More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rita Nakashima Brock, Ph. D.

GET UPDATES FROM Rita Nakashima Brock, Ph. D.
 

The Importance of Mary's Virginity

Posted: 12/14/10 07:42 PM ET

This Advent season, an atheist group put up a billboard at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel that says "You know it's a myth -- this season, celebrate reason." The atheist appeal relies on the literal impossibility of a boy being conceived without a donor with a Y chromosome having been involved. At the other end of the tunnel, the Catholic League countered with their confidence in the story's truth, "You know it's real. This season celebrate Jesus."

Actually, it is quite possible as a Christian to believe Jesus had a biological father and believe the story of the virgin conception says something important. It all depends on what you think "virgin" means. I think the most significant meaning of Mary's virginity is Christian resistance to the oppression of the Roman Empire.

The keystone of Roman power was the pater familias; the patriarchal system was its tax base and source of soldiers for its legions. By extension, the emperor was the ruling father of the empire, supported by the male heads of households who owned everything and everybody: the women, younger men and slaves. In the pater familias system, a virgin was an unmarried daughter who had not had sex with a man -- this male-ruled type of family is still favored by right-wing "family values" Christians. If a daughter was not a virgin, she was worth far less to her father, who had to find a way to marry her off.

Mary was definitely not a virgin of this type -- her father plays no part in her story. She is independent of a father's rule, and by implication, of the father-in-chief, the emperor. Her only kin in Luke's Gospel are cousins who are experiencing an unusual pregnancy in their old age. She visits them for three-months, when the only one of the couple with a voice is Elizabeth, the wife. Mary's husband Joseph obviously serves her, not the other way around.

The ancient type of virgins she most resembles are the women who possessed themselves in service to a deity and who, therefore, might have sex with men who came to the temple to pay homage to the deity. The men, however, had no controlling power of the women who had sex with them.

The only time Mary speaks in her own voice, in Luke 1:46-55, she extols God in distinctly anti-imperial terms:


And Mary said,
"My soul magnifies the Lord,...
for the Mighty One has done great things for me, ...
He has shown strength with his arm;
he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts.
He has brought down the powerful from their thrones,
and lifted up the lowly;

he has filled the hungry with good things,
and sent the rich away empty.

In Matthew's version of Mary's story, King Herod, the taxation surrogate for Rome in Judea, wants to murder her son. Warned by an angel, Joseph takes Mary and her son off to Egypt. Herod orders the killing of all the baby sons of the Jews. The slaughter harkens back to the story of Pharoah's murderous rampage when Moses' birth challenged him.

The ancient Greeks thought a virgin conception signaled the arrival of a deity, and human beings who possessed divinity were a common occurrence in Jesus' time -- even a garden variety emperor was called a son of god. Emperor Diocletian expected supplicants to refer to him as "Lord and God" and appear before him prostrate. While we think of religion and politics as separate, the opposite was true under Roman rule. Loyalty to the empire included worship of the emperors as divinities. Christians took on the religious hegemony of Rome and challenged its power to intimidate subject populations.

Human divinity was a way to talk about people who have strong charismatic power, and the community that collected around Jesus certainly thought of him as extraordinary. It would have been highly unusual for them not to find ways to suggest he had special origins that signaled divinity.

When the church began claiming that it was the Holy Spirit of God who had conceived Jesus, this elevated his mother Mary to a divine status of her own. In the earliest images of her, she is depicted seated with her infant son in her lap or standing in the middle of the Apostles, the largest and central figure. When Jesus' divinity was declared the same as the most high God, Mary was deemed the Mother of God. For nearly a thousand years, she is enthroned as the Queen of Heaven, like the goddess Isis, holding her infant son, even sometimes nursing him with her naked breast. This iconography is not that of a father's virgin daughter. It depicts her as a symbol of divine dignity, serenity and beauty.

Unfortunately, Mary's virginity has been domesticated, as if the point was her innocent chastity or lack thereof, which cost the sponsors of the dueling billboards about twenty grand each. Artist Rich Doty's "logos" of the season, below, capture layers of irony around the domestication and commercialization of a story that is pretty revolutionary, if you think about it a bit.

It signals a new model of human relationships built on justice for the oppressed, food for the hungry, protection for those endangered by violence, and God's favor on those whom none of the mighty would expect to have any power to do remarkable things for the good of others.

We might describe the story of Mary as a powerful rejection of patriarchal family systems and imperial powers that oppress everyone subject to them. By blessing her and trusting her with the Spirit in human flesh, God challenges the rich, proud, and haughty, which means those who love her story and follow Jesus ought to be doing the same.

