Iñigo of Loyola was 30 years old when his leg was shattered by a cannonball during the siege of a castle by the French military in Pamplona in 1521. This pivotal incident, which might have been merely a tragic setback to another person, marked the beginning of his new life.
After Ignatius stayed in Pamplona for several days, his French captors, who treated him "with courtesy and kindness," brought him back to his family's castle, where the doctors reset the bone. To do so they had to break the leg. "This butchery was done again," he writes in his autobiography. His condition worsened and those around him, worried that he was about to die, arranged for him to have the last rites.
Finally he recovered. Yet Ignatius noticed something troubling: the bone below one knee had been poorly set, shortening his leg. "The bone protruded so much that it was an ugly business." Now his vanity took over. "He was unable to abide it," he wrote, "because he was determined to follow the world." He couldn't abide the idea of being thought unattractive.
Despite the pain involved, he asked the surgeons to cut away the bone. Looking back, the older Ignatius recognized his foolishness. "He was determined to make himself a martyr to his own pleasure," he wrote.
During his subsequent convalescence, Ignatius was unable to find books on what he most enjoyed reading: adventure stories and tales of chivalry. The only things available were a life of Jesus and the lives of the saints. To his surprise, he found that he enjoyed the tales of the saints. Thinking about what the saints had done filled him with a sense that they would be "easy to accomplish."
Still, he was attracted to the ideals of knightly service, and when he wasn't reading about the life of Christ or the lives of the saints, he mused about doing great deeds for "a certain lady." He considered what clever things he would say to her and what gallant deeds he would do on her behalf. Even though her station was higher than a countess or a duchess, Ignatius was obsessed on winning her over with daring exploits. In this way he wasn't very different from some men in our time, or any time for that matter.
So he went back and forth, thinking about doing heroic things for the noble lady and doing heroic things for God.
Then a strange thing happened, something that would influence not only Ignatius, but the life of every Jesuit, and anyone who has followed the way of Ignatius.
Ignatius slowly realized that the aftereffects of these thoughts were different. When he thought about impressing his "certain lady" with exploits on the battlefield, he felt one way. When thinking about doing great things, and even undergoing hardships, for God, he felt another.
I'll let him describe it in one of the most famous passages in his autobiography:
Yet there was a difference. When he was thinking about the things of the world, he took much delight in them, and afterwards, when he was tired and put them aside, he found that he was dry and discontented. But when he thought of going to Jerusalem, barefoot and eating nothing but herbs and undergoing all the things that the saints endured, not only was he consoled when he had these thoughts, but even after putting them aside, he remained content and happy.
He did not notice this, however; nor did he stop to ponder the difference until one day his eyes were opened a little, and he began to marvel at the difference, realizing from experience that some thoughts left him sad and other happy. Little by little he came to recognize the difference between the spirits that agitated him, one from the enemy and one from God.
Ignatius began to understand that these feelings and desires might be ways that God was communicating with him. This is not to say that Ignatius found God and women in opposition. Rather, he began to see that his desires of winning fame by impressing others drew him away from God. His desires to surrender to a more generous and selfless way of life drew him towards God. What religious writers call a "grace" was not simply that he had these insights, but that he understood them as coming from God.
As a result of his experience, Ignatius began to understand that God wants to communicate with us. Directly.
This idea would get Ignatius in trouble with the Inquisition and land him in jail. (Ignatius had his own problems with "religion" at times.) Some critics suspected that Ignatius was trying to bypass the institutional church. If God could deal with humanity directly, what need was there for the church?
As I've mentioned, religion enables people to encounter God in profound ways in their lives. But Ignatius recognized that God could not be confined within the walls of the church. God was larger than the church.
Today the Ignatian notion of the Creator dealing directly with human beings is less controversial. It's assumed by those on the "spiritual but not religious" journey. The far more controversial aspect is that God would speak to us through religion.
But Ignatius's insight is as liberating as it was in his time. And it is here that Ignatian spirituality can help even the doubtful find God.
Some agnostics or atheists await a rational argument or a philosophical proof to demonstrate the existence of God. Some will not believe until someone can show them how suffering can coexist with the belief in God. A few may even hope for an incontrovertible physical "sign" to convince them of God's presence.
But God often speaks in ways that are beyond our intellect or reason, beyond philosophical proofs. While many are brought to God through the mind, just as many are brought to God through the heart. Here God often speaks more gently, more quietly, as he did during Ignatius's convalescence. In these quiet moments God often speaks the loudest.
