This is the age of corporatized politics. That means we may admire our leaders, but we can't depend on them. We're paying the price for Thomas Jefferson's unfulfilled desire to "crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
This July 4th, politics is too important to be left to the politicians. The stakes are too high and the system is too broken. Citizen action is everyone's job now, and it will be as long as our political debate focuses on misplaced austerity and ignores the majority's yearning for jobs, growth, and those things that government does best.
But the problem isn't just with politicians, or even the system. The problem is dependence itself.
We call it "Independence Day." But the British didn't leave on July 4, 1776. The war lasted until September 3, 1783, when the Treaty of Paris was signed. July 4th is the day we declared ourselves independent. Victory came with the recognition that freedom is our natural condition. Our country wasn't born with violence, but with the realization that freedom is discovered and claimed, not granted by others. That's why we celebrate July 4, not September 3, as our Day of Independence.
That will disappoint the history-challenged right-wingers whose patriotic posturing is limited to speaking in their odd pseudo-military lingo, that echolalic Esperanto for fantasy revolutionaries. They don't realize that war is a tactic, not a system of values. And "independence"? Today's "Tea Party" wasn't named for the tea-dumping patriots of Boston, but for some self-entitled commodities traders shrieking "losers!" on cable television. They were sneering at struggling homeowners, mocking middle-class people like the Tea Partiers themselves. And they were enraged at the idea that ordinary families might be rescued the same way their own financier class had been rescued.
They won. Nobody's rescued the middle class yet. Unlike them, the Founders believed in common purpose. They shared George Washington's goal of "protecting the rights of humane nature and establishing an Asylum for the poor and oppressed of all nations and religions." They understood what conservatives don't: There's a difference between declaring independence and telling people they're on their own.
When Sarah Palin tells her followers to "RELOAD!" she has no idea where to aim. When Michele Bachmann says she wants people to be "armed and dangerous," she doesn't understand what's endangered. When John Stossel "jokes" about hanging Barney Frank in effigy, he's putting reason (and the tattered shreds of his own reputation) in the noose generals once used for hanging enemies -- and patriots like Nathan Hale.
At least their mangling of Revolutionary War history gave us a great chuckle, when Keith Olbermann said Sarah Palin thought Paul Revere was "warning the British Invasion that kicks keep getting harder to find." Conservatives adopt the Revolution's pose and forget its principles. They're dress-up generals in a make-believe war, corporate servants who use the rhetoric of yesterday's revolution to serve today's Redcoats.
We fought for the principles of self-representation and economic freedom. Those principles are under attack again today. But there's no place for rhetorical violence (or any other kind) in today's debate. When corporations intimidate us with economic pressure and distorted information, the best responses are communication and mobilization.
We resisted Britain's state-sanctioned monopolies in 1776. Today's government-sanctioned corporations hang out on Wall Street, not by the chartered Thames. The spirit of the East India Company lives in the five banks which now control nearly 96% of the derivatives market in this country. Our financial oligarchs receive Treasury Department money, Federal Reserve giveaways, and get-out-of-jail-free cards for a corporate crime wave that would make Al Capone blush.
Some of our ancestors came to this country as slaves or indentured servants. The slaves were freed in body but their descendants' economic freedom is not yet fully won. Unemployment's much worse for African Americans. Infant mortality rates are 2.5 times higher than they are for whites and life expectancy is years shorter. Indentured servitude's making a comeback, too. In colonial days people signed away years of freedom for the "loan" of ship's passage to America, where they were sold to bidders for a period of bondage. If only Wall Street had existed then! Imagine the money Goldman Sachs could have made on selling "IBS's" -- "indenture-backed securities."
And then shorting them, of course.
Today's borrowers aren't exactly indentured servants, but their contract terms can be unilaterally changed and their debts sold and resold without notice. Their homes may be foreclosed by unknown lenders for violating terms they didn't know existed. If they resist paying unfair penalties, the full weight of the law will be brought down on them (but not the banks.) Bad credit may leave them unable to borrow money, rent a home, or even find a job.
These economic injustices and others will continue as long as wealthy contributors corrupt our political process. Many of us feel the President can and should do much more to rein in Wall Street, create jobs, and defend Medicare and Social Security. But any likely opponent would probably be far worse. Politicians in this post-Citizens United world are either limited by corporate power or prostituted to it..
So we must work around, as well as within, the electoral system. That means getting the truth out, speaking for the majority's viewpoint, and outlining the real choices we face. That's especially hard when almost everyone in Washington is pushing austerity over jobs and growth (no matter how many Nobel Prize-winning economists tell them they're wrong), and when media empires mislead us about our situation and its causes. So we must wage a war for the mind -- a war against corporate think tanks and TV talking heads who tell us our problems arise from self-indulgence and those in need, not corporate malfeasance and runaway greed.
So it's a war against media monopolies, and for publicly-financed elections. Politicians can do great things, but they can't lead this struggle. This week some conservatives claimed John Lennon was a secret Ronald Reagan fan. Jon Weiner, the writer and historian who's authored two books on Lennon, effectively refuted them. Weiner points out that Lennon's last political statement was in support of union workers. But to truly dismiss their claim, all you need (besides love, of course) is this Lennon quote:
"You make your own dream ... If you want to save Peru, go save Peru ... Don't expect Jimmy Carter or Ronald Reagan or John Lennon or Yoko Ono or Bob Dylan or Jesus Christ to come and do it for you. You have to do it yourself."
