iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rep. Dennis Kucinich

GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Dennis Kucinich
 

NDAA Authorizes War Against Iran

Posted: 05/17/2012 12:04 pm

This week, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to Iran. The first undermines a diplomatic solution with Iran and lowers the bar for war. The second authorizes a war of choice against Iran and begins military preparations for it.

H.Res.568: Eliminating the Most Viable Alternative to War

The House is expected to vote on H.Res. 568. Read the resolution. Section (6) rejects any United States policy that would rely on efforts to contain a nuclear weapons-capable Iran. Section (7) urges the President to reaffirm the unacceptability of an Iran with nuclear-weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to Iranian enrichment.

This language represents a significant shift in U.S. policy and would guarantee that talks with Iran, currently scheduled for May 23, would fail. Current U.S. policy is that Iran cannot acquire nuclear weapons. Instead, H. Res. 568 draws the "redline" for military action at Iran achieving a nuclear weapons "capability," a nebulous and undefined term that could include a civilian nuclear program. Indeed, it is likely that a negotiated deal to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and to prevent war would provide for Iranian enrichment for peaceful purposes under the framework of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty with strict safeguards and inspections. This language makes such a negotiated solution impossible.

At the same time, the language lowers the threshold for attacking Iran. Countries with nuclear weapons "capability" could include many other countries like Japan or Brazil. It is an unrealistic threshold.

The Former Chief of Staff of Secretary of State Colin Powell has stated that this resolution "reads like the same sheet of music that got us into the Iraq war."

H.R. 4310: Authorizing War Against Iran and Preparing the Military for it

While H. Res. 568 undermines our diplomatic efforts and lowers the bar for war, H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 begins military preparations for war. Section 1221 makes military action against Iran a U.S. policy. Section 1222 directs our armed forces to prepare for war.

SEC. 1221. DECLARATION OF POLICY.

(a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:

(2) At the same time, Iran may soon attain a nuclear weapons capability, a development that would threaten United States interests, destabilize the region, encourage regional nuclear proliferation, further empower and embolden Iran, the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, and provide it the tools to threaten its neighbors, including Israel.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), as well as U.S. and Israeli intelligence, have all agreed that Iran does not currently have a nuclear bomb, is not building a nuclear weapon and does not have plans to do so. Both U.S. and Israeli officials also agree that a strike on Iran would only delay their nuclear program and actually encourage them to pursue a nuclear weapon.

Sustained, diplomatic engagement with Iran is the only way to ensure transparency and prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. Rejecting or thwarting any inspections-based deal we are currently seeking with Iran, even when analysts are expressing guarded optimism that a near term deal is achievable, makes pre-emptive military action against Iran more likely.

(7) In order to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the United States, in cooperation with its allies, must utilize all elements of national power including diplomacy, robust economic sanctions, and credible, visible preparations for a military option.

Pursuing these non-diplomatic options, contrary to popular myth, does not help negotiations. U.S. policy toward Iran for the last three decades has primarily taken the form of economic sanctions, threats and isolation. None of these things has created meaningful change in the behavior of the Iranian government or achieved the transparency we seek. In fact, history has demonstrated that sanctions often preclude war; they do not prevent it. Sanctions hurt the same ordinary Iranians that we claim to support, and undermine their efforts to encourage democratic change in their country. Threatening military action against Iran can only undermine sensitive and critical diplomatic negotiations that could be our last chance to achieve the transparency and cooperation we seek from the Iranian government.

(8) Nevertheless, to date, diplomatic overtures, sanctions, and other non-kinetic actions toward Iran have not caused the Government of Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program.

The United States, IAEA and Israel have all publically recognized that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. In a January 2012 interview on CBS' Face the Nation, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta stated unequivocally that Iran is not trying to build a nuclear weapon. This clause further ignores that the U.S. and Iran have barely engaged in direct negotiations. Prior to last month's negotiations, the U.S. and Iran had only engaged in 45 minutes of direct talks since 2009.

(b) Declaration of Policy- It shall be the policy of the United States to take all necessary measures, including military action if required, to prevent Iran from threatening the United States, its allies, or Iran's neighbors with a nuclear weapon.

This is an authorization for the use of military force against Iran. It ignores the warnings of both current and former U.S. top military brass who have spoken in opposition to the use of military force against Iran, including former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. A February 2012 poll demonstrated that less than 20% of the Israeli public supports an Israeli strike on Iran if approved by the United States. Congress must avoid the same mistakes it made in the Iraq war and reject any language that can be construed as authorizing war against Iran.

