iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Schiffman

GET UPDATES FROM Richard Schiffman
 

The Heartland Institute Self Destructs

Posted: 05/04/2012 7:37 pm

It is an environmentalist's dream come true. The once feared "Heartland Institute," funded by the secretive Koch brothers in their campaign to undermine science and deny the plain evidence for climate change has just committed a very public suicide on the Eisenhower Expressway on the outskirts of Chicago.

That is where the first billboard appeared the other day to launch what has to be one of the kookiest public relations campaigns in history. I could scarcely believe my eyes when I saw the image on the internet -- the disheviled "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski glowering down at commuters asking: "I still believe in Global Warming. Do you?" The weirdest part of it is that the Heartland folks actually put their name on the bottom of it for all to see. In other words, the notorious group has come out of the shadows (where they have been lurking for the last decade or so funding false front groups and harassing hard-working scientists) and finally fessed up to being the kooks and fanatics that we long suspected they were.

heartland billboard


The free market "think tank" was discredited in February when documents leaked to the press revealed its plans to disseminate a new school curriculum which aims at "dissuading teachers from teaching science." The documents detail how the organization has funded a rogue's gallery of debunkers (mostly non-scientists) to sow seeds of doubt about the clear consensus of researchers worldwide that our climate is warming due to the rising levels of CO2 released into the atmosphere by the burning of fossil fuels.

But evidently this huge public fiasco only whetted Heartland's appetite for punishment. The billboard campaign which they have just initiated will undoubtedly finish off the spectacular crash and burn which the leaked "Climategate" memos initiated. The Kaczynski ad is only the first in the goofy series which are being put up in preparation for the group's so-called "7th Annual Conference on Climate Change" scheduled for the end of this month. Still to come are billboards featuring Charles Manson, Fidel Castro, Osama bin Laden and James J. Lee (who took hostages inside the headquarters of the Discovery Channel in 2010).

"These rogues and villains were chosen," Heartland revealed, "because they made public statements about how man-made global warming is a crisis and how mankind must take immediate and drastic actions to stop it."


"Why did Heartland choose to feature these people on its billboards?" the group itself asks in a prelude to a truly breathtaking rant. "Because what these murderers and madmen have said differs very little from what spokespersons for the United Nations, journalists for the "mainstream" media, and liberal politicians say about global warming. The point is that believing in global warming is not "mainstream," smart, or sophisticated. In fact, it is just the opposite of those things. Still believing in man-made global warming -- after all the scientific discoveries and revelations that point against this theory -- is more than a little nutty. In fact, some really crazy people use it to justify immoral and frightening behavior...

The people who still believe in man-made global warming are mostly on the radical fringe of society. This is why the most prominent advocates of global warming aren't scientists. They are murderers, tyrants, and madmen."

Really? But not to go overboard... "Of course, not all global warming alarmists are murderers or tyrants," Heartland reluctantly concedes. Well, that's a relief!

It is also a relief to know that after word gets out about this astonishing billboard campaign, with any luck at all we won't have the anti-science Heartland Institute to kick around anymore!

 
 
 
FOLLOW GREEN
It is an environmentalist's dream come true. The once feared "Heartland Institute," funded by the secretive Koch brothers in their campaign to undermine science and deny the plain evidence for climate...
It is an environmentalist's dream come true. The once feared "Heartland Institute," funded by the secretive Koch brothers in their campaign to undermine science and deny the plain evidence for climate...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:11 PM on 05/07/2012
I am quoting the absurd statement from your article above. "The free market "think tank" was discredited in February when documents leaked to the press revealed its plans to disseminate a new school curriculum which aims at "dissuading teachers from teaching science."

The Climate strategy memo has been widely debunked, yet those not wanting an honest debate on the science continue to promote the memo as authentic.

Are we to believe those that lack the critical thinking skills to recognize an obviously bogus memo somehow possess the superior critical skills to ascertain the validity of the climate science.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubyfoo
04:56 PM on 05/07/2012
I still believe we accomplished our mission in Iraq, Brownie did a great job in New Orleans, and letting the market do whatever it wants is the way to go.
GW Bush
03:28 PM on 05/07/2012
Quoting from your article - "The free market "think tank" was discredited in February when documents leaked to the press revealed its plans to disseminate a new school curriculum which aims at "dissuading teachers from teaching science"

This alledged statement from Heartland has been widely debunked.

