iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Kuttner

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Kuttner
 

Don't Blame Bernanke

Posted: 08/05/2012 7:15 pm

Let's not expect central bankers to bail out the continuing economic mess. That's not who they are, and cheap money can only do so much to levitate a deflated economy.

This past week, Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank, said that he would not in fact do "whatever it takes," as he had pledged a week ago Thursday, to save the euro and the European economy. After Draghi floated a commitment buying more government bonds without demanding rigid austerity policies in return, his trial balloon was shot down by Jens Weidmann, president of the German Bundesbank. Draghi will remain captive to the budget hawks led by the Germans who are keeping Europe depressed.

Here in the U.S., the policy-setting Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve met on Wednesday and decided against taking any further action for now. Financial commentators clucked that the Fed perhaps should have done more.

But, face it, there is not much more that that the Fed can do, and we should not expect it to perform miracles. Interest rates are already at record lows, and that is not enough to revive an economy suffering from the aftermath of a financial collapse. After the crash of 1929, critics called the fantasy that cheap money alone could rescue a deflated economy "pushing on a string."

Today, consumer demand is deflated by high unemployment, low wages, and diminished capacity to borrow. Growth slowed to an annual rate of just 1.5 percent in the first half of 2012.

Banks are willing to lend only to their best customers. Corporate America is sitting on nearly two trillion dollars that corporations won't invest because they don't see demand for their products.

Homeowners are out several trillion dollars in net worth because of the housing bust. Wage earners, who supported economic growth in the 1990s and early 2000s by borrowing against their homes, have less to borrow against, and have been paying down debt.

In these circumstances, interest rates could be zero, and it wouldn't provide enough stimulus.

Government needs to do two things that neither Democrats nor Republicans have been willing to do.

First, we need a massive program of mortgage refinance, not just for borrowers with plenty of equity (who have been refinancing) but for underwater homeowners with negative equity.

The administration has been unwilling to embrace such a strategy for fear of the impact on bank balance sheets. However the Treasury has supported the idea of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac supporting more refinancings. But Ed DeMarco, head of the agency that regulates Fannie and Freddie has opposed the idea. DeMarco's own agency thinks the approach would be helpful.

DeMarco's stance makes no sense. He is acting head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and he is not a policymaker. Obama should begin the shift to a far more aggressive program of mortgage refinance by firing DeMarco.

But even with more robust efforts to deal with the overhang of excessive mortgage debt and depressed housing prices, the economy will still be stuck in a hole.

We need massive public investment on a scale that is far outside mainstream debate. How massive?

It took World War II to cure the Great Depression, and during the war the government ran deficits averaging 25 percent of GDP for four straight years.

Government also had high surtaxes on the wealthy, with top rates of 91 percent. It turned around and spent and invested that money. The war restored the productive capacity of America, put fifteen million people to work, and restored household purchasing power -- even though most of that production was blown up.

If you watched any of the PBS encore broadcast of the Ken Burns documentary, The War, this past week, you have some sense of what kind of a production machine can be energized by government contracts in the face of a depressed economy.

There is so much that we could spend that money on -- energy self sufficiency, infrastructure, a smart electrical grid, public transportation, better education at all levels -- all of which would not only create economic activity and jobs, but would make for a more productive economy.

But nothing like this is part of the mainstream conversation. If you propose this sort of thing, you are packed off to the Museum of Un-reconstructed Keynesians. White House economists quietly admit that you are right, but you are politically radioactive (even with a Nobel Prize.)

Though President Obama strikes the right rhetorical notes, the actual budget debate is the Republicans demanding that we cut more while the Democrats respond that we should cut a little less. Nobody is declaring that only massive public investment will cure the shortfall in private purchasing power.

And so we will continue with growth depressed, and unemployment stuck above 8 percent, with some slightly better months of job growth like July, and some worse ones like April, May, and June.

Despite this feeble performance, President Obama may get re-elected, thanks to the reliable ineptitude of Mitt Romney. Unless Obama's feistier campaign performance translates to a Democratic Congress and a much bolder recovery program, Obama's second term will be a time of continuing economic frustrations.

By opening the monetary floodgates, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke helped save the economy from a second Great Depression; and for this he deserves our thanks. But what we have now is a prolonged Lesser Depression that the Federal Reserve can't cure.

Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos. His latest book is A Presidency in Peril.

 
 
 
FOLLOW POLITICS
Let's not expect central bankers to bail out the continuing economic mess. That's not who they are, and cheap money can only do so much to levitate a deflated economy. This past week, Mario Draghi, p...
Let's not expect central bankers to bail out the continuing economic mess. That's not who they are, and cheap money can only do so much to levitate a deflated economy. This past week, Mario Draghi, p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 649
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Terri Skau
Se... sotto una splendida luna piena...
03:51 PM on 08/07/2012
Well then who are we suppose to point the finger at then???

Another very informative article and who we should be pointing the finger at...:-))

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/truth/2009/12/seven-steps-to-transform-the-global-financial-crisis.html

Wake up people...This is the problem and will be until it is gone....:-))
photo
demockracy
The Library:Like taking your brain to the gym
02:42 PM on 08/07/2012
You ask why policy makers ignore Krugman and Stiglitz. I ask why they ignore Steve Keen, Michael Hudson, Stephanie Kelton, William K. Black and Marshall Auerbach. These are "Chartalists" or "Modern Money Theorists," (MMT) and ignoring them is how the likes of li'l Timmy Geithner gets the paycheck he can mis-report to IRS.

What do they say? Exactly what you mention: The Fed cannot revive demand with more bank reserves. That's like pushing a string. We need fiscal stimulus. Incidentally, even Krugman notes that the net government stimulus counting Federal (positive), State (negative) and Local (negative) spending is about zero. It's not that stimulus doesn't work. It hasn't been tried.

Expecting Obama to cut his ties to the banksters who employed him is kind of a long shot. He doesn't respond unless threatened. So I say vote Green! (Jill Stein)...unless, of course, Obama actually does something hopey-changey. (Not much, so far)
12:33 PM on 08/07/2012
Since March, the Chinese government has been approving an average of 300 development projects a month.

In the U.S.? Zero.

No matter what they say, our globalist elites long ago quietly concluded that this is no place to invest in infrastructure because we have lost or are in the process of losing the industries that can take advantage of it. Now we just need a way to hustle these people, both Democrats and Republicans, off the stage so we can get down to the business of rebuilding our country.

And it is our country, not the globalists'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. crowsnest
08:18 AM on 08/07/2012
The major effect of WW2 on the economy was the (temporary) removal of millions of workers from the job market. Their replacements had to be paid higher wages. That cannot happen this time because there are too many persons competing for too few jobs hence wages are still not rising enough. I am an admirer of Keynes because he was one of the few economists at the Paris Peace Conference 1919/20 who understood that the economic consequences of that Peace would be devastating and they were. He was also the driving force behind the Bretton Woods conference. Because he is no longer with us it is impossible to know what he might say about the current economic slump but it seems possible that he would warn that without severe structural economic and political changes Government pumping will fail this time. That has been the failure of the Obama administration and Congress and one can safely predict that the failure of a Romney administration plus Congress will be even worse. Much worse in fact.
FDR and WW2 are poor models for today. In fact, they are antiquated.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:13 AM on 08/07/2012
no...blame greenspan for lowering and lowering interest rates in the face of all that bush/chainy induced oil inflation...
10:47 PM on 08/06/2012
You link here to your own review of Paul Krugman's new book where you say, "Krugman argues that a moderate dose of inflation would be preferable to prolonged depression, and he’s right."

Who do you think is in charge of managing the inflation rate? Elves? Fairies? If we got the growth we need to get back to full employment more people will be spending money on gas, better housing, etc. so prices would go up. The Fed needs to make clear that it would allow this to happen and not stamp out a recovery to preserve their precious 2% inflation rate. Under Reagan 4% inflation was "Morning in America." The Fed needs to allow that to happen again.
10:06 PM on 08/06/2012
The leadership of the Federal Reserve and it incestuous Mega Bank Cartel destroyed the American economy. There is no plan to commit funds to new State Banks and local banks for the great projects we need to educate and employ millions and bring the U.S. - outside of NASA and the military (both public institutions) - into the 21st century. Those involved at the high end of U.S. banking, industry, and politics are nothing but a bunch of criminals feeding on what's left of the middle class and poor and using our nation as their fortress downloading everything the people have built into their global gulag. Oh, I forgot, the Fed aristocracy and the top 1% have also destroyed our national security in all aspects and at all levels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jmdziuban1
Aspiring ne'er do not-so-well
07:29 PM on 08/06/2012
The problem is that the republicans have too much invested in a failed economic theory to allow consideration of any alternatives. They also have too much political capital invested in their mantra that "Government is the Problem" to allow the government to function properly and aid itself and the population out of this mess of primarily republican creation.