SEC. 1222. UNITED STATES MILITARY PREPAREDNESS IN THE MIDDLE EAST.

Section 2 (A) pre-positioning sufficient supplies of aircraft, munitions, fuel, and other materials for both air- and sea-based missions at key forward locations in the Middle East and Indian Ocean;

(B) maintaining sufficient naval assets in the region necessary to signal United States resolve and to bolster United States capabilities to launch a sustained sea and air campaign against a range of Iranian nuclear and military targets, to protect seaborne shipping, and to deny Iranian retaliation against United States interests in the region;

(D) conducting naval fleet exercises similar to the United States Fifth Fleet's major exercise in the region in March 2007 to demonstrate ability to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and to counter the use of anti-ship missiles and swarming high-speed boats.

A plain reading of these provisions in H.R. 4310 taken together with H.R. 568 makes it clear: Congress is setting the stage for war with Iran.

 

Follow Rep. Dennis Kucinich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RepKucinich

FOLLOW POLITICS
This week, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to Iran. The first undermines a diplomatic solution with Iran and lowers the bar for war. The second authorizes a war of choice a...
This week, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to Iran. The first undermines a diplomatic solution with Iran and lowers the bar for war. The second authorizes a war of choice a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 440
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
05:23 PM on 05/22/2012
There is no difference - as the article would like us to think - between the policy of not allowing Iran to attain a nuclear weapon and that of achieving nuclear weapon capability. The latter is generally accepted to mean enrichment of uranium past 20%, at which point one can easily enrich to 95% (bomb grade). If you allowed this to occur, they would not have a nuclear weapon, but could quickly build nuclear bombs in a matter of months. All of the assembly would take place in deeply buried facilities to ensure it could proceed uninterrupted.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
05:06 PM on 05/21/2012
yarden all this talk about bombing them is a ruse. More likely we will switch off all their lights by computer - then walk in. After all these years of bombing things I am sure we have something better. OH GOD I have just given away the secret! Another idea BTW is sending in our soldiers and cross the wires of the centrifugals. I am for them just stopping but I am interested to see whats what.
12:16 PM on 05/26/2012
Whose idea is it to send in the soldiers? What pray tell would be your role in this, Mr Northern Border? I see you seem to know things about kosher stuff in some of your rants. Is it just me, or are you of a certain ethnoreligious persuasion and are hoping to see American boys and girls act a certain way in the Middle East? Is that bigoted and intolerant or is it right on the money??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShinjiIkari
Do you understand how stupid it is to be afraid?
12:06 AM on 05/21/2012
This is just hypocricy, vented by people who still haven't forgiven the seizure of our embassy in Teheran in 1979. Our Fundamentalist fanatics are still riled up against their Fundamentalist fanatics. If our Fundies were at all sincere about nuclear weapon downsizing, they'd start in their own backyard, not go looking for (so far nonexistant) WMDs halfway around the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
05:15 PM on 05/21/2012
Thank you for your optimism. ( JUST btw Kenedy nearly had a WW about bombs in Cuba - do you want us to want less - and wait to see that just maybe you right that they have no WMD aimed at us but simply a sausage maker (kosher)). OK lets wait, you're right. I am trying to think when the USSR said they intended to wipe the US off the face of the earth - maybe your are right they must have.Maybe the Iranians havent - I am confused - tell me what to do quickly. Maybe we are non existant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShinjiIkari
Do you understand how stupid it is to be afraid?
09:09 PM on 05/21/2012
Let's see: Cuba, Russia, North Korea, Iran-if we had gone out full-tilt against these countries who talked smack about nukes but didn't have (a) a bomb and /or (b) a delivery system, how many people would have been killed by our mindless fear?

Cuba didn't have nukes in 63 and doesn't have them now; missiles were en route when Kennedy stopped them, but the missiles were all they had: no nukes ever got to Cuba, which is why it's called the Cuban Missile Crisis, not the Cuban Bomb Crisis.

As for Iraq, Bush knew going in that the intel on Iraq was 5 years old or older (read Bob Woodward's book "State of Denial"). He could claim with a straight face that Iraq had WMD (at some point in the past) because Rumsfeld sold nerve gas to Saddam in 1983 for Reagan. Not one of the WMD leads panned out.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
10:37 PM on 05/20/2012
Fascist monsters.
01:11 AM on 05/20/2012
hi
12:19 AM on 05/20/2012
doesnt US have internal issues then?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:31 AM on 05/21/2012
We can't solves those, so we attack other countries. And since we no longer have a democracy all we can do is whine about it on HuffPo.

