iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Patrick Murphy

GET UPDATES FROM Patrick Murphy
 

Veterans Are Vital Part of the '47 Percent'

Posted: 09/20/2012 7:57 am

After hearing Romney's private comments this week about the 47 percent of Americans he isn't reaching out to, is it any surprise that he failed to even mention those serving in Afghanistan during his acceptance speech?

When Mitt Romney said he wasn't concerned about the "47 percent" of the country who pay no federal income taxes -- describing them as "victims" who fail to take "personal responsibility" for their lives -- he again showed he lacked an understanding that 61 percent of them already pay taxes. But what about the sacrifices our men and women in uniform make for the country they love?

Included in the half of America that Mitt Romney dismissively wrote off while standing in front of wealthy donors, were seniors, students, and people with disabilities -- but also people serving in the military. That's right, the military families with loved ones currently fighting in combat, defending the freedoms that all Americans enjoy regardless of political party. What they earn from their sacrifice and service to our nation isn't something that is just given.

Even more troubling is the fact that yet again, Mitt Romney was caught only providing policy specifics to wealthy donors at a private fundraiser while failing to do the same for the vast majority of the country he is asking to vote for him -- because as his advisers admitted, providing specifics before an election would be suicidal.

In public, all veterans and military families hear from Mitt Romney are empty platitudes, bluster that says more about his lack of foreign policy experience than it does our men and women in uniform, and promises that don't quite line up with his record. As governor, Mitt Romney was not a friend to my fellow veterans. He proposed eliminating hiring preferences for veterans applying for civil service opportunities, and cut veterans' programs by 11% in his first budget.

Many veterans and military families remember quite well the last time Mitt Romney decided to get specific about policies impacting their lives. Again, speaking before a group of wealthy donors at a private fundraiser back in April, Mitt Romney said that as president he'd consider eliminating the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). If Mitt Romney had his way and eliminated HUD altogether, it would undermine tremendous progress that has been made under President Obama's leadership to end veteran homelessness. If Mitt Romney had his way and abolished these services -- where would our nation's heroes turn? What's Mitt Romney's plan to continue the progress we've seen under President Obama in taking care of those who have served our country?

Proposing we get rid of HUD and the work it is doing to combat veterans homelessness as a way to cut spending while maintaining tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires is not only wrong - it's something I think most Americans, especially military families would find offensive. Mitt has suggested privatizing the VA healthcare system, and let's not forget that Romney called bringing our troops home from Iraq "tragic."

President Obama and the First Lady have proven to veterans that they will fight for them. From implementing and expanding the most comprehensive educational benefit for veterans and their family members since the original GI Bill of 1944 to tax credits for businesses that hire unemployed veterans and wounded warriors, President Obama has walked the walk, even for veterans who didn't vote for him in 2008.

Therein lies the difference between a President Obama and a want-to-be President Romney. Upon entering office, President Obama didn't just wash his hands because half of our veterans didn't support him -- he instead did what a president should do and went to work for all of us. He led by example and always had our back.

As a proud Democrat, I don't plan to vote for Mitt Romney. But as a veteran, who risked his life in service to our great country, it saddens me that a person seeking to become commander-in-chief sets out only wanting to represent half the country. After Mitt was one of the biggest cheerleaders for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Mitt was asked if his sons would serve in Iraq or Afghanistan. He replied, "One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I'd be a great president." I'm sorry, Governor Romney, that just doesn't cut it.

One thing I learned in combat is that when it comes to standing up for America, there are no Democratic or Republican values -- just American values. It has to be the same for the commander-in-chief. So when Mitt Romney says he isn't concerned about 47 percent of the country, his words and past actions prove to veterans and military families that his values couldn't be further from those that we all share.

