest percent of GDP since tracking began in 1947.

In 2010, the typical American household earned an inflation-adjusted income of $49,445, scarcely different from that in 1989 and a fall of 2.3% since 2009. Current incomes are at roughly the level of the late 1970s for those near the bottom of the income spectrum. From a real income perspective, the American economy has already experienced a lost decade, but for the median household the picture is one of a generation of stagnation.

http://www.employmentpolicy.org/sites/www.employmentpolicy.org/files/field-content-file/pdf/Mike%20Lillich/Revised%20Corporate%20Report%20May%2027th.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
02:54 PM on 06/14/2012
I would vote for Alan if he was running nationally. He stands up unlike all but about 5 Democrats in Washington.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boymom
02:44 PM on 06/14/2012
This is what Bush did, plain and simple. And why fixing it will take at least as long as breaking it did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gretchenart
Fine Art Technology
02:30 PM on 06/14/2012
"In the greatest economic crisis that the United States has faced since the Great Depression, the rich barely lost a nickel. But the poor definitely got poorer. And people in the middle were crushed. "

And it took two years to get these 2010 results because?
Does make it easier to blame it all on Obama that way, I guess, even though it is the result of fraud and actions perpetrated by the banks and other corporations on the people, and promoted by their politician water carries, all now signed sealed and delivered courtesy of "corporate" Citizens United. Real citizens be damned!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
02:55 PM on 06/14/2012
Obamas Bankers took care of their own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fiddler3
physicist, musician, parent
02:22 PM on 06/14/2012
Grayson says: "the poor definitely got poorer. And people in the middle were crushed. "

And so, what is the answer? Take the money from the rich and pay the poor for being poor?

Nonsense.

American workers need to start competing in this global system. We have to STOP coddling our workers and get them off their butts and back to work. Learn new trades. Start new businesses. Take some risks. Work with your families and communities. It takes time and a lot of effort. But sitting around waiting for another unemployment check, or another batch of food stamps does not help our economy.

Whining isn't going to solve anything. America still has the ability to compete, but we are losing it. American productivity is still among the highest in the world. America still is just behind China as the largest producing company. The infrastructure in the US is better than any developing country. We have impressive advantages. What we don't need are politicians telling us it is the fault of the Europeans or the wealthy or Bush. Stop whining, accept some responsibility for your situation, and go out and make a difference.

OWS is an example of the problem. They took whining to a new level -- and then showed the world what they really were about -- disgusting behavior and vandalism. It didn't convince our business leaders they should hire that rabble. Hopefully that experiment in self-pity is over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RICHARD DIEFENBACH
01:56 PM on 06/14/2012
Hey Alan your guy in the White House is doing a bang up job. Applications for unemployment were up again this week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gretchenart
Fine Art Technology
02:33 PM on 06/14/2012
We are hoping the gop will please apply now so we don't have to lay off ALL of our teachers, firefighters, police workers and give their salaries to your favorite citizens united buddies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RICHARD DIEFENBACH
04:52 PM on 06/14/2012
I wish that both sides would stop tinkling in each others corn flakes and take care of the countries business and put party politics aside. Because we dems have given the country stimulas to keep the unemployment rate below 8%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Facts instead of Faux
03:22 PM on 06/14/2012
By strictly numerical measures, Obama at this point is doing better than Bush. From January 2001 (when Bush took office) to April 2004, the United States lost 1.43 million jobs, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. From January 2009 (when Obama took office) to April 2012, the United States lost 1.39 million jobs.

Obama's first three months witnessed a loss of 2.34 million jobs; Bush saw a growth of 20,000 jobs.

More jobs were lost in the recession of 2007-09 than in the previous four recessions combined. At the current pace, it looks as if it will take until late 2016 to make up for the net job loss to date of 7.5 million. There were six million jobs outsourced under President Bush and then we lost 8.5 million jobs under the recession the GOP passed to the current administration. Isn't that 8.5 million jobs lost and 6 million outsourced jobs really close to the 15 million unemployed Americans? Bush and the Republicans ended their term with payroll employment below where it was when they took office, the first time that’s happened since the Hoover administration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony Helfenstine
01:48 PM on 06/14/2012
If it gets worse..better watch out...the poor will rise up!..theres only so much they will take
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
02:55 PM on 06/14/2012
If incumbents were being turned out of office, that would be more believable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DIgnified
03:06 PM on 06/14/2012
That ball is rolling. Those of us in the middle should be picking sides currently. Middle being those of us with jobs to get by but no extra, and who make just enough to not qualify for help, and not enough to buy our help.
01:40 PM on 06/14/2012
Mr. Grayson, Did the Democratic Party Machine fully support you in your failed election? did they fail Feingold? did they fail Barrett?
jhNY
Mercy.
01:40 PM on 06/14/2012
As it will continue, better phone up the guy with the round collar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gretchenart
Fine Art Technology
02:34 PM on 06/14/2012
BEFORE your phone is disconnected!