iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert L. Borosage

GET UPDATES FROM Robert L. Borosage

It Takes a Movement

Posted: 06/03/11 01:33 PM ET

This is a classic "small d" democratic moment. The economy is in deep trouble -- immediate and long term. Washington is oblivious, compromised by moneyed interests, knotted by ideological divides. It will take an angry and aroused citizens' movement to demand the debate worthy of a great nation in deep trouble.

The dismal jobs numbers only punctuate the reality of an economy that isn't producing sufficient jobs. The crisis is both immediate and long-term. The so-called recovery hasn't begun to recover the jobs lost in the Great Recession. 25 million people are in need of full time work. Home values continue to fall. 25 percent of 17- to 25-year-old high school graduates not in college are out of work. Much of a generation is at risk.

The immediate is only an expression of more profound problems. The middle class was losing ground before the Great Recession. Good jobs are being shipped abroad. Wages aren't keeping up with the costs of basics. The broad middle class that made America exceptional is disappearing. The American dream seems ever more like a nostalgic memory. The nation continues to run unsustainable trade deficits, and must dig out of a mountain of debt -- both public and private. For the first time, an increasing majority of Americans fear their kids won't fare as well as they have.

We need action to put people to work. But short term fixes aren't enough. Americans are looking for a serious strategy that will get us out of the mess we are in.

The Beltway Bloviating

But inside the beltway, Washington is clueless. It's the only major city in the country where housing prices are going up. A flood of corporate lobby money insures that the tables are full at the high end restaurants. Entrenched corporate interests buy a lot more than lunches with their dough. They block vital reforms on health care, energy, trade, Wall Street. They feed off taxpayers, protecting their subsidies and tax dodges, avoiding taxes, while deficits rise and essential programs like nutrition for infants get cut.

The politicians prefer posturing to bold action, "message" and "spin" to leadership. Republicans even with the majority in the House are focused on obstruction. They vote for more tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, paid for by ending Medicare and Medicaid, hiking costs for those least able to pay -- seniors, the disabled, the dying. They vow to blow up the economy if they can't get a deal on trillions in domestic spending cuts, accompanied by more tax breaks for the wealthy. They're lining their campaign coffers carrying water for the big banks against even minimal reforms.

The adult Republican presidential candidates like Mitt Romney claim they can get the economy going and create jobs. But they only recycle old and failed nostrums. More tax cuts for corporations who are already sitting on over a trillion in cash waiting for customers. More tax cuts for the wealthiest, who already have the most concentrated income and wealth since the eve of the Great Depression. More corporate trade deals that ship goods jobs abroad, undermine wages at home, and force up to borrow over a billion a day from abroad to balance the deficits. Less regulation when we haven't recovered from the catastrophe caused by the excesses of deregulated Wall Street. They pretend they can balance the budget and put people to work by cutting domestic spending, cutting taxes, increasing spending on the military, and not dismantling basic promises like Medicare and Social Security. They and everyone else knows that is a lie.

The White House offers no clear way out. The president wants to hail the successes of an economy that isn't working for most people. Yes, his policies saved us from free fall -- thanks, but we're worried about what we face, not where we've been. He sensibly calls for "winning the future" -- making investments in areas like education, innovation and infrastructure. But he's locked himself into austerity, focused on cuts, and offering no big vision of how we move forward. He's more sensible than the tea party zealots, but remains unwilling to tell Americans what needs to be done and that fight for it.

The Democrats in the Senate are a babble, too divided to deliver a message. The House Democrats are cowed by the losses in 2010, too worried about being accused of being "big spenders" to lay out a course to get the economy going and put people to work.

And few seem ready to put out a strategy that necessarily will take on the interests that are strangling the dream. A national trade strategy that isn't controlled by multinationals. Affordable health care not catering to private insurance and drug companies. Fair taxes that shut down the tax havens, the dodges, the obscene subsidies that drain our resources. An investment strategy that generates vital public and private investment, not more Wall Street speculation, or CEO incentives for laying off workers and plundering their own companies.

