Barack Obama's March 18th speech on race in America was game-changing, and very likely will be remembered as historic. Here's why.

In electoral politics -- particularly presidential politics -- people don't vote based on the issues or positions of the candidates. They vote based on their assessment of the qualities of the candidate. Their votes have much more to do with their assessment of candidate character than on 10 point programs.

The videos of the sermons delivered by Barack Obama's former pastor, Reverend Wright, presented problems for his candidacy because they caused voters to question three key candidate qualities that are central to Obama's narrative as to why he should be president.

Most profoundly they caused doubt among white voters as to whether Obama was "on their side" -- the threshold question of all politics. Ironically, the potential that he might completely disown Reverend Wright, raised the same question among African Americans.

Second, voters want leaders who have strongly-held core values. They don't want leaders who tell them one thing but believe something else -- or even worse, have no core values except their own desire to be elected. The Wright videos caused voters to question whether, as they believed, Obama was indeed committed to the core values of unity and hope that have been the central themes of his candidacy.

Third, voters want leaders who are strong, effective leaders -- leaders who can respond to crisis with cool, decisive, effective action. The videos had put Obama on the defensive for days. In politics, when you're on the defensive, you're losing. The crisis put Obama to the test. How, they wondered, would he respond?

With his speech in Philadelphia, Obama passed all of these tests of character -- and more.

His speech made it clear to all who listened that he was absolutely "on their side." He demonstrated a knowledge and empathy for both sides of the racial equation. His speech rang true to African Americans who grew up in the segregated America of the '50s and '60s. But it also rang true to white ethnics who have had to struggle for everything in life and whose jobs are now being outsourced to Southeast Asia.

Rather than a posture of moral superiority, he affirmed the legitimacy of both sides' anger and called on Americans to unite against the forces that have historically stifled the aspirations of both groups and fanned the flames of hatred and division.

He reminded everyone that as the son of an African father and a white mother from Kansas, he is the personal embodiment of an America where everyone is on the same side.

While Obama forcefully dissociated himself from Reverend Wright's remarks, his unwillingness to dissociate himself from his former pastor personally was a convincing testament that he passes the fundamental test of whether someone is on your side: whether or not he is a loyal friend -- even when the chips are down. Obama's speech made clear that while he is absolutely ready to stand firmly against positions with which he disagrees, he is not the kind of person who will throw someone under the bus to advance his own career. It communicated the unmistakable message that he is on our side for keeps.

Second, more than ever, Obama's speech gave insight into his commitment to the core values of unity and hope -- coupled with the even more fundamental values of empathy and responsibility. He demonstrated that he has the empathy to understand what motivates people in the direction of division and anger. And he also demonstrated his commitment to take responsibility to address and resolve racial tension rather than simply ignoring those divisions on the one hand or fanning their flames on the other.

Third, Obama showed America what strong effective leadership is all about. In the face of a crisis that could have sunk his candidacy, he was cool, decisive and bold. Over the objections of some in his own high command he personally made the most critical decision of his campaign and executed it with skill and confidence.

Barack Obama showed America that he is the guy you want answering the red phone at 3AM.

But Obama's speech gave us insight into two other critical qualities as well.

Obama talked to Americans as adults. He presented a serious, no-holds-barred discussion of race in America. He showed he trusted the voters. Voters don't want leaders who patronize them like children -- who pander or sloganeer. They want leaders who treat them with respect.

Finally, Obama demonstrated once again the power of inspiration. He showed us again that inspiration can overcome fear. When leaders inspire us they call on us to be more than we are; they call on us to be the best we can be. Obama didn't lecture or moralize. He declared his commitment to lead America to overcome racial division and hatred -- to be all that we can be.

In the end, it is his ability to inspire us -- to call on us all to be part of something bigger than ourselves -- to sacrifice for our common future -- that has the potential of making Barack Obama a transformational figure -- both in America and on the world stage.

The character of a leader appears in the greatest relief when he is tested. All of us who watched his speech yesterday saw firsthand why Barack Obama should be President of the United States.

Robert Creamer is a long time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: Stand Up Straight. How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com.