James Martin, SJ, is culture editor of America magazine and author of The Jesuit Guide to (Almost) Everything. This essay is an excerpt from that book, and it also appears on "In All Things."
Paul Raushenbush: 5 Suggestions for Re-Creation This Summer
Ignatius of Loyola - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: St. Ignatius Loyola
Barbossa in the Pirates of the Caribbean says , “the (pirate’s) code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.” The Church might do well to try the same humility about the rigid dogmas that it demands Catholics follow, and admit that in the end, all the Church can do is suggest guidelines to moral behaviour and union with God.
And how do the faith full respond? They worship their founder as a saint, they praise dogmatism and intolerance as revelation and virtue.
Interesting that the whole case for believers rests on claims of physical "signs," which fill the Bible. Of course, such physical signs have not been seen since the New Testament.
However, according to Father Jim, because he doesn't give us any "physical signs," "God speaks to us in ways which are beyond our intellect or reason."
I suggest that believing this preposterous nonsense is beyond intellect and reason.
What is preposterous is the arrogance that human intellect and reason are so absolute that nothing can exist outside of its comprehension. Its a diabolical arrogance and ignorance at the same time.
Imagine how high we could reach if were finally able to free ourselves of terms like "diabolical"and "holy".
"You may say I'm a dreamer..."
The human race has much to discover about life and the universe and it is unlikely we ever will because of our limited intellect and reason. However, if you have evidence of the supernatural, please enlighten us or at least explain why you think our unlimited intellect and reason might uncover God without a physical sign.
It doesn't take much intellect and reason to work out that God does not "speak to us in ways which are beyond our intellect and reason." Anyone who thinks he does is deluded.
Diabolical??? Of the Devil? Hold on there Jay!
It doesn't take much intellect and reason to imagine the non-existence of an omnipotent supernatural being who loves us unconditionally but wreaks misery, havoc, death and destruction on innocent people through disease and natural disaster. A God who has to be worshipped and prayed to and begged for help, but whimsically, helps (according to believers) sometimes but not others.
I suggest it requires a lot of arrogance to posit a God who has laid down his rules in a book but then works in incomprehensible ways, which by way of excuse, illicits pathetic platitudes such as, "God's purpose is beyond our understanding."
Pretty much up to here with what i've already learned about him/hir/it.
What would really interest me, is a discussion about God has learned about US.
the Iraq War, the gutting of our Constitution, torture and all of their other excesses?
What would do the good Ignatius say about such an institution?
I gave up.
So give up on the church. Just don't give up on God:)
That being said, the hierarchy of the church (including the Pope) DID oppose the Iraq War, and the US bishops have taken stances against torture. Unfortunately, these are always viewed as less important than the abortion issue, so if a certain candidate says he is "fer" overturning Roe v. Wade, he's automatically better in their eyes. To those who can see through the BS, it's obvious that the Republicans never intend to make abortion go away. They've had decades in power and never did so. Even McCain and Palin both said that they are anti-Roe, but DO NOT support a right-to-life amendment, which is necessary to make abortion illegal in the state. The bishops are very highly educated men, so their lack of discernment on the issue is inexcusable, and must be a calculated lie.
Also, Fr Jim has frequently been critical of the behavior of some people in the institutional church. Check out past blogs. In fact, he's admitted that he's a liberal. So don't smear all Catholics with the same brush - that's nothing but bigotry.
Head in the sand Christians have more in common with militant Islamists than you could possibly imagine. Lets stop using fables that aren't even as old as the Greek Myths to run our lives.. My Grandfather left the church when he was a teenager because what they were teaching him and what he observed in the real world didn't match up. Is that hard to do?
Out of the mouths of babes.
The answers to all the complex questions we perplex ourselves with are there, if only we have the eyes to see. The world speaks to us, if only we have the ears to hear.
Ignatius recognized that we do not live in a dead world, one governed by random chance. The world is alive with meaning, it speaks to us every day, and the task becomes how to discern what the world is telling us.
Your last paragraph captures the feelings I occasionally get in my daily work. As an archaeologist, I deal with a "dead" world that is still imbued with meaning and pregnant with new discoveries and insights. In some sense, those long-dead people seem to be alive, as I try to put my own consciousness into their heads, to see what they were thinking as they made decisions. And sometimes, I feel that God might very well be there, looking over my shoulder at what I'm working on, and at other times, gently tapping at the window...