Clinton's followers have been insulting Obama supporters for months, denigrating them as 'cultists' and worse, and I pointed out last week that Clinton's followers often behave in cultlike behavior. Now we have the controversy over Rev. Wright. His more objectionable comments about Hillary Clinton can be categorized with those of Robin Morgan, who wrote a rambling and vain pro-Clinton diatribe several weeks ago.
Robin Morgan mythologized Clinton, giving her experiences and qualities she doesn't have, while trivializing and denigrating Obama. Morgan seems to associate support for Obama with every offensive sexist act ever taken, much as Rev. Wright seems to assocate Hillary and her supporters with racism. As literal truth, Morgan's essay is almost meaningless.
Other feminist Hillary supporters, especially some of my generation, have put enormous pressure on other women to support Hillary regardless of their personal preference. Jessica Valenti writes about the experience of Maureen McFadden facing the board of the feminist organization that employs her:
.. The chair of the board asked Maureen McFadden, a communications executive with the organization, which candidate she'd voted for in the recent primary. McFadden, hoping to avoid an awkward moment, answered that she'd voted by absentee ballot. The board chair pressed ahead, "Did you vote for a boy or a girl?"Still other pro-Hillary feminists have suggested that black men are less oppressed than women. These feminists are the mirror image of Rev. Wright."I paused for a long time," says McFadden. "Then I told her I voted for a boy--I wasn't going to lie." McFadden, who has worked on women's issues for twenty years, says the room went silent and the board chair chastised her. "It was clear that I had betrayed feminism by voting for Obama. It became obvious--if you didn't vote for Hillary, you were less than a feminist and only marginally a woman."
Yet I'm not prepared to throw any of them overboard because I disagree with their statements. All of them are reflecting genuine experience ... and genuine pain. All of them have struggled with prejudice, and we should honor each of them for their experience, their struggle, and their contribution.
If Rev. Wright says extreme things, he has spent a lifetime fighting against extreme evils - the evils of poverty, inadequate health care, and brutal prejudice. If some feminists say extreme things, they have spent a lifetime seeing half of humanity robbed of the ability to reach its full human potential - and sometimes even robbed of their lives. If they project their own struggle onto a political insider like Hillary Clinton, that's understandable. Hillary's life decisions - even those that may be incomprehensible to younger women - reflect the experience of many generations of women who lacked better choices in their lives.
The tragedy is that neither group can see beyond its own pain to recognize the pain of the other. Hopefully, someday we will move toward a more inclusive politics that can change that. This year, I'd like to see people choose their candidate on the basis of what each could bring to the office of President. I hope that they do, and of course I hope they'll choose the candidate I support. Yet the 'cultists' who project their own experience and pain onto the candidates are a reflection of genuine experience, and have much to teach us about our shared American reality.
I intend to continue learning from all of them.
A Night Light
The Sentinel Effect: Healthcare Blog
Future-While-U-Wait
RJ Eskow at the Huffington Post
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
With this comment: : "Clinton's followers have been insulting Obama supporters for months, denigrating them as 'cultists' and worse," you definitely take yourself off the" we need to all stand together bandwagon,",chiding both sides for bad behavior.
Sexist and hostile comments about H.C must be just truth in your mind.Do you really think this is a healing stance or do you just want to continue the diatribes? It may turn against you when Obama needs all the votes he can get if he faces McCain or do you really think Obama supporters alone can carry the Dem side?
He cant win the election that is the fact.
fact- a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred.
I wasn't aware the election had already occurred...
As I predicted some weeks ago, the MSM have switched from fawning over Obama to treating him like a political oddity, a hopeless romantic who (the coverage implies) has little chance of actually winning the presidency. This transition was predictable because Obama poses too great a threat to the nation's establishment, the New York money men who don't trust him to do their bidding if he's elected. He's a loose cannon, so they prefer Hillary. They secretly prefer McCain even more, and in the months ahead you will see the media increasingly fawn over McCain while Obama, if he's still around, will be treated with sorrowful condescension, as one might treat a once-promising child who has become an embarrassment. It's a cliche but still true: Follow the (New York) money.
My perspective is that he was given tremendous leeway to flesh out his vision. He failed to do so.
And then there's those of us who have been lucky to not be a victim of either racism or sexism our whole lives, who are looking at the fractions in the party with growing dismay. I happen to be an Obama supporter, because I looked at their ideas, and I liked his better. However, come November, I will happily vote for whoever has the D after their name, rather than see four, or more likely, eight years of President John McBush!
Actually, if I may be so bold, even if you are a white male, I'd still practice adopting the same "niche" thinking.
You're as much of a niche as anyone.
True, but I try not to think of myself as a niche voter, and instead focus on being simply a good human being. I sometimes succeed.
Glad to hear it ! This is the stance we need to have to win against the Repugs .The diatribes between the two candidates supporters based upon hostile name calling and vicious rumor must must stop.Reminding ourselves that we need the other's votes to accomplish our task
needs to become a must before posting.
These are not just the philosophical musings of a new...
Two significant comments in the past two days by...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
Jim Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for...
Don't write off Saint Sarah all you political pundits,...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
Posted March 18, 2008 | 01:11 PM (EST)