Why what does your country do? You mean this isn't normal?
12:18 AM on 05/20/2012
they authorize war, they wage war and we all stare at them doin nothing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yarden
Tel Aviv dude
09:34 PM on 05/19/2012
Minor infraction in the article. The author states that the IAEA, US and Israeli intelligence all agree that Iran "Does not have a bomb, is not making a bomb and has no plans of making a bomb." This maybe the opinions of US Intelligence ( Which has been reliable in the past 20 years in the middle east, right) But this is not the case.

All 3 agree there is no current bomb, but IAEA and Israel agree that they have plans on making a bomb and possibilities of constructing currently. The IAEA has not been satisfied with Iran's lack of cooperation of revealing their program in full transparency, so how can IAEA assume anything? Israeli intelligence with its stellar record, knows what Iran has violated and what Iran is doing. And Israel will decide if it needs to act Iran for its national security or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dogpaddle47
Cui Bono
11:33 PM on 05/20/2012
You see, Israel has developed this mind-reading ray-gun and they sent a man into Iran (he was blessed by Messiah Bibi first) to point the gun at every Iranian nuclear worker.
And, don't you see, Mosaad also knows exactly what Iran is doing wrong and everything else they are doing.

It's so clear that the miraculously "stellar" Israelis should be running everything in the Middle East.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:37 AM on 05/21/2012
The former head of Mossad says that is not the case. As does the last PM.

The US is required to defend Israel. Israel knows the US will jump in. It's not really up to them, then if they attack. Because they cannot finish the job, and they know it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yarden
Tel Aviv dude
12:18 PM on 05/21/2012
There is to much contradicting articles. The only figures who say its not the case are only ex PM's and EX' chiefs. You will find not one soul in Israel that says living with a nuclear armed Iran is acceptable. Journalist can't report this, the only people in the world who know about if to attack or not are the Israeli government leaders.

US is not required to defend Israel. An airstrke on nuclear facilities does not equate war, it will just be a proxy war through hezzbollah and hamas. Israel has finished the job all by themselves since 1948. You should be thanking the Israeli's for bombing the Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors, which good ole US intelligence failed to predict.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
05:29 PM on 05/21/2012
The head of the mossad NEVER NEVER said that. He said wait.
08:22 PM on 05/19/2012
Iraq and Afghanistan are the cover. The prize is and always has been Iran. Think about it. Why wage war the nations surrounding Iran. We need our military assets close by. The question is why Iran? And trust me when I tell you it is not the oil. Israel is the scapegoat. We are using Israel, not the other way around. Don't let the media shape your thoughts. It is not about democrat or republican. You can blame Bush you can blame Obama. They too are scapegoats. The president will always get all of the praise or all of the blame. Learn to live off of the land. Hunting, fishing and growing your food is crucial to know. You can buy gold and silver all you want but unless it is in your possession, you do not own anything. In a time of a global war all of your assets will probably be taken. Again, the question is why Iran?
05:40 PM on 05/20/2012
You get it.

Why do YOU think we'd go to war with Iran? I'd really like to hear your answer.
11:31 PM on 05/20/2012
I am still researching the answer to that question. Why go to war for their oil when we can drill for our own oil. Read this.

http://www.grandmabecky.com/2011/01/politics-and-government/us-oil-in-the-ground-more-than-all-the-middle-east-put-together/.

http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/378870_315387018489546_196601040368145_1238414_1480575092_n.jpg

Iran has other resources besides oil that is worth much more than oil. Here is an article from 2004. http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html

