iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Bernie Sanders

Sen. Bernie Sanders

GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Bernie Sanders

Deficit Reduction Requires Shared Sacrifice

Posted: 03/13/11 07:35 PM ET

The rich are getting richer. The middle class and poor are getting poorer. What is the Republican solution to the deficit crisis? More tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires. Savage cuts in programs that are desperately needed by working families.

There is another approach, which is why I've just introduced legislation imposing a surtax on those households earning a million dollars or more and the elimination of tax loopholes which the big oil companies take advantage of.

Everyone agrees that this country has a major deficit crisis, but few discuss how we got there. When George W. Bush inherited the White House from Bill Clinton we had a significant surplus. Now we have a $1.5 trillion deficit. How did that happen?

First, against my vote, Bush and Congress launched a war in Iraq. By the time we take care of our last veteran that war will end up costing us some $3 trillion. When the war drums were beating do you recall any of our Republican friends wanting to know how that unnecessary war was going to be paid for? I don't.

Second, Republicans for years have pushed for huge tax breaks for the wealthiest people. I didn't hear them ask how that was going to be paid for.

Third, under President Bush and a Republican-run House, Congress passed a $400 billion-plus Medicare prescription drug program. Written by the insurance companies and the drug companies, it barred the government from negotiating better prices. It drove up drug costs, padded pharmaceutical company profits and added to the deficit.

Fourth, again over my objection, Congress voted for a massive bailout of Wall Street. I didn't hear too many people talking about how we would pay for that $700 billion to bail out Wall Street. I didn't hear them worrying that it would drive up the deficit. Wall Street, having destroyed the economy through their reckless and illegal behavior, needed a welfare check and Congress provided it. End of story.

Those are some of the reasons we now have a deficit crisis, reasons Republicans don't talk much about when they provide soaring rhetoric about the dangers of large deficits.

The corporate media have been very lax in describing the devastating and unprecedented pain that the Republican House passed budget bill, HR 1, would bring about for low and moderate income families. Let me briefly mention just a very few of their cuts.

The Republicans want to decimate the Head Start Program. Every working family in America knows how hard it is today to find affordable childcare or early childhood education. At a time when we have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world, the Republican solution is to slash Head Start by 20 percent, throw 218,000 children off the program and lay off 55,000 Head Start instructors.

The cost of college education today is so high that many young people are giving up their dream of going to college, while many others are graduating deeply in debt. The Republican solution? Make a bad situation much worse by slashing Pell grants by $5.7 billion and reducing or eliminating Pell grants for 9.4 million low-income college students.

Social Security is another target. We get calls in my office every week from senior citizens, people with disabilities, widows who are having a hard time getting a timely response to their Social Security claims. It takes much too long to process the paperwork today. What is the Republican solution? They want to slash the Social Security Administration, the people who administer Social Security, by $1.7 billion. That means half a million Americans who are legally entitled to Social Security benefits will have to wait significantly longer to receive them. (Become a citizen member of the Defending Social Security Caucus)

When it comes to health care, we have 50 million Americans with no insurance today, and 45,000 Americans die each year because they don't get to a doctor in time. Last year, as part of health care reform, I worked very hard to expand community health centers so that more and more low-and moderate-income people could walk into a doctor's office, get health care, dental care, low-cost prescription drugs, mental health counseling. What is the Republican response to the health care crisis? They want to drastically cut-back funding for community health centers and deny primary health care to 11 million Americans.

For the poorest of the poor in our country, the Community Services Block Grants provide the infrastructure, the mechanism to get out emergency help for food, heat, housing and other very basic necessities of life. With homelessness and poverty increasing, the Republicans want to slash $405 million from the Community Services Block Grant Program.

In cold weather states like Vermont, where the weather can get to 20 below zero, home heating assistance is critically important. In fact it is a life and death issue. At a time when home heating oil costs are soaring, the Republicans want to cut $400 million from the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

After decades of progress cleaning up our air and water, and preventing much illness, the Republicans want to slash the EPA by 30 percent and undercut enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.

