Eight days after returning home from his Gulf oil-spill response job, Jason Brashears has flashbacks of a scene that he witnessed one day in Lake Ponchartrain, Louisiana: Thousands of fish gasping at the surface in a sea of foamy oil and dispersant.
Brashears spent 65 days spotting oil in Lake Ponchartrain; Mobile Bay; and along the coast off Destin, Florida; Ocean Springs, Alabama; and Cat Island, Mississippi. His team reported oil sightings during the day. At night, planes sprayed dispersant to break up the oil.
The fish are not the only thing that haunts him from his Gulf work. His lungs feel "leaden," he has trouble concentrating on his graphic designs that used to give him so much pleasure, his moods swing unpredictably, he is dizzy, and the fragrance in ordinary household products makes his eyes water and sinuses stuffy.
"You would think," Brashears said over the phone, "that they [his subcontractor] would not send us out the next day if they knew the dispersants would make us sick. You would think they would warn us or give us a day off."
But Brashears received no such warning. Nor did other people across the Gulf as BP applied at least 1.8 million gallons of dispersants to the oil it spilled there. Even though the number of gallons reported by BP is widely questioned as conservative, this is still by far the longest and heaviest application of dispersant in world history. Yet neither workers nor the public were, or are, being adequately informed of the risk of exposure to oil and dispersants.
I have been in the Gulf since May 3 and have witnessed the outbreak of a public-health epidemic as the oil and dispersant came ashore. Every day now, former workers, Gulf coast residents, and visitors share similar stories with me of respiratory problems, central nervous system problems, chemical sensitivities, or bad skin rashes after exposure to air or water in the Gulf -- predictable illnesses from chemical exposure, all of which were avoidable given adequate warning and protection.
Stories of illnesses persist despite assurances from four federal agencies -- the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the U.S. Coast Guard -- that no levels of oil or dispersant measured in Gulf water or air were found to be unsafe.
But government officials have no credibility in communities across the Gulf because the official story does not match the reality of what people are seeing and smelling. The community stories that string together across the Gulf coast paint a picture quite different from what BP, its contractors, and our government report.
A week ago, a team dispatched by local officials with Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, discovered a beach on a barrier island oozed oil from tiny holes drilled by Hermit crabs. Oil trapped in fragile marshes degrades slowly. It's been more than 40 years since the Florida barge ran aground in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, and spilled 200,000 gallons of fuel oil. Yet the oil is still there -- and still has measurable effects on marsh life.
Off Long Beach, Mississippi, on August 8, fisherman James "Catfish" Miller tied an oil absorbent pad onto a pole and lowered it 8-12 feet down into deceptively clear ocean water. When he pulled it up, the pad was soaked in oil, much to the startled amazement of his guests, including Dr. Timothy Davis with the Department of Health and Human Services National Disaster Medical System. Repeated samples produced the same result. Three weeks earlier, there had been a massive fish kill along the same shoreline from Gulfport to Pass Christian.
Also this past weekend on a beach near Dauphin Island, Alabama, a family was alarmed to find themselves covered in thick gooey oil after swimming in what looked to be clear water.
In Florida, Joe Yerkes reported sludgy brown oil and foamy white dispersant bubbles in Destin and 40 miles east in St. Joe Bay, just days before a fish kill of croaker, flounder, trout, and baitfish on August 5.
Sludgy brown oil-dispersant concentrated by rip current in Destin Bay, Florida. August 5, 2010. Permission: Joe Yerkes.
Oil plume and telltale dispersant bubbles in St. Joe Bay, Florida, offer one explanation for fish kill on August 5, 2010. Permission: Joe Yerkes.
Let's think about this. There's been an unprecedented release of oil and dispersants -- industrial grade solvents -- into the Gulf. Unprecedented means we have no past history to fall back on and really no science to guide us because it's an ongoing experiment, right now.
The old science, the old standards, and the old protocols may be dangerously unreliable -- as was the case in the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Scientists relied on old science in 1989 and predicted that spill impacts would be short-term and the ecosystem would recover rapidly. Ten years later, the new science proved there were long-term impacts; 21 years later, the oiled ecosystem still has not fully recovered.
