More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Dr. Janet Edwards

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Dr. Janet Edwards

Where Are Our Christian Values in the Debt Ceiling Drama?

Posted: 07/26/11 02:11 PM ET

One of the most deeply held aspirations of the American people is to be the shining city upon the hill, an example of the best that human beings can be in the world. And for many this aspiration stems from an understanding of Scripture and more specifically Jesus' words -- what many of us learned as children in Sunday school.

Jesus built a community laid upon the foundation of loving God and loving one's neighbor. When asked to name the greatest commandment, Jesus drew upon His tradition, responding, "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second it is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'"

What astounded the crowds and antagonized the religious leaders was that Jesus' love clearly included those who had traditionally been cast aside. In other words, Jesus' "we" was all-inclusive.

When we are at our best as a nation, our "we" is also all-inclusive. From "We the people" upon which our nation was founded, to our historic welcome to the immigrant during the Industrial Revolution, when our government took decisive action to help one another in the Great Depression, or when labor and management forged the bountiful expansion after World War II--we have had moments where our history shines in reflecting Jesus' teaching to love our neighbor.

Right now, as the debt ceiling drama unfolds, Americans are at the brink of another could-be historic moment.

At this moment, politicians, most of them Christians, are telling us that we no longer have the money to care for all Americans, including the least among us. That statement has profound moral implications. It contradicts the very moral lessons that we are teaching our children in Sunday school - to love your neighbor as yourself.

The reality is that there is a wide community whose contributions and needs should be taken into account when difficult fiscal choices are made. And there certainly are difficult choices. We simply cannot continue living beyond our means as a nation the way we have, trusting that economic growth will minimize the debt we are passing on to our children in order to have all we want now. Our children do not have a vote or a voice except through us so we need to take special care to include them in our community during these deliberations. We have, indeed, kicked the can down to them for too long (actually since 2001 for you may remember we have a budget surplus in 2000 and were on a path to end our national debt when the Clinton presidency ended).

The either/or world of American politics in general does not help: It's either spending cuts or tax increases, either social or military spending, either Democratic or Republican, either Wall Street or Main Street, either liberals or tea-partiers.

Where is the "we" in all this? Where is the awareness of, let alone love for, our neighbor in all this?

The "we" resides in the faith and will of us, the people, whose most basic impulse is generosity. The temptation of greed, the fear of the stranger, and the illusion of a quick fix do distract us for stretches of time but in the past we have eventually returned to solutions that include us all. We can do that now as well.

Returning to an all inclusive "we" means that the rich among us have got to step up and pay their fair share. When the US has the lowest tax rates for the wealthy of any developed nation, we know there is room for tax increases for those who can make that contribution to our communal life.

Returning to an all-inclusive "we" means government has a role to play. Rather than pulling back during tough economic times, history has taught us, over and over, that the government should play an active role in returning us to economic prosperity. Our government is the best apparatus for the effective embodiment of "we" in a time like this.

And returning to an all-inclusive "we" means old-fashioned organized lifting of the people's voice to our elected officials. The message we need to put into millions of phone calls, emails and text messages is our expectation that they will remember the "we" as they make the tough decisions required of our present times.

Let's reestablish our best insight: There is no they, there is only we. That is the value that should shine from Capitol Hill. Then what to do with the debt and the budget and the deficit will come into focus because we will find a way to love one another -- all of us.

 

Follow Rev. Dr. Janet Edwards on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RevJanetEdwards

 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
soma77
Author, Speaker, Retreat Facilitator
04:48 PM on 07/29/2011
Good article.....................I feel my fellow Christians need to get a faith lift. They are being mis-lead. It is amazing grace that Jesus knocks at their door with the opportunity to help the less fortunate and they refuse to answer it because a Republican minister or priest says it is a trick.
photo
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
02:22 PM on 07/28/2011
I like your essay Rev. My only question is where have all the Christians been? We have been swamped with problems for years now and all I have heard from are the thumpers who condemn anyone to hell who does not agree with their leaden dogma. Why just the other day I was rebuked in the name of Jesus Christ for not believing some of the miserable theology of death that so many holy folks espouse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Thocher
my doG looked in the mirror and saw God
10:02 AM on 07/28/2011
There is no single christian dogma that is embraced by Americans. At the present time politics is dominated by some twisted form of calvinist reconstruction,that relies heavily on the old testement, and disregarding the fundemental teachings of Jesus. While many Americans may claim some involvement in christianity, most dont know the true works of Jesus, but can quote chpater and verse of their religions opinion on sin and damnation. This is why Government needs to have a stricdt prohibition against religion in the public commons. Religion is devisive, purposely, and a base for power and bigotry.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
04:45 PM on 07/27/2011
from your lips to cantor's ears
01:21 AM on 07/27/2011
Lovely thoughts, and a welcome message, but I'm not optimistic.

The "better angels" of American Christians have never been powerfully present in our partisan political battles, even less present in our budgets.

And efforts to shame proud American Christians into ensuring that theiir politics reflect the values they claim to hold haven't really paid off very often.