 

Follow Patrick Murphy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PatrickMurphyPA

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:48 PM on 10/04/2012
If Obama cared for veterans like me he would have not changed the law on the GI-Bill that now allows schools to charge out of state tuition to out of state veterans trying to further there education. He left me with the bill of paying the difference and put more burden on the Financial aid system. I signed an obligating contract that my school would be paid for, not that i would have to pay the difference. Thanks Obama. No one cares about Vets.
05:08 AM on 09/23/2012
I don't think Romney (or many others for that matter) realize that a large number of active duty military families not only don't have to pay income taxes, many are on govt assistance. I'm not talking about their healthcare or housing. I'm talking about WIC and foodstamps. I know this firsthand. I remember when I was in the military families needing to go to food banks, or being on foodstamps. Just spoke to a military spouse last weekend who's on WIC. Apparently not much has changed since in the 15 years since I got out. Usually the spouses can't work, especially with all the repeat deployments because of the cost of childcare. What does that say about us as a nation that we don't even pay our military enough to feed their families?

What does that say about our candidates that they have no clue that those they disparage are the ones who are willing to lay down their lives for this country. Romney won't even keep his money in the US for fear of it being taxed too much yet our troops are willing to shed blood for this country and he just dismisses them as freeloaders?

As a veteran he disgusts me, and I pay a much higher effective tax rate than he does.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:10 PM on 09/25/2012
Your CURRENT President made the suggestion when he was running in 2008 Military should pay their own medical bills when they came back. he said, after all they did volunteer. he refused to put his hand on his heart when saying the Pledge...would ware a Flag Pin...He called you Corpsman now where was you disgust at that time....and yes you can google all of the above facts and they are true...

He is NOT talking about the Military in the 47& anymore than talking about me as I am a 47%er too..I know who he's talking about and may I suggest you do more research...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sparrow4
I laugh. I trust. I care. I vote.
07:21 PM on 09/25/2012
No, he did not say that "after all they did volunteer", nor did he say they "should pay their own medical bills".

He did float a stupid cost-cutting idea that those Veterans who had private insurance might be able to use it for service-related injuries. When responses came back such as "Do you not realize what that would do to our rates", and other rightful criticisms, he quickly backed off.

I'm a veteran, and yep, he stepped in it with that. However, his actual RECORD on developing and supporting Veterans programs since then is not applauded enough. And if you want to know how well your representatives in the legislature are supporting Veterans, check out the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) Congressional Report Card at http://iavaaction.org

Your tirades about flag pins and hand positions are red capes to be waved in front of armchair-patriots trying to be the biggest bull in the ring.
photo
JstDarla
Gone Fishing
10:53 AM on 09/21/2012
First off....Mr. Murphy thank you for your service to this country and the fight for our freedoms. As an American not speaking in a political D or R, MR has said some very offensive things to the citizens of this country. As someone who bought up failing companies to make huge profits on, then hides money in off shore banks as to evade taxes, outsourced jobs to other countries, takes loopholes to pay as little in taxes as possible, etc. He is the very thing he is speaking about! Then to be so arrogant as to say his son's jobs are to make daddy president and not serve their country, is beyond words that they will allow me here. Does not seem he has the best interest of this country in mind!
03:23 AM on 09/21/2012
For all the Republican "support our troops" bragging - they don't, and they haven't for quite some time now. I've never understood why anyone in the military can be a Republican supporter. Republicans have done grievous harm to the military for the last 30 years or so. It hasn't always been that way. There was a time when all Presidents and Administrations put politics aside when it came to the military and their families. That started to change with Reagan and has continued in a downward spiral ever since.

The Bush Administration cut aid to military families (I believe more cuts are in Lyin' Ryan's budget as well), and also got rid of a 50+ year law that protected active duty soldier's homes from being foreclosed on. The Republican majority Congress also voted down a bill to raise pay for active duty soldiers, but had no problem paying out thousands a month to people working for Blackwater, Halliburton, CACI, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
centauro962
Under the rising Sun the best leaders serves all.
02:09 AM on 09/21/2012
I thanks Mitt Romney to be totally sincere and showing his true personality, the only credit he gets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mike711l
The universe is laughing at you behind your back
01:53 AM on 09/21/2012
I guess Mitt would rather keep them overseas indefinitely (or at least until he was out of office). That way he would never have to deal with the issue of helping them when they come home.

