iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rep. Dennis Kucinich

GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Dennis Kucinich
 

Iraq: Ten Years, a Million Lives and Trillions of Dollars Later

Posted: 10/02/2012 10:51 am

Ten years ago today the debate over the Iraq War came to Congress in the form of a resolution promoted by the Bush administration. The war in Iraq will cost the United States as much as $5 trillion. It played a role in spurring the global financial crisis. Four thousand, four hundred, eighty eight Americans were killed. More than 33,000 were injured.

As many as 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi civilians were killed. The monetary cost of the war to Iraq is incalculable. A sectarian civil war has ravaged Iraq for nearly a decade. Iraq has become home to al Qaeda.

The war in Iraq was sold to Congress and the American people with easily disproved lies. We must learn from this dark period in American history to ensure that we do not repeat the same mistakes. And we must hold accountable those who misled the American public.

On October 2, 2002, the day the legislation to authorize war in Iraq was introduced, I sent and personally distributed a memo to my colleagues in Congress refuting point-by-point every reason given by the Bush administration to go to war.

On October 3, 2002, I held a press conference with 25 Members of Congress and then presented an hour long explanation to Congress on the House Floor, refuting the lies upon which the cause of war was predicated.

It was clear from information publicly available at the time that Iraq did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs), that Iraq had no connection to 9/11, and that Iraq was not a threat to the United States. Anyone who wanted to look could have seen the same information that I did.

Yet some of America's top political leaders bought into the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld drumbeat of war. Two leading Democrats were among those taken in by the White House hype and the WMD argument:

"I believe the facts that have brought us to this fateful vote are not in doubt. Saddam Hussein is a tyrant who has tortured and killed his own people ... [I]ntelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort and sanctuary to terrorists including Al Qaeda members." -- Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), October 10, 2002.
"September 11 was the ultimate wake-up call. We must now do everything in our power to prevent further terrorist attacks and ensure that an attack with a weapon of mass destruction cannot happen. ... the first candidate we must worry about is Iraq... [Saddam Hussein] continues to develop weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear devices." -- Leader of the Democratic Caucus in the House, Richard Gephardt (D-MO), October 10, 2002.

Even the most trusted newspapers around the country blindly repeated as fact grossly incorrect assertions by leaders of both parties.

"No further debate is needed to establish that Saddam Hussein is an evil dictator whose continued effort to build unconventional weapons in defiance of clear United Nations prohibitions threatens the Middle East and beyond." The New York Times, Editorial Board, October 3, 2002.

Notwithstanding the blizzard of disinformation, 133 Members of Congress voted against the resolution that authorized the use of military force in Iraq, including nearly two-thirds of the Democratic Caucus in the House. Seven Republicans, including Ron Paul (R-TX), also voted against the resolution. In the Senate, the vote was 77 to 23 in favor of a war of choice.

Ten years ago Congress voted to wage war on a nation that did not attack us. That decision undermined our fiscal and national security. To this day we are suffering from the blowback. While most of the troops are home, the United States maintains a significant presence in Iraq through the State Department and its thousands of private security contractors.

The war against Iraq was based on lies. Thousands of Americans and perhaps a million Iraqis were sacrificed for those lies. The war in Afghanistan continues. New wars have been propagated in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia pursuant to the never-ending "War on Terror." This mindset puts us at the edge of war against Iran. Ten years and trillions of dollars later, the American people by and large still do not know the truth. It is time to usher in a new period of truth and reconciliation.

 

Follow Rep. Dennis Kucinich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RepKucinich

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
02:17 PM on 10/04/2012
Right on, man. The cold, hard truth is that Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Blair et. al, are plain and simple war criminals and in a rational world would be spending the rest of their lives in jail cells.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
07:26 AM on 10/04/2012
Very good article.Concise and articulate.
People should read this before they vote.
05:38 AM on 10/04/2012
Republicans are bound to lose....

Despite the rhetoric, it's really hard to find a positioning farther right of the one B@rrack 0Bam@ currently has without imploding.
05:35 AM on 10/04/2012
The so called W0T policies ensure that the conflict is not only perpetuated indefinitely, but also expanded.

It's what the M|C wanted.... it's what the M|C got.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
09:23 PM on 10/03/2012
"War on terror" is a funding template for growing the Military Industrial Complex that President Dwight Eisenhower (a Republican!) warned us against.