Republicans also want to cut the WIC program, which provides supplemental nutrition for women, infants, and children. They want to cut that by $750 million.

Everybody understands we have problems with education right now, including large dropout rates. At a time when states are laying off hundreds of thousands of teachers, Republicans want to cut $5 billion from the Department of Education.

On and on and on it goes.

In my view, we do need to boldly address our deficit crisis, but we need to do it in a way that is fair -- that is not on the backs of the sick, the elderly, the children and the poor. In other words, we need shared sacrifice. The wealthiest people in this country, who are now doing phenomenally well, are also going to have to help us with deficit reduction. That is why I introduced legislation which would place a 5.4 percent emergency surtax on income over $1 million. The revenue would go into an Emergency Deficit Reduction Fund. Just doing that - asking millionaires to pay a little bit more in taxes after all the huge tax breaks they have received -- will bring in up to $50 billion a year.

I think that is a good idea, but it is not just me. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll recently asked the American people about the best ways to go forward on deficit reduction? Eighty-one percent of the American people believe it is totally acceptable or mostly acceptable to impose a surtax on millionaires to reduce the deficit. My legislation also would eliminate tax loopholes that enable the big oil companies from avoiding their fair share of taxes.

The American people get it. They understand that we cannot move toward deficit reduction just by cutting programs that working families, the middle class, and low-income people desperately need. They understand that serious, responsible deficit reduction requires shared sacrifice. They know that at a time when the top 1 percent earn more income than the bottom 50 percent, that when the effective tax rate for the rich is now lower than at any time in recent history, that it is absurd not to ask the wealthiest people in this country to provide additional revenue to help us lower the deficit.

The federal budget is not just a bunch of big numbers. It is the document that speaks to the values of our country, our national priorities and our hopes for the future. At a time when the gap between the very rich and everyone else is growing wider, it is a moral abomination to give more tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires, while cutting programs for the most vulnerable people in our society -- the children, the elderly, the sick and the hungry. The Republican budget proposal must be defeated.

Join Sen. Bernie Sanders' Facebook community, the largest in the U.S. Senate.

Join @SenatorSanders by tweeting the most alarming GOP-proposed cuts. You can cull you #DailyCut from this list.

 

Follow Sen. Bernie Sanders on Twitter: www.twitter.com/senatorsanders

The rich are getting richer. The middle class and poor are getting poorer. What is the Republican solution to the deficit crisis? More tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires. Savage cuts in p...
The rich are getting richer. The middle class and poor are getting poorer. What is the Republican solution to the deficit crisis? More tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires. Savage cuts in p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,400
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bkerensa
BenjaminKerensa.com
01:10 AM on 05/09/2011
Shared sacrifice? Hmm.. Well I think the Poor and Middle Class already have sacrificed when Bush launched this insanely expensive wars and when he initiated tax exemptions for the wealthy and created billions in tax credits for various industries.

Perhaps now the rich and business can "man up" and do their half of the sacrificing.
06:57 AM on 05/05/2011
shared huh why does not congress give BACK the RAISE THEY VOTED THEIRSELVES and give up some of their retrirement PERKS just asking!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
05:35 PM on 05/04/2011
Saw Bernie on "Real Time" with Bill Maher, he was a reasoned voice of sanity versus the Republican co-panelists.

Keep on speaking the truth Bernie!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
09:44 PM on 05/03/2011
Right you are Bernie! Get rid of tax breaks for everyone, including corporations, and start there. Spread the misery. The GOP/TP now goes so far as to call the unemployed (who they unemployed) "pigs and hogs" while they give corporations bigger tax breaks. So, get it from the corporations and the top 1-10% and anyone else not paying their fair share for us "pigs" and "hogs" please.

Florida Senate approves business tax cut that shrinks unemployment ...
May 3, 2011 ... The Florida Senate approved a tax cut for businesses that will shrink unemployment ... “Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered,” Detert said. ...
www.miamiherald.com › News › Legislature
03:45 PM on 03/17/2011
Bernie is right on !
11:22 AM on 03/17/2011
If national defense, interstate highways, national parks, homeland security, and all other discretionary programs somehow became absolutely free, we'd still have a budget deficit.
11:21 AM on 03/17/2011
Shared sacrifice? I do not wish to sacrifice because wall street chose to speculate on housing and the politicans involve us in one war after another.
I did not get to vote on this and therefore did not make a poor choice to get us into the mess.
07:10 PM on 03/15/2011
I applaud Senator Sanders efforts for EVERYTHING he has stated, BUT...

