I do not view the labor movement as part of the problem, to me it's part of the solution.
-- President Barack Obama, January 30, 2009
The great union leader John L. Lewis, who headed the United Mine Workers from the '30s through the '50s and helped organize millions of workers into the CIO, used to declare in organizing drives: "President Roosevelt wants you to join the union." Roosevelt never said that in so many words, but FDR did strongly back the Wagner Act, giving workers the clear right to organize.
During World War II, Roosevelt's War Labor Board made clear that corporations seeking war contracts needed to have good labor relations. In practice, that meant unions; and it meant "pattern bargaining" in which workers for different companies in the same industry got the same wages, so that companies could not play workers off against each other.
Roosevelt's wartime contracting policies, the Wagner Act, and the militancy of the labor movement laid the groundwork for the golden age of American unions during the postwar boom. Not coincidentally, this was also the one period in the past century when the economy became more equal, and more secure for working people.
So, while Roosevelt's words never quite urged workers to join unions, his deeds spoke volumes. John L. Lewis was well within the bounds of poetic license.
On Friday, President Obama, a onetime organizer, had more words to say about unions, and they were the kind of explicit endorsement that we literally haven't heard from a president since FDR's day.
"We need to level the playing field for workers and the unions that represent their interests, because we know that you cannot have a strong middle class without a strong labor movement," the President said. "When workers are prospering, they buy products that make businesses prosper. We can be competitive and lean and mean and still create a situation where workers are thriving in this country."
And Obama offered deeds to match. This stunning declaration of support came at the White House announcement of a Task Force on Middle Class Working Families headed by Vice President Biden, with Jared Bernstein as its executive director. The idea was proposed last summer by Change to Win unions, who endorsed candidate Obama early in the primary season. He embraced the concept, and it was a commitment he kept. His remarks and actions were a dazzling example of the transformative power of a president to shift public opinion and the political center of gravity.
The task force, and the effusive and genuine embrace of the labor movement, came as a huge relief to union leaders, who have watched anxiously as nearly all the key economic posts went to centrist veterans of the Clinton administration, and the job of secretary of labor was not announced with the other senior economic officials. As it turned out, the appointment of Hilda Solis, a very pro-union member of Congress, was delayed because others had turned down the job first, but the delay sent an unfortunate signal.
Labor activists have also been worried about whether Obama will keep his pledge not just to sign the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) guaranteeing the right to join a union, but to work hard on its behalf with legislators, especially in the Senate. Since the election, the US Chamber of Commerce and allied anti-union business organizations have mounted a furious publicity and lobbying offensive with one message: Mr. President, you don't need this bruising fight right now.
But the Chamber's allies in the Republican House Caucus have beautifully undercut that logic. The Chamber's premise was that EFCA would be highly divisive, at a time then the new president was seeking unity. With the wall-to-wall Republican stonewalling on the Obama recovery package, that premise is up in smoke. And the Chamber's other allies, on Wall Street, have also done a service by inviting some salutary class warfare. Obama responded last week, calling Wall Street bonuses in the face of government bailouts "shameful," and seems to genuinely view the growth of unions as a necessary counterweight.
The task force itself will be a welcome counterweight to the outsized influence of Wall Street inside the Obama administration. Several weeks ago, Jared Bernstein, then a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, wrote a joint op-ed piece for the New York Timeswith Robert Rubin pointing out where they agreed. One issue where they pointedly disagreed was on the Employee Free Choice Act, which Rubin explicitly refused to endorse. The Biden operation now looks to be the go-to place for progressives seeing access to Obama's priorities. The Task Force will serve as the White House center to review all proposals, legislative and administrative, for their impact on the effort to raise wages and rebuild a middle class.
Without Obama's strong personal engagement, EFCA will be anything but a legislative cakewalk. Democrats may have a working majority. But at least five business-oriented Democrats are not considered certain votes for EFCA, and Obama will need to let them know that the White House considers this bill a top priority.
Our last two Democrats went out of their way not to get close to organized labor. Jimmy Carter did not lift a finger when the last big push to put some teeth back in the Wagner Act's right to unionize went down to defeat by just two votes in the Senate in 1978.
On Friday, announcing the Task Force, Obama signed three executive orders. One will prevent federal contractors from discouraging their employees to join unions. Another will assure that workers keep their jobs when a contract changes hands. Down the road is an executive order to promote project agreements on construction contracts.
If Obama is serious, he can take a leaf from FDR's book, and use government's extensive contracting power to actively promote unions. Late in the Clinton administration, then Vice President Al Gore led an effort called the Responsible Contractor Initiative. The idea was to reward federal contractors who took the high road by providing good jobs and not standing in the way of unions.
It remains to be seen just how much real power Obama will give Vice President Biden. But the task force is a superb beginning. If government can just use its influence to make sure employers stay neutral, it will be a new day for the labor movement--and for American progressivism.
Robert Kuttner is Co-Editor of The American Prospect. His new book is "Obama's Challenge: America's Economic Crisis and the Power of a Transformative Presidency."
Tom Engelhardt: The Afghan Speech Obama Should Give (But Won't)
While we don't know what exactly is going through Obama's mind, or just when or in what form he will address us on his plan for the war in Afghanistan, we do know something about what his conclusions are likely to be.