2010-12-14-miracle2.jpg


2010-12-14-virgin2.jpg

 
This Advent season, an atheist group put up a billboard at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel that says "You know it's a myth -- this season, celebrate reason." The atheist appeal relies on the litera...
This Advent season, an atheist group put up a billboard at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel that says "You know it's a myth -- this season, celebrate reason." The atheist appeal relies on the litera...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 650
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
09:18 PM on 12/21/2010
It is not what you believe is possible in this world of phyical limitations, but rather what makes good story that one can pin one's heart to at death and during life as well. I don't believe in my religion, but I truist in it even though I know it is not possible. One logic for the world and mind, one logic for the heart and the heart is what I choose despite the ridicule. Just sayin' ...
06:23 AM on 12/22/2010
sure, but then don't tell other people that what you believe is true.
photo
Donald Rappe
Im old! Perhaps my thinking is rigid.
04:47 AM on 01/01/2011
"One logic for the heart"; Did you miss that?
09:14 PM on 12/21/2010
Well I'm glad this cleared all things up for me. "Little by little you're turned to the middle and your never sure why you are here" - Dylan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Foresters do it in the woods.
09:10 PM on 12/21/2010
This is utter nonsense, but if people need to believe these things then I guess they will.
I know plenty of good religious people, but the mythology is really unnecessary any more.
06:25 AM on 12/22/2010
People believe in so much rubbish.

There are the daily horoscopes, clairvoyants, faith healers, magic healing stones, homeopathy and tons of other rubbish that is taken be the masses to be true, even if they don't fully believe it.
photo
Donald Rappe
Im old! Perhaps my thinking is rigid.
04:50 AM on 01/01/2011
Good thing we're not part of the masses, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunflwer1975
Just a girl!!!
08:22 PM on 12/21/2010
what i have read makes me think that all first born children are God's/Goddess's children destined for the church as rituals and sex and conception was very different in those long ago days.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunflwer1975
Just a girl!!!
08:28 PM on 12/21/2010
how they understood sex and conception is what I mean
05:38 PM on 12/21/2010
Mary conceived Jesus without any male lover. Biologists name this 'parthenogenesis'. It occurs, but is very rare.

Mary remained a virgin throughout her life.

Mary is 'married' to God as Father.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:05 PM on 12/21/2010
when she gave birth , she was technicaly not a virgin anymore.
06:26 AM on 12/22/2010
was she never married to Joseph? Would they have not consummated the marriage?
07:35 AM on 12/22/2010
There is some study to suggest the theory that Mary was an arranged mariage to Joseph a much older man to save family honor since she had been possibly raped by a Roman Centurian.

Neither of the details matter if you hold true that Yeshawah was the son of God our Lord and savior. But interesting.
12:23 PM on 12/21/2010
It actually is not possible to be a Christian and reject the virgin (as in not having had sex) birth. No real Biblical scholar actually holds that Matthew or Luke did not mean "virgin" as simply understood, which is further elaborated with Matthew's use of "ouk eginosken" (imperfect, active, indicative) in 1:25. St. Irenaeus, makes the defense against this foolish argument in Against Heresies Book III, Ch. 21... I'll let the intelligent readers here do the searching and see clearly the Church has always upheld the Virgin birth, not for some misplaced view of Roman patriarchy, but in upholding the Divinity of Christ.
photo
Donald Rappe
Im old! Perhaps my thinking is rigid.
05:18 AM on 01/01/2011
The Gospel writer John was aware of the Gospels of both Mathew and Luke. He tells us that all those who believe are born not of blood or the will of man but of the will of God. He also tells us that the first disciples understood Jesus of Nazareth (not Bethlehem) as the son of Joseph. This is all in chapter 1 and wasn't hard to find in spite of the quality of my intelligence. But it was the Church that included this sacred book in the canonical scriptures. Is it possible you're misunderstanding something Matt?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Indigo River
07:52 PM on 12/20/2010
Virginity doesn't matter if you look at the family tree written down in the first chapter of the new testament. Even if she wasn't a virgin, the ancestry from both, Mary and Joseph was pure.

I think elevating her to a divine status (e.g. Mother of God) and praying to her has rather Pagan origins and was popularized by the Roman Catholic church in the late 60s.

But I think you are right in that the New Testament presents a very new attitude towards women. Look at Jesus talking to the other Mary. That was extreme back then.
Then when he died and his body couldn't be found. It was a woman who was the first to tell everyone about the resurrection, thus a woman was the first Christian.
02:14 PM on 12/21/2010
Indigo: "Even if she wasn't a virgin, the ancestry from both, Mary and Joseph was pure."

Please re-read those genealogies and tell me if Mary is mentioned even once? There is no mention of Mary's ancestry explicit in the NT. What do you mean by "pure"?

Do you have an explanation why Matt and Luke's versions are almost completely different and finish with Joseph, who of course was not a blood relative of Jesus? How would that have made Jesus descend from the House of David?

Women in the NT, rather scraping the barrel here aren't you?

