More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard (RJ) Eskow

GET UPDATES FROM Richard (RJ) Eskow
 

From Alexandria to Zuccotti Park: They've Been Destroying Books For 2,000 Years

Posted: 11/25/11 12:44 PM ET

Fahrenheit 451: The temperature at which book paper catches fire and burns.

They're back.

But then, they've never gone away. The Book Killers have always been with us. Before recorded history they were with us, murdering the scholars and storytellers and mystics of every tribe they ever conquered.

They were there when Great Library burned in Alexandria 2,000 years ago. They destroyed the library known as the House of Wisdom when the Mongol Empire invaded Baghdad in 1258. They say the invaders took the books from every ruined library in Baghdad and piled them into the Tigris River, to serve as a bridge for their soldiers and chariots.

They say the river ran black with ink for years.

In 2003 the United States invaded Iraq with an indifference, incompetence, and arrogance that led to anarchy in the streets. There was widespread rioting, vandalism, and looting of priceless ancient antiquities and manuscripts. The National Library burned, and the flames lit the skies for miles around.

Seven centuries later, the great library of Baghdad died again.

Always before it had been like snuffing a candle. The police went first and adhesive-taped the victim's mouth and bandaged him off into their glittering beetle cars, so when you arrived you found an empty house. You weren't hurting anyone, you were hurting only things!

- Fahrenheit 451

Now the book assassins have come to Wall Street. They removed the people and property from Zuccotti Park, destroying or damaging thousands of books in the process. Occupiers and Supporters brought the surviving books to a press conference this week. They were "torn, wrinkled, coverless and even mangled," as Gianna Palmer reported for McClatchy. "Among the books visible on the table were a leather-bound copy of the Bible, a collection of Chinese mythology and a volume of selected poems by Allen Ginsberg."

Bloomberg hasn't apologized. In his press conference announcing the raid he wore the same arrogant look of self-satisfaction that humanity has seen for thousands of years. It was the face of every Mongol chieftain, every Roman centurion, every officious book-destroying official that has ever lived.

Bloomberg and his compatriots would undoubtedly be horrified at any comparison to these vandals and barbarians. If Bloomberg ever does deign to apologize, which might only happen if there's enough political pressure, he'll undoubtedly say it was an accident.

And since things really couldn't be hurt, since things felt nothing, and things don't scream or whimper, as this woman might begin to scream and cry out, there was nothing to tease your conscience later.

But it was no accident. As Captain Ray Lewis explained to Piers Morgan, police procedure demands that receipts be provide for any personal property that is confiscated. The property must then be stored carefully. Negligence is no defense for the destruction of any property. And a society that values knowledge should be especially horrified at the destruction of books.

Bloomberg and his minions ignored police procedure. His police, aided by a private militia, disregarded property rights that are safeguarded for any suspected criminal.

But then, they knew they weren't dealing with criminals. They were dealing with something much more threatening to their system: Independence.

You were simply cleaning up. Janitorial work, essentially ... Who's got a match!

Rights are inalienable, which means they can't be sold or transferred. Somebody should tell that to Bloomberg and any other politicians. It means you can't designate a public area as "privately owned" and then retroactively suspend civil liberties there. Somebody ought to give Mayor Bloomberg a copy of the Constitution.

I'm sure the Occupiers would have been happy to lend him theirs.

Rights are also indivisible. If you discard one or two of our legal safeguards, you've discarded them all. Nobody gets to decide how many of our freedoms we're allowed, when or where they may be granted or denied. That's not freedom at all.

Books in the Occupy Library were literally treated like garbage. Their owners were finally allowed to reclaim their shredded remains - at the Sanitation Department.

But that shouldn't be a surprise. Bloomberg and his forces were already treating the Constitution like trash and police manuals like toilet paper. Why behave any differently toward a library? After all, Bloomberg and his peers must have been furious at what they would have considered the arrogance, the impertinence, of Zuccotti Park's residents. A library? A library is for a community!

And we decide who is a community and who isn't, say the Book Killers.

A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man's mind.

Even worse, books contain ideas. And information. You only have to read one or two of them to realize how transparently Mayor Bloomberg is lying - about human rights, or about the cause of the financial crisis of 2008. One of the Occupy movement's great victories has been the unmasking of Michael Bloomberg, who until now had been the false face of a "centrist" mythology designed to hide the corruption behind today's politico-economic dynasty.