Daschle filed the amended tax returns after Obama announced he intended to nominate him as secretary of health and human services.
He recently filed amended returns for 2005-07 to report $128,203 in back taxes and $11,964 in interest.
"I disclosed this information to the committee voluntarily and paid the taxes and any interest owed promptly," Daschle wrote.
"My mistakes were unintentional." HA HA HA HA !!!
I AM ABOVE THE LAW I WILL PAY NO PENALTY!!
OBAMA CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!!!!
“Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce our laws to the letter” - Sen. Tom Daschle, Congressional Record, May 7, 1998, p. S4507
The benefits I received in pay and medical, disability, retirement, the list goes on and on I received for those 2 hours I would give the pay of to the Union.
I was born and raised in Detroit and worked for the UAW in the early 70's and the postal union in the late 70's and early 80's and finally with the Teamsters from 1986 until I was diagnosed with a disease with no cure. The Union stepped up and informed me of my benefits throughout.
Whereas the company treated me like a number and just slid someone my junior into my slot as they had to pay them less and insist on more. Not once during the decade I've been suffering with this illness I've not once heard from management. And as the disability's were exhausting as the time went on I was left with 10 days notice that benefits would no longer be available. It was a disgusting show of the company I once loved working for and bled Brown from.
Just because Nike gets their sneakers made in Thrid World Countries - does Nike pass off the "savings" (of the slave labor of children) to the consumer by cutting the cost of the shoes - or do they increase their stock prices of which the managers have many options to purchase?
They're not perfect. But the last couple decades have shown us how much the middle class suffers when unions are not supported.
Businesses have Organizations where they set wages and prices.
Doctors even have Unions!!!!!!!!
Even countrys have organizations to screw the poor.
OPEC !!!!!!!!!
Those of you who deliberately put the security and well-being of your families at the mercy of corporations are irresponsible at best and outright cowards at worst. You owe your family better. If only you had the guts to stand up for yourself and your rights.
It's about changing the power dynamic. Workers have no power as individuals and greed at the top knows no bounds. Unions help level that playing field.
The middle class works longer and harder for less and less, while management continues to line its pockets. No one needs to earn 400+ times what their average worker makes. No one. Those are dollars which could be used to fund pensions and retiree health programs.
Unless unions are allowed to level the playing field so that workers get what they need from their employers to ensure a comfortable and dignified retirement, YOU will be footing the bill for all the old and destitute baby boomers whose portfolios have been demolished and whose home equity has disappeared.
My union also doesn't always do such a great job of representing our needs, but they sure take my money. They have to pay their employees.
Finally, what if your union was all atwitter about McCain in its mailings? Would you have thought that a good use of your dues?
"You wanna job? You pay your dues! You wanna job in this town? You pay your dues!"
So, where's the money go? To a small few who, with their big smiles, and empathetic nods, claim to be going to Washington to fight the good fight! But nothing changes, they just come back every once in awhile demanding their next round of dues.
Make no mistake: Unions, government parties, any organization that depends on the funds of those who are actually working are doing one thing and one thing only- capitalizing on that money, while doing no real work of their own.
What about the mine workers that are going below the ground without Unions demanding safety mechanisms in place? Is this the way we are suppose to treat our fellow man? Make a working wage so rare that miners have to make a life decision to support their family as the mining companies just accept a disaster as the cost of doing business and move on to another small town.
Now I personally wouldn't do a miner's job even if it were a Union paying job. But to risk life and limb in a workplace doesn't it seem just the right place for a Union to be watching the risk to workers?
during the reagan era we were "individuals" with "individual responsibility". all the while corporate america was merging, forming lobbies and heading to DC like sailors on shore leave!
and this is the govt we got. broke, bailng out poorly run businesse that are leveraged to the teeth.
scrap it and start over and this time remember that income inequality matters. labor matters. dignity matters. and we cant all work at walmart!
When these ideals and institutions were alive and well we prospered as a nation, but when they are on life support like they are now the nation is weak, especially the middle class and those just hanging on to dear life.
We have seen a huge shift in the tax burden from corporations and the rich to the working people because as long as the GOP keeps us distracted on wedge issues they create and win elections. The more they tilt the scales in favor of business and the rich the longer the people suffer.
How anyone would trust their economic futures of themselves and their families to the hope of a giant corporation's generosity and morality, I say: Good luck. That company will pay you the minimum it can get away with and steal every single benefit, perk and safety measure it can given half a chance. You hate unions and the protections and benefits they provide so much, go move to a third world country and enter the work system.
Just think of the bank bailouts and then what the auto companies had to do just to get a LOAN and only a very small percentage of what the banks got for ...................... Who knows? Do they really think that people believe that the Rep Party are the ones looking out for us? That's the slop they're selling!
I then moved to the UK when I married in 1981 and I witnessed the wholesale destruction of the unions by Maggie Thatcher, culminating with the downfall of the Miners' Union. Thatcher emasculated the unions in the UK and employers treated workers with nothing short of contempt. Whatever unions were left were shadows of their former selves. There arose in these past 20-odd years a culture of greed and selfishness. Now, it appears, in the UK, workers are having wildcat strikes due to an influx of cheap foreign labour taking jobs from British workers. Had the unions been active, maybe we wouldn't have seen this.
As for the US, I'm happy that Obama is encouraging union development. Happy and secure workers are productive workers.