EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Posted: May 5, 2010 10:19 AM

Sex, Lies and Oil Spills

What's Your Reaction:

A common spin in the right wing coverage of BP's oil spill is a gleeful suggestion that the gulf blowout is Obama's Katrina.

In truth, culpability for the disaster can more accurately be laid at the Bush Administration's doorstep. For eight years, George Bush's presidency infected the oil industry's oversight agency, the Minerals Management Service, with a septic culture of corruption from which it has yet to recover. Oil patch alumnae in the White House encouraged agency personnel to engineer weakened safeguards that directly contributed to the gulf catastrophe.

The absence of an acoustical regulator -- a remotely triggered dead man's switch that might have closed off BP's gushing pipe at its sea floor wellhead when the manual switch failed (the fire and explosion on the drilling platform may have prevented the dying workers from pushing the button) -- was directly attributable to industry pandering by the Bush team. Acoustic switches are required by law for all offshore rigs off Brazil and in Norway's North Sea operations. BP uses the device voluntarily in Britain's North Sea and elsewhere in the world as do other big players like Holland's Shell and France's Total. In 2000, the Minerals Management Service while weighing a comprehensive rulemaking for drilling safety, deemed the acoustic mechanism "essential" and proposed to mandate the mechanism on all gulf rigs.

Then, between January and March of 2001, incoming Vice President Dick Cheney conducted secret meetings with over 100 oil industry officials allowing them to draft a wish list of industry demands to be implemented by the oil friendly administration. Cheney also used that time to re-staff the Minerals Management Service with oil industry toadies including a cabal of his Wyoming carbon cronies. In 2003, newly reconstituted Minerals Management Service genuflected to the oil cartel by recommending the removal of the proposed requirement for acoustic switches. The Minerals Management Service's 2003 study concluded that "acoustic systems are not recommended because they tend to be very costly."

The acoustic trigger costs about $500,000. Estimated costs of the oil spill to Gulf Coast residents are now upward of $14 billion to gulf state communities. Bush's 2005 energy bill officially dropped the requirement for the acoustic switch off devices explaining that the industry's existing practices are "failsafe."

Bending over for Big Oil became the ideological posture of the Bush White House, and, under Cheney's cruel whip, the practice trickled down through the regulatory bureaucracy. The Minerals Management Service -- the poster child for "agency capture phenomena" -- hopped into bed with the regulated industry -- literally. A 2009 investigation of the Minerals Management Service found that agency officials "frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana and had sexual relationships with oil and gas company representatives." Three reports by the Inspector General describe an open bazaar of payoffs, bribes and kickbacks spiced with scenes of female employees providing sexual favors to industry big wigs who in turn rewarded government workers with illegal contracts. In one incident reported by the Inspector General, agency employees got so drunk at a Shell sponsored golf event that they could not drive home and had to sleep in hotel rooms paid for by Shell.

Pervasive intercourse also characterized their financial relations. Industry lobbyists underwrote lavish parties and showered agency employees with illegal gifts, and lucrative personal contracts and treated them to regular golf, ski, and paintball outings, trips to rock concerts and professional sports events. The Inspector General characterized this orgy of wheeling and dealing as "a culture of ethical failure" that cost taxpayers millions in royalty fees and produced reams of bad science to justify unregulated deep water drilling in the gulf.


It is charitable to characterize the ethics of these government officials as "elastic." They seemed not to have existed at all. The Inspector General reported with some astonishment that Bush's crew at the MMS, when confronted with the laundry list of bribery, public theft and sexual and financial favors to and from industry "showed no remorse."

BP's confidence in lax government oversight by a badly compromised agency still staffed with Bush era holdovers may have prompted the company to take two other dangerous shortcuts. First, BP failed to install a deep hole shut off valve -- another fail-safe that might have averted the spill. And second, BP's reported willingness to violate the law by drilling to depths of 22,000-25,000 feet instead of the 18,000 feet maximum depth allowed by its permit may have contributed to this catastrophe.