It will take a popular uprising to get Washington even to begin to focus seriously on jobs and the economy. We've seen this before. There was a bipartisan consensus on the Iraq War until a growing movement forced first Democrats and then the Bush White House to face reality. The Washington establishment was drunk on slashing Social Security and Medicare to address deficits, and Republicans embraced gutting Medicare, until popular disapproval expressed both in the polls and in the special election in upstate New York sobered them up a bit. The anger expressed by the Tea Party minority still has Republicans in Washington reeling.

Now we need the people to speak again. This time for the American majority. We aren't buying the old conservative elixirs. The New Dem-Republican lite embrace of half measures and conservative cross dressing isn't acceptable.

Washington has to hear a clear message. We elected you to get this economy going, not gut Medicare. We want to know how you will create jobs. We don't want to be served the old tired babble. We know we can't simply cut our way to prosperity. We know we need a major change in our global strategy. We know we've got to make investments vital to the future -- in education and in innovation. We know this economy needs major reforms. Anyone not willing to challenge the corporate interests that are strangling change isn't serious. We know it is hard to focus on creating jobs when deficits are this high. We know we'll have to sacrifice, but we're not broke -- we don't have to break promises to our kids or our parents. And don't ask the victims of this economy to sacrifice when those making out like bandits are given a pass. We know once the economy is moving, taxes have to go up and spending has to be brought under control. So stop the nonsense of no tax hikes. Tell us what you will cut and why. Don't pretend choices don't have to be made.

So lay it out. How do you put people to work, change our economic strategy so we begin once more to make things in America and create good jobs, not poverty wage jobs? How does that relate to getting our books in order and our priorities straight? Give us a debate worthy of a great nation in deep trouble.

In August, after Washington reaches an inevitable deal on lifting the debt limit after weeks of posturing and bluster, of an idiotic debate focused on what to cut rather than how to get the economy going, legislators will return home for recess. They need to hear from us.

 

Follow Robert L. Borosage on Twitter: www.twitter.com/borosage

 
 
  • Comments
  • 433
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
09:02 PM on 06/04/2011
End BUSH Half Trillion Giveaways to Big Pharma in Bush Medicare Drug Bill

End BIG OIL and corporate Agriculture subsidies. Those industries receive TENS of BILLIONS in tax breaks, subsidies, and royalty exemptions.

AND Suddenly AMERICA IS A GREAT COUNTRY AGAIN WITH A SURPLUS!

Reduce Corporate Welfare 50% saving up to $50 Trillion/10 years. STOP FED Dumping $Trillions in Corporate Welfare on WALL STREET. Nationalize natural resources (oil and metals) and issue fixed price contracts.

DROP GOP TAX CUTS for RICH - SAVES $4Trillion to $5Trillion/10 Years! Nationalize the FED - Takeover control of monetary policy - Issue Credit Currency.

Set our Defense Budget at Twice #2 China at $198 Billion per year - Saves $8.04Trillion/10 years and $16.08Trillion/20 years! Congress should authorize ZERO% Interest printing like Lincoln did to prevent ADDED DEBT Burden on American families, sending their kids off to war.

Place Tariffs on all CHINA IMPORTS and a 35% TAX on their Currency Exchange UNLESS and UNTIL they let our Companies’ goods
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
08:58 PM on 06/04/2011
HST's economic plan:

Reduce Corporate Welfare 50% saving up to $50 Trillion/10 years. STOP FED Dumping $Trillions in Corporate Welfare on WALL STREET. Nationalize natural resources (oil and metals) and issue fixed price contracts

DROP GOP TAX CUTS for RICH - SAVES $4Trillion to $5Trillion/10 Years


Set the top tax rate on Richest 2% at not 35% but at 45% over $500,000 and saves another $2 Trillion/10 years! Eisenhower's TOP TAX RATE of 91% - America Prospered!