Yet we are to believe those that lack the basic critical thinking to recognize an obviously fraudulent document some how possess the superior critical thinking skills to ascertain the validity of the man-made global warming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaulBardinas
Educating one person at a time.
12:53 PM on 05/07/2012
I suppose when you have no scientific facts to support your purely ideological denial of global warming and climate change this is the sort of stunt you must resort to. It's hardly surprising when an organization that can make patently false claims about the reality and facts about the scientfic consensus with no evidence for their absurd claims stoops to tactics like this. The facts are pretty clear to anyone with even the simplest of brain function, of the thousands of peer reviewed scientific work published in the last 10 years by scientists in the fields relating to climate science, not a single one has challenged the consensus view that global warming an climate change are fact. True scientific skeptics do challenge particular aspects of climate science, and that is healthy, but none challenge the underlying theory. FACTS PEOPLE!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubyfoo
04:57 PM on 05/07/2012
Repetition of lies about something people find bothersome and would rather deny can actually be quite effective. Much more so than sticking to the facts.
11:44 AM on 05/07/2012
We're trying to get an Ad published that actually is science based and tells truth about global warming. If more people see Ads that tell them that 97% of climate scientists think global warming is real and caused by humans, we'd have a lot fewer non-believers. Then the policymakers in Washington would have to start actually solving our global warming problem.

Help crowd fund our Ad Proposal, "Climate change is Real and caused by Humans!": http://www.AdsForCauses.com/ad/Climate+change+is+REAL+and+caused+by+Humans/?adid=11
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
04:10 PM on 05/05/2012
It is also a relief to know that after word gets out about this astonishing billboard campaign, with any luck at all we won't have the anti-science Heartland Institute to kick around anymore!

What makes you say that Heartland is anti-science?
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
08:41 PM on 05/05/2012
Reread the article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
11:41 PM on 05/05/2012
Were you not paying attention? Helloooo? McFly????
10:44 AM on 05/05/2012
Oh, would that it were true! But where Heartland stumbles, scores of similar astro-turf pseudoscience organizations march forward like zombies, steering the debate, whispering into a sympathetic right-wing media echo chamber. They've had great success with their "manufactoversy" over anthropogenic global warming. The scientific community regards it as an established fact -- with the exception of a tiny minority of cranks, has-beens, sellouts, and/or ideologues -- but they've managed to obscure this extremely well, and very cheaply.
08:41 AM on 05/05/2012
I tell deniers this: If Exxon, BP, Shell, and all the major oil corporations on the planet are themselves spending billions on global warming planning—companies that never make an economic move without solid science—then that's good enough for me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
susiewatusi
Dancing around words daily...
09:43 AM on 05/05/2012
Excellent point.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Schiffman
09:57 AM on 05/05/2012
That's true. But Exxon in particular is also spending a lot of money on global warming denial. They are funding several groups that are spreading disinformation on climate science.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:58 PM on 05/10/2012
I do think that the world needs to know that internally they plan for climate change while externally they deny it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:01 AM on 05/05/2012
It was a slow news week and extremist Republicans and Christians will spend more time and money to avoid actual science work than if they had actually did something worthy of a 4th grade science fair.
02:15 AM on 05/05/2012
Here's the message I get from the billboards: Even sick, twisted, insane, mentally-ill mass murderers and terrorists have the ability to understand what the world's top scientists are telling us -- but the Heartland Institute is still in denial. What does that say about the Heartland Institute!
01:15 AM on 05/07/2012
What is said is subliminal! Those that make their bread and butter at Heartland would be selling get rich quick weight loss scams if, not for the cash rich cow they now ride. They are going to ride that puppy all the way into the front gate of the slaughterhouse.
09:58 PM on 05/04/2012
I can't help but agree that Heartland's descending to this kind of alarmism is stupid. Kaczynski's belief in the conjectures of CAGW, along with Manson, Castro, bin Laden and Lee paints many sincere believers as guilty by association. It is a base public relations ploy, as well as defying logic. Should we eschew every single thing these people believed just because they are evil people? Questioning their motives for their advocacy on this issue is appropriate but that does not necessarily reflect on the motives of others who agree with them.

Suggesting that "climate alarmists" are akin to dictators and terrorists is no different than suggesting that "deniers" are akin to Nazis. It does not forward intelligent debate to call names. I applaud Joe Bast's decision to take down this billboard.

Cheers,
10:40 AM on 05/05/2012
Um, Kelly, pretty much every major scientific organization in the world says that "the conjectures of CAGW" are very well-founded.

Even if "C"AGW -- only the denialists put a "C" in the front of it -- were a conjecture, that doesn't in itself mean it's unlikely. The Poincare conjecture was a conjecture for about a century, before it was proven. Conjectures are often statements that are very, very likely to be true.
07:11 PM on 05/05/2012
Um, Palindrome, an appeal to "pretty much every major scientific organization" is not a logical argument, whether or not their assertion is true. My point was neither "alarmists" nor "deniers" advance the debate by marginilizing opposing views. Such behavior doesn't deal with facts, doesn't shed any light on uncertainties and certainly doesn't advance understanding.

As far as Perelman's proof of the Poincare conjecture, it deals with a very large but finite number of parameters which we know. In climate science we don't even know all the parameters. So let me retract the description "conjecture" and replace it with " informed guess."

Cheers,