Since our Congress, both the House and the Senate, is mostly bought and paid for by corporate America (courtesy of our corrupt campaign process, endorsed and "improved" by our now partisan Supreme Court) I see no chance of improvement.

Hell, political bribery is not only LEGAL in this country, it's become the only way to survive!

Am I jaded? You bet your ass.

Am I a realist? Be honest... What do YOU think!

Senator? You have my total respect, and I hope you get SOME support and success! I believe you to be the most ethical member of Congress in Washington DC.

But will it be enough?

John Cheney 88
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
06:17 PM on 03/15/2011
I just realized today (slow learner) an important difference between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans' primary concern is with (their view of) right and wrong. There is no gray area. Furthermore, the implementation of right vs. wrong is carried out without regard to unintended outcomes. Democrats, on the other hand, while concerned with (their view of ) right and wrong, are additionally concerned with what works and what doesn't work. This is why Republicans flounder about like a fish out of water when asked to come up with a solution to, for instance, the problem of jobs. They would agree that people having jobs is important. They're simply not concerned with the solution to the problem. Thus, they say 'everyone for himself or herself'. Work harder. We establish the right, that's enough.
08:04 PM on 03/15/2011
I agree with you somewhat (you're point is somewhat similar to the classic 'ends vs means' debate throughtout history).
But i have one bone to pick with your comment too.. I don't think one can classify "democrats" and "republicans" as homogeneous groups. Maybe in 1971 one could, but now, it's more complex. You have some "democrats" (ok i know he's an ex-democrat) like Joe Lieberman who are 100% for war and there are some "republicans" who are against it. same with the wall street bailout and most issues.
the "democrats" seem divided as many are becoming disenchanted with obama and some of his not-so-liberal policies such as the war in afgahanistan. "republicans" are absolutely divided between the hard core ex-nixon millitarists and the hard core radical christians and the philisophical classical libertarian views of the Ron Paul clan.

But I also see your point. I'm independendent, but I'm kinda on the big picture right/wrong camp (what you call republican here). but i resent being grouped with other republicans because i was out on the streets protesting both iraq wars and not many other people were out there with me, and i voted for clinton/obama/even ralph nader (lol). heck i spent 5 years of my life following the grateful dead and going to rainbow gatherings....
just saying it's not a black and white world anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
08:38 PM on 03/15/2011
In partial response, here is my today's response to another post:

I have great Texas friends who are quite liberal. I know what you say is true. It's true of every red state. And every blue state has its ignorant, backward-t­hinking conservati­ves. I think we all know that. I'd go so far as to say that there are a lot of conservati­ves, even a few relatively wacky ones who are nice people, if you don't get into politics or society as topics of conversati­on.
The problem of Texas is much the same of the problem in other red states. The conservati­ves vote. They vote against their self interest, and they vote in lockstep. They tend to be closed-min­ded and often illogical. They want everyone to be just like them, to the point that they are intolerant of those who are not just like them. There are some liberals who are that way, too, with one twist. Instead of voting against their self-inter­est, they don't vote for their self-inter­est.
I'd like to think that we can all recognize the others' foibles, but things have become so politicall­y charged that that seems like a pipe dream.

It's sad, and I don't have a clue how to stop the vicious cycle that we seem to be in, other than to ensure that Democrats vote and that states elect Democratic government­s. That way the people can see how much better things are under Democrats than under Republican­s.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
08:54 PM on 03/15/2011
I don't put you in the camp of the black/white Republicans. I put you in the camp of the grey independents. Which is not a bad thing. We can agree on some things and disagree on others.

But I wasn't talking so much about divisions within each camp. I was more talking about particularly those Republicans who seem to be unwilling to listen, or pay attention to Democrats, or to change their minds when confronted with facts.

