More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Jesse Jackson

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Jesse Jackson
 

Government Health Care OK for Politicians, but Not Us

Posted: 02/14/2012 12:59 pm

Republicans on the campaign trail denounce Obama's health care reforms as a virtual threat to the Republic. It's "socialized medicine," "a job killer," "a government takeover of health care." All the Republican candidates for president promise to repeal it, and Republican legislators are virtually united in trying to do so.

Ironically, most of these same politicians enjoy the benefits of government health care -- and don't complain about it. While a handful of House freshmen announced they wouldn't partake of the federal health care plan for legislators, the vast majority happily signed up. Freshman U.S. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) garnered national headlines for complaining that his government health insurance wouldn't kick in for 30 days after he was sworn in -- even after he had campaigned on repealing "Obamacare" for everyone else.

The federal health care plan for legislators is a pretty nice deal, with the federal government offering a broad array of plans while paying an average of $700 per month -- about 75 percent of the cost. When the cost of the plans goes up, the government subsidy goes up. No member can be refused because of a pre-existing condition. Meanwhile, for the rest of us, more and more employers don't offer health care at all -- and those that do are demanding that employees pay an ever-increasing percentage of the premiums and co-pays. And it is Obama's reforms that these legislators want to repeal that require insurance companies to cover everyone regardless of pre-existing illnesses.

The Republican presidential contenders also display something of a contrast between rhetoric and practice.

Libertarian Ron Paul happily takes his congressional, government supplied health-care benefits and subsidies. When asked whether it would be hypocritical to take government subsidized health care as a member of Congress but repeal it for everyone else, Paul was honest enough to say "could be."

Mitt Romney refuses to reveal what kind of coverage he and his family have. That may well be because he doesn't want to admit that he's enjoying the benefits of the health care reforms he passed in Massachusetts that became the template for Obama's. As a 64-year-old unemployed man with a wife with a serious pre-existing condition, Romney exists in one of the only states that offers a choice of 41 state-regulated health care plans, requires insurance companies to cover those with a pre-existing conditions and limits how much they can raise premiums because of age or condition.

Former Sen. Rick Santorum has a private plan. With his young daughter fighting a serious illness, he'd have a hard time getting insurance at any price if Obama's reforms were repealed. One of the first parts of the reforms to go into effect requires companies to cover children up to age 19 regardless of pre-existing conditions.

At 68, Newt Gingrich enjoys Medicare, the government's single-payer plan, which he supplements with a Blue Cross-Blue Shield plan. Medicare is the plan the Republicans tried to dismantle last year in the House. They would turn it into a fixed premium that would pay for less care over time.

Why is government subsidized and organized health care good for legislators and not for the rest of us? Why should they be guaranteed coverage despite pre-existing conditions? Why should Newt happily take Medicare and denounce "socialized medicine"?

Perhaps candidates who are millionaires don't understand the challenges most Americans face. Or perhaps their ideology blinds them to their hypocrisy.

 

Follow Rev. Jesse Jackson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/revjjackson

Republicans on the campaign trail denounce Obama's health care reforms as a virtual threat to the Republic. It's "socialized medicine," "a job killer," "a government takeover of health care." All the ...
Republicans on the campaign trail denounce Obama's health care reforms as a virtual threat to the Republic. It's "socialized medicine," "a job killer," "a government takeover of health care." All the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
Capricious Capricorn
Don't wait for a storm to pass. Dance in the rain!
01:45 PM on 02/15/2012
Things are getting pretty desperate in this country. The following is not to be taken seriously but it does point out the irony of the screwed up priorities in our government.