Read more HuffPost coverage and reaction to Obama's speech



 
 

Comments
213
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Hi, I'm an Obama supporter. I just listened to the remarks he made Friday with Keith Olbermann, and am comparing them to his wonderful speech. I, like many others, am having trouble resolving what he says in the interview, that he had never heard this kind of tirade, with what he said in the speech. I am tempted to give him the benefit of the doubt, but can someone please help me resolve these two? Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 03/20/2008

Its really simple. There are 52 weeks in a year. Obama joined the church some time in the 1980's. That ends up being 27 maximum years Obama could have caught a sermon by Rev. Wright. 52 x 27 = 1404 sermons. Now if Obama had only lived in that community, never went to the state senate on business, or out of state on organizational business, never went on vacation out of Chicago, AND insisted he never missed a church sermon, then you could make the case that there is NO WAY Obama could have missed a sermon where Rev. Wright made that speech. But most people without a racist agenda who do attend church would think you're some kind of person who PREFERS to believe Obama is lying, rather than using COMMON sense.

Now, it may be possible that you think Wright makes those kinds of sermons every Sunday. That would make you a different kind of dope.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 03/21/2008

If you are sincere email me at my address in my profile. Or just read more reader's comments. He has explained that he heard Rev. Wright say OTHER controversial things, but was not there for those comments the press likes to play over and over. But the more important issue which you seemed to have missed (though I'm glad you give him the benefit of the doubt) is that while he does not agree with the RW's conclusions, he understands the things RW's generation had to endure. But let ME put it this way--- regardless of what Obama may or may not have heard, you either believe he is a racist or you don't. If you don't believe Obama is a racist then you have to believe that he is sincere in saying that the racial divide in this country can never be bridged or understood without a dialog between the races. Such a dialog would help you to understand what beliefs African Americans harbor about whites as well as helping us discover what beliefs whites harbor about us African Americans. If Obama's association with RW is enough to make you think he is a racist then you illustrate the tremendous lack of understanding between the races. Also, It's easy to ignore the fact that Obama recognized how the experiences of many whites lead them to have unfavorable views of Blacks. And we all know that it ain't just a Black/White thing. Having moved to the West Coast, I have become aware of the Hispanic/Blk divide and other things that separate us based on race/ethnicity and an inability to communicate with each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 AM on 03/21/2008

Thanks for the article Mr. Creamer. I have been reading about the polls showing Hillary's increase in popularity (more like Obama's decrease) and while I'm virtually certain these are pre-race speech results, it's still not an "encouraging" thing to see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 03/20/2008

It may not look like it now and it may not look it for several months, but that speech not only cinched the nomination for Obama, he will be the next President of the United States. And I guarantee you the campaign season will get uglier and it'll look like he won't even get the nomination, but my intuition tells me, he will. I do not envy the task he has ahead of him. He'll have a monumental task to clean up the colossal fucked up mess Bush and Cheney created. And he's going to need our help to do it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 03/20/2008

I am very upset when I read comments from people on this site who feel that Obama, in a penned and recited speech, would contradict his own statements.

Obama has undeniable skills as a lawyer, takes care with the meaning of words, and focuses on the meaning of his words for his audience.

However, Obama is not simply writing briefs for other lawyers, he is a master of public opinion, a trial lawyer presenting statements to us, the nation as jurors.

I highly recommend watching the speech as opposed to reading it.

The pacing of the speech is particularly important as is the passion of the man giving the speech that should erase any idea that Obama himself is anti-american.

Perfecting ourselves from imperfect parts was part of his message, as well as the idea that perfection is unattainable.

Obama's platform is hard work for a better life, a reasonable, practical, and sensible idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 03/20/2008
Moderator's Pick

HuffPost's Pick

Respectfully, Mr. Creamer, I can't say that I agree with you. I think the speech (which I read, not heard) was excellent and one of the best that I have ever read, and I have read many.

But it did not address the problem head-on but rather shifted the problem to show that it reflects OUR problems with race in this society. That was all well and good but it does not tell me why this charismatic, intelligent and kind man (Obama) would attend such a church for more than 20 years when it has now become clear - and Obama admitted it - that this man's views, not rarely given, were not just angry but flat-out wrong and patently offensive to many people, NOT just whites. I can accept that he probably belonged to that church because that is where his wife, who seems to hold views in-line with Wright's, belonged or wanted to belong. That would make perfect sense but it certainly wouldn't help him win an election.