http://antiwar.com/hirsch/?articleid=7861

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/policy/dod/jp3_12fc2.pdf

This might also be the reason. http://batr.org/view/012912.html

What do you think?
01:55 AM on 05/22/2012
I like your question and a study of history would be beneficial. Who ruled where, when and how? Iranian nationalism vs. Arab tribalism and their susceptibility to influence and internal power struggle should be subjects of interest. Resources and geopolitical atmosphere should be considered. And last but not least…each Nation/Ethnicity/Culture’s identity vs. Faith/Islam. I’ll give you a hint, ask an Egyptian what is he first, second and third, an Egyptian, an Arab or a Muslim? Let’s make sure we differentiate between Arabs and Arab-speakers and Iranians are of course Persian. The British had a strategy of starving the Persians and feeding the Arabs. To keep people under control, you starve intellect and fuel personal greed.
capn moose
Retired reading ranting
12:11 PM on 05/19/2012
To this day I cannot understand why the United States continues to pursue an imperialistic war-centered policy in the Mideast. With Saudi Arabia we have maintained good relations primarily by buying as much oil as they can pump, we being the U.S. and the rest of the Westen democracies acting through the multi-national petroleum companies. In Iran we sent in the CIA to topple a democratically elected government and placed the "Shah" on the Peacock Throne then enabled him to enslave his own people. Why -- oil companies feared Iran might not go along with them. When that nutball but charismatic Muslim imam dethroned the Shah, well we funded Saddam Husseim to fight against Iran -- this encouraging Saddam to later invade Kuwait, a no-no to the Saudis and the oil companies, so we attacked a country, Iraq, that could not have hurt the U.S. if it tried. Now, we go after Iran with "war" policies, threats, sanctions. Okay America, how many of your brave sons and daughters do you want to die on the sands of Iran? That is the real question.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dogpaddle47
Cui Bono
12:27 PM on 05/19/2012
The answer is that it doesn't matter. Israel and Corporate America could not care less how many die so long as their agendas succeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yarden
Tel Aviv dude
09:38 PM on 05/19/2012
Dogpaddle47 continues his quest to forsaken the name of Israel in every post, pending that the original author even had the country of Israel in mind. Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism which usually come hand and hand, has been a growing problem in recent years, as it takes away from the current dangers in hand. Dogpaddle47 continues to add no contribution to solving the conflict, as long as its blaming Israel and Israel being removed from the middle east.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:45 AM on 05/21/2012
Israel doesn't have that much power. C'mon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yarden
Tel Aviv dude
09:39 PM on 05/19/2012
A joint strike with Israel on Iran's nuclear facilities has nothing to do with deploying troops in Iran.
capn moose
Retired reading ranting
10:58 PM on 05/20/2012
Yarden: A) The U.S. has no legitimate right to attack Iran; B) We have nuclear wreapons and Iran is just as much a sovereign nagtion with the same rights as the United States, but you are not suggesting it is OK for some nation to strike at us to erase our nclear stockpile or capabilities; C) Since we have troops all over the world, and more so in Afghanistan and Iraq plus units in Saudi Arabia, to think we would not send in troops is worse than wishful thinking; D) If we join in strike against Iran, the Russians and the Pakistanis, both with nuclear stockpiles might just consider it is time to unleash them on their enemies -- and that includes the U.S.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:47 AM on 05/21/2012
They fought Saddam Hussein for a decade and lost half a million of their men.

They don't just take it from countries who invade/attack them.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
12:07 PM on 05/19/2012
11 years of war and carnage is not enough? The time to leave Afghanistan was yesterday. War with Iran over what they are not doing is absurd. Another WEar in another Islamic Country is not what the US needs to be doing and hypocritical Israel is the last one to talk, as they developed nuclear weapons in secret and eshcew thew NPT unlike the Iranians.

(Reuters) - The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/30/world/middleeast/chances-of-iran-strike-receding-us-officials-say.html?_r=2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:51 AM on 05/21/2012
Every day one soldier dies and 18 vets/soldiers take their own life.

They have a 25% unemployment rate and some of the highest rates of mental disabilities we've ever seen in ANY population.

Can the Military go on strike?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
05:48 PM on 05/21/2012
> Can the Military go on strike?

No. But they can take over. It’s called a Junta. faved. cheers
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
05:36 PM on 05/21/2012
which if true WE went through 3 serious wars without a peep
I dont mind if Switzerland has a 1000 bombs but shudder if Iran gets one. Not only for me/ CAN YOU GRAP THIS SUCH EASY TO UNDERSTAND SITUATIOIN
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
05:52 PM on 05/21/2012
The hypocritical Israelis scream the loudest about which they themselves are guilty. Developing nuclear weapons in secret and not signing the NPT. Israel is a rouge nuclear nation with an avowed first strike without warning policy.They have done it before and will do it again. They have promised to attack Iran.

