The Obama Administration worked for months on a deal that would have let America's biggest banks off the hook for a crime wave of runaway mortgage fraud. All they had to do in return was pledge a negligible sum of money, to be paid by their shareholders and not themselves, and which they would dispense themselves. In return, crooked bankers received immunity from prosecution - and even from investigation.
After the deal came under attack from a number of its allies, the Administration settled with the banks anyway. But it promised millions of wronged homeowners - and the nation as a whole - that it would move "aggressively" to investigate criminal misdeeds and prosecute bankers and anyone else who broke the law.
That was then, this is now. Two and half months later the Administration hasn't even started to take the inadequate steps it promised it would take. The clock is running out on the statute of limitations and there's no sign that the Administration has lifted a finger to investigate criminal bankers.
Talk vs. Action
hThe New York Daily News did something simple and smart today - so simple and smart, in fact, that some of us wish we'd thought of it first. It called the Justice Department switchboard and asked for the "Mortgage Fraud Task Force." The operators didn't know what they were talking about. As of a couple weeks ago Eric Schneiderman, the New York State Attorney General who was appointed to the Task Force as the homeowner's champion, didn't even have a phone yet.
The contrast between the talk and the action - or lack thereof - couldn't be clearer. Look at some of the statements made by the President and members of his team when this deal was signed, and compare them to this week's Daily News report:
"The mortgage fraud task force I announced in my State of the Union address retains its full authority to aggressively investigate the packaging and selling of risky mortgages that led to this crisis."
- President Obama, February 9
"On March 9 -- 45 days after the speech and 30 days after the announcement -- we met with Schneiderman in New York City and asked him for an update. He had just returned from Washington, where he had been personally looking for office space. As of that date, he had no office, no phones, no staff and no executive director."
- Daily News
"This investigation is already well underway."
- President Obama, February 9
"None of the 55 staff members promised by Holder had materialized."
- Daily News
"And working closely with state attorneys general, we're going to keep at it until we hold those who broke the law fully accountable."
- President Obama, February 9
"On April 2, we bumped into Schneiderman on a train leaving Washington for New York and learned that the situation was the same."
- Daily News
"[The deal] benefits struggling homeowners now, not some time in the future when the help they need may be too late."
- Senior Justice Department official Bob Ryan, February 9
"Tuesday (April 17), calls to the Justice Department's switchboard requesting to be connected with the working group produced the answer, 'I really don't know where to send you.'"
- Daily News
"This action, while significant, is only one step of many. But this action is momentous."
- Spokesperson for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, February 9
"After being transferred to the attorney general's office and asking for a phone number for the working group, the answer was, "'I'm not aware of one.'"
- Daily News
Small Talk
The Administration only promised 55 staffers for the Task Force, despite the fact that the much smaller Savings and Loan scandal was investigated by roughly 1,000 staffers. But they haven't even met that meager goal. An anonymous Justice Department official told David Dayen, for example, that "at least 50" people were working on mortgage fraud.
Yet when I spoke with David at length on The Breakdown (a great conversation - check out the whole hour) it seemed that a clarification was needed: Did the official say specifically that these 50 people were working full-time on the investigation? No, said Dayen. Did he say whether they were professional staff, support people, or another type of employee? No. (They clearly weren't telephone operators.)
And let's not mince words: There's a reason why a judge in Louisiana recently called Wells Fargo "highly reprehensible" as she slapped it with a $3.1 million judgement. As her ruling makes perfectly clear, the bank cheated its customers, broke its contracts, and then spent a fortune in court trying to wear the plaintiff down.
That's how they all operate. An audit in San Francisco found that 84 percent of foreclosures were performed illegally,reports Reuters, while 4500 out of 6100 mortgage documents studied in North Carolina showed "signature irregularities" (a clear warning sign for fraud).
As we were saying, there's a reason for the judge's outrage: These guys are slime balls.
In the face of such wanton crookedness and downright evil, the Administration's overall handling on bank fraud is quickly moving from disappointing to disillusioning even for some of its most diehard supporters. After all, it's been three years since the banks' crimes have come to light. Where are the prosecutions?
