iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Posted: November 19, 2009 03:11 PM

The New Arms Race

What's Your Reaction:

Hobbled by opposition from the carbon incumbents and their short-sighted allies on Capitol Hill the Obama administration acknowledged this week that it would not return from Copenhagen with any groundbreaking commitment to control green house gases. Meanwhile, Congress is backsliding on the administration's wise commitment to impose a rational price on carbon. Behind the logjam, a treacherous U.S. Chamber of Commerce, always willing to put its obsequious scraping to Big Oil and King Coal ahead of its duty to our country, has battled every effort to accelerate America's transition to a market-based de-carbonized economy.

The Chamber has continued to argue, idiotically, that energy efficiency and independence will somehow put America at a competitive disadvantage with the Chinese. Meanwhile, the Chinese have shrewdly and strategically positioned themselves to steal America's once substantial lead in renewable power. China will soon make us as dependent on Chinese green technology for the next century as we have been on Saudi oil during the last.

Indeed, the Chinese are treating the energy technology competition if it were an arms race. China is spending as much or more on greentech as it does on its military, hundreds of billions of dollars annually on renewable energy and grid infrastructure improvements. Those investments, if not vigorously countered, will effectively erode America's greentech industry leadership and secure China's dominance. China's economic stimulus package, targeted 38% of spending on greentech, as compared to a miserly 12% of the U.S. stimulus program. By 2013, greentech will account for 15 percent of the Chinese GDP. While the United States is projected to roughly triple its wind generation by 2020, China will increase its capacity twelvefold to a wind generating capability more than twice that of America's. And, while the United States is projected to increase its installed solar generation a modest 33% by 2020, China's solar generation is projected to increase 20,000%.

China's investments in solar technology have so powerfully stimulated the growth of a Chinese solar market that Chinese solar panel manufacturers now far outnumber American ones, and they are achieving low-cost production much faster than their American counterparts. Chinese companies are now flooding the American market with cheap Chinese solar panels and devastating the American manufacturing sector that was gearing up to create tens of thousands of U.S. jobs for our own ailing economy. Hundreds of U.S. solar manufacturers now see their prospects as grim. BP Solar, Evergreen, and General Electric have already announced the closing of American-based solar panel factories and outsourcing, primarily to China. America's leading solar manufacturer, Applied Materials, has opened the largest non-government solar energy research facility in the world in China. Of today's ten leading solar panel manufacturers, only one is American. The largest solar panel installation in the United States is a 70,000 panel, 14.2 megawatt array on Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. The array provides more than 25% of the base's power needs, and saves the Pentagon a million dollars annually in energy costs, but the panels' manufacturer was China's Suntech Power Holdings. Even in the thin film solar market, among the last redoubts of American dominance Chinese businesses are squeezing profit.

Last year, America achieved a milestone, building more wind power generation than all new oil and coal generation combined. We have led the world in wind installations for several years, and the wind industry already accounts for more American jobs than coal mining. At one point the U.S. enjoyed global domination of wind turbine manufacturing with great prospects for job creation. Yet today, of the five leading wind turbine manufacturers, only one is American. While Congress dawdles, China is clobbering us. Shenyang Power Group recently inked a deal to be the exclusive supplier of turbines to the largest wind project in the United States, a 36,000 acre, 600 megawatt development in west Texas. The project will create 2,800 new jobs -- 2,400 in China, but only 400 in the United States. As Lu Jinxiang, chief executive of Shenyang's controlling shareholder noted, "This is just the beginning ... [the United States] is an ideal target." China is likewise poised to take away our lead in batteries and electric cars, and has already pulled far ahead of America in automobile fuel efficiency.

Capitol Hill Republicans will soon recognize that the arms race of the 21st century is already in progress with a totalitarian nation that they not long ago called "Red China." But America will not win with more warheads and better rockets. We can only prevail with robust investment in and support of U.S.-based greentech innovation.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 228
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritgar
no micro-bio is big enough for me
01:58 AM on 11/24/2009
I just drove thru central Illinois & saw hundreds, if not thousands, of giant windmills as far as the eye could see on farmland North of Bloomington. I bet all of them have a "Made in China" sticker on them!
photo
whitecollargreenspacegut
Environmentalist, healthcare reformer, middle of t
09:16 PM on 11/23/2009
I have contacted the Waterkeeper Alliance to forward this policy proposal to Robert F. Kennedy. This policy change could help seal the legacy for both Robert and Ted Kennedy as it could cover the uninsured and also cut the governments carbon footprint by 50%. Our hearts and prayers are with the Kennedy family.
The government has the money to pay for universal health and to reduce the carbon footprint of office buildings by 50%.
The Federal government pays for almost one billion square feet of office space. It is is very expensive yet it sits unused 70% of the time because white collar work is scheduled for only one shift per day. 30% efficiency is unacceptable in today's economic and ecological environment. We could schedule 2 shifts of white collar workers, reducing our costs and carbon footprint by 50%. The potential savings could be $50 billion per year, enough to pay for healthcare reform.
This simple plan will help our government and private industry in the following ways:

•Save federal gov a trillion dollars in next 10 years
•Exactly amount needed for universal healthcare
•Reduce white-collar overhead costs by 50%
•Reduce carbon footprint of office space by 50%
•Reduce budget deficits for most state governments
•Reduce our dependence on foreign oil
•Make workers competitive in the global economy
•Improve profits for all businesses and
•Increase tax receipts for state/fed governments
•Businesses can hire more employees & lower prices
see:
http://whitecollargreenspace.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/greenspaceguy
12:41 PM on 11/23/2009
Dear Mr. Kennedy, my freshman daughter invited me to your speech at Central Michigan University last Thursday evening. Although I am not a believer in the scientific truth of global warming, I was most impressed with the passion, wit, and eloquence of your two hour presentation, as well as with the sheer volume of information you put forth without the aid of notes. I also wanted to thank you for signing the book (which I began reading last night) and taking a picture with us. As an Irish Catholic father of seven, I have always had a special affinity for the Kennedy family, especially your Father, and the photo means a lot to me. God bless you and your family.

Regards,

Ray McConnell
Saginaw, Michigan
12:05 PM on 11/23/2009
I studied game theory economics in grad school. The use of a finite natural resource is akin to the "Prisoner's Dilemna" problem, when independant parties are involved.

The "Prisoners' Dilemna" is used by the police to extract confessions from criminals -- seperate a pair of suspects. Offer each the following, 1) No sentence (time served) if he confesses and his partner doesn't -- 2) or 3 years if his partner also confesses, 3) 10 years if he doesn't confess, and his partner does, 4) If neither confess, then each only get 1 year for a misdemeanor. The dominant strategy for each would be to rat the other out, given that each can't control/trust the other, given that they're crooks to begin with. What happens is that instead of cooperating and getting only 1 year, each will get 3.

What happens with multiple parties in extracting, and selling a finite resource, in an unregulated market.... economic game theory shows that the natural resource will be depleted sooner than would be optimal for maximizing the natural resources value to society. In the case of a slowly renewable resource, like fish. This model shows that the resource will be deplted before there's a chance to replenish the resource, and it will go extinct.
12:49 AM on 11/23/2009
Part II. We know that there is a finite supply of petroleum and that global reserves will not be able to sustain our energy needs at current or increased rates past the middle of this century. It is too hard for many to imagine life beyond oil, just as many scoffed at the automobile as too expensive and too impractical to replace the horse and buggy just a century ago.

This skepticism is despite watching hugely expensive new infrastructure develop in our lifetimes, such as the network of satellites which make our global communications something to take for granted. Or the interstate highway system which was "invented" just fifty years ago. Or the ubiquitous computer and internet systems which have shrunk the globe and changed communication in less than twenty years.

"Common sense" says we cannot afford the expensive new technologies, yet history says we can. "Common sense" has people buying stock in these new technologies only after they are well established and proven, long after you can make a great return on your investment. Who doesn't wish they had bought stock in IBM in the 1950s or Wal-Mart or Microsoft in the 1970s? The same short sightedness is dominant in the current energy discussion.
12:48 AM on 11/23/2009
Part I: My state of Louisiana produces a large portion of the USA's energy resources (about a third I'm told). Understandably there is much opposition to the Waxman-Markey Cap & Trade bill, because people reflexively see it as a threat to our jobs and economy. Industry and conservative organizations make up dismissive names for it, like the "Cap & Tax" bill to rally opposition.

The good news is that the opposition is mostly based upon ignorance, and ignorance can be cured.
The bad news is that the ignorance is vast and entrenched and seemingly unable to look past the surface of the issues.

One of the biggest distortions is the issue of job and revenue loss. It is hard for people here to seriously envision an economy or society where petroleum is not the overwhelming source of energy and jobs. "Common sense" reasoning is prevalent, and empirical science is dismissed and rebuked. This makes it easy to believe fraudulent “research” and “statistics”. One doesn’t know who to trust, so many just pick and choose the ideas and numbers which support their preconceived biases.