Not hard to understand at all.
06:15 AM on 05/19/2012
And once the war starts with all the chaos in Europe + debt in the US you know what? Gold will skyrocket. Buy as it is still legal to do so. Check latest prices of gold and silver daily in 26 currencies updated every 2 minutes (except for weekends) at www.sh1ny.com. Thanks for tuning in!
capn moose
Retired reading ranting
12:12 PM on 05/19/2012
Yeah and you will sell gold on the fear. Gold and silver prices are falling right now, but gee, if we can just get another war scare going then you can cash in. Patriotism, yeah, sure, great.
04:49 PM on 05/19/2012
I'm not precious metals dealer. Yes, I make money on the Google ads on the site, but I don't sell precious metals. I provide price and yes you can see on my website that it's been going down. I started buying in 2007 and yes in 2009 it lost about 40% too. Just to go even more to the upside. I'm not creating or causing fear. The politicians and media are. And the reality itself isn't too nice as well. I started protecting myself in 2007 and can't complain. Gold and silver are just like insurance. It's common sense to have it. And sure when you watch life insurance ads or commercial you may also have an argument that they 'cash in on scare'. Not really. They cash in on facts of life. Read this article you are commenting underneath. Fact: we are going to war with Iran. Scary? Hell, yes it is! Am I spreading this information? No, it's media reporting on US Government actions. Is it just common sense to buy Precious Metals based on this information? Hell yes!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Mercy
In war, truth is the first casualty.
11:53 AM on 05/21/2012
If Iran disrupts the oil trade, gold will go up.
12:22 AM on 05/19/2012
We made this commercial to raise awareness about the alarming implications of the NDAA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muKDyL-FK98
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
07:49 PM on 05/18/2012
Certain sewage in Congress, the same ones who ducked war when it was their opportunity to serve the country, are now war lovers. Why? (1) because they get their bribes from United Technologies and General Dynamics. (2) because their sons and daughters have no draft to force them to go to war and have some come home in body bags. That is reserved for the poor of this once great nation. So, this sewage has no problem in keeping wars going so they can get richer while people who don't vote for their anti-American agenda die and they don't have to worry about these people voting against them in the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stockton jeff
12:35 AM on 05/19/2012
Don't forget Israel has its proxies deep in the pockets of our congress. They are the major reason we are having this discussion
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yarden
Tel Aviv dude
09:43 PM on 05/19/2012
Stockton Jeff clarifies his position of being Anti-Israel with the comment above, as the original poster has no mention of Israel at all. Jeff then accuses of Israel of having "proxies" which the term is out of context to go "deep in the pockets of congress." Ofcourse Jeff, makes no clarifications about Saudi hush money floating around congress and obsessive Arab lobbying of an US strike on Iran.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
07:49 PM on 05/20/2012
Correct, Jeff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cory Gudwin
examine thyself before blaming the system
02:37 PM on 05/18/2012
How to deal with Irans weapons program is Israels choice alone.
Outside opinion, especially that of foreign Leftists who have always been very hostile to Israel, is mostly worthless.
If Israel feels it is pushed against a wall because of new developments in Iran, it will attack the nuclear sites.
Such an attack will not ignite a world war nor involve anything other than conventional weapons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KJ Pierson
06:44 PM on 05/18/2012
Exactly. If Israel wants to take out the nuclear sites, they will and no one will stop them. They'll get a stern letter in public from everyone, and pats on the back and more support in private. Neither of which the really care about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cory Gudwin
examine thyself before blaming the system
10:51 PM on 05/18/2012
Exactly. Just as the other attacks on nuclear facilities, there will be terse condemnation in the UN and then handshakes from the same members in private. Particularly in this case, as most of the worlds Muslims harbor strong negative feelings towards the Shia [for reasons I have never fully grasped.]
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
10:39 PM on 05/20/2012
We could stop them and we ought to. And if we don't then we are complicit.

This country is turning into the hub of an axis of evil. A real axis of evil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stockton jeff
12:39 AM on 05/19/2012
Seems your to young to be around in 1973 when OPEC boycotted us because we supported Israel and their stubborn resistence to give back the Sinai. It cost this country a 19 month recession and gas prices went up 110%. Look for this to happen if Israel attacks Iran. I am not looking foward to long lines at the pump like we had in 1973 and a double dip recession
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cory Gudwin
examine thyself before blaming the system
10:36 AM on 05/19/2012
You are forgetting that Arabs depise Iran. This will have no more impact on oil than the temporary loss of Iraqi oil caused, which was very little.