FORCE CORPORATIONS TO PAY FEDERAL TAXES TO IRS INSTEAD OF OFF-SHORING
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:11 AM on 06/05/2011
You do realize, of course, that a government monopoly and overreach into "public-private partnerships" is characteristic of many FAILED STATES.

"The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The [3rd Re_ich] will always retain its right to control the owners of property."
- A. H i t ler,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
03:15 PM on 06/05/2011
You do realize, of course, the first thing AH did when came to power in Germany is to outlaw unions...
photo
steve11407
pending approval and won't be displayed until ...
05:18 PM on 06/04/2011
"And few seem ready to put out a strategy that necessarily will take on the interests that are strangling the dream. A national trade strategy that isn't controlled by multinationals. Affordable health care not catering to private insurance and drug companies. Fair taxes that shut down the tax havens, the dodges, the obscene subsidies that drain our resources. An investment strategy that generates vital public and private investment, not more Wall Street speculation, or CEO incentives for laying off workers and plundering their own companies."

Who?What?When?Where?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:33 PM on 06/04/2011
The politicians are smart and know how to stimulate the economy, the problem is the rich put them in office, democrat and republican alike, and they’ve manipulated US policy to the extent of having the US taxpayer pay them to move their companies overseas and allow them to export goods here tax free. That’s the root of why all the jobs are gone and the only way to fix it is to reverse that strategy. Of course the rich wouldn’t go for that, but they should look a little deeper and realize they are ruining the country that put them where they are. I suggest we give the rich all the tax cuts they want; with the condition they use the money to rejuvenate the US economy. And the way to expedite this strategy is to raise their taxes 50% if they refuse to invest, and in that case we could use that tax money to pay off the deficit and to stimulate the economy ourselves. If they invest in hiring American workers that would be the engine to run the rest of the economy, just as it had before they made the mass exodus from the US. It seems like the only way to get them off the fence is to give them no other choice. After this recession/depression or whatever it is, I hope the unions learnt that if you twist the rich man’s arm, their simply just go to another country to play their greedy game.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deminmo
just looking for answers
03:40 PM on 06/04/2011
You have to have living wage jobs. You have to balance cuts with increased
taxes. If you cut Medicare and use vouchers one visit to the hospital wipes
grandma out of the system and someone will have to pick up the bill. Same
with general healthcare. Stop Social Security and have no living wage jobs,
how do people save for retirement and actually have enough for 70 years?
I might be missing the addition somewhere but it just doesn't make sense.
03:27 PM on 06/04/2011
"It's people like you who survive on Washington programs for your living. I resent the fact that you are causing me to stop my work-a-day life to get involved and eradicatin g these Washington machinatio ns used to bolster your lifestyles."
--------
Buck, here's the problem: We let go of the wheel. Democracy is participatory. When we stop participating, the greedy take over and call the shots. None of us can afford to bury our heads in our work-a-day lives. We never could.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chazet2
06:39 PM on 06/04/2011
Spot on!
03:22 PM on 06/04/2011
You only have to read some of these posts to see why we are doomed as a country. To have a viable democracy you need to have an informed educated populace. For the most part we have a majority population composed of idiots .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
02:29 PM on 06/04/2011
I live in the SF bay area, on a clear day I can see forever------Chinese cargo ships coming into shore delivering all the shiny bright things Americans want. If most the people in the Middle West an South could see this they might start voting in their own best interest.

We have a lot of empty building that used to be high tech companies, these have now
gone on a slow tug boat to China.

Most Californian’s are angry and worried and would join a citizens movement in a flash second. California being one eighty the world economy knows that we are in deep trouble.
The unemployment rate in CA is 11%.

Milton Friedman was wrong!!!!!!