I'm a pretty liberal guy, a pragmatic liberal to be precise, but I've had my mind changed somewhat more favorably toward gun ownership, for example, through dialogue with conservatives. I still wish for more restrictions and enforcement, but I know longer want anything other than a hunting rifle confiscated. There are some Republicans willing to meet Democrats half way, but the Republican party has become so polarized that Republicans vote in lockstep. I don't sense independent thinking. The extreme right appears to me to have the moderate Republicans so cowed that they never speak out for compromise.

Take governor Walker in Wisconsin, who has gotten everything he wants by hook or by crook. Yet he still hammers away against Democratic positions. The Wisconsin public employee unions made pay compromises and offered to discuss more. Walker then guts collective bargaining, with no financial value, because he claims it does have financial value. Where are the moderate Republicans up in arms about this? Maybe I'm deaf and blind, but I don't sense them anywhere.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyleewonder
04:25 PM on 04/27/2011
Yep, nuff said
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
03:42 PM on 03/15/2011
OOPS! You said some Bad words! "Shared Sacrifice" !! Not in Congress!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
02:17 PM on 03/15/2011
The Republicans are only willing to take sacrifices that don't effect the super rich and mega corps. Anything that only effects the bottom 95% is open game to them. The funniest part is that 40% of the bottom 95% loves this party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LesleyAnne
06:55 PM on 03/15/2011
What gripes me is that when we discuss raising taxes for the wealthy, it's called socialism. When Repubs want to cut benefits and/or pay for teachers and firefighters, it's called shared sacrifice. This is crap and the media is fostering the narrative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
11:23 AM on 03/16/2011
That's a good point. It is getting real old hearing republicans make up excuses why we should give the top 1% tax breaks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Bugbee
The truth suffers from a liberal bias
05:52 PM on 04/29/2011
Also, the repugs have a problem with social welfare, but seem to have no problem with corporate welfare. eg:subsidies
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
09:00 PM on 03/15/2011
That's because they appeal to their black/white right/wrong nature. People who don't like nuance, who don't like shades of gray vote for those who also, and hypocritically, preach that way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booktone
10:39 AM on 03/15/2011
For all those conservatives who vote to screw the lower classes, then make a big show of their Christian faith, here are about 100 Bible passages they ought to read:

http://home.snu.edu/~HCULBERT/poor.htm
12:29 PM on 03/15/2011
tis easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the gates of heaven (or something like that) -- that's about the only thing i remember from my days of reading the bible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booktone
01:09 PM on 03/15/2011
Works for me, Ken.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanityisneeded
No one said it was going to be easy.
01:49 PM on 03/15/2011
The Bible asks all of us to use we have and not hide those talents. If you do not use your talents they will be taken away. There will always be poor among us. But many who are poor and asking for help when they do not help themselves, need to become productive. Yes, those with much should share with the less fortunate. Many, if not most, of those with wealth give significantly to charities and help those less fortunate. Our churches have programs to help those less fotunate and when tragedy occurs, they are first in line to help. Why is there so little talk from liberals about their charities helping people rather than depending on funds from hard working Americans to support causes which in many cases seem to be contrary to our beliefs and in some instances fund activities directly taking aim at religious institutions. Late term abortions not endangering the mother, art defaming religious figures, support for organizations encouraging abortions, accessible porn on the internet and in the libraries, funding for organizations not essential to our health and welfare, over-regulating those trying to serve food and shelter for people while people starve and are homeless, and the list goes on. It is time for all to contrbute to the health and welfare of peopleratrher than hiding behind a banner of self-righteousness and those 46% of Americans not paying income taxes. Once invested, your priorities might just change and the essential needs can be met.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booktone
02:03 PM on 03/15/2011
Interesting response....Except that I'm not talking about those who help by doing noble charity work. I'm talking about the billionaires who don't pay their taxes. If there's a heaven, I'm guessing they're not getting in.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
02:05 PM on 03/15/2011
"But many who are poor and asking for help when they do not help themselves­, need to become productive­."

Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged or Let He Who is Without Sin Cast the First Stone

Who are you to judge whether the poor have or have not helped themselves. Your reasoning is just another way to asuage your guilt for blaming the victims. We are our brothers keeper.
09:56 AM on 03/15/2011
Bernie,
If this is how you feel than why did you undermine Ron Paul's efforts to Audit the Federal Reserve?
Surely you know that the Federal Reserve is a mechanism that takes from the poor (mostly by inducing inflation which everyone knows hurts the poor more than the rich) and gives to the rich. You think that the federal reserve is helping poor people? Please.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
11:11 AM on 03/15/2011
You must have missed this...

May 11, 2010

WASHINGTON, May 11 – In a major victory for transparency at the Federal Reserve, the Senate today passed an amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders to audit the Fed and make the central bank reveal which banks received more than $2 trillion in emergency aid during the financial crisis
11:56 AM on 03/15/2011
Trust me I am very aware of that.

Do you realize how much money $2 trillion is???
You are not outraged that each bank can recieve 1.9 trillion dollars without the taxpayer knowing about it???
1.9 trillion dollars could eliminate poverty in the usa.
Ron Paul was outraged at Bernie for putting that in at the last minute. The bill was supposed to provide transparency to the taxpayer for all banks recieving government money.
Clearly Bernie feels it's more important for Goldman Sachs traders to recieve million dollar bonus' than to eliminate poverty.

Bernie will not comment on this. Ron Paul has ripped him publically, Bernie wont debate him. Bernie will not comment to me and I have emailed him several times (I live in Vermont).

Trust me, I'm on your side. I find it disgusting how much aid the us government has given wall street and how little it gives the needy; but if you think the Frank/Dodd bill was substinative "reform" than you are mistaken. Me, I want real reform. I want to know which banks recieved money, even if it wasn't 2 trillion dollars. (fyi, the biggest company in the world is not worth 2 trillion dollars!)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Amschler
on the edge
04:03 AM on 03/15/2011
Amen Bernie! It's about time SOMEONE in government said this!

Republicans have been shouting from the rooftops about the need for "shared sacrifices" then reading out sacrifice after sacrifice that the poor and middle classes must make. NOT ONCE have they offered a sacrifice from the rich. Sorry but that is NOT what I call SHARED sacrifice. That's what I call sacrificing this nation's least able to fend for ourselves and least able to protect ourselves against the government and the corporations that apparently own it (or at least most of the Representatives & Senators who SHOULD represent the PEOPLE).

If the Republicans want to do more than talk about shared sacrifices, then they need to quit placing all sacrifices on the poor to middle classes and START REQUIRING some sacrifices (major ones) from the rich and corporations. They caused this mess, they should help pay to clean it. They also have failed to produce the long promised economic benefits from "trickle down" - jobs in foreign lands or that involve asking if I want fries with my food or if I need my retail items gift wrapped don't count as adequate employment and they won't sustain an economy even if the rich and corporations are staying afloat. I'm thinking a good start is a return to Eisenhower era taxes for the upper brackets with sharp penalties for off-shoring jobs OR income...
09:57 AM on 03/15/2011
Ron Paul has offered no sacrifices from the rich?
Do your homework.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Amschler
on the edge
01:22 PM on 03/15/2011
Ron Paul wants to do away with the income tax and the IRS. How is that sacrificing? He wants to implement the so-called "Fair Tax" which is atrociously unfair due to its regressive nature. Then he mentions implementing "consumption" taxes which are, in effect, federal sales taxes are are ALSO regressive. He still hasn't offered any sacrifices from the rich.

Care to try again? Also, care to try making a point without any insults whether open or implied?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Strawley
03:16 AM on 03/15/2011
Their Goal for the last 30 yrs. A GOVERMENT FOR BIG BUSINESS, BUY BIG BUSINESS!!!
Let us wipe out the middle class so its all cheap labor! Screw the poor they must fund for them self!!!!
ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME !!!!!

IS THEIR ANY ONE OUT THERE? WAKE UP, WAKE UP, WAKE UP!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
HELP YOUR FAMILY!!