Not to question the public's taste in movies, but I need to question the public's taste in movies.
I see you, out in the public, jamming theaters to see this summer's blockbusters -- namely, sequels to ''Fast and Furious,'' ''Star Trek,'' ''Iron Man'' and ''The Hangover.'' Millions and millions spent on what? Entertaining, thrilling, funny movies?
Why, when in the comfort of your own home entertainment system you can stumble almost any week on the greatest movie sequel of our lifetime. While others might quibble and claim ''The Godfather Part 11'' holds that honor, this is no time for quibbling.
This is time for ''Jaws 3-D.''
This second sequel to Steven Spielberg's 1975 "Jaws" -- considered the first summer "blockbuster" -- is a cinematic tour de force that when released in 1983, forever neutered the phrase "tour de force."
If you don't know, ''Jaws 3-D'' is the story of a killer mommy shark terrorizing water skiers and the heavily tanned in an Orlando, Fla., theme park. In the end, the shark dies from a grenade in its throat. Other stuff happens involving blood and bobbing heads and water skier pyramids. But the key plot point is the grenade-in-the-shark-mouth trick.
The movie was directed by none other than the production designer for the first ''Jaws'' -- and by none other, I mean I don't know his name. The movie starred a young Dennis Quaid as Mike Brody, son of Sheriff Brody. Baltimore's Bess Armstrong and Louis Gossett Jr. rounded out the cast, as did talented, selfless extras who were hired during filming at Orlando's SeaWorld 30 years ago.
Reviewers, while sparing the extras, savaged the movie.
"Enough is too much -- even in 3-D. The franchise stinks."
"I have no respect for this film."
Came the reviews on the online movie site, Rotten Tomatoes, which added its own 12-percent "rotten" rating.
What went wrong? Some say the producers should have stuck with the original idea of hiring ''National Lampoon's'' John Hughes (he of "The Breakfast Club" and "Uncle Buck) to write a spoof called ''Jaws 3, People 0.'' But that idea was canned. Cooler, less-fun heads prevailed, and the ''Jaws'' brand was maintained and by that I mean maimed.
Would it have been a better comedy? Of course.
Was the dialogue stilted and the special 3-D effects laughable? Double of course.
But let's focus on what went so very right with ''Jaws 3-D.''
For reasons best left unexplored, I found myself in Orlando in 1983 and standing in line to work a week as a movie extra. I got $50 a day and free lunch. I got to leer at Bess Armstrong, who did not return my leers. I got to chat up Dennis Quaid in between "set-ups," which is movie talk for waiting around for hours while stuff is set up then set up all over again and life's precious moments tick away.
During one set-up, Dennis and I discussed the craft of acting:
We both watched a man load a golf cart with popcorn for our scene.
"So, do you like acting?" I said.
Dennis said something I still think about every day.
"It beats tarring roofs."
All acting is reacting, as any extra knows. And my reaction to shark-spooked Mike Brody racing toward me in his popcorn-packed golf cart -- mere seconds of screen time -- is nothing short of somnambulant. In fact, I might have been sleep walking.
It's eerie to see yourself preserved on film from 30 years ago. I was thinner, true. Had the Polo tucked in, for some reason. And the hair color was that of any Florida boy looking for summer work and without a clue what his own sequel would be.
I just hoped it would beat tarring roofs.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.