To borrow Brashears' phrase, you would think the federal government would warn us if it thought there was -- or even might be -- a problem. But the framework of risk management is very narrow and limits itself to educated best guesses among the experts -- until proven otherwise.
And therein lies the current danger of this evolving Gulf experiment. The federal government is re-opening vast areas of the Gulf that were closed to fishing because it has "not observed any oil" in these areas and because the "rigorous safety standards" will supposedly "ensure the seafood is safe."
The problem is the 'rigorous safety standards' are outdated. The protocol relies on visual oil. What of the underwater plumes? The chart produced by NOAA last week shows, in effect, that over 50 percent of the oil (not to mention dispersant) is still in the water column as dispersed or dissolved oil. Scientists have found that the oil-dispersant mixture is getting into the foodweb.
The Food and Drug Administration only tests for oil in "edible" tissue of seafood. So if oil has contaminated a fish's organs or other body parts, it would still be deemed safe for consumption if the flesh tested fine. If a steer had cancer in its kidney and blood, would you eat its "edible" tissue? To make matters worse, though, there is no test for dispersants -- yet.
The new Coalition of Commercial Fishing Families across the Gulf is urging the federal government to use precaution rather than 30-year old standards. The coalition has asked NOAA to close all Gulf fisheries until updated protocol and standards are available to test seafood product. Fishermen are also concerned about losing consumer confidence. Kathy Birren, a commercial fisherman from Hernando Beach, Florida, stated at a Gulf of Mexico Alliance conference last week in Gulfport, "We believe that Gulf and Inland waters have been prematurely re-opened to fishing. Fishermen do not want to lose our credibility or deliver contaminated seafood to market. We have lost enough already."
BP has already stated that it is "not responsible" for any long-term effects from its dispersant experiment. Unless American seafood consumers want to be part of the Gulf experiment, I suggest we all support our fishermen -- and not trust the federal government to warn us about seafood safety.
Act of Congress Didn't Stop Experimental Use of Oil Dispersant
Greenpeace to launch expedition to probe BP oil spill impact
Oil-Spill Dispersants Come Under New Scrutiny At Senate Hearing
Do Dispersants Pose a Risk in Seafood?
Scientists Try To Determine Oil's Impact On Sea Life
US agency rules out health threat from oil dispersants
This ain't over until the last oiled bird flies....even the dead ones!!!
Many fishermen don?t want to risk their reputations on possibly tainted catches.
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/seafood-safety-gulf-11362023
I just cannot believe how quickly this is being rushed - it boggles the mind!
I hope that people use their own judgment with seafood - but this will be difficult if they do not know where it came from.
This is a terrible lapse of judgment and responsibility!
Government assisted BP in covering up effects of spill
Gulf coast seafood.
Let’s teach our children and young people the truth and educate them about the dangers of oil drilling and corporate corruption! If you’re in the Gulf States, ask your students to document what they see on the beaches, in the ocean, and the effects of the disaster on people and their communities. For those who don’t live in the Gulf States, ask your students to create art projects, photography, and films about the tragedy of the oil spill.
GIVEN BP’s and THE MEDIA’S BLACKOUT AND SPIN, IT IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO DOCUMENT THE DAMAGE FROM BP’S OIL SPILL.
1. Submit photos, pictures, and art work to BetterGulf.org here: http://www.bettergulf.org
2. Please take pictures and videos of the damage from BP’s oil spill. Note time and place. Some smart phone cameras' GPS chip will record location even when there is no cell signal.
Here are FREE SMART PHONE APPS to help document the damage of the oil spill.
iPhone App - http://foo.am/dH4
Android App - http://foo.am/dH3
Blackberry App - Point your Blackberry web browser to: http://swooshsoftware.com/SpillReporter.jad
If you have a digital video or still camera, up load your images to: http://gulfcoastspill.com
(from Yobie Benjamin http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ybenjamin/detail??blogid=150&entry_id=64912 )
Together we can show and document the truth.
