EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

The Big Bank Lobby: Too Big to Bear?

What's Your Reaction:

240 former legislators, bank committee staffers, and Treasury officials deployed to lobby. $600 million spent in lobbying, trade association activity and political contributions since March 2008. And