Industry speculation has kept oil prices artificially high by cutting back on production and refining. $4.00 per gallon gasoline will return and eventually look cheap. Those prices have a fairly direct correlation with electricity prices.

Higher prices will be a fact. Diversifying and developing new energy sources will be the only way to stabilize prices in the long run.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
10:05 PM on 11/22/2009
Congress "dawdles" not just because of special interests, but because the public is so ignorant and stupidly conservative on these issues. The health care fight has worn Congress out. So naturally they're dragging their feet on global warming, because the Fox-Limbaugh-Palin know nothings all think it's a hoax, because that's what the dittoheads have been trained to think. Be that as it may, Kennedy's dead right: China is crushing us in the race to dominate green technology. Just like they're clobbering us in every other area. We're now in the position of have a totally dysfunctional democracy (mainly because of the stupidity of so many of our voters) competing against a highly efficient, and super savvy, China that is driven by highly effective top-down directives. Just at the time when this country desperately needs to get its act together to slow down China's complete steamrolling of our economy, Fox-Limbaugh-Palin do all in their power to create total gridlock in all areas of our national life. How suicidal can you be?
09:41 PM on 11/22/2009
How did such a nation like ours that used to be so forward looking become so backwards and behind?
11:08 AM on 11/23/2009
One of our two parties (GOP) began to put party over country, thereby obstructing all progress.
07:50 PM on 11/22/2009
I guess we finally did it - our government is now more corrupt than China's. The obviousness green technology presents as a solution to so many of our economic ills proves that graft and philosophy over ride patriotism and pragmatism every time. As soon as the government would announce an investment in green mass transit, like electric trams and high speed trains, the private sector would jump in to compete for a piece of the pie. We could create literally millions of jobs practically over night, not to mention creating the mass transit system this country sorely lacks. If I had the choice, I would gladly take a train to work, or even cross country, if they were like the northern European trains.

Then again, China has a distinct advantage; they are not trying to occupy two countries. Instead they are busy developing undeveloped nations in Africa to be their satellites, suppliers, and customers.
05:03 PM on 11/22/2009
China will clobber us even more if congress does act. Let's say that wind turbines are the solution to climate change. If we sign a treaty where we have to cap emissions, but China doesn't, and it takes a lot of energy to manufacture windmills, they will have even more industrial advantage over us than they do now with their low wages.

The windmills we would need to comply with the treaty would be way cheaper to buy from China than from here, and we would lose more ground. Even if we invented some huge advance in renewable energy, countries like China and India do not respect intellectual property rights. They would just start producing it with dirt-cheap labor and none of the enviro laws that we have to comply with.
03:24 PM on 11/22/2009
Also worth noting, our competition is both economic and ideological.

For decades the USA has maintained that it is ideologically superior because of free election , freedom of speech and generally being free. Yet today we allow fascistic gang stalkers to openly and notoriously stalk, harass, poison and irradiate people without the slightest fear of arrest or governmental action. Speak of it at your own peril.

How can we claim to have a superior ideology today?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mogamboguru
I am a liar. Don't believe me.
03:23 PM on 11/22/2009
Corrupt lawmakers make decisions based on corruption only.

If you bribe them into supporting green energy, Congress will go to work.

Until then: "Hasta Manana!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sportswoman
03:22 PM on 11/22/2009
That quote was from President Kennedy, by the way...
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
06:05 PM on 11/22/2009
Which quote?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
02:40 PM on 11/22/2009
China's been making solar panels for probably over a decade, now, and they're no dummies, and they've got 1.4 billion mouths to feed, hence little or no time to waste, regardless of what happens in the United States. One way we can continue, though, is by furthering research to help companies that are seeking to 'go green', and also to continue to promote conservation. Problem is, though, here in the United States we have people that are a lot more interested in becoming dope dealers, or living off dividends, and not getting off their butts to actually DO anything, and, if anyone does try to do anything, then they start whining about 'the environment', which I'm pretty sure translates to: 'I have investments in China, and if we actually start doing or building anything in the United States, then those might be jeopardized, so I'm against it'. Yes, some of the whining and sniveling about China is indeed disingenuous, because there's US companies that gave up on ghettoes and retirees and moved on to 'greener' climes where people actually still like to build stuff and make the concept work. These aren't the 1960's, anymore, in this country, land's all owned, this country is megatrillions in debt that'll be extracted out of any corporation that dares make a profit in this country, and millions of people are just plain strapped, and their only 'green' recourse involves the circuit breaker box, and a padlock.
02:28 PM on 11/22/2009
Mr Kennedy, we are a pathetic bunch.