Long Term Senior Health Care

So you're a sick senior citizen and the government says there is no nursing home available for you, what do you do?
This plan gives anyone 65 years or older a gun and 4 bullets. You are allowed to shoot four Congressmen.
Of course, this means you will be sent to prison where you will get three meals a day, a roof over your head, central heating, air conditioning and all the health care you need! Need new teeth? No problem. Need glasses? That's great.
Need a new hip, knees, kidney, lungs or heart? They're all covered. And, as an added bonus, your kids can come and visit.
And who will be paying for all of this? It's the same government that just told you that you they cannot afford for you to go into a home.
Plus, because you are a prisoner, you don't have to pay any income taxes anymore.
Is this a great country or what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Rowland
I thought I was wrong once...but I was mistaken.
01:51 PM on 02/15/2012
perfect perfect perfect.
photo
Capricious Capricorn
Don't wait for a storm to pass. Dance in the rain!
02:07 PM on 02/15/2012
Like that, huh? btw, thanks for the link to the cute animals. I 'saved' them to my Pet Therapy Folder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rolanda Ridley
Librarian
10:00 AM on 02/15/2012
This is so true!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
milesz
attorney, commentator, and author
08:28 AM on 02/15/2012
It is really a shame to have Rev. Jackon and scores like him including me write about the hypocrisy and arrogance of those who are elected to public office or who are running to become president to say they can have health care through programs fostered or run by the federal government but not the average joe who put them in office. When are Americans going to wake up and realize that the current health law---if it survives the Supreme Court--will be as welcomed as Medicare is to our seniors. When will Americans wake up to realize that without health, we have nothing at all, and the new health law is a sure fire start have millions more Americans access and afford health care.
07:26 AM on 02/15/2012
no one ELECTED to office should get ANY BENEFITS.

only a salary while they are IN OFFICE.

no health insurance.

no pensions.

they should also be BARRED from ever lobbying ANYONE in government in ANY way for life.

and if those small changes are to much of a BURDEN on elected officials...then TIME TO GET OUT.

there are many other REAL patriots who would be willing to serve for the good of the nation , instead of serving to ENRICH themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
02:53 AM on 02/15/2012
As Rev Jackson well knows, government healthcare for legislators is not Obama Care. They asked for and got themselves an exclusion. I wonder why?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:33 AM on 02/15/2012
T.R. Reid, correspondent and author of "The Healing of America" , hosted a one-hour PBS show, "Sick Around the World", comparing the health care systems of the U.S., Britain, Switzerland, Germany, Taiwan, and Japan. It's available for viewing at:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/
FRONTLINE: sick around the world |PBS

Only Britain has socialized medicine; the other four countries use social insurance, but limit the profits on the base insurance:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/countries/
Five Capitalist Democracies & How They Do It | Sick Around The World | FRONTLINE | PBS

These graphs compare the health care systems of Japan, Britain,
Switzerland, and Germany to the U.S.:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/etc/graphs.html
FRONTLINE: sick around the world: Graphs: U.S. Health Stats Compared to Other Countries | PBS

A review of "The Healing of America":

http://www.tomhull.com/ocston/books/reid-healing.php
Tom Hull: T.R. Reid: The Healing of America

"...(pp. 13-14):
The academics have a term for this approach to problem-solving:

"comparative policy analysis." The patron saint of comparative policy analysis was an American military hero who went on to become our thirty-fourth president: Dwight D. Eisenhower. That's why this book is dedicated to his memory..."
12:50 AM on 02/15/2012
The question shouldn't be Government or private healthcare. The question should be healthcare for profit. For profit heathcare simply puts the dollar and Profit in control of life and death. America's whole healthcare system is to extract every cent they can from human pain. Yet the people who support all of this claim to be religous and caring human beings. I doubt if God would support vulture capitalistic healthcare. So why do most Americans?
photo
OzzieTonto
“Hatred, the only thing that lasts.”
07:44 AM on 02/15/2012
Good point. America appears to have difficulty having more than one value. The only value allowed is the Almighty Dollar. The whole point of government involvement in health is to produce HEALTH. You cannot produce health while you allow GREED to rule. that is the reason Dennis Kucinich's single payer system was the only decent system ever proposed for Americans. The rest, Obamacare included, are scams.
12:21 AM on 02/15/2012
Thank you, Rev. Jackson, for speaking clarity to the nonsense the right spews. Tea Partiers who got into congress all have government subsidized healthcare - on MY dime, yet they tell me who and who cannot have quality health care.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:01 PM on 02/14/2012
Good article but geez, we all know all gop politicians are hypocrites and panderers. This really isn't news and the people that need to read it never will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
02:55 AM on 02/15/2012
I read it. It's the usual BS ranting from Jesse Jackson. What was it he said that was new & which I just had to read?
photo
BigBearcatBill
This is the real Bearcat - a Binturong
10:41 PM on 02/14/2012
Rev, the ruling class knows the most powerful thing to hold over a person's head - it's called your health. On another note, I read a while back that most med students would choose public option/socialized medicine approach like Canada, Europe, Japan, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 PM on 02/14/2012
http://www.creators.com/opinion/jim-hightower/healthcare-hypocrites.html
Healthcare Hypocrites by Jim Hightower on Creators.com...

Healthcare Hypocrites

by Jim Hightower

How do you spell "hypocrisy"?