There is also the difficulty of getting the terms of debate acceptably altered. The right wing have successfully dominated the economic conversation over the last 30+ years to the extent that any raising of an alternative to their policies is shouted down, derided, and dismissed by their echo chamber and by their propagandized followers. You can show them all the evidence in favor of your argument you wish to, but it will not sway them. You cannot have a rational discussion with those who refuse to discuss things rationally, and who instead insist upon clinging to ideological driven beliefs in the face of incontrovertible fact.

For the right wing to accept recognition of their own failures would to them be the same as admitting utter and absolute defeat, which they will refuse to do until given no other choice.
12:09 AM on 08/07/2012
I think I can agree without almost every word you said. The sad thing is with just a few adjustments I can agree with the same thing but with Democrat substituted for Republican and left wing for right wing.
01:10 PM on 08/07/2012
There is no real left wing in America. If you were to compare the policies of today's democrats with those of the republicans of 20 years ago, you'd find precious little difference. As the late Gore VIdal said, In America there is but one political party, and it is the party of property.
photo
YouTubeJEFF9K
Big on the Big Picture.
07:09 PM on 08/06/2012
Shouldn't we be asking why evidence-based solutions are considered “politically radioactive?” My sense is that it is due to the influence of talk radio and Fox News. In other words, the Republican Fraudcasting Network.
12:12 AM on 08/07/2012
And yet another post where you could imagine reading on a conservative site but with CNBC substituted for Fox News and Democrat for Republican. It's zero meaningful content no matter which partisan says it. It is just the same all old, we are right, they are wrong, our arguments are logical, theirs are not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatWard
model for Rodin
06:06 PM on 08/06/2012
Ronald Reagan's worst statement "government is the problem" coupled with Alan Greenspan's (Ayn Rand) "trickle down economics" caused unthinking Democrats to switch loyalties and support Reagan. They still hate our government and have become the Tea Party. Until we can convince enough voters to support the Keynesian economic approach to investment and recovery we will remain mired in this doldrum. It is very popular that the Republicans want to return to the old perjorative "tax and spend Democrats", while conveniently forgetting that the Republican war-mongering got us into this situation in the first place. Money flowed freely under Bush 43 and went directly to the national debt. As soon as they were discovered and defeated, their return to fiscal responsibility began. The polarization of wealth continues. Banks refuse to lend, and businesses sit on their trillions of dollars. We need huge investment projects, and we need a leader that can convince the majority that that is true. Investment in America is the answer, not hiding money in off-shore accounts.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:32 PM on 08/06/2012
fanned. The banksters robbed the world, and would rather gamble with a 30T$ FED free slush fund .004% than invest.

FDR the banks. NOW.

SWAP gambling insurance without reserves is now over a QUADRILLION DOLLARS in total overhang.

The slights stumble by the horses at the track, home lean, currency, Greece, will be leveraged without limit into a crash. That's what happened and it's set to happen again.

And the Dupes want to elect the bankster Mitt!
12:13 AM on 08/07/2012
I wonder how the world survived before Keynes was born?
05:58 PM on 08/06/2012
I agree. I do not hold accountable Bernanke but I do hold accoun tab le this president. he has no plan, he is not a leader, he is a "facilitator". He switches stance that his supporters do not want to admit and clearly from his strategy to run for reelection, clearly he knows his record is poor, it is about the best of the worst. For me, that worked the first time. not again. Think I am partisan, go back to his taped speeches over the past several years including his campaign speeches, which I can be forgiving before because he was not in office. After two years, no. He is incompetent and it is time for change. He advocated change and did not deliver
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
asomer
06:50 PM on 08/06/2012
Couldn't agree more. We tried his stimulus. He wanted more, but still assured us what he got would jump start our economy & lower unemployment. Well, unemployment has risen, companies are drowning in regulations, fears of costs due to Obamacare/per employee. That is why the are scared outta their minds to part with cash right now. Would you freewilly spend money if you didn't know what you would be facing in 6 months? I wouldn't!!
08:42 PM on 08/06/2012
I love how we think that a single man is supposed to singlehandedly steer the largest economy on the planet when he has a congress that wouldn't sign a birthday card for him. Economies are extremely complex; if it were as easy as 1-2-3, don't you think the billionaires that he and every other politician are beholden to would have paid him off to get it fixed by now?

