iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Peter Morales

Rev. Peter Morales

Posted: July 28, 2010 04:14 PM

Thousands of people will gather in Phoenix tomorrow, July 29th, to protest the scheduled implementation of Arizona's harsh new anti-immigrant bill, SB 1070. The law's provisions require sweeping changes to current statutes regulating everything from vehicle impoundment to warrantless arrests. Today a federal judge blocked some of the most flagrantly unconstitutional sections from going into effect tomorrow, but this reprieve is temporary, and several other states are considering similar legislation. Laws like SB1070 will harm immigrants and people of color, separate children from parents, make entire communities less safe, and blight the American spirit.

The Arizona law requires local and state law enforcement officials to ask for proof of citizenship if they suspect a person might be in the country illegally. Following a nationwide outcry, the law was amended to clarify that it does not allow for racial profiling. Still, it is impossible to imagine how this abusive practice can be avoided. There can be no mistake about the intent and outcome of this legislation: people with brown skin who speak Spanish are the targets. Ethnic cleansing could soon become the law in Arizona.

Ironically, SB1070 will undermine the very goals it purports to defend, particularly public safety, health, and education. Crime victims and witnesses will be afraid to speak to police for fear they will be detained and separated from their families. Parents will avoid taking their children to medical facilities for vital care. Schools will be disrupted when students are removed. It will also become increasingly difficult for Latino people -- citizens and immigrants alike -- to work and support their families.

When I was in Phoenix for the Memorial weekend protests, I was moved beyond words to see demonstrators holding sings reading "Undocumented and Unafraid." Their courage was truly inspiring, for if conservatives win the coming court battles, SB 1070 will create a police state in which neighbors are required to inform on one another or risk prosecution themselves. Citizens who offer rides to families after church or who volunteer to drive seniors to medical appointments risk having their cars impounded if they are found to be transporting undocumented residents.

It is no surprise that most of the Arizona law enforcement community, including the state's Attorney General, oppose the law. SB 1070 allows, and even encourages, individual citizens to bring suit against municipalities that they believe have not gone far enough in enforcing the many provisions of the law. Towns will go bankrupt defending frivolous or malicious lawsuits, neighborhoods will be destroyed, and families will be torn apart.

This vision is not the America I want to live in.

We must acknowledge that the United States is largely responsible for the influx of immigrants across our southern border. Our economic policies are helping to create wrenching economic dislocations in Mexico, Guatemala, and Nicaragua, while at the same time US companies and consumers demand and benefit from the cheap labor that immigrants supply. Businesses, consumer-citizens, and undocumented workers are profoundly connected in a vast, interdependent economic web. We cannot solve the problem by scapegoating and casting out the most vulnerable members of a system we created and profit from.

We must not allow our country to be ruled by fear and diminished by racism. Arizona is ground zero in a looming human rights crisis. And it is a spiritual crisis as well. Addressing these problems on a national scale will require honesty, humility, and generosity. By summoning these qualities we will reclaim what is best about the American spirit.

This is why I will be back in Arizona tomorrow. Unitarian Universalism is a "creedless faith, meaning we have no prescribed doctrine or dogma. But we do have principles. Our first principle affirms the worth and dignity of every individual, and the second calls for justice, equity, and compassion in human relations. I will be in Arizona to witness for the dignity of the people about to be persecuted and demeaned by SB1070. All of the world's major religions emphasize loving one's neighbor, so I will be part of a broad interfaith coalition standing on the side of love in Phoenix. Finally, along with thousands of other people, of every religion and none, I will be there to defend the America I believe in -- a country that rewards hard work, protects privacy, and guarantees civil and human rights for all. We must act now before we betray our deepest American values and damage the soul of our nation.

 
Thousands of people will gather in Phoenix tomorrow, July 29th, to protest the scheduled implementation of Arizona's harsh new anti-immigrant bill, SB 1070. The law's provisions require sweeping chan...
Thousands of people will gather in Phoenix tomorrow, July 29th, to protest the scheduled implementation of Arizona's harsh new anti-immigrant bill, SB 1070. The law's provisions require sweeping chan...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:18 PM on 08/08/2010
Bravo to Rev. Morales and the Unitarian Universalist Association for standing up on this count! Keep it up, brothers and sisters!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:43 AM on 07/31/2010
Not one word in HP about the leaked memo that makes an end-run by the administration around the laws of immigration. It was leaked and published in the Arizona Republic newspaper and shows that the government is trying in every way possible to give amnesty to illegals.

In the summary it says "This would enable thousands of individuals in TPS status to become lawful permanent residents". TPS - Temporary Protected Status - entered the United States without inspection = illegally. And when the government says "thousands" you know they really mean "millions".

Why have laws? These illegals have broken our laws and now the administration will reward them for doing so. Why should I have to get a driver's license, insurance, pay taxes (state and federal)?
Because it is the LAW! We obey our laws or we are punished. Illegals deliberately break our laws and get rewarded - what is wrong with this picture?

They can take their children with them when they leave. They made a choice and should have to live with the conseqences of their actions. I don't see any of the religious groups crying about the children of citizens or legal immigrants who are left parentless when their parents are jailed for committing crimes. In their minds, only the illegals should get sympathy for being lawbreakers.
relevancematters
You're so full of what's right, you can't see what
09:09 AM on 07/30/2010
I am not well informed on one aspect of the immigration situation, and that is why there are so MANY undocumented people living in the US. What makes them come without trying to go through the immigration process? What is it about that process that discourages so many people from doing it legally? I don't for a moment believe these are all outlaws; something is keeping them from trying to use the system.

I think the most shocking thing to me right now is the fact that nobody is shutting down the American businesses that are making money off people they despise in their own circles, and that people like the young woman who spent her whole life growing up here and has been accepted to Harvard can't go now because she's undocumented and is going to be deported to a country she has absolutely no way to navigate culturally. That's just insane--we're throwing a lot of potentially brilliant babies out with the bath water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald McBee
04:54 PM on 07/30/2010
relevancematters. I am not well informed as I should be either, but from what I understand the United States only allows a number of people into the US a year. This is the case with all other countries, I think because they have to meet certain criteria. One is a criminal background check, because we wouldn't want criminals. The second is they need to speak english to be able to communicate in all areas. But the biggest one is numbers and quota, if to many people enter the US employment would be a factor. We wouldn't want 3 or 4 million people here unemployed to take care of we could not afford it, no country could. Plus the imagration process takes several years. I think the only way to get all these people legal would be to make them go to their country of origin, but make exeptions for there return, put them on the front of the list and give them priority in returning, this country based on their contribution level. (better education should move you up on the list!) Plus job availability, it a person is qualified to do a certain job and we have openings in that field then this should also give you priority. But I still feel the law is the law and should be enforced, and if the majority in this country feels it should be changed then change it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald McBee
05:02 PM on 07/30/2010
Also the real problem is the criminals crossing the boarders, this is really what gives the undocumented people a bad name. Without tough immigration laws drugs and violence will increase and destroy familes and people here in the US. Drugs is what increases the violence, someone addicted to drugs will steal anything to support their habit. I have noticed this in my own neigborhood, and I live 1500 miles from the border. My neigbors house was burglarized just last tuesday while he has in bed sleeping. It just so happens he owned a gun and held the person until police arrived. If he wouldn't have had a gun he would have probably been dead!
11:33 AM on 07/29/2010
The potential for racism is not the only argument Rev. Morales makes. He also mentions that "It is no surprise that most of the Arizona law enforcement community, including the state's Attorney General, oppose the law. SB 1070 allows, and even encourages, individual citizens to bring suit against municipalities that they believe have not gone far enough in enforcing the many provisions of the law. Towns will go bankrupt defending frivolous or malicious lawsuits, neighborhoods will be destroyed, and families will be torn apart."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald McBee
01:21 PM on 07/29/2010
Rev. Lund, what is your suggestion for the illegal immagration problem? Don't you feel the drugs smuggling coming from Mexico tears families apart and destroys neighborhoods also? Shouldn't we try to stop this destruction? The way I see it the problem is two fold, to stop illegals at the border, and to find a way to legalize the 12 million Mexicans here already. Amnisty cannot be possible at this point. We would have a flood of people comming across the border creating a humanitarian disaster. Also, the SB 1070 would only be active with illegals once they have broken the law. Every person who has been stopped by a police officer has been asked for their ID. This is the norm, so what if a person does not have an ID after commiting a crime? They get detained by the police until their identity can be established. So really how does this law differentiate from normal operating proceedure? If you take the time to read my previous post you will see my position on this.
01:38 PM on 07/29/2010
When you are asked for an ID, you have already passed into "probable cause" There is reasonable evidence that your committed an illegal act. (i.e. doing 75mph in a 55mph zone) If you are doing nothing wrong a policeman cannot ask to see your ID. This law presumes guilt without evidence. Assume you are in the grocery store and a cop come up and says I need to see your ID and you don't have it? Can he detain or arrest you if you just for looking at him funny? That's what make this law different from standard operating procedure.
05:58 PM on 07/29/2010
@donald mcbee I was attempting to respond specifically to @pamique's post saying "There is plenty of healthy debate to be presented on both sides of this argument, but Reverend Morales has used the weakest and most dishonest argument possible--that the Arizona law is racist." That's why I quoted this particular section of Rev. Morales's post, where he does, indeed, use more than a single argument against this bill.
11:18 AM on 07/29/2010
Focus on OUR citizens! Under this law, legal US citizens can be detained, asked for papers to prove they are not illegal! As for whether this law could be racist, we'll just have to wait and see how many Canadians, Polish, or English illegals are arrested under this law. I suspect it will be zero.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 AM on 07/29/2010
Comrade Morales you're not telling the truth. SB1070 mirrors Federal Law. An activist judge has attempted to render it inert but it's likely the Supreme Court will uphold it.
10:57 AM on 07/29/2010
How does SB1070 mirror federal law? It doesn't, of course, because the "activist" law-makers in AZ decided to create an unconstitutional abomination. You are right in that the SCOTUS might uphold it because it is populated with right wing activists, but that does nothing to undercut any of Rev. Morales' arguments, all of which are completely grounded in fact.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:11 AM on 08/03/2010
I guess you've yet to read SB1070 or the Federal Law it mirrors. Well, nearly mirrors, it's actually more restrictive. The Feds don't need a reason to check someone's immigration status. Read the bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
10:35 PM on 07/28/2010
Thanks for this piece and keep up the good work.

"Our first principle affirms the worth and dignity of every individual, and the second calls for justice, equity, and compassion in human relations."

You'd think everyone could support that.
04:22 PM on 07/29/2010
Hello, fellow goddess!

....but they don't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
04:35 PM on 07/29/2010
Sadly, I know you are correct.
10:17 PM on 07/28/2010
There is plenty of healthy debate to be presented on both sides of this argument, but Reverend Morales has used the weakest and most dishonest argument possible--that the Arizona law is racist.
04:23 PM on 07/29/2010
There is just no way around it - it's racist. Do you think white people will be targeted as "potential illegal immigrants"?
09:58 PM on 07/28/2010
“This is a real problem for the Yankee-go-home crowd in Latin America. Because now that there is no longer any "home" for the Yankee, where is he supposed to go?”
11:03 AM on 07/29/2010
Thanks for posting this "quote". It perfectly reflects the fantasy that there has ever existed a perfectly "Yankee" (*wink wink*) country, and that this fantasy country has been ruined by all these, um, "Non-Yankees." I say thank you, because it is exactly this desire, to have a "racially pure" society, that is motivating all the recent anti-immigrant laws. Thank you for bringing it out into the open.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romulus
Centrist
07:26 PM on 07/28/2010
"demonstrators holding sings reading "Undocumented and Unafraid."

Should have read "Illegal but Intitled"
07:35 PM on 07/28/2010
I hope they would spell better than you... :)
09:55 PM on 07/28/2010
I hope they have a better sense of humor than you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
10:32 PM on 07/28/2010
Did you not comprehend the how we have contributed and created the factors that lead to this? So, stick your sign on yourself.
06:42 PM on 07/28/2010
"Laws like SB1070 will harm immigrants and people of color, separate children from parents, make entire communities".

Sorry ... but when illegals make the choice to cross the US border unlawfully, they are making a choice of potentially separating children from parents. And that is only if they choose to leave their kids here. Stop blaming AZ or anyone else other than the people who should be accountable for their actions.
07:00 PM on 07/28/2010
Sorry, but no. When a parent crosses into America without legal documentation, that does not in any way mean they have accepted the possibility of having their children taken away from them. It is tragic that such an unjust action is so trivial to you simply because it is inflicted upon a non-U.S. citizen. It is exactly this kind of dehumanization that underscores SB1070 and must be challenged. The lawmakers of AZ are responsible for this abomination, not the people who, just like your own ancestors, want to build a better life in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald McBee
08:47 PM on 07/28/2010
Why would people without legal documentation have their children takin away? They could always take their children back to Mexico with them. I thought the US abolished slavery along time ago! I do not like people saying, "if we deport the Mexicans who will do all the jobs Americans do not want to do!" Like picking vegetables and maids. Does this sound familiar? This sounds just like 200 years ago with African Americans would work in the fields picking cotton and working on the plantations cooking and cleaning for their masters for very little money. To me this disgraces Mexicans as second class people. I think they should be made to leave to keep greedy Americans from exploiting them! Also if they wanted to build a better America they would obay American laws. What kind of America would it be if everyone broke the law?
10:06 PM on 07/28/2010
Actually, yes. If I decide to hold up a liquor store, or engage in any other illegal activity, the burden of potential harm to my family is squarely on my own shoulders. When (hopefully not "if") I get arrested, the police that arrest me, and the citizens at large have not dehumanized me. I dehumanized myself by breaking the law.

Laws have to mean something. Without laws, there is no civilization. If you don't believe me, ask the citizens of Mexico living near the Guatemalan border. They want their borders protected too.
photo
f0rTyLeGz
Everything is falling.
02:30 AM on 07/29/2010
But we have had "illegals" in our country working like Latino SLAVES to capitalism for over six decades. They were perfect for all those nasty jobs that no one would do. Picking fruit... picking anything really. Cleaning up... anything. And all those nasty farm jobs too. And making beds in every hotel motel in the country. Then all those construction jobs... and lawn maintenance. But now they are all of a sudden a big problem?