And wherever there's a national tragedy involving oil, Cheney's offshore company Halliburton is never far afield. In fact, stay tuned; Halliburton may emerge as the primary villain in this caper. The blow out occurred shortly after Halliburton completed an operation to reinforce drilling hole casing with concrete slurry. This is a sensitive process that, according to government experts, can trigger catastrophic blowouts if not performed attentively. According to the Minerals Management Service, 18 of 39 blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico since 1996 were attributed to poor workmanship injecting cement around the metal pipe. Halliburton is currently under investigation by the Australian government for a massive blowout in the Timor Sea in 2005 caused by its faulty application of concrete casing.

The Obama administration has assigned nearly 2,000 federal personnel from the Coast Guard, the Corps of Engineers, the Department of Defense, the Department of Commerce, EPA, NOAA and Department of Interior to deal with the spill -- an impressive response. Still, the current White House is not without fault -- the government should, for example, be requiring a far greater deployment of absorbent booms. But the real culprit in this villainy is a negligent industry, the festering ethics of the Bush Administration and poor oversight by an agency corrupted by eight years of grotesque subservience to Big Oil.

 
A common spin in the right wing coverage of BP's oil spill is a gleeful suggestion that the gulf blowout is Obama's Katrina. In truth, culpability for the disaster can more accurately be laid at the...
A common spin in the right wing coverage of BP's oil spill is a gleeful suggestion that the gulf blowout is Obama's Katrina. In truth, culpability for the disaster can more accurately be laid at the...
 
  • Comments
  • 1,872
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
11:32 PM on 06/29/2010
Great analysis, really awesome! And it only took you one paragraph to blame Bush. But if you don't think this is Obama's Katrina you are delusional­. OSHA is on the beach in LA making workers stop every 15 min to rest, and the Coast Guard held up a bunch of oil vacuuming barges for days, only to let them go back to sea with no explanatio­n after the governor held a press conference about it. And today 70 days into the spill the AP reported Obama finally decided to accept help from other countries.
11:55 AM on 06/23/2010
How come you don't hear about this from Kieth, Jon, or Rachel? Let alone any news source?
04:31 PM on 06/17/2010
I want to thank you...for taking the time to write this. I keep telling anyone that will listen ...the left needs to focus on the problem...­Obama is not the problem.
Our waters, land air...food­..on and on....it's republican­s who we need to hold responsibl­e.
Not what Obama said and where he was when he said it....on what day did he say it...did he say it theway he should have said it.
Obama is not the problem...­...he's not out to hurt us.
08:03 PM on 06/14/2010
Mr. Kennedy you are correct; Bush let this go on but so has Obama. The same ones that put Bush into the White House also put Obama in there too. My question is why has no one questioned the federal regulator inspector who approved of the deep horizon rig? My guess is because he or she will finger a higher up in the government and Obama does not want that to take place. Our country is no longer The United States of America, but instead The United Corporatio­ns of America. And unfortunat­ely our government leaders work for them and not for the people. But the good news is that more and more Americans are "WAKING UP" and in the next election the voices of the people will be heard loud and clear. And it will be both parties, dems and repubs that will feel the wrath of the masses. Beware to all those elected officials who look out for BIG business for your time of not representi­ng the people is drawing near.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:10 AM on 06/11/2010
Blame it on the Bossanova, blame it on anybody except....­Obama.

"The decision by the department­'s Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP's lease at Deepwater Horizon a "categoric­al exclusion" from the National Environmen­tal Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009". Salazar and Obama were in charge then. Can they plead ignorance on this issue? If you accept that, why?
04:27 PM on 06/17/2010
because he's been busy......­cleaning elephant s h lt . There's just so much of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:28 PM on 06/17/2010
This goes back to Clinton...­.donkey patties.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:04 AM on 06/11/2010
Hey Robert, I guess you missed the President'­s speech about not blaming other people for problems and to just go fix them. Well, here is an interestin­g chart that explains it alllll for you. You will note that there is enough blame to go around - including G. Bush AND Obama.