Yes, America has a problem with race and I get that as do most people. But being close to a man who damns America, blames 9-11 on us, says AIDS was invented to kill black people (a view shared by fools like Waters) amongst MANY other things said that are crazy on any level, is simply unacceptable to many people I know (myself included).

Also, it has been noted by many of my friends here in NYC (admittedly supporters of Clinton or Republicans) that the reverend's words were only part of the problem. Watch the videos and see how the congregation - Obama's congregation! - reacted to those hateful words. They jumped for joy and cheered out loud. Perhaps Obama didn't know the church was so inclined but you will have the hardest time convincing me of it.

The problem for the Democrats is that this happened so late in the game and it is almost impossible to stop Obama from taking the nomination without alienating the entire black vote. Obama will secure the nomination and the black vote and the progressive vote but I would bet my house on it that he loses the general election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 03/20/2008

Its called changing the argument. Yes, its a manipulation in a sense. But then so was the airing of the Wright tapes. You could spend now until next Christmas quibbling about just how inflammatory or not the Rev.'s statements were and it would resolve nothing except to lose the race for Democrats.

If in the end, Obama's picture of a nation divided about our differences that needs to come together about our common interests, does not prevail, then history will judge his speech as you do. Otherwise, it will go down as an eloquent call to unity.

In football parlance, you would call it a stiff arm. It takes skill and timing, and has scored more than one touchdown.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 03/20/2008

I just want to make it clear that I thought the speech was excellent and one that - whether he wins or loses the nomination or the election - will be remembered and studied for a long time to come.

Have a nice night, Herrington!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 03/20/2008

Obama wasn't decisive but he was well spoken. I said he agrees with everyone: black, white and crazy preacher (well sees where he comes from).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 03/20/2008

50 hours and still no substantive comment from either Clinton on the most important speech on race since the 60's.

How can either Clinton claim a position of leadership for progressives if they don't have the intelligence and sincerity to support the important remarks and encourage the important recommendations Obama made.

The Clintons are what they are: cheap, insincere political hacks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 03/20/2008

I think this speech was a political strike out.

His original statement that he was not present during Wright's radical rantings and his present admission that he was are political liabilities.

His and his family's relationship with this church and this pastor are political liabilities.

Making Imus statements proposing his immediate removal then standing by Wright's lunacy is a political liability.

I don't think the average voter can intellectualize about the necessity of this speech on racial taboos and division without also considering the ploy of a political smokescreen speech given in the state of the next primary in the middle of an extreme media bashing.

I think it will cost him in this 2008 election and beyond, and if Hillary wins the nomination by some stretch of luck, I hope she will reconsider asking him to share the ticket.

Then he would become her political liability.

We have to have a dem occupying 1600 in January.

If Obama gets the nomination, I'll put a clothespin on my nose, cover it with duct tape, spray the booth with Glade and vote my usual straight democratic ticket.

I just wonder how many more foul balls these candidates are going to hit between now and November.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 03/20/2008

"His original statement that he was not present during Wright's radical rantings and his present admission that he was are political liabilities."

He said he wasn't there for the particular rant that's getting all the air-time. And he wasn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 03/20/2008

Obama has always appeared to me as a boy - a rookie. He talks like a professor - talks down while pushing his chin up. He uses words with a flair - yet I can't figure out what he actually believes.

All I can figure out is I'm being told I have to vote for him or I am a racist.
And that his DNA is a problem for him but he wants me to celebrate it for him.

He is getting boring to me - putting me to sleep.

When I wake up - I'm upset and want to run away.

I dreamed that Obama was punishing all the little children for his mixed up miserable life.

Talking to us like adults? That was a joke said with a straight face.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 03/20/2008

It's comments like this that make me understand how Chief Chimp got voted in - twice. Scary.

It's easier when the candidate makes everything appear black and white, no shades of gray, everyone is either a patriot or a terrorist. Nuance and careful consideration is for them intellectuals, I reckon.

[sigh]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 03/20/2008

Your reactions say more about you than Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 03/20/2008

I can't trust what he says. He did not sqaush this from the beginning. He could have. He says one thing, then the other.

I just think that right now we need someone in the White House that knows their way around to get things down now, not later. Good speech, yes. But I want action.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 03/20/2008

Actions AND "solutions"? Well, there you go. Problem solved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 03/20/2008

It sounds like you're criticizing him for taking some time to think through a course of action. From my perspective, rather than address Wright's comments in a vacuum, he took some time to put together a more comprehensive response, turning the whole incident into a teaching moment, raising the level of dialogue.