A great many people are to blame for our current situation - from greedy bankers and non-bank mortgage lenders who took advantage of homeowners who were biting off way more than they could chew, to consumers who had been operating for YEARS at a negative savings rate in a credit bubble, to industry barons who played monopoly with OUR money knowing full well that even in the worst circumstances they would be the first ones to be made whole by Bank of Taxpayer. Millions of people collectively created the mess we're in over then last 15-20 years - you really think 1 man is going to dig us out in a 4 year period with no help from anyone else in government?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PartisanLove
doh
11:57 AM on 08/07/2012
you would think that would be obvious, but the need to be partisan in this country is more important these days.
05:54 PM on 08/06/2012
The local, state and federal governments already take over 6 trillion dollars out of the economy, and it's growing. That is why the economy is slow to recover. The government doesn't control the economy it can only control people. Besides, politicians have no clue how to spend the money except on buying votes. Think how many times you spent some money today. Now think about over 150 million adults spending money today, and every other day - THERE IS NO WAY THE GOVERNMENT CAN CONTROL THAT!!!!!!! Lower everybody's taxes, including corporations, make more people pay taxes, decrease government spending, decrease regulation and watch the economy take off.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:36 PM on 08/06/2012
we did everything you suggested and IT CRASHED THE ECONOMY. TWICE. we did the same thing before the depression.

Lowest taxes in 80 years, least regulatory power in 80 years, and you want more.

Good serf.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vesaversa1
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
05:48 PM on 08/06/2012
Much respect Mr Robert Kuttner , But those Ken Burn movies help to create thousands of jobs in this country too .
05:10 PM on 08/06/2012
"It took World War II to cure the Great Depression..."

Oh lordy, not this myth again. All right. Who do we declare war against this time?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jmdziuban1
Aspiring ne'er do not-so-well
07:31 PM on 08/06/2012
Aliens from outer space. Just in case.

Besides, it is not a myth.
10:44 PM on 08/06/2012
So, we'd still be in the Great Depression were it not for WWII.

I am glad you were clear and specified outer space aliens and not just aliens.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:37 PM on 08/06/2012
no myth. 5 trillion dollar in today's money is the stimulus we need. What bubble are you in?
10:50 PM on 08/06/2012
You are conflating two issues. One is whether or not WWII got us out of the Great Depression and the other is whether deficit spending will get us out of this Great Recession.

We were already coming out of the Depression when WWII broke out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Roth
Interests include politics, history, world affairs
05:08 PM on 08/06/2012
What was one of the great tools that we used to win WWII? It was the financial support that War Bonds (US Savings Bonds) brought to the effort. Doesn't everyone question why we aren't doing the same thing today with regard to dealing with this mess that the US Congress, Bush and now Obama have made? Its pretty clear to me, that once again its the banks that are at the heart of the problem. They don't want the government borowing from its citizens. They want the government borrowing from and through them, it is very profitable.
So let's see how borrowing from ourselves could help us with our current problems. Number one, instead of borrowing from China or the Federal Reserve, the Government would borrow from each of us. The approach would be for each of us to purchase 21st Century Bonds in the amount of 5-10% of our income. For example, a person making $50k per year would purchase $5-10K in Bonds. The Bonds would mature in 10 Years and pay 5% interest tax free. The inital cost of the Bonds would not be considered as income. So if you were in the 15% bracket and bought $10K in Bonds your tax savings would be $1,500 dollars.
Now, if we all got behind this, we could rebuild infrastructure, water/sewer systems, roads/high speed rail, airports/runways, energy production and delivery, and bring Made in America back.
05:49 PM on 08/06/2012
If we don't stop borrowing and inflating the money supply, 5% interest will be swallowed up by inflation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
asomer
06:39 PM on 08/06/2012
What about throwing money at boondoggles like Solyndra & such?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:40 PM on 08/06/2012
If you invest in profitable things like infrastructure and citizens safety net, you get great value.