Billionaires sometimes endow libraries, but they don't want people creating their own. Knowledge is power, and power must be centralized. The centralization is well underway. As the book publishing industry shrinks, that power will be concentrated in the hands of fewer and larger corporations.

At this rate, the "Firemen" in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 will soon be obsolete. So will Bloomberg's batallions. Soon a faceless bureaucrat or corporate lackey will be able to destroy every single copy of any "unauthorized" book - instantly, simultaneously, and permanently - with a single electronic command.

"It was a pleasure to burn. It was a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed."

Have you seen the video clips of the Mayor announcing his crackdown? It's the look of a man who was, as Southern aristocrats used to say, "taking his pleasure with his social inferiors." But some pleasures extract a high price on the soul.

In the end it doesn't matter whether the destruction of Zuccotti Park's library was "deliberate," or just the byproduct of a vandal's disrespect for the written word. Either way it showed us the values of the Bloomberg Administration. We've seen those values for 2,000 years.

Books were destroyed in Alexandria? Too bad, but we needed to burn the waterfront. Books were destroyed in Baghdad? Too bad, but we needed a bridge. They're all the same, these Book Killers. When it comes to the written word, their indifference and contempt reveals their brutality and hatred.

Destroying books is the instinctive act of tyrants and their servants. Subconsciously or consciously, they're driven by a desire to crush the minds of others, the awareness of others, the memory of others. Most of all, they're driven by a desire to destroy their own awareness and memory, because deep inside themselves they know what they're doing is wrong.

The Book Killers. Every time they destroy a book, they destroy a piece of themselves. They can ruin the physical objects, but they can't ruin the spirit that creates them, reads them, and shares them.

The Book Killers. In every age, they return. They come back to destroy the books, and they often succeed. But they never kill the minds, the memories, or the insights behind them. They can never kill knowledge, or passion, or justice, or wisdom. They're always trying, but they always fail.

And in the end, that's why they always lose.

 

Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow

 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
11:23 PM on 11/26/2011
Anyone defending the destruction of books has little understanding of the principles which this country was founded upon. Nor do they have any understanding of what a healthy civilization should be.

To defend the destruction of books, regardless of circumstances, is to stand with the barbarians and the destroyers of civilization.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
07:57 PM on 11/26/2011
intentionally destroying books conjures up all sorts of images i'd rather not think about. and i have little doubt that they were destroyed intentionally, along with the tents and sleeping bags. whatever the reasons were, it appears to be an attempt to destroy the infrastructure that supported people's ability to stay there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
shooting fish in a barrel is sure relaxing
09:33 AM on 11/26/2011
In the movie "Rollerball", James Caan's character visits a library where history is kept in a few banks of digital archives, trying to find out about the past. The curator/keeper comments that once they had a system crash and lost the whole of the 13th Century. Was that serious, Caan's character asks. "No, just a few corrupt popes and a war or two" went the reply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
07:08 PM on 11/26/2011
That was before Barbara Tuchman published her classic 14th century history A DISTANT MIRROR!
08:47 AM on 11/26/2011
If you want a picture of the future we're heading toward, add an image of a pile of books burning forever in the background to the image of "a boot stamping on a human face—forever" in the foreground. Make no mistake, those who are complacent about & even complicit with the 'Book Killers' are responsible. This is NOT mysticism - it follows the laws of cause & effect (causality - causation).

"There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always—do not forget this, Winston—always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever."
—Part III, Chapter III, Nineteen Eighty-Four
02:47 AM on 11/26/2011
WOW this article is a real stretch!

What is most telling for me about the OWS is the widespread use of illegal drugs. This shows contempt for the law, but more, an incredible selfishness. While they sit 'protesting', the money they use to buy the drugs is in-turn used to oppress, murder, and enslave people on both sides of the border. I find the hypocrasy incredible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
07:10 PM on 11/26/2011
If drugs were legalized, that money would no longer finance oppression, murder and enslavement.
10:21 AM on 11/28/2011
True, but while drugs remain illegal, they STILL finance oppression, murder and enslavement. But I guess that’s OK with the OWS crowd as long as it’s not affecting THEM? The glaring hypocrisy of the OWS has revealed the movement as a sham. They use the same arguments to justify their bad behavior as the administration uses to defend corrupt government loans, gun trafficking and billionaire bailouts.
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
11:03 PM on 11/26/2011
But the most telling thing about the crack down on OWS is pepper-spray, beatings and the destruction of books.