I contrast this with Clinton's utterly insufficient response to Geraldine Ferraro's ridiculous assertions. Clinton didn't deal with it right away; and when she finally did, she simply said she didn't agree. Presented with an opportunity, she did nothing with it.

By the way, Dick Cheney sure knew his way around the White House when he got there; knew how to get things done. And get them done, he did; just look what he got done...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 03/20/2008

One has to be careful when intruding on an issue such as race, particularly when writing from the country which introduced the shameful concept of slavery to the North Americas. But I think there are some points which may be made.

In English law prior to 1772, slaves were regarded as commodities rather than human beings. It was not until Somerset's Case in 1772 that the great jurist Lord Mansfield declared on a return to habeas corpus that that slavery could not exist in England.

Interestingly, Lord Mansfield had a black ward - the illegitimate daughter of Mansfield's nephew. She lived with his family and appears in a family portrait. Mansfield made generous bequests to her in his will and one wonders whether Mansfield was influenced by the presence of this young lady in his household. Certainly his decision was contrary to precedent but in accordance with principle.

Another dictum of Lord Mansfield occurred to me after viewing Obama's great speech:

"I will not do that which my conscience tells me is wrong to gain the huzzahs of thousands, or the daily praise of all the papers which come from the press; I will not avoid doing what I think is right, though it should draw on me the whole artillery"

I think Obama too spoke in accordance with the dictates of conscience. That is a rare quality in a politician - one might say that it is the difference between a politician and a statesman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 AM on 03/20/2008

Well said!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 03/20/2008

Worth pointing out over and over again, too, is this single fact: slavery was only legal for blacks. Not whites or Indians, unless the latter (called 'brass ankles') had some black blood. Only blacks could be subjected to this horror. Hence the 'racism' at the root of slavery directed toward blacks differed in quality and character from all other racial stereotyping. Not the same thing. Not the same problem. Not the same evil. Not anywhere near dealt with yet, least of all by the adopting of allegedly 'race blind' policies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 03/20/2008

The Cherokee owned black slaves in the South and took them with them to Oklahoma on the Trail of Tears. They were freed by the Cherokee Nation just after the Civil War and were included in the tribe as Freedmen.

I am a descendant of Cherokee and Choctaw, victims of genocide and what would now be called ethnic cleansing. My mother traveled out of state to give birth to me because the local doctor had an infant mortality rate of 8 in 10, among monorities. My great grandmother was forced to register and chose to declare herself 1/8 Indian when he was full blood, because no Indian of more than 1/8 blood could own land without a white custodian. My grandfather 3/4 Indian, a Marine who served in WW I, spent his lifetime passing as white.

The fabric of the American experience is indeed complex. When can spend the next ten centuries talking about the greater outrage and compounded injustices, or we can set that aside and work on the problems that can be solved to our mutual benefit. The choice is up to the voters. My hope is that they will see the sense of it, because the injustices of the past are predicated on ignorance of the object of your hatred.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 03/20/2008

Thanks for sharing your story Herrington.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 03/21/2008

Brilliant and empathetic, human and humane, Barack Obama is what America wishes that it could be! We are very blessed as a nation to have him even if the majority of us aren't ready to rise to the challenges he presents us YET. And I, for one, consider him to be by FAR the finest leader in our country today (irregardless of whoever wins the election in November). And I'm so very PROUD of him! Just one 59 year old southern white lady's opinion...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 AM on 03/20/2008

I agree with you...Thanks for writing. Coming from a 51 year old woman from Kansas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 03/20/2008

Thanks to Hillary, Bill, Geraldine, and Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell to name a few... Barack Obama was given the perfect platform to prove just how Presidential he is. This speech just bought him the Presidency.

As it did in South Carolina, the Clinton plan to marginalize Obama, and create racial divisions has backfired. It worked in Ohio, and it may work in Pennsylvania. But the Clinton camp has now sealed their fate... as well as cemented the fate of Barack Obama.

He has once again demonstrated the kind of "judgment" that proves he is indeed the man to occupy the office of President of the United States.

We owe a deep debt of gratitude to the race-baiters, as well as the mainstream media for presenting Barack with such a timely gift. Rather than awaiting Barack to make a fatal mistake, it looks as though all Barack has to do is continue to be himself, and let the Clinton camp continue to shoot themselves in the foot.