Lennon was right, and if he were still around I suspect he'd add another Presidential name or two to that list.
We can vote for the best (or least objectionable) choices in the next election, but we can't surrender our fate to them. We'll need to keep pressuring them with calls, petitions, and other initiatives. In this corporatized system, we can't expect many leaders to heed Revolutionary pamphleteer (and ur-blogger) Thomas Paine, who said "Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead." Paine also made this timely observation: "Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice."
Some of us have surrendered to despair. Chris Hedges, one of our most brilliant political writers, wrote recently: "When did our democracy die? When did it irrevocably transform itself into a lifeless farce ...?" But he's wrong. Democracy hasn't died here, not yet. Despite a half-century of corporate manipulation and misinformation the country elected a President with an unlikely name and biography, one who promised real change.
What we've learned since then is that the system itself must change. That begins with the vision of something better. "Revolution is not the uprising against preexisting order," said the Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset, "but the setting up of a new order contradictory to the traditional one." We have to imagine what our leaders can't or won't imagine, then work to bring it into being.
Hard? Sure. But democracy? Dead? Tell it to the Egyptians. They won't be completely free or democratic until we're completely free and democratic. But they've accomplished what seemed impossible, and so can we. It will take action -- independent action, action that doesn't depend on a leader or a spokesperson or party, action that rejects even the most informed pessimism or the deepest despair. That kind of action needs an independence that comes from within.
Happy Independence Day.
Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow
Ken Allen: Say 'Corporatization,' Not 'Privatization'
Curtis Arnold: 10 Worst States for Credit
DeMint Chronicles Rise of Tea Party in New Book
Bleak Prospects for Substantive Immigration Debate in 2012
In time for Election 2012, a Stephen Colbert super PAC. What is that?
With districts yet to be redrawn, candidates still lining up for 2012
A Departing Governor Looks Ahead to a Bigger Prize in Mexico
Liberals Want Justice Ginsburg To Resign Before 2012 Elections?
When you have millions of people wanting change but are in distress trying to figure out how to do something about it, they just get frustrated. WE need a person who is respected and has the ability to help co-ordinate massive rallies to get it moving. Any suggestions?
Robert Reich on Labor Day in front of the White House to protest our jobless society due to loopholes and outsourcing would be good, but no matter how many times I post it no one wants to get involved.
Mental fatigue has worked inflicted by the Corporations money and power. Too many just feel hopeless.
Send letters to Progressives United, Moveon.org, ect---ask them for their help and support. My letters alone won't do it. If we don't, we have no one to blame but ourselves.
Our democracy will not effectively be a government of the people, by the people and for the people until we find a way to limit free speech to individual people, and to prevent the wholesale bribery that pervades all three branches of our federal government now. We must make the changes necessary to fund political campaigns with only public money.
Each candidate should be given equal funding and ir time and run on their merits.
One is temped to think that we've already lost. But we are in a much better position than the founding fathers were. If we can't hold on to our Republic against the corporate takeover pressure - then we deserve to loose it. We must at least try! So let's organize and start electing representatives of the PEOPLE rather than buying the corporate choices that they put up. If we take back our government it must be one city council seat at a time. That's how the conservatives have managed to rule from the minority. They payed attention at the small level. Let's get busy!
"Let's get busy!" at this point, amounts to not just closing the barn door after the horse is gone, but after the barn has burned to the ground. In the poor old battered U.S.A. right now, the individual voter means nothing at all. Want to change the status quo? Well, then, how many millions have you got? No, wait, make that... billions.
Either we end free speech and polictical dontations for all groups or else we end free speech for none of them. Don't approch me & my orginization and tell me we can't by TV time unless you and your groups are willing to give up the same right.
Corporations are a mistake. They have become above the law. They stole untold billions in the name of profits, and when it came time for them to pay up for their crimes we learned we are nothing more than slaves to the corporate world. They have so infected American that if there reckless greed caused them to fall so too would our financial system. So we bailed them out, just so they can turn to the people who saved them, the tax payers of this country and tell them we are going to cut off your life support. If you don't make it in our world you can starve and die.
Long live your "free" speech.
And at the moment nobody is saying you can't buy tv time, we are saying (Supreme Court endorsed this idea 8-1) that you should tell us who your donors are that are funding your tv time, so voters have information about the source when considering which ads to believe at election time.
Grass roots movement of every day folk who are only concerned with fiscal responsibility and less intrusive government....that's the big lie the baggers still hold dear.....
It's all nonsense and slight of hand,and I for one am smart enough to see the truth....
As things turned out, though, Carter was the last genuine Democrat to occupy the White House— Clinton and Obama certainly can't be considered Democrats. There's only one party now, the Corporatist party. It has two wings, and the only real choice the voters have there is whether they want more or less intrusion by organized religion into the public arena. Other than that, they're just Tweedledum and Tweedledumber. There won't be any "taking back" of the country by the Main Street folks, because the current generation has been raised in a dumbed-down country where nothing much matters but creature comforts and entertainment. The result? They're as pliable as can be, with all the backbone of a jellyfish... definitely not Lexington and Concord material.