In these times of austerity, the Pentagon has to lower its expectations. Is it guns or butter?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hls Cvs
04:33 PM on 10/03/2012
This is the American style in spreading "democracy" , this is the new Middle East .Ziobugs
12:11 PM on 10/03/2012
pretty weak article
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
You can't turn the wind so turn the sail.
01:59 AM on 10/04/2012
What part?
09:06 AM on 10/04/2012
the part after the title. it's so easy to look back and criticise. clinton screwed up, and bush never complained, he is a great leader that knows when to get off the stage.
i do like kocinich though as a plain speaker.
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
You can't turn the wind so turn the sail.
03:11 AM on 10/05/2012
No one gets to lie about war, because when you do it's called murder, and that's not a "screw up." It's called treason.
03:34 PM on 10/07/2012
To think that you call BUSH a GREAT leader is scary on many levels.
11:14 AM on 10/03/2012
The American mindset prohibits the people to see the realities of the world around them, When ever I visite the USA I have always been left with the feeling that USA leaves in a glass house, isolated from the realities of the world.
The Lobbies and the corporations pay and choose the majority of the reps, senators as well as the presidents. every fact is manipulated in order to fit the requirements of very powerful individuals.
It is un imaginable how can a truly democratic society permit the individuals and corporations that provoked the crisis walk free with absolutely no responsibility.
As long as an election of a president of a country depends on how much money is spent, hardly any positive change can be detected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neillevine
want to go into waterwheel business
10:41 AM on 10/03/2012
Let us appeal to weak egos and blame the victims
09:38 AM on 10/03/2012
The $750 billion base sticker price Military Industrial Complex needs a reason to exist. If no real threats are on the horizon, some need to be created to keep the war machine oiled. Another $8 billion aircraft carrier is nearing completion which has no purpose, no enemy and is destined to sit in a salt water harbour rusting away while millions of American citizens go hungrey. The hawks all come from States with large military bases or large military contractors who have plenty of money to keep the fiction rolling. America's foreign aid mostly involves selling outdated military hardware to dictators around the world so new stuff can be built here. Insane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
30Taurus
Now is the time and you are the one.
08:44 AM on 10/03/2012
Good Lord Dennis! Must you continually tell the truth so boldly? No wonder you couldn't be nominated!
President Obama's greatest failing, in my opinion, is in the way he genuflects to the neo-con/military-industrial complex on the "war on terror" meme. Ergo, he got in to office.
No one who voted for Mr. Obama did so thinking that he would get us into more of these stupid wars (Libya, Syria) or that he would keep us in Afghanistan. I want to call him "the executioner."
If you're reading this and you voted for Mr. Obama (I did), ask yourself - if you had known that he would increase military spending and cut domestic spending, would you have voted for him?
This country is almost past saving - we've almost past the point where citizen involvement can save us from corporatocracy.
If you read this article and think our current situation sucks, please do everything you can to stop supporting corporations. Localize your economy.
The war on terror is a war for oil. We are killing people so we can drive monster trucks.
Thank you Mr. Kucinich for putting the war on terror into such a clear light.
12:10 PM on 10/03/2012
f & f 30 Taurus . . great blog . . .
08:30 AM on 10/03/2012
Obama has expanded the war and increased aid by billions. He lied to the American people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Anton Bidner
What are you conserving?!?
09:17 AM on 10/03/2012
Expanded Iraq? Are you sure?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Professor Higgins
Israel call on your God not the USA
03:38 PM on 10/03/2012
Tell me genius, if Bush didn't put the US in Afghanistan, How many troops would Obama be managing and ultimately have to return home from Afghanistan?
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
You can't turn the wind so turn the sail.
02:03 AM on 10/04/2012
What the heck does that mean? He kept them there to train their own murderers. What brainiac would allow that to continue?
09:40 AM on 10/07/2012
Bush's largest defense/military budget was $650 billion. Obama's had been well over that last year it reached $721 billion.
SPKen
Anti-war
07:23 AM on 10/03/2012
Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, the only two politicians with a rational foreign policy.
06:46 AM on 10/03/2012
The current system is doomed. Neither Kucinich nor any other elected leader can fix it; the military-industrial complex has grown too large and has a life of its own. Fictional or not, there's a powerful scene in Oliver Stone's film in which Nixon, trying to reach out to anti-war demonstrators at night at the Lincoln Memorial, is confronted with protestors who make him realise the truth:
Young Student: Then what's the point? What's the point of being President? You're powerless!
Richard M. Nixon: [Firmly] No. No, I'm not powerless. Because, because I understand the system, I believe I can, uh, I can control it. Maybe not control it totally, but tame it enough to make it do some good.
Young Student: Sounds like you're talking about a wild animal.
Richard M. Nixon: Yeah, maybe I am.
09:39 PM on 10/04/2012
Yes, the word wild animal fits squarely when talking about private sector taking control over the government. No body can control it. Instead, they control the government which in my humble opinion, it is what happens in the USA. Both private sector and government should work together in the interest of a society. I am aware that only a striving society could afford a government who could care about the people.But that is not possible when private sector is leading the government because they are just focused, as business oriented as they are, in the profit of their own business. they don't care about the social effect of what they do. It would seem there is divorce between society business social roles. if the government has no ground to stand on, certainly it can not carry out any social program. I don't think that it could be possible in a society where just a few grow richer and richer while the vast majority gets dipper and dipper into the muds of poverty. If the government in its leading role can not create opportunities for those who are already trapped in poverty, they will stay forever in that condition as if they had been cursed. If there are not such opportunities for those living in such conditions they will do anything to survive in the first place, I mean anything, and get out of that situation. Continue...
09:41 PM on 10/04/2012
.....That could be the common grown for crime to be born. A baby born in a family living in such a condition would be like doomed to have such a fate for the rest of his life.The only way to avoid that is by the government creating opportunities for those people to take an active part in the social development make a decent living and be accepted and respected in the community. One man, not even the president can do that, but the people, aware of the society they are living in and a willing to make it better, yes, they can. Yes American people can do it and they, like any other people on this earth deserve it. I loved Michel Obama's speech at the Democrats Convention Center, specially when she said something like ... when you go through the door of success you don't slam it shut behind you, you reach back and help others to be as successful as you are... Open your eyes America!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SoCalDan
42 Million >> 24 Million
03:45 AM on 10/03/2012
Thank you Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Powell for lying to the world and causing this utter and dispicable atrocity. You should all be in jail for what you did.
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
You can't turn the wind so turn the sail.
02:05 AM on 10/04/2012
...and Obama should have put them there, but he didn't.
05:40 AM on 10/04/2012
Key point many are unwilling to accept....

The lesser of two evils is still an evil

fnf...