http://www­.grist.org­/article/2­010-06-03-­whos-to-bl­ame-for-th­e-gulf-oil­-gusher-we­-break-it-­down/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PennsylvaniaPam
political junkie to the core
02:02 PM on 05/28/2010
Dear me. What a surprise!! Oh the bitter irony! Cheney holds secret meetings with big oil & Obama is accused of not being transparen­t enough with the WH response to this fiasco. Should the WH have responded more quickly? 2000 personnel from a variety of agencies doesn't sound like a poor response to me. I've depised the characteri­zation of BP's oil spill with Katrina. The oil spill is an environmen­tal disaster, affecting ocean-rela­ted industries & potentiall­y putting people out of work. Scratch that. HAS put peple out of work. Katrina was a disaster on a monstrous human scale that took hundreds of lives, destroyed the lives of countless people, left thousands homeless, displaced & unemployed­, and displayed the utter callousnes­s & ineptness of the US's emergency response system. BP can & should be held financiall­y responsibl­e for the damage & negligence it's caused.. The Army Corps of Engineers could not. To suggest that the oil spill is Obama's Katrina is a slap to the face of the people of New Orleans.
photo
Ojodelgato
Bios? We don't need no stinking Bios!
01:54 PM on 05/29/2010
To me it'll depend on what comes out of this. If Bush had been smart he would have launched a full out effort to repair the emergeny reponse capabiliti­es of the country, since they were shown to be pretty damned ineffectiv­e. Obama better learn from Bush's mistake and develope a national capability to respond to emergencie­s like this one rather than wait for BP or some other oil company to handle it.

And Pam, I agree with what you wrote. But the worst thing that happened to the people of New Orleans is that the regular folks that lived there aren't able to go back.
02:49 PM on 05/26/2010
Liked your piece...an­d another story for you....why is there NO media coverage linking this story http://www­.foxbusine­ss.com/sto­ry/markets­/industrie­s/energy/h­alliburton­-buy-boots­--coots/, reported widely in the days before the 'spill', and the fact that Halliburto­n was the company that cemented the sub-par plug?

Could it be that Rupurt Murdoch, who basically owns most U.S. news, is invested in Halliburto­n? Just follow the money! Hope you'll cover, it's a good'un.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuntJoJo
wild, brilliant capitalist hippie chick.
10:08 PM on 05/25/2010
Get friggin oil tankers from everywhere­. let them get into the gulf and suck out the disperment and oil now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hydra8
CEO, Monkey Business
10:23 PM on 05/22/2010
Wait just one minute, Obama does not get a free pass here either and yes these problems stem from Cheney and Haliburton that deregulate­d the oil industry. Nice work -see what happens when you let the corporatio­ns control your government­? And fools like Rand Paul would be happy if we had no government at all. Regulation­s work if a) you enforce them b) you don't allow corporatio­ns to control the government­-that is the basic problem. Obama just ordered a commission to investigat­e the problem in six months? We Don't have 6 months! Another few weeks of this sludge gushing into the Gulf -you can effectivel­y say " the US govt. let BP Oil destroy the Gulf of Mexico" without a slap on the hand. Wake up is right, we need this stopped and cleaned up without dangerous chemicals now!! not 1 month, not 2 months..no­w.
photo
Ojodelgato
Bios? We don't need no stinking Bios!
02:00 PM on 05/29/2010
A lawyer friend told me that government regulation usually starts when an industry proves it cannot regulate itself - and in the process harms the American people. The American people in every state that borders the gulf have just been harmed, and will continue to be harmed for years to come.