Watchdogs
And fraud isn't the only area where the White House is failing. Here's what President Obama said on February 9:
"We're going to make sure that the banks live up to their end of the bargain. If they don't, we've set up an independent inspector, a monitor, that has the power to make sure they pay exactly what they agreed to pay, plus a penalty if they fail to act in accordance with this agreement."
Unfortunately it looks like monitor Joseph Smith isn't being given much of a staff, either, although he tried to put a positive spin on it. American Banker interviewed Smith and reported that "Smith said he wants to keep his own staff small and rely heavily on contractors to help him review the self-monitoring work that must be done."
But the pool of contractors is small. Although Smith says he wants to avoid hiring the "usual suspects," most of the candidate firms will have a built-in conflict of interest. They all depend on the big banks themselves for a large chunk of their revenue. Smith's role is temporary but Wall Street's is permanent - and they all know it.
What's more, all of the large accounting firms have signed off on inaccurate (if not downright fraudulent) financials for the big banks in the past. (See some reflections on bad accounting firms and our own work experience in "Law and Order: AIG.") Are these firms really expected to police dishonest bankers?
Pyramid of Failure
The Administration has already retreated on key elements of Dodd/Frank, the financial reform bill which was already too weak to protect the world's economy from crooked behavior and too-big-to-fail banks. (Here's one recent example; Here's another. ) Its HAMP program was a cruel disappointment, and now we've learned that its "Hardest Hit Fund" has only paid out 2 percent of the money that was allocated to help unemployed homeowners. The only real action seems to be taking place on the state level, but most local officials and state Attorneys General have also been asleep at the switch.
The enforcement failure is dramatic, it is systemic, and it is taking place at every level of government. The chain of failure leads straight to the top. We heard a lot of talk in February but there's been no perceptible action since then. The only concrete thing to come out of this settlement so far is that the banks got a cheap ticket out of the litigation death trap brought on by their own criminality.
This settlement was always profoundly flawed, but it provided some opportunities for further action - or we were told it did. But there's very little evidence anybody's acting on these opportunities - and time is running out.
________
The coalition of progressive groups that worked to improve the original settlement (disclosure: I work for one of them) is now urging people to contact the White House to let them know what they think about the Administration's lack of action.(The White House comment line is 202-456-1111, by the way.) Attorneys General in each state should also get a call, too, and a question: What are you doing to investigate crooked bankers?
Richard (RJ) Eskow, a consultant and writer (and former insurance/finance executive), is a Senior Fellow with the Campaign for America's Future and the host of The Breakdown, broadcast Saturdays nights from 7-9 pm on WeAct Radio, AM 1480 in Washington DC.
Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow
Banksters changing the game to make short term profits from treating a non-fungible as though it were fungible unhinges the hundreds of years old land title system. The "recovery" cannot be as short as recovery from a stock bubble. Real estate and pork bellies cannot be treated the same way.
The same thing happened to me with GMAC! I called to inquire about refinancing to a lower interest rate after the mortgage fraud settlement.........I spoke with two different loan specialists who indicated they didn't know anything about it!!! Oh for heaven's sake, this is ridiculos! I said, "it's posted on your website!" They each still insisted they were completely ignorant of any clause of refinancing to lowered interest rates being a part of the settelement!
Before joining the Obama Administration, Holder was with Covington & Burlington. See link.
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2011/12/27/eric-holder-covington-burling-and-merscorp/
They know that they don’t own our mortgages; notes were never transferred to these trusts. NO PROPER ASSIGNMENTS EXIST!
So when our President, State Attorney Generals, and other government officials that “always” have our best interests in mind, say that Fannie should do principal write-downs, they are just telling us another lie… they know that Fannie doesn’t have any interest in all those mortgages…they don’t own it. There is no law in the world that can change that and they’re aware of it.
http://boston67.blog.com/people-vs-fraud/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89843763/Barry-Fagan-v-Wells-Fargo-Re-Reply-to-Wells-Fargo-s-Opposition-to-Plaintiff-s-Motion-for-Reconsideration-of-the-Motion-to-Compel-WITH-EXHIBITS-A-B
Obama, the lesser of evils in 2012.
This is the 21st century version of trickle down economics based on the idea that if the banks are healthy, the economy is healthy. Perhaps it is really neo-feudalism. We bailed 'em out, right? Then the Federal Reserve keeps feeding them on near zero percent interest so they can profit off people stuck with debt.