Romney / Ryan - N E V E R
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mike711l
The universe is laughing at you behind your back
01:48 AM on 09/21/2012
As governor, Mitt Romney was not a friend to my fellow veterans. He proposed eliminating hiring preferences for veterans applying for civil service opportunities, and cut veterans' programs by 11% in his first budget.

On another thread I wondered whether Mitt, if asked about it would go along with the rest of the GOP in the disdain they showed by blocking the veterans jobs bill. I guess he's already answered the question in his policies as governor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mass maritimer
The cake is a lie
03:30 AM on 09/22/2012
That veterans' preference helped me get a civil service position and excellent health care outside the VA for my failing kidneys.
01:01 AM on 09/21/2012
"You didn't build that" and "I'm not concerned about the 47%."

Both quotes spun completely out of context by the other side in an attempt to villify their opponent and make him into what they actually want him to be for their own purposes. It's absurd.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:22 PM on 09/25/2012
carpelibertatem....I am confused by your post...You did't build that ?? Who are you quoting ??
12:03 AM on 09/26/2012
Obama. My point is that both sides take what the other side says and twist it out of context for their own purposes and people on places like the HP just jump on board.
MHT73
words matter
11:20 PM on 09/20/2012
Very, very well said. A slap on the back and a loud 'welcome home' are meaningless if we don't put our money where our mouths are.
markgoode
a voice from the center
09:27 PM on 09/20/2012
Go get 'em Murphy!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47
07:34 PM on 09/20/2012
I am in the 30% tax bracket and pay close to that amount in taxes.
So why do I support President Obama?

Passage of Affordable Care Act
Near-End of the two wars
Other sucesses in domestic, economic and foreign policy endeavors too numerous to mention.

Appalling Romney-Ryan's performance. Examples:

Legacy of Bain Vulture Capitalism
Use of foreign bank accounts to avoid / dodge US taxes
Failure to reveal their 10 years tax returns
Both Republican candidates low tax rates albeit deemed 'legal',
Exposure of Republican talking points as an extension of RIGHT-WING LIES,
Ryan economic plan that's anti middle-class, pro very-rich and markedly increases federal debt.
Blundered foreign policy stands.
Near-certainty of another war(s), starting with Iran
Disgust at the Republican campaign being bought by big money interest groups
Rejection of the "Party of No".

Please feel free to circulate this list to the 1%ers among your family and friends.
DrinkerOfTheRye
Eschew obfuscation
09:57 AM on 09/22/2012
If your in the 30% income tax bracket and pay an effective rate close to that, you are very unusual. Between child, education, mortgage, health care, 401K, state and local tax and sales tax credits and deductions, most in that bracket pay much less. Your either a great American or have a very bad accountant.
05:00 AM on 09/23/2012
If you don't have a home, don't have kids and aren't married it's quite easy to pay the 30% bracket! Especially living in Ca certain careers easily take home over 100k a year. I'm not complaining. Its a first world problem, I use whatever dedications I can, charitable, 401k, etc but still end up paying quite a bit. Again first world problems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:15 PM on 09/25/2012
rtx47 Passage of Affordable Care Act Who's going to pay for it and how ???
Near-End of the two wars..Do you watch World News ??? We are just about to see the Middle East go up in flames....Oh and I am a 47%er..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47
05:40 PM on 09/25/2012
You will see the Mid East go up in flames with Romney in the White House.  Perhaps that is what you want, if you benefited by Bush Cheney administration. Or have you forgotten that period?
 