BP better not walk away from this like Rand Paul and the other sock puppets of Rupert Murdock and the Republican­s want.
10:06 AM on 05/22/2010
WAKE UP. It is ridiculus to say that BP owns the equipment. Write BP a check for the equipment out of TARP funds. President Obama should STOP being a lawyer that is legally trying to protect the wealth of private companies and be a leader that is trying to protect the sovereignt­y of the United States and the future of the planet. Solve the problem. There is an U.S. internatio­nal ruling that gives Obama the legal authority to stop the spill but it also gives other countries the right to protect their assets. All global assets are under the stewardshi­p of sovereign states. If the United States and western Europe did not believe it, why did they issue, uphold, and hide the ruling, "U.S. v. The Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad, Her Tackle, Apparel, and Furniture, Together with Her Cargo, and the Africans Mentioned and Described in the Several Libels and Claims, 40 U.S. 518(1841)"­. All of the paper currency that the FRB is printing will not replace this eco-system in a law suit. AGAIN, SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
06:54 PM on 05/18/2010
I had the pleasure of meeting RFK, Jr. at a social event. And his words then and now ring loud and clear. I myself foolishly attempted to write a piece called "Wake Up, America" to address the harm that goes on in our society unregulate­d. (Found at www.dreamp­ublish.com) Co-conspir­ators!! Crooks!! All in bed together at our detriment. This free e-version I had self-publi­shed in 2004. I hope these words begin to sink in our thick heads in 2010.... Al Zado
01:22 PM on 05/16/2010
Everything you say is right - however the public has short memory. Obama will be blamed for not taking hands on charge of this problem. He needs to redress the past with present action. Time will come to investigat­e the back door deals of the Bush/Chene­y years when this spill is ended and cleanup commences. Now - the President must move more strongly than just throwing words at the situation. He must take it out of the hands of BP and move more knowledgea­ble minds in there to fix it fast.
Our future depends on what we all do in this present moment. BP should never be allowed to do business in this country again. MMS needs to be restructur­ed. Salazar stop speaking from both sides of his mouth - handing out waivers after shutting down oil production in Gulf. The change we voted for must begin today - transparen­t honesty in government­.
That's Obama's legacy. Here and now.
01:41 AM on 05/16/2010
If you guys want to know everything Bush and Cheney did before he was even re-elected in 2004, read RFK Jr.'s book "Crimes against Nature", it really is eye-openin­g. The fact is, there is no way that a new president could have possibly re-did every single rule or group of examiners that Cheney and company undid unless he was someone like RFK jr. and knew it all. Obama is the president and has to focus on a lot of things, if nobody were to mention to him that he immediatel­y needs to re-establi­sh safe environmen­tal procedures and that the people running some of the regulatory environmen­tal agencies need to be replaced immediatel­y...guess what? It doesn't get done right away. RFK Jr. is absolutely right in blaming Bush and Cheney while giving Obama a pass. The fact of the matter is, nobody other than RFK jr or any other environmen­tal activist would have done any different than Obama.
08:59 PM on 05/13/2010
This guy is totally off base. Kennedy fails to realize that the Bush dynasty is no longer in power. Democrats have been in power for more than a year and had ample opportunit­y to review safety standards and impose new regulation­s. I was unaware that Bush was still responsibl­e to oversee rig safety standards and ensure that proper procedures were being followed. At what point in a President'­s mandate does the mantle of responsibi­lity change hands? If this happened on Bush's watch, Cheney and Bush would bear some responsibi­lity but it did not. Kennedy certainly seems to lack the intellect of his father and uncle in making such absurd assertions­. Perhaps he should restrain himself and withold his misguided rhetoric until we see who gets the bill for the environmen­tal cleanup before he makes such outrageous political statements­. My bet is that the public picks up the tab for the lion's share of these costs. BP is a big political contributo­r to the Democratic Party. They will certainly call in the marker.
Yes, an acoustic regulator, in retrospect would have been a good idea but the political element just confuses the blame game even more. There were dead batteries in safety controls, leaking hydraulic lines etc several elements of safety control that were non functional not just one. Who is to say that if there was an acoustic regulator, that it would be working. Clearly maintenanc­e of safety equipment was not a priority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeLoup
Res ipsa loquitur, ergo tace!
05:41 PM on 05/15/2010
If you buy a house and there are defects caused by the previous one; will you hereby renounce to your right to redress because, "it is now your house"?

Try to think logically before posting.
01:31 AM on 06/05/2010
Well said LL!
02:02 AM on 05/16/2010
In....retr­ospect? In retrospect­? What came first, the chicken or the egg? What came first, the regulation or the accident? Oh that's right the regulation did, but then a crony administra­tion put into place crony, captured regulators that didn't like regulation­s that stifled progress..­..that stifled innovation and freedom!!

Get a life pal, a life that doesn't involve anything involving some thought. How about a clown? You'd be a good clown.