Orrin Hatch has shocked the political world by offering legislation in favor of government health care. After voting against the recent bill in Congress, the senator now believes that the government should be involved with the public's health. Indeed, going even further, he says that the government should protect those who can least-afford health care. The unemployed. And those on welfare.
Sen. Hatch (R-Utah) has introduced an amendment that drug tests should be administered to people out of work before they can received unemployment insurance. This is not a punitive act against the needy, he insists, but rather is purely a matter of health. A matter of the government stepping in, so that these users can get the treatment they deserve.
"This amendment is a way to help people get off of drugs," the senator states. And showing a concerned, progressive side few people knew existed, added emphatically, "It does get the help for them that they really need."
But Orrin Hatch goes deeper in his embracing of government health care. Because after the government administers these tests, "then states could enroll them in either a state or federal drug treatment program."
Federal drug tests. Federal drug treatment. Giving help to the needy. It's almost as if Orrin Hatch has become a socialist. But, no, he's just become a humanitarian.
Now, certainly, there can be many arguments on both side of the issue whether this is a good thing. Whether it will cost more money. Whether people should be tested for all manner of abuses or all illegal acts. Whether anyone getting any type of compensation from the federal government should have to pass a test of what is allowable by them. Whether someone who's had an abortion or been arrested for drunk driving or spent any time in jail or even gotten a parking citation should be allowed to get unemployment insurance, or a federal grant, or a federal paycheck.
No, all that's another matter entirely. That's for another debate at another time. This is in praise of a wonderful man, doing a wonderful thing. Orrin Hatch, a seriously right-wing Republican, going against the party line -- a party line he himself so fiercely fought to hold -- and saying, yes, it is important for the government to be concerned with the health of our citizens. Yes, when the most vulnerable of our citizens, the unemployed, can't do for themselves, then the government should step in and help them. Give them medical tests for drug use. And more.
And why? Because, as Orrin Hatch said, it gets them the help "they really need."
Sometimes you have to look past your own demons and do what's right. And if it means Orrin Hatch supporting socialized medicine, so be it.
Good for Sen. Hatch. He once was blind, but now he sees.
Admittedly, this program isn't the solution to what is a far larger problem. After all, the nation is full of employed people who are on drugs, as well, and deserve the same help that Sen. Hatch says drug abusers need. But it's a first step. And a noble one.
And it's a step that others in Hatch's home state of Utah support, including State Rep. Carl Wimmer (R-Herriman) who had introduced a similar bill, though he had to drop it for a conflict with federal law. But Mr. Wimmer believes just as strongly that the government should offer health care. "Clearly, people who have a drug addiction need help," he told the Salt Lake Tribune.
Indeed, they do. All such people. Carl Wimmer has honed in on the issue and focused on its essence. "People who have a drug addiction need help." For decades, this call has been the domain of those dismissed by the far right as "bleeding hearts.' But now, Orrin Hatch and the Carl Wimmers of the world have stood tall to address this reality on both the federal and state level. To get government involved in bringing that medical help to people who need it.
Their words.
And surely we take them at their words for they must be good men. Honest men. Honorable men. Men who say they believe that people with a drug addiction need help, and federal drug programs are the way to provide it.
Orrin Hatch calls for government-mandated federal health care. Remarkable.
If only he'd voted that way when he had the chance.
But it is not Socialism to hand out Billions in grants to Corporations for anything they want if jobs are created ?
Want to build a power plant that burns coal ? There is a grants for that too ! There are Grants to cover all your start up cost !!!!!!! Even Grants to pay for an EPA study. Of course there are not that many employees at a coal fired power plant for all the billions invested in them but in the long run .........
Seems to be a fine line for Socalism the Corporations can have some but the Citizens can't decide to help each other.
Wait a minuite !!!! When did a Corporation have to join the military, fight and die in a war ? It is only the Citizens who do this.
Thanks, Senator!
I'd say you definitiely nailed him on this one.
"People who have a drug addiction need help." True. And people who have other health problems need help, too. So, why not give them full medical exams? And treatment for any illnesses?
"..it is important for the government to be concerned with the health of our citizens."
I do believe that was the point of President Obama and The Dems health care reform argument: Every American should have access to affordable health care.
Wonder if this bill has any FUNDING for it. Yeah. Right.
Why is it that Republicans can only seem to come out for more government when it involves telling people how to run their lives? This is far more of a "nanny-state" move than anything in HCR.