Paul says in Corinthians 14:34-35 "Let the women keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is a disgrace for a woman to speak in church."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanGreen
02:57 PM on 12/21/2010
The Bible tells us Mary was of the house of David by virtue of her having to journey to Bethlem to be registered along with Joseph. Both of them evidently had kinfolk there, and likely stayed with relatives while Jesus was being born. The differences in the two geneaolgies in Matthew and Luke are not open to simple explanation, and a careful reading will show that neither could be completely accurate because of the time frames involved. The writers of biblical times knew exactly what the word "virgin" meant, and there's no indication whatever that it was used symbolically in the account of Jesus' conception. Virgin births of god-figures are quite common throughout history, and many predate the story of Jesus' conception. The gospel writers quite evidently intended for us to believe Mary was a literal virgin and that Jesus was conceived by God. This article is pure speculation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harmonikasavingsbonds
Standard?Nonsense! I DEMAND an automatic poodle!
06:44 PM on 12/20/2010
Virginity?

BULLS&&T.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El 84
Reason is my religion.
02:41 PM on 12/20/2010
The so-called virgin birth is based on a mis-translation. Like I said in a previous comment, Mary was a "bethulah" (young woman), not and "almah" (virgin). Look it up.
01:20 PM on 12/20/2010
The significance of Mary's virginity is not a matter of politics or the patriarchal family system. It's significance is found in the miracle of God's amazing power to impregnate a woman with Jesus. It was not an attack on the family. It was to show man who God truly was.

He loved us so much that He left His thrown in Heaven and came to earth as God.

He healed. He preached. He lived a life free from all sin and died for our sins because we cannot save ourselves. Please do not be deceived.

If you repent and confess Jesus Christ as Lord, He will save your soul.
08:03 PM on 12/20/2010
Throne, not thrown. Maybe he was thrown out of heaven for misconduct?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanGreen
02:59 PM on 12/21/2010
"Thrown?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Treehuggindirtworshiper
Steward of God's Creation
10:10 AM on 12/20/2010
A lot of the comments seem to be based on the writers view of fact. As a Christian I don't claim to know the mind of God. It's beyond human understanding. There are a lot of things we can't explain but it doesn't mean there isn't an answer, we just don't have an answer yet. For those who choose not to believe, well good luck with that. I'll respect your non-belief even if you don't respect my belief.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LanceLee
07:22 PM on 12/20/2010
If someone believed, I mean truly believed, that Zeus existed, that Zeus was God and there was no question about it, would you respect his beliefs? You may humour him, you probably wouldn't try to embarrass him, but would you really respect him?

That is how I feel about you, then. You truly believe in a story that doesn't make sense and doesn't have a basis in reality, isn't backed up with fact. If you picked up the Bible off the shelf at the Library, and read the thing with no history behind it, would you generate a belief system around it?

Also, I don't have a non-belief. I don't need belief at at all. Well, in a way I believe in my wife and daughter, if you know what I mean, but I don't need to make up stories to explain things I don't understand.

You are absolutely right, there are things we can't explain. I'm OK with that, I leave it there. What happens after death? I don't know, and I'm fine with not knowing. I guess my question for you, why do you need to make up a story to answer those questions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Treehuggindirtworshiper
Steward of God's Creation
07:46 PM on 12/20/2010
I didn't mean to offend. Peace.
06:32 AM on 12/22/2010
That's great. I would be happy for you to believe in what you want, but keep it out of the public sphere and away from my children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Treehuggindirtworshiper
Steward of God's Creation
08:35 AM on 12/22/2010
Well I can't keep my belief that all persons have a right to be legally married and treated equally in the eyes of God and the law but I certainly don't condone school prayer or the teaching of any faith in our school system.
photo
Aquest
No one here is exactly what they appear.
12:21 AM on 12/20/2010
hey, If you want to keep censoring comments, why not make 'censored comments' one of the stats.
It would be a badge of honor.

This is so much intellectu­al masturbati­on. The religious belief this myth, they really don't want nor need a rationale in order to accept the idea of virgin birth.

If anyone started thinking about it logically, they might come to the conclusion that the importance of believing in a Virgin Mary, virgin birth, was the start if not the basis of the suppressio­n of women. If god could force a woman to be pregnant and give birth without her consent, the god is basically saying that rape is OK, that women are property, have no rights and should be used and treated any way someone more powerful (men in this case) want.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FreedToChoose
...excepting when I'm not.
07:06 PM on 12/19/2010
Considering how many historic figures were born of a virgin--Jesus, Caesar, Sargon(?), Lao-Tzu (conceived by a shooting star and born an old man)--the issue seems moot.
photo
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
06:18 PM on 12/19/2010
to believe scripture of a quote 2,000 yrs old doesnt seem very reasonable