Of Gods and Men is the greatest film I've ever seen on faith. It surpasses even some of my longtime favorite movies on the spiritual life, like Romero, Diary of a Country Priest, A Man for All Seasons and The Song of Bernadette. Perhaps only Franco Zeffirelli's multi-part series Jesus of Nazareth has moved me more.
By now, you probably know that the French-language movie, lauded in all corners (except, inexplicably, by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences -- the film was omitted from being nominated for Best Foreign Language Film), is about the Trappist monks of Our Lady of Atlas Monastery in Algeria, who were assassinated by Algerian extremists in 1996. Their story, which was in danger of being forgotten even in many corners of the Catholic world, is told in John Kiser's essential book, The Monks of Tibhirine.
What may make the film so profound?
First of all, it is a realistic portrayal of the life of faith. The monks are not perfect; no saint, or martyr, is. Holiness always makes its home in humanity. Occasionally, the monks are impatient, tetchy or short with one another. ("He's tired," says an older monk after a younger one has spoken to him sharply while cleaning up after a meal.) Moreover, the group struggles mightily with the idea that they might be "called" to be martyrs, indeed resisting it until almost the last minute. As anyone would. The life of the believer often involves uncertainty, doubt and confusion. Two of them are seen, quite distinctly, as "avoiding" their fate. But all try to grapple with what God seems to be asking of them, strange and frightening as it may seem to them.
Second, the movie does not stint -- at all -- on the religious underpinnings of their actions
and choices. Too often in contemporary cinema, producers or directors indicate by their own choices that audiences will not understand people who talk about God in a serious way. And so we see (and hear) the monks chanting their prayers, celebrating Mass, preparing for Christmas. We hear the words of their prayers, too; and we are privy to their conversations with one another about God, and often with God. God is real to them, and God's effect on their lives is made real to the viewer.
We see, too, the real-life effects of their Christian faith: particularly in the love they show (and receive) from the villagers who live near the monastery. The Trappists are, moreover, charitable and loving not only to friends (to one another, to their longtime friends in the village) but to those who oppose them (to both the terrorists who threaten their lives and the army officers who have nothing but contempt for their desire to stay). The life of contemplation and action are inseparable. The true effects of their belief are made manifest.
Third, the director, Xavier Beauvois, underplays many scenes, like a beautifully pastoral image of the abbot walking silently through a flock of sheep. Another director might have wanted to demonstrate more explicitly (through music, a caption or a voice-over) the idea of the Good Shepherd who does not leave his flock, which the monks discuss at one point during their deliberations on whether or not to "stay." The use of music from "Swan Lake," which Anthony Lane in the New Yorker felt was used more effectively than even in Black Swan, is also subtle. At a meal, a kind of Last Supper before their martyrdom, the community listens not to the traditional "reading at table" (where a monk reads from a religious text to the silent diners) but to Tchaikovsky's great music. They drink good wine, as the camera pans over their now confused, now calm, now sorrowful, now joyful faces.
The movie, as the modernist poets liked to say, shows rather than tells.
Fourth, the performances are nearly perfect. Based on the monks (and Trappists) I know, these characters felt as close to real monks as I've ever seen on screen, particularly the kind-hearted Brother Luc, played by Michael Lonsdale, and the abbot, Christian, played by Lambert Wilson (who can be heard on NPR's "Fresh Air" speaking about his role).
Fifth, and perhaps most importantly, the film treats the idea of martyrdom intelligently. Watching Of Gods and Men, I started to realize, slowly at first then more strongly, that more people might begin to understand the strange idea of martyrdom. For it is an idea that even believers find hard to comprehend.
Besides this unique film, perhaps only A Man for All Seasons and Romero can help people understand this difficult and complex idea, which today is often seen as naïve, bizarre or simply masochistic. But martyrdom is always more about fidelity to one's mission than it is about an outright courting of danger. None of the Trappist monks do this; they all want to live. Until they cannot.
In addition to being the final result of fidelity to God in a dangerous situation, or a
faithfulness to those with whom one ministers, martyrdom may also involve a negation, a via negativa. That is, martyrdom is just as often about finding oneself not being able to do something. St. Thomas More could not say "yes" to the king's actions in Renaissance England; Archbishop Oscar Romero, the American churchwomen and Jesuit priests could not leave the poor with whom they worked in El Salvador in the 1980s; the Trappist
monks in Algeria could not desert a poor and oppressed village that had come to depend upon them.
But in this "no" comes a "yes." A yes to solidarity with the oppressed, a yes to God, a yes, paradoxically, to life.
This essay first appeared on America magazine's "In All Things" blog.
Of Gods and Men Movie Reviews, Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes
I am an atheist, but people's work on themselves and their compassion attracts me greatly. So, I will rent this movie.
Maher: ... people in this country doubted evolution more than any other country on that list [list of 32 developed nations] other than, I think, Turkey ...
do you believe in evolution?
Pryor: ... I don't know ... clearly the scientific community is divided on some of the specifics of that ...
Maher: I don't think they are ... I think they pretty much agree.
Pryor: I don't know how it all happened ...
Maher: It couldn't possibly have been Adam and Eve 5,000 years ago with a talking snake in a garden, could it?
Pryor: Well, it could have possibly been that ...
Maher: C'mon ... it worries me that people are running my country, who believe in a talking snake ...
Pryor: You don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the senate though.
Movie tickets for two, $25.
Popcorn and cokes, $12.
Hearing a sitting evangelist Senator say you don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the senate, priceless.
So while I find the idea of a god to be the intelectual equivelant of rubbing a rabits foot; this article may not be the propper venue for bashing religion.
As I write this, there are several hundred students at Liberty and Regent Universities (and others) being groomed to become Christian activist lawyers and politicians. Legislators in South Dakota are passing legislation that considers murder of abortion doctors "justifiable homicide". Legislators in Kentucky are legislating the teaching of creationism in high school science class. Lawmakers are de-funding the contraception, STD screening and treatment, HIV screening and treatment, pregnancy screening and care and gynecological care activities of Planned Parenthood - where 97% of PPH's budget is allocated. Only 3% goes to fund abortions.
I don't bash religion, it is everyone's right to worship as they wish, or not. I bash the next Great Awakening zealots who are trying to take control of our social, legal and political systems. Never in our country's history has Christianity had such a stranglehold on our government - even during Prohibition.