Are there any more Republican Talking points you want me to to reply?
06:56 PM on 09/20/2012
Go get them Mr Murphy, Next attorney General of PA, Next Governor of PA.
T4Timbuktu
Rich people actually pay the freight
08:32 AM on 09/21/2012
No, actually he lost his primary and isnt on the ballot. The attorney general "candidate" is part of his resume.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbackl
Guns kill people - the rest is rhetoric
06:38 PM on 09/20/2012
The sad thing is that not only does it show how insensitive this man is to so many, but also how poorly he realizes who is in his own base. This includes lots of vet's, seniors and working class in the south and the heartland.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmandaCL
06:36 PM on 09/20/2012
Romney knows who fills the ranks of our military. People who want to find a better life for themselves and their families VOLUNTEER to join the military so that they can get training and educational benefits, such as the GI Bill. He knows that the ranks are not filled with the sons and daughters of the elite rich. These people will not sacrifice their children. They let the poor and the middle class do that. One thing that I do respect the royal family for is that they do put their sons at risk by allowing them to wear a uniform. Do they do the heavy duty fighting like the rest of the British troops? Probably not, but they are there. Romney would never encourage his sons to join the military because he doesn't respect the people who do serve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:19 PM on 09/25/2012
Well John McCains son served, as well as Sara Palin's and many other people in high places have Son's & Daughters in the Military...The Military is NOT all poor folks as you try to spin it..

Obama could stand the Military until he realized he needed their votes !!
04:13 PM on 09/20/2012
It is unfathomable that anyone that heard the "controversial" comments by Romney that doesn't understand that he didn't mean he's not concerned with the 47% that don't pay income taxes but rather he understands that they won't vote for him so he's focusing on the center to win election. This is the greatest malpractice of media I've ever witnessed particularly in a time when Obama's foreign policy and response to actual crisis has been nothing short of a disaster and they have been proven to have been outright lying to the american people.
markgoode
a voice from the center
09:34 PM on 09/20/2012
The crisis could have been a lot worse. He's handling it better than expected. Imo.
photo
blueskyseas
Veni, Vedi, Velcro. I came, I saw, I stuck around
04:56 PM on 09/23/2012
I understood the context of discussing voters that will not vote for him and the need to look toward the middle...but I also heard the contempt in his voice as he repeated, almost word for word, the technically incorrect extreme-conservative meme of the mooching 47%.

If he wasn't pandering to the worst side of his wealthy audience, he would have simply said that there were 47% of the electorate that will stick to Obama, and then go on to talk about the moderates the he should appeal to, and his plans for doing so. Instead he chose to take the lead in sneering at a large group of people.

I feel he was foolish. Did he fail to realize he was speaking about some of his own supporters? Or that he said it in front of the servers, who might record such a famous person, and then share it with their friends and family, all of whom might be part of that 47%?

He missed a chance. Imagine if it went viral for his being so funny, so thoughtful, so well spoken, so intelligent, or ...instead it went viral for talking smack.

Another problem is if you look at the entirety of the speech, the theme of contempt is a recurring one.

To me, the greatest media malpractice is journalism's loss to infotainment, and the lowest common denominator contempt found on both sides of the rumor media.

Strange days, indeed.

Best wishes,
Blueskyseas
11:34 PM on 09/23/2012
I agree it wasn't a good moment for Romney. I disagree as to hearing any contempt in his voice. I heard much more contempt from the president in his 'you didn't build that' speech. And the same thing from Elizabeth Warren who I think Obama was trying to emulate. And not the broken sound bite but the context of the speech. 'I'm amazed when people say they work hard, alot of people work hard'. The tone of that line and the whole speech is of absolute contempt business owners and tax payers.
And this from the man who said in his book that he felt like he was 'behind enemy lines' when he worked in the private sector. I'd also add that his bitter clinger comment was at least equally offensive as Romney's yet the MSM gave him a pass.
You talk said imagine if there was a sound bite about being thoughtful or funny. There are lots of stories about Romneys generousity that are out there that you won't get on HP. I bet you haven't heard the story of the family that had two sons cripled in a car accident and showed up on Christmas Eve with presents and supported them for years after? Or him paying for the food at a veterans hospital for years anonymously. No fanfare no press because that's how he wanted it. There are dozens of stories like that but you didn't even see them at the RNC because if you give for
11:35 PM on 09/23/2012
yourself then that's vanity and not who he is. I believe he will be a great president. I'm sure I didn't change your mind but I hope I made you realize you're only getting one side of the story. Best wishes, Ted