More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Social Security Doublespeak

What's Your Reaction:

Social Security is a lifeline for millions of Americans. It is one of our proudest historical achievements, this promise from one generation to the next that we will care for those who came before us. Last week we celebrated Social Security's 75th anniversary, and in commemoration I stood with House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman, Sandy Levin, and signed the Medicare Pledge. In doing this, I committed to oppose all efforts to privatize Social Security, divert any funds to private investment accounts, or cut benefits -- a promise I did not make lightly.

The day after I signed this pledge, my opponent, former banking lobbyist Steve Stivers, announced that he also opposes privatizing Social Security. You know, it would be great if this were true, but it's just one more example of political doublespeak -- saying one thing to the public and another when you don't think anyone else is listening.

To tell Steve Stivers to take an honest stand on Social Security, click here.

The truth is, Stivers' campaign is being bankrolled by organizations that have waged a ten year crusade to destroy Social Security: the National Federation of Independent Business -- which Karl Rove praised as "walking hand-in-hand with the Bush Administration" -- and Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform. These groups are working overtime to make sure that their friend Steve goes to Washington, and we all know that when it's time to vote, they're going to call in their favors.

Former banking lobbyist Stivers knows the rules of this game. He played it himself for years. But this year these ties aren't going to go unnoticed -- and we won't let him get away with trading away our safety net in dimly-lit rooms.

There is a way for Steve to show Ohio voters that he is being honest about protecting their Social Security benefits. If he really stands with the people of Ohio, as he says he does, he needs to cut the financial strings tying him to these right-wing special interests that are threatening our families and senior citizens. Otherwise, this is just one more round of political games.

You can join us in calling for Steve Stivers to take an honest stand on Social Security and return the NFIB and Americans for Tax Reform's campaign contributions by clicking here.

Thanks for your support.

Mary Jo Kilroy
Representing Ohio's 15th Congressional District

 

Follow Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MaryjoKilroy

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:02 AM on 09/27/2010
Outrageous... Congresswoman Kilroy presumes to lecture Steve Stivers about misrepresenting his position on Social Security, while running campaign ads which misrepresent the Fair Tax plan.

Specifically, the ad points out that mortgage interest deductions are eliminated - that would be the mortgage interest deduction from your income ta...x, WHICH ALSO WOULD BE ELIMINATED. The ad is, in other words, complaining about a deduction from a tax which would no longer exist!

Just to be clear, I am NOT a proponent of the Fair Tax plan - I would prefer a flat income tax. But Congresswoman Kilroy is throwing a proverbial brick while living in a glass house, and should withdraw this ad.
08:33 PM on 08/22/2010
The problem with this country is that no one really does what is right, they do what is right for themself. The reality of what should be done for Social Security is that everyone needs to sacrifice, not just certain group. My plan is as follows: (1) Everyone currently receiving beneifts should have them cut by at least 5%, period, they are part of the group that got us into this mess and they need to participate in saving the program (2) The retirement age needs to be raised immediately for anyone that think that he or she is retiring in the next 5 years, it just became the next 6 years and it needs to be gradually increased to at least 70 years old (3) The cap on social security needs to be raised to all wages earned, but not at 6.2%, the incremental rate should be 0.5% for all wages above $106,800. Note that this is on all wages. (4) For those people that are retired that have annual retirement income greater than a very wealthy number- let's say $400,000 for married filing jointly and $250,000 for an individual then for every dollar of retirment income over that number they lose $1 in social security. Therefore, if you are an individual and your retirment income is more than approximately $275,000 per year, you get no social security period.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
02:52 PM on 08/18/2010
2 billion dollar a week war.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
02:52 PM on 08/18/2010
Don't even discuss social security as long as we have a 2 billion dollar war in Afghanistan and for what?
That money alone could save us. Raising the ceiling on social security is also an option - use it!
And if our brilliant minds in Washington don't know how to work it then go back to the source where it was adopted from, the Germans. Enough said.