At her campaign celebration last night in Ohio, Hillary Clinton
raised the specter of a nasty, divisive fight at the Democratic
National Convention, claiming that she should be the party's nominee
based on her big state victories, rather than on the pledged-delegate
count. It was a slick and sophisticated attempt to change the rules
in the middle of the game and declare herself the winner.
She said, "You all know that if we want a Democratic president, we
need a Democratic nominee who can win the battleground states just
like Ohio. And that is what we've done." Then, she listed the states
she "won," boldly including Florida and Michigan in the litany.
Weeks before her boast, Julian Bond, the Chairman of the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and one of my
heroes, penned a letter to DNC Chair Howard Dean noting that he is
"deeply concerned" about the "will and intent of the Florida and
But, both Clinton and Bond leave several important facts off the
First, the rules. They were known and agreed to by everyone
involved, well before the first votes were cast in Iowa. All the
campaigns, including the Clinton campaign, pledged to honor the
"early window" that included only four states: Iowa, New Hampshire,
Nevada and South Carolina. Enforcement of the primary timing rule
against Florida and Michigan was necessary to prevent the 2008
nominating calendar from falling into chaos. Moreover, a decision to
overturn this action by the DNC could destroy our nominating process
for 2012 and future years, as states realize that there will be no
penalty for violating the primary timing rule.
Second, the DNC's Rules Bylaws Committee gave both Florida and
Michigan a full and fair hearing, plus an open and transparent vote,
and their efforts to "jump to the head of the line" were soundly
defeated. No other state party organization or Rules Committee
members supported them. None of the campaigns--including the Clinton
campaign, which is very well represented on the Rules Committee--spoke
up for the principle of allowing Florida and Michigan to go ahead of
Third, the new 2008 primary calendar was painstakingly worked out for
the very purpose of increasing early voting diversity. Along with
Iowa and New Hampshire, most Democrats agreed that both Latinos and
African Americans should be added to the early voting equation.
Adding Nevada and South Carolina to the early calendar increased
regional and racial diversity while protecting the grassroots, small
state nature of the early primary process. The DNC was right to
protect these two states from encroachment in the calendar by Florida
Fourth, since there was no campaigning in either Florida or Michigan,
and neither the names of Obama nor Edwards even appeared on the
Michigan ballot, the idea that the votes cast there represent "the
will and intent" of the people is nonsense. We must not allow the
uncontested primaries in Florida and Michigan to "nullify" the will
of the large mass of voters in all of the hotly-contested primaries
and caucuses around the country where the candidates did campaign and
the voters had the chance to meet the candidates, ask questions, hear
their message and make an informed decision on who would be the best
nominee for the Democratic Party.
Finally, I want to be clear that this is a disagreement between the
DNC and the Florida and Michigan State Democratic Parties. This is
not--and should not become--an argument between Senator Obama and the
voters of Florida or Michigan. Senator Obama will reach out to the
voters in Florida and Michigan as the presidential nominee of our
Party, and will work hard to carry these two important states for
Democrats in the November election.
Congressman Jackson is serving his seventh term in the US House and
is a National Co-Chairman of the Obama for President Campaign.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.