My major problem with the world is a problem of scarcity in the midst of plenty ... of people starving while there are unused resources ... people having skills which are not being used.
Milton Friedman
beachgirlchix
We Will Not Be Silent!
04:04 PM on 06/04/2011
Agreed! Milton Friedman's plan can only work under a military dictatorship, like Augusto Pinochet, the war criminal's. Actually, it did not even work then, but it took the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Chile and the torture, disappearance and murder of thousands of citizens before our multinational corporations could even try it out. No one there wanted it. After Friedman's plan for mass privatization went through, the unemployment rate skyrocketed to 40%. Only the nationalized copper mine kept the experiment afloat. And now we are worshipping Ayn Rand, whose ideology makes up the bulk of the Satanic Verses and Milton Friedman, advisor to war criminal Pinochet. Why are Americans still blindly following this ideology that has been debunked?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
07:29 PM on 06/04/2011
Ayn Rand was a friend of Allen Greenspan with a couple other people they called themselves "The Collective". Allen Greenspan was the one that suggested to Regan that Friedman’s economics was something they should use. There were many in the 1970’s that thought Ayn Rand was Fa$cist.

The Shock Doctrine is a great book

In THE SHOCK DOCTRINE, Naomi Klein explodes the myth that the global free market triumphed democratically. Exposing the thinking, the money trail and the puppet strings behind the world-changing crises and wars of the last four decades, The Shock Doctrine is the gripping story of how America’s “free market” policies have come to dominate the world-- through the exploitation of disaster-shocked people and countries.
There is also the movie that can out in Jan 2010.

Some people are blind because they do not inform themselves with more then one reading source. Then the others because they truly believe in this stuff or it fits their own self interest.

Upon books the collective education of the race depends; they are the sole instruments of registering, perpetuating and transmitting thought.
Harry S. Truman
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:43 PM on 06/04/2011
The fact that you think "Friedman's plan can only work under a military dictatorsh­ip" or that any free market economist would advocate for tyrannical Government control, shows your TOTAL ignorance of the principles of free market capitalism

The "ideology" that you blindly claim has been "debunked" was banned in the Communist Soviet Union, and is the same "lightly regulated" free market capitalism that made the U.S. the envy of the free world, improved the standard of living for every strata of society, and can only exist under the kind of limited government control and personal freedom mandated by the U.S. Constitution..... which is the ANTITHESIS of central planning, corporatism, and government control of the free markets through "public-private partnerships" - aka Corporate Welfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:46 AM on 06/05/2011
Pssst...... Friedman was AGAINST corporatist government manipulation of the economy, i.e. Corporate Welfare. The empty buildings you see are because more and more businesses are LEAVING due to the high cost of doing business in California.

Please explain what you see as "wrong" about the quote you posted.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
10:22 AM on 06/05/2011
Yes, they are moving for the serf labor in China.
They are also moving to the South -- the environmental standards are lower and they can pollute the coast with oil.
I hear they will be moving to Vermont now that they have lowered the child labor law.
They are waiting for Scott Walker to finish removing laws, so they can move to Wis and privatize the town.

The world now is their oyster---Serf labor, pollution heaven, and no drug or food standards.

Yep, Corporatist Heaven.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
01:58 PM on 06/04/2011
I'm curious. With as many as one third of the voters claiming to be independents why don't those voters form a third politcal party called, simply, the Independent Party. It seems like the solution to the problem exists but no one wants to do anything about it. By "solution" I mean a third major party. I doubt there would be a problem fielding credible candidates (unlike other third party tries that got us ross Perot or Jesse Ventura.) There are ceratinly enough voters calling themselves independents to insure ballot status in all 50 states. Why do voters on both sides of the aisle complain about the mess in DC ON both sides of the aisle, yet do nothing to create what appears to be a "ready to go" alternative with a third party?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
02:48 PM on 06/04/2011
The moderate Republicans are now demo or independents so they would go for a third party, but do not count on the Die Hard Republicans/ Tea Party coming aboard, they would never agree to any changes.
They like the status Quo.

