More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rep. Jim McDermott

Rep. Jim McDermott

Posted: May 4, 2010 11:09 AM

Some Surprising News About "Crack Babies"

What's Your Reaction:

In 1965, New York State pioneered an innovative effort to encourage the adoption of children out of foster care. New York recognized that children with special needs within the foster care system generally languished in care and faced severe barriers to adoption. Attempting to overcome some of these barriers, and acknowledging the unusual and long-term costs of caring for special needs children, the state began to offer incentive payments to encourage their adoption. Because this practice enabled many loving families to adopt children they otherwise could not care for, it was embraced by many jurisdictions. This practice was codified in federal law in the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980.

The passage of the Adoption Assistance Act was especially well-timed. In the late 1980s, this country experienced unprecedented social and economic crises. Homelessness, which began primarily among individuals who were part of the de-institutionalization process, spread to entire families with children. We also saw the explosion of the drug epidemic, which included a boom in the use of crack-cocaine, cocaine, PCP, and other drugs. This epidemic not only destabilized individuals, it also endangered families with children and entire communities. "Crack baby" became a common phrase in our language, and, increasingly, women abandoned their babies in hospitals. "Crack babies" were sensationalized by the media and written off while still infants. These babies were in for "a life of certain suffering, of probable deviance, of permanent inferiority," according to columnist Charles Krauthammer. Well, these children are coming into adulthood now, and a recent Washington Post article sheds light on just where and how we got it wrong. What it doesn't point out is where we got it right.

The Washington Post followed some of these so-called "crack babies" and, among notable findings, "(I)n the two decades that have passed since crack dominated drug markets in the District and around the nation, these babies have grown into young adults who can tell their stories -- and for the most part, they are tales of success."

In the 1980s and 90s, the media warned that these children would grow into "superpredators." Presumably, then, we now should be seeing marked increases in crime rates across the country and particularly here in DC, which is among a list of cities with the highest rates of infant abandonment in the late 80s and 90s. But, The Post reported, "The national violent crime rate in 2008, the last year for which data are available, hit its lowest level since 1972, when the Bureau of Justice Statistics began its annual survey. According to FBI data for the District, from 1990 to 2008, murders dropped from 472 to 186, rapes from 303 to 186, and robberies from 7,365 to 4,154."

What explains these figures? What has enabled many of these supposedly doomed children to avoid the grim futures that supposedly awaited them? One significant answer comes from a legislative milestone: the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, legislation that helped lower-income families to adopt children out of the foster care system and to address the special and ongoing needs those children frequently carried. We have learned through decades of experience that when children in the foster care system are adopted into safe and loving homes, their outcomes improve markedly. And society at large shares those benefits.

In the decades since passage of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, the foster care and child welfare systems have confronted adult epidemics, including HIV/AIDS and substance abuse, that affect the long- and short-term well-being of children. These efforts have succeeded in increasing the number of children adopted out of foster care. Nonetheless, an alarming number of young adults continue to ''age out'' of the foster care system (nearly 30,000 in 2008) without finding a permanent family and the love, security, and stability that comes with it. These numbers, and the profound needs they represent, compel us to redouble our efforts to reduce barriers to adoption. The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 and the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 both committed new resources to kinship care, adoption, and assistance for older youth in foster care.

Recently, the District of Columbia seized a crucial opportunity offered by federal child welfare law and enacted emergency legislation allowing adoptive parents and legal guardians to receive the same assistance as foster parents, until the youth in their care turn 21. Prior to this change, adoptive parents and legal guardians could receive assistance only until a child in their care turned 18, thereby creating a cruel disincentive to forge a permanent, legal bond to children. The extended assistance confirms what many of us have long known: children are not magically independent once they turn 18 nor are they self-sufficient when they turn 21. They still need help from loving parents and permanent, legal guardians.

The child welfare system must respond to constant change within our complex society, and policymakers continually must seek solutions that offer improved outcomes for children. Encouraging the adoption of older youth and children with special needs furthers the vision of foster care as a temporary arrangement, not a long-term solution. When family reunification is not in a child's best interest, kinship care and adoption are critical to establishing lifelong family connections. Foster children, like all children, deserve no less than a safe, loving, and permanent home.

 

Follow Rep. Jim McDermott on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RepJimMcDermott

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momcat54
04:54 PM on 05/05/2010
I taught school for more than thirty years, most of it in Alternative Ed. This means I dealt with a lot of children in foster care. In our small town we had three different "homes" Presbyterian, Baptist and the state of Texas and myriad of foster care situations. Many of them were crack babies , a huge influx in the late eighties, but there was alcohol and other drugs and a variety of hearthbreaking circumstances envolved. These children so wanted love and homes and parents . They were often battered both physically and emotionally harmed in ways you cannot begin to imagine. My husband and I brought home and adopted one and I wish we could have taken more , as teachers with three bio kids we couldn't take as many as I wanted and I wanted so many. However adoption is a hard process . It isn't easy to take an older child a damged child and the state does not make it any easier. I am glad to see people like Sandra Bullock who adopt but she got that perfect newborn It is the older children who also need love and help and hope.
09:08 PM on 05/04/2010
This is probably one of the most important articles on Huffpost today, but it doesn't have the flash to rate more than three comments so far.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
05:58 PM on 05/04/2010
We have a number of unofficial fosterlings that came to us in late teens. Most are doing well, but they have been expensive; better support is a win-win situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Solja
05:42 PM on 05/04/2010
I agree wholeheartedly with you. Thank you for caring!