It is so awesome when the dirty deeds of the perpetrator boomerangs on them. History will prove that in addition to running one of the worst Presidential campaigns in history... with all things in her favor and on her side... Hillary Clinton will be viewed historically as having done ALL THE WRONG THINGS!

She is the best thing that could ever happen to Barack. I hope she stays in until the very bitter end. She is such a blessing!

Thanks-a-million!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 AM on 03/20/2008

Great post here by jbsouth

You want honest race talk. Well here goes. It was not easy to be white, live in the southeast and be an outspoken supporter of the Bill Clinton in the nineties. I would not take it back for nothing in the world. I was accused of being a n......lover many times. I held my head high and kept going. This is not to say it was not easy to be black. I was not black. But the Clintons stood for equality for all races and it was the good fight. I still love the Clintons. Bush abandoned the NAACP immediately upon taking his oath. Go figure. A republican being a racist son-of- thing. I ain't backing down now. The Clintons have always stood for equality for all races. And, they damn sure did not attend a racist church.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 03/20/2008

I like your point of view, and I hope you're right! However, I wonder whether it wouldn't be nice if the superdelegates did their duty and brought a quick end to the Clinton candidacy. I think Mr. Obama revealed himself to be not merely a transcendent human being but also a transcendent politician.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 03/20/2008

So in your new book Stand Up Straight, you will discuss how to bring Ameirica together by having an Anti-American guy on your staff celebrating 9/11and still win the White House

Geeezzzz, its no wonder the Dem"s have such problems winning elections. I have not seen one blog by a white person on the Huffington Post condemn this guy or his anti-American statements, why, are you terrified that you would be called a ¦¦ or a ¦¦.

To me that is the most telling of all, you say Obama opened up a dialog about race that has inspired you, but you are terrified to really lay a hand on the subject except espouse praise for a speech given after the fact, that he was forced to give to explain his association with such a man.

You should write a book on why the Dem"s are considered p@ssy"s because of the leaders of the Party who never stand up and defend their country over politics at difficult times like these, but that would take some balls, something the Dem"s demonstrate time after time they don"t have, we just have to look at how they have handled the war, and if they get the White House I"m sure they will find some way to waffle on health care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 03/20/2008

Those were not 'anti-American' statements, Jack. They were anti-religious-chauvinism statements, which diagnosed the same disregard for the humanity of scapegoated peoples that always deserves condemnation covered up under the hypocrisy of 'God bless America'. If you can't follow the logic of a statement, you can't help but find offense all over the place. I can't even figure out what anti-American would be, unless it would be something like claiming that the God-given gift to the people of a government of them, by them and for them is 'the problem, not the solution'. And if being opposed to the occupation of Palestine by Israel after 41 years of oppression is anti-Semitic, that's going to be a shock to thousands of Jews who agree with Wright on the question.
You WANT liberals to be traitors because they're not willing to worship the idol of American nationalism, but that's all there is. Your desire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 03/20/2008

Often when a writer resorts to vulgarities it results from an inability to reason. You have provided a fine example.

While every paragraph of your discourse lacks rationality, the nadir is achieved in your closing paragraph. "we just have to look at how they (the Democrats) have handled the war. . ." How did I miss the election of a Democrat to the White House? How did I overlook the appointment of Democrats to the cabinet? Please forgive my ignorance. You are absolutely correct that the people who handled the war since its inception have been utterly incompetent. But, oops, they weren't Dem's were they?

My bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 AM on 03/20/2008

Hey, Knighthowl, there was only one Bill Buckley, Jr. and he was wrong most of the time, too. I agree that there's an awful lot of folks who have barely a passing acquaintence with the English language -- even fewer with the concept of logic (it does not compute!). Our challenge, as progressives, is ineffective communication in distinguishing the cause of a common problem. That's what Barack Obama did so effectively in this speech. And that's what gives me the depth of hope I haven't felt in more years than I care to admit toward a raised level of political discourse.

Obama '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 03/20/2008

Obama's speech was an attempt to cover up that he lied on several points regarding Wright. That's the truth you folks are trying to avoid. But the polls don't seem to be fooled as badly as you are. Notice Obama sinking, HRC ascending? Kerry, Kennedy, Olberman? Pull your heads out.