Try this: "H-Y-P-O-C-O-N-G-R-E-S-S." The hypocongress consists of those Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats who have risen up on their hind legs in recent weeks to snarl and howl at any mention of a government role in meeting America's health care needs. "Socialism," they bark — we won't allow Barack Obama and the liberals to create a Washington-run, big-government intrusion into the hallowed private market. Sen. Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican, even pledged to fight so ferociously that the health care battle would be Obama's "Waterloo."

What a stand-up guy for free enterprise! What an ideologically correct appeal to laissez-faire principle! And, let me add, what a crock!

What these bellicose market-purists hope you don't discover is that they are closet
socialists. As members of the congressional elite, they and their families are governmentally blessed with their very own gold-plated, taxpayer-financed, Washington-run health care system. And, they loooove it.

Theirs is such an effective system that not a single member of the hypocongress has been willing to give it up — even though they surely realize the political peril of being exposed as rank hypocrites for enjoying the very program they so adamantly reject for you..."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
02:56 AM on 02/15/2012
In recent weeks? So the Republicans have just now taken a stand against Obama Care? That's news to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:44 AM on 02/15/2012
The article was from 2009.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:46 AM on 02/15/2012
The ACA should be called Fowler Care...

http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/03/29/baucus-thanks-wellpoint-vp-liz-fowler-for-writing-health-care-bill/
Baucus Thanks Wellpoint VP Liz Fowler for Writing Health Care Bill | FDL Action

"...I wish to single out one person, and that one person is sitting next to me. Her name is Liz Fowler. Liz Fowler is my chief health counsel. Liz Fowler has put my health care team together. Liz Fowler worked for me many years ago, left for the private sector, and then came back when she realized she could be there at the creation of health care reform because she wanted that to be, in a certain sense, her profession lifetime goal. She put together the White Paper last November–2008–the 87-page document which became the basis, the foundation, the blueprint from which almost all health care measures in all bills on both sides of the aisle came. She is an amazing person. She is a lawyer; she is a Ph.D. She is just so decent. She is always smiling, she is always working, always available to help any Senator, any staff. I thank Liz from the bottom of my heart. In many ways, she typifies, she represents all of the people who have worked so hard to make this bill such a great accomplishment..."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rex Devious
If you don't vote, don't bitch
09:44 PM on 02/14/2012
I really wish someone had mentioned this while the Republican congressmen were claiming that private insurance was fine and didn't need to be changed, 3 years ago when health insurance reform was the talk of the country for months.

Keep this in mind every time you see a Republican criticize changes to health insurance: they are their family get a level of healthcare you and your family will *never* get.

And they damn well know it.
Transverseangle
To stay healthy, everything in mderation
08:22 AM on 02/15/2012
F&F, totally agree, it's rather blatantly obvious overplayed let the rest eat cake scenario. They talk about reducing the deficit, hmm, they should consider the fact these guys get lifetime bennies after being fired from their constituencies, hey every dollar counts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:42 PM on 02/14/2012
Thank you
09:19 PM on 02/14/2012
off with their heads...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Freese
08:58 PM on 02/14/2012
Jesse Jackson has the moniker "Reverend"! Why doesn't he ever talk about our Lord Jesus Christ? Whi do people listen to him when nothing comes out of his mouth that emulates Christ? His message is a "Social Gospel". What he does not understand is that God changes people from the inside. If someone is a racist, it requires a heart change to redefine them, not a law. You cannot force a person to believe or follow you. It is indeed Christ's love, acceptance and forgiveness that changes the "hearts" of people, not social commentary.
11:28 PM on 02/14/2012
"Now the other myth that gets around is the idea that legislation cannot really solve the problem and that it has no great role to play in this period of social change because you've got to change the heart and you can't change the heart through legislation. You can't legislate morals. The job must be done through education and religion. Well, there's half-truth involved here. Certainly, if the problem is to be solved then in the final sense, hearts must be changed. Religion and education must play a great role in changing the heart. But we must go on to say that while it may be true that morality cannot be legislated, behavior can be regulated. It may be true that the law cannot change the heart but it can restrain the heartless. It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me but it can keep him from lynching me and I think that is pretty important, also. So there is a need for executive orders. There is a need for judicial decrees. There is a need for civil rights legislation on the local scale within states and on the national scale from the federal government." ~ Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
02:59 AM on 02/15/2012
Great man Dr King, incredible speaker, I wish he was still with us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracee Collins
APATHY = COMPLICITY
06:59 AM on 02/15/2012
Hogwash.