IMAGINE IF STUDENTS OF ALL AGES FROM ALL OVER THE COUNTRY PARTICIPATED!
The mess is huge and far-reaching, and BP – Transocean and their collaborators should be prosecuted so something like this is less likely to happen again.
Evidence of long term damage from the oil spill:
Scientists Deeply Concerned About BP Disaster's Long-Term Impact: http://www.truth-out.org/scientists-deeply-concerned-about-bp-disasters-long-term-impact61946
The article starts out: “Contrary to recent media reports of a quick recovery in the Gulf of Mexico, scientists and biologists are "deeply concerned" about impacts that will likely span "several decades".
Environmental and Health Impacts of the BP Gulf Oil Spill By Dr. Tom Termotto: http://oilspillsolutionsnow.org/?page_id=176
Scientists Find Evidence That Oil And Dispersant Mix Is Making Its Way Into The Food chain: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/29/scientists-find-evidence_n_664298.html
Prof: Gulf chemicals very concerning: http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/us_news/professor-says-gulf-chemicals-will-have-long-term-effects
This informative report, "Gulf Oil Spill Health Hazards", describes the toxicity of chemicals in crude oil and in the dispersants currently being used in the Gulf area. http://www.sciencecorps.org/crudeoilhazards.htm
BP Accused of 'Buying Academic Silence': http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10731408
More than a dozen scientists interviewed by The Associated Press say the marsh here and across the Louisiana coast is healing itself, giving them hope delicate wetlands might weather the worst offshore spill in U.S. history better than they had feared. Some marshland could be lost, but the amount appears to be small compared with what the coast loses every year through human development.
On Tuesday, a cruise through the Barataria Bay marsh revealed thin shoots growing up out of the oiled mass of grass. Elsewhere, there were still gray, dead mangrove shrubs, likely killed by the oil, but even there new green growth was coming up.
"These are areas that were black with oil," said Matt Boasso, a temporary worker with the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
As crude from a blown-out BP well oozed toward the marshes after an April oil-rig explosion, experts had feared it would kill roots in marsh grass, smother the mangroves and ultimately dissolve wetlands that plant life was holding together.
http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/08/marshes_fouled_by_gulf_of_mexi.html
1) BP has made deals with academic institutions to control alternative energy. Read the following for the details of BP's deal with UC - Berkeley: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/The_BP-Berkeley_Deal.php
BP will effectively be able to choose which technologies are developed for large-scale adoption. And there is no indication of when, if ever, new technologies would pass into the public domain. And shame on UC Berkeley and others for colluding!
2) BP is in the business of buying up scientists. Here’s an example of how BP works with scientists: Blacklash Grows Against BP Efforts to "Buy Up" Gulf scientists -- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kromm/blacklash-grows-against-b_b_665621.html
3) BP will do anything to protect its interests:
BP ADMITS ROLE IN LOCKERBIE BOMBER'S RELEASE:
http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-07-16/news/21985586_1_bp-megrahi-transfer-pact
ACTION PLAN:
1. Write and call your Senators and Representatives. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR PROSECUTING BP AND OTHERS INVOLVED. You can find your legislators’ contact information here: http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml
You can buy into the nonsense coming from BP and the government if you like, but if so, I would like to interest you in some beachfront property in New Mexico :)
Spending time in the White House kitchen and meeting Sam was really cool for all of us. I've met some famous chefs in New Orleans; they are treasures of our city. To us, food is art. Emeril and John Besh, our artists. So meeting Sam Kass was kind of like meeting Picasso. The best part was that we were cooking something that’s already so good, it's hard to mess up. Our shrimp, from near Houma, Louisiana, speak for themselves. So when Sam took his first bite and said, "Those are the best shrimp I've ever had," it didn't come as much of a surprise to me. I said the exact same thing the first time I had Gulf shrimp.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/08/13/behind-scenes-video-when-saints-go-cooking-shrimp