The economy is plainly stuck in second gear. For the third month in a row, new job creation in June, at just 80,000, was barely enough to keep the unemployment rate from rising, and not nearly sufficient to accommodate new entrants to the labor market and unemployed people looking for work.
Not only did the private sector fail to create enough jobs. With the crisis in state and local budgets and the absence of federal aid, the loss of public sector jobs continued. Ordinarily in a slump, public employment takes up some of the slack. In this recession, government has shed 627,000 jobs.
Here's the deeper worry. Not only could a weakening economy cost Barack Obama the election -- this slump could literally go on indefinitely.
In the aftermath of a financial collapse, the economy gets stuck in a downward spiral. Banks are too traumatized to lend, businesses see too few customers to invest, and there is too little purchasing power among consumers who are either out of work or who haven't seen a raise in a decade. The housing bust only adds to the downward drag.
Exports have been a bright spot, but as Europe succumbs to a similar vortex of recession compounded by austerity, Europe's even worse economic woes are likely add to America's.
Something similar happened in the late 1930s. Though economic growth returned, it wasn't strong enough to repair the damage of the Great Depression or create enough jobs. Despite the New Deal, unemployment remained stuck at around 12 percent.
World War II solved the problem -- it was the greatest accidental economic stimulus in economic history. It put people back to work, retrained the unemployed, and recapitalized industry. But today, there is nothing in the wings waiting to play the role of the Second World War.
During the war, federal deficits averaged more than 25 percent of GDP, nearly triple today's deficits. But that's what it took to blast out of the depression. After the war, high growth rates paid down the accumulated national debt.
What's needed today is a massive investment program, to shift the economy to a clean energy path, modernize infrastructure, increase productivity -- and along the way create millions of good jobs and restore consumer purchasing power. Then, the vicious circle could be reversed.
The problem is that neither party is proposing such a program. It is entirely outside mainstream debate.
President Obama is willing to have the federal government spend more money. But he has partly bought the story that deficit reduction has to come first. The Republicans would further gut the public sector.
Contrary to the conventional view that deficit reduction would somehow "restore confidence" and increase business investment, that's not how economies work. Businesses invest when they see customers with open wallets. Though the Congressional Budget Office projects higher growth returning around 2014, it bases these projections on a "return to trend." There is no plausible story about where the higher growth will come from.
If we don't get a drastic change in policy, we will be stuck in this rut for a generation or more.
The best case for November is that Obama is re-elected and somehow the Democrats take back the House and hold the Senate. If this happens, it will not be due to green economic shoots or a persuasive Democratic program but because Mitt Romney is such a dismal candidate.
However, with dozens of Senate Democrats senators committed to the folly of deficit reduction first, there is no prospect of an investment program on a scale that could make a difference.
I am an optimistic by temperament, but I don't see much to make me optimistic about either economics or politics. Though the recession nominally ended in June 2009 when weakly positive growth returned, there is little doubt that the economy is stuck in a long-term slump that could well deepen between now and November.
Frankly, the best hope is that whether Obama wins or loses, progressives take back the Democratic Party so that a candidate genuinely committed to full employment runs and wins in 2016. But that's an awfully long time to wait. And in the meantime, as government fails to improve things, more people are likely to give up on politics or to turn to demagogues.
It is also possible that Barack Obama in a second term, freed of the need to win re-election and looking to his legacy, could become more of the leader we thought we were electing in 2008, shaming Republicans and rallying Democrats to back a true recovery program. Nobody would be more surprised or pleased than your faithful writer.
Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos. His latest book is A Presidency in Peril.
David Paul: Is Romney Playing Rope-a-Dope or Is There Really No There There?
Chris Weigant: Team Obama Should Thank Karl Rove
Rev. Jesse Jackson: Put U.S. Jobs Above D.C. Partisanship
but you want to go back.
ICut
In italy is called ITaglia ( playing with the name Italia)
This is what happens when NO ideas exist except the one that is of making money no matter what in bigger hoogenous and therefore already half dead nations conglomerates oligarchies NAFTAs EU China bunches"
Where are the thinkers? We need an idea to kill these old ideas. Ideas will take us out of the recession not the Romneys or a half baked democrat like pres Obama and his army of half republican democrats anf full fledged fascists on the other end of the isle.
Can you imagine a country run by a capitalist trained on bankrupting companies for a buck to stash that buck in switzerland with an IRA of 100 milions?.. He can have 100 millions in an IRA you know how much can you save instead?
The banksters still have a 0T$ slush fund to backup thier gambling.
As long as SWAPS are legal, the economy is dying.
The dems controlling the party are DLCs or corporatist democrats. We may have to purge them out of party like tea party did to GOP. Most of the people in this country instinctively is 'left of center' wanting a fair, equal opportunity to have the best lives for all, believe in the common good as well as having a govt that works for everyone.
When democrats strongly message these points, fight for the 99%, and don't back down the people declare themselves democrats as they did when Howard Dean ran the national party in 2005 where dems went on to take back congress, then to win big time in 2008.
Come 2009, DLCers came back to power landing in the national party, controlling the senate, the president and his cabinet. Messages became muddled, unclear aimed at helping corporate America, bending over for GOP to take unprecedented aim at all they did.
That's a brief history of what happened to the modern democratic party. It's not FDR party anymore.
No Change is what the Dempublicans are offering us in '12. But an excellent choice of fears from previous campaigns, and old diversionary issues from the last half-century.
Not a peep about how we get from here to where the People are served.
Here's one, and it can be rendered to a song, the democrat song!
Like nuns reciting a prayer:
"Oh, only government knows best for you and me! Can't we all just sing together?"
Bass:
"Fox news is all lies. Only the stupid watch Fox., Oh!"
Soprano:
"Let the conservatives have their slogan: QUESTION AUTHORITY and TRUST PEOPLE", for we know best, there's research that shows we are smarter!"
Tenor:
"All corporations are bad. Corporations are owned by all kinds of people, but they try to get profit, Oh." "Government seek to apply power!" "Government is more efficient than corporations"
All
"Can't we all just sing?"
"Oh!"
Other than collapse, we have no politically-plausible path toward balance. Grover Norquist wants to borrow-and-spend until our government can be "drowned in a bathtub", the Republican Party is still solidly behind him, the Democratic party is still giving jellyfish a bad name, and third parties are still not on the map.
The Supreme Court is 20-40 years. Can this country afford another Scalia or Thomas on the bench?
No, and Romney would definitely tack hard right, if not harder.