The people will save their government, if the government itself will allow them.
Abraham Lincoln
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jtwalk45
06:30 PM on 06/04/2011
third party is just a tool to split the votes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BuckCarson
Life outside the ObamaSphere
01:37 PM on 06/04/2011
I am one of those ignorant middle class Americans whose judgement appears to always be in question by progressive elites.

Bob, it's not "tax cuts". It's not "wall street greed". It's not "evil corporations".

It's people like you who survive on Washington programs for your living. I resent the fact that you are causing me to stop my work-a-day life to get involved and eradicating these Washington machinations used to bolster your lifestyles.

Bob, it IS about CUTTING spending. It IS about FANNIE and FREDDIE. It IS about greed, indeed, but not in the private sector, in fact it's in the government sector.

We are coming to clean house and it may be worse than all of the houses, families and retirements that progressive thinking has ruined.

Remember you have affected my children's future too. There's no talking point briefing to get you out of this one.
beachgirlchix
We Will Not Be Silent!
04:24 PM on 06/04/2011
You have really fallen for the corporate divide and conquer strategy that is tearing this nation apart while the corporate oligarchs take what is left. I pity you. Listen to yourself. Open your eyes, man. Corporate welfare costs taxpayers at least $50 billion a year more than welfare for actual people who are hurting, and yet we see whose side you are on. I can tell you are not a Christian or much of a thinker either. But hey, I am just one of those ignorant progressives questioning your blind judgement...
Nightangle
NPA - no party affiliation
05:09 PM on 06/04/2011
Fanned and Faved. Dagny Daggart would be smiling.
01:34 PM on 06/04/2011
Boy, do you have the facts right on Mr.Borosage. The most comprehensive article yet ! The death of
common sense is now in living in Washington, DC. You repubs and dems are going to be the demise
of America and "We the People" can no longer look to Your leadership with any respect.
GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
01:13 PM on 06/04/2011
One hundred percent spot on article. But of course it is a futile one. If the American Dream was based on capitalism, then it was unsustainable from go. The whole "free market" system is designed to build corporate and shareholder wealth.The only business of the day that matters is, where the DOW closed. The only way the DOW will close higher is if investors are buying stock and are being rewarded with dividends because the company is making earnings. So even when the business model fails to produce more goods based on consumer demand, how does the company make earnings to reward the shareholders? Slash the American workforce and offshore their labor and profits overseas. Pretty much where we are right now. We've been duped I'm afraid. How are we any different from the Oligarchs in Russia or Communists in China? Those at the top had their wealth created by the working and middle class people who made their businesses grow and produce. That wealth and poltical power now works to ensure that this system stays in place.
beachgirlchix
We Will Not Be Silent!
04:10 PM on 06/04/2011
You have it all wrong! Just look at Buck's post up there. It is all the poor indigent people who have destroyed the economy! Can you believe he bought into that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nomccain
11:49 AM on 06/04/2011
The next country to have a "revolution" should be this one....the USA. It's way pas time for the American people to take back their government and their country. If we don't we've lost it. It's just that simple.
11:43 AM on 06/04/2011
Yeah, let's close the tax havens. The Number One Tax Haven...the United States, where nearly 60% of the workforce pay little or no federal tax at all. Exxon alone pays more federal taxes than than the lower 50% of the tax filers (filing or course to get back all their withholding plus the "Earned Income" tax credit). I don't know what nation Borosage has been living in for the past three years, but he has seemed to miss a massive small "d" movement called the Tea Party, that is in fact offering solutions. The facts are that Borosage's organization is simply another front organization funded by Soros for Soros.
01:00 PM on 06/04/2011
Wow! What planet are you from?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hiddenfangs
Four legs good, two legs bad
01:12 PM on 06/04/2011
Actually you're wrong. You're saying federal tax. What you mean is federal INCOME tax and that is only 1/5 of tax revenues. Counting all the taxes (sales tax, income tax, etc.), the poor and middle class pay more than the wealthiest Americans and far more than any corporation. The question is "How much of a person's total income goes to pay taxes?" Again, the middle class and poor pay more in total taxes than the wealthy.