These are NOT the tactics appropriate to a free society; they are the tactics of a society that oppressed its people and seeks not freedom of thought, but a brutal conformity of thought.

Compared to that, smoking a little weed is rather beside the point.
10:09 AM on 11/28/2011
OWS is trying very hard to create conflict with the police so that they can keep in the headlines. It’s quite cowardly because while the police have been trained to show restraint, the OWS continuously shows selfishness and contempt for everyone around them. They’ve been violent with kids, with the police, with property and with each other. I see nothing redeeming in OWS’ inconsistent message, their arrogance or their ignorance.

The OWS crowd is guilty of the same hubris, arrogance and greed with which they try to paint others. They have no problem putting others out of work, costing taxpayers’ money to clean up their filth, or inciting meaningless violence. Maybe they should go home, shower, and actually try to do some good in the world instead of making it worse for everyone around them! Or would that be too grown up for them to handle?
10:31 AM on 11/28/2011
The callousness of your last sentence sends shivers down my spine. How can you compare a little pepper spray with over 34,000 murders financed by people who "smoke a little weed". I can understand a child thinking that way, but an adult? How can you make so little of the suffering of others while trying to inflate the "suffering" of the OWS? I guess that explains the mentality of the OWS. TOTAL NARCISISM and a desire for the government to be a spoiling MOMMY, with no rules and no accountability. Drug use finances the murder of others and you're perfectly ok with it. Disgusting, yet completely consistent with OWS 'values'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NY Guy
President Romney - get used to it.
02:52 PM on 11/25/2011
Zuccotti Park was not a library, it was a tent with books in it located on someone else's property.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:35 PM on 11/25/2011
jesus wept...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
07:11 PM on 11/26/2011
Nobody's gonna promote readin' on MY property!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Three Lakes
01:43 PM on 11/25/2011
Thankfully the Internet brings me fine writers and explanations to what is happening in this sorry society. I hope this freedom continues a long time.
photo
JR1126
actor, author of Shut Up & Dance!
01:40 PM on 11/25/2011
Powerful piece. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
01:37 PM on 11/25/2011
You're not really comparing the Occupation's book collection with Alexandria are you?

Come on. You hold an occupation and then tie yourselves to the site with a bunch of peripheral stuff you think you need, like a soup kitchen and "library."

If books were destroyed, well so were tents, laptops and other possessions. All the detritus of a supposedly illegal presence was swept away.

Maybe Occupy 2.0 and dump the soup kitchens, libraries, drum collections and tents and move light and fast.

It's how we won the American Revolution. Learn from history. Imagine if the Minute Men had to move wagonloads of books and beans when the British were coming!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
RJ Eskow
01:46 PM on 11/25/2011
So let me see if I understand your position:

1) People can't bring anything with them when they are exercising their freedoms of speech and assembly.

2) If they do, those possessions should be subject to illegal seizure and destruction by the authorities, in violation of law and accepted police procedure.

3) The Occupiers had a "library" - with quotation marks around it - not a real library. Because a real library is a collection of books, and theirs was ... well, I don't get your point at all.

4) What's wrong with illegally destroying books? After all, they illegally destroyed other stuff too.

5) In your version of history the Minute Men - who were soldiers, after all, and not demonstrators - didn't carry books. Or beans. (I wonder how they ate.)

Interesting position you have there. I don't share it.
03:47 PM on 11/25/2011
Thank you RJ. Saved me the trouble and you said it so well.
And indeed, books are sacred things if anything is.
10:59 PM on 11/25/2011
You conveniently forget that someone's right to freedom of speech ends when they are trampling other's rights to use the park or if it is private property, to own the park. The Occupiers were camping illegally, were told to move, chose not to move so they were arrested. The police have little choice but the occupiers did, they chose to stay and be arrested or removed. If there books were so important, they should have removed them in advance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
04:16 PM on 11/25/2011
I can agree there's a difference between destroying knowledge, which Medieval book-burning and 451 were about, and destroying property, but the police shouldn't have done either one.