It's worth continuing the effort to hold American Christians to account for their very un-Christ-like behavior, their economic and political goals, but I'm not optimistic.
12:04 AM on 07/27/2011
-----

I think you made a fundamental mistake in thinking the Bible defines God's expectations for citizens. It does not. It identifies God's expectations of Christians. The Bible also identifies God's expectations of the Church - not government.

-----
06:01 PM on 07/27/2011
How weird then that the bible doesn't mention Christians one single time, and the biblical use of "church" is vastly different from its current meaning. "Government", however, is mentioned over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over. Genesis talks about "government" (in Egypt, more specifically) and Revelation talks about "government". Now then, what were you saying?
05:34 PM on 07/28/2011
-----
perhaps you can provide some scriptures from Genesis where God is giving instructions to the Egyptions on how that governmnet should function as a government and nation.
-----
It seems to me the laws of the Old Testament were given to Israel, God's chosen people, not to every nation. And the New Testament is given to the Christians, followers of Jesus.
-----
12:51 AM on 07/28/2011
HI notwaff, the bible accepts and identifies almost everyone. Consider Romans 2:12-16 where "the law" are religious proscriptions. All the best.
05:24 PM on 07/28/2011
The law only reveals the shortcomings of the believer but the law does not provide the answer to those shortcomings.

Romans 3:20-22 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin. But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe.
04:43 PM on 07/26/2011
As an atheist I have never understood the simultaneous selfishness/greed and Christian faith of the Republicans. Sometimes I feel like I am spreading the word of Jesus when I am talking to them. Empathy, compassion, selflessness... It's very frustrating to witness such hypocrisy. I have no problem with those who live according to the teachings of Jesus, as long as it is genuine. But there is no room for greed and hatred towards the poor. Also Republicans tend to believe in an inherent evil and laziness of people whereas I think people are naturally good natured and will do right if given the chance. There is much anger coming from that side of the aisle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almostlyniceguy
Not young enough to know everything..
10:00 PM on 07/26/2011
Absolutely correct. The hypocrisy is mind-boggling.
08:04 AM on 07/27/2011
as an atheist, perhaps the obvious answers are the ones you cannot see, but clearly there is a wide distance between those who preach about being Christian and those who practice it.

In my experience, the more vocal the conservative republican the less Christ-like they are.
photo
michelesda
My micro-bio is empty.
03:56 PM on 07/26/2011
The writer seems to think that politics ought to be shaped according to Christian values. She's got the cart pulling the horse, talking as if culture were a Christian phenomenon, rather than Christianity being a cultural phenomenon.
03:27 PM on 07/26/2011
The realty is 99.8% of all politicians regardless of political affiliation are christian in name only. To think otherwise is folly. Being a christian wins votes. Being a buddhist does not. It's simple. Politicians say what we want to hear and do what they want when in office. Let's not be naive about true motive. Beggers generally speaking do not vote.
03:27 PM on 07/26/2011
Thank you for saying with intelligence and conviction that which I have been trying to say for years. Not only about the debt ceiling but the health care bill and the homeless programs. what people consider entitlement programs is more the government doing for those who can not...“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’Matthew 25:39-41 Jesus healed the the sick and fed the multitudes. The churches are over burdened with charity why can't the government help with ENTITLEMENT programs to feed and cloth and educate the less fortunate?
02:47 PM on 07/26/2011
I've never seen a liberal who thought taxes were high enough, that government was big enough, or that Americans were doing anything at all for "the poor". To hear liberals tell it, you would think that "the poor" spend their days begging for food on the streets before they go back and sleep under a bridge, while "the rich" spend their days counting their money and scheming about how they can get the morsels "the poor" have begged.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ExiledMan
I have no need for religion, I have a conscience.
03:04 PM on 07/26/2011
http://www.yaliberty.org/yar/the-end-of-big-government-conservatism

You need to open your eyes up to what is really going on. Bush junior was the latest republican president to expand the govt. He also enlarged tax breaks for the rich and de-regulation so that big companies could write their own safety checks, aka the oil spill last year.

http://blogs.forbes.com/robertlenzner/2011/07/25/the-400-richest-americans-pay-an-18-tax-rate/


Here is a piece from Forbes about the top 400 Americans paying 18% in taxes, less that you do I suspect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almostlyniceguy
Not young enough to know everything..
10:10 PM on 07/26/2011
Well, I am a liberal, and I want to see a balanced budget. I also want to see shared sacrifice, and I want to see the entitlements, specifically SS and Medicare, that people have paid for and are counting on for retirement, honored.

Further, I want to see our lousy infrastructure rebuilt. I want to see government support of basic reasearch, which almost no companies can afford. I want to see governemnt support and expand educational opportunities for all of our citizens, and I want to see that nobody has to do without healthcare.

All of these things are done in European democracies. Yes, they pay somewhat higher taxes, but the quality of life is much better for the vast majority of people. It can be done, and it can be done in our own way, probably better than it is done anywhere else. What is required is a changed mindset about who we are, and what we aspire to be.

We need to get away from these false Christians and start being the nation we started out to be.