Man Bites Dog: Newspapers Outlive Themselves; Blissfully Unaware Becomes an Artform

News comes yesterday that the Old Grey Lady is starting an Instant Op-Ed feature online. This new technology will "allow the paper's Web site to post immediate expert viewpoints on breaking news," said Editorial Page Editor Andrew Rosenthal.

Thank you, New York Times.

Golly, imagine. I can get Maureen Dowd's opinion on something before tomorrow's paper comes out! I can even, *gasp*, comment on what she wrote! Paul Krugman can tell me what to think of economic news in the middle of the day!

As one editor reaching put it: "This could be a forum for one of those people to express themselves in a more extended way."

Well. We are witnessing harnessing of the awe-inspiring power of the Internet...yeah, if this were 2001.

Oh, my Times. What you've created is called a weblog -- or a blog. These have been around for several years. They've been scooping you for probably the last few. Your own paper has blogs that are starters. The guys over in Sports run an awesome baseball blog appropriately called "Bats." There's "Bits" with several of our well-informed friends writing on tech-smart topics far and wide. This blogging is not a new concept, friend.

As an imbiber of the Times since my days in small pants, I have to wonder and I need to worry. Are they unaware that blogs exist, or are they hoping we don't know blogs exist? Or, most interestingly, are they calling their blog "Instant Op-Ed" in order to make their so-called experts seem like more than mere bloggers?

This is problematic because -- everyone take notes -- there are smart people in the world who write blogs without needing the validation of being called an "expert." A guy named Duncan Black, who holds a Ph.D in Economics writes a fabulous political blog that merits reading daily. A lawyer/veteran from Honduras has with a single hand organized the entire left into electoral victory with the power of HTML. Heck, the trombone player for our local Philharmonic runs a regular blog that is well-read and even longed for. Heavy sigh.

The point is that the New York Times may have officially jumped over the ship, sailed over the shark and ran over my admiration. Not only has its Op-Ed department not embraced the technology that exists and has for years, they apparently are so hung up on the concept of "expert" that they fail to understand that anyone with a blog tendency is, can be, and should assert themselves with their expertise.

The old-fashioned Op-Ed is dead now. Freely ask anyone with Wordpress capabilities if you think not.

...For more like this, see the book (buy the book even better) "2011: Trendspotting."

Comments

[MurrayAbraham]

Mind you, we are still legions who like to sit down at breakfast with the real thing laid wide open on the table.
I will also point out that the only reporting accessible from this site are in fact in newspapers. (The same is true of cable.) Bloggers (and cable "stars" shouldn't shoot too fast at newspapers. First because yoiu rely on them for most of your real content, and second because it is yet to soon which of newspapers and blogs will survive.
Twenty years ago there was this big thing about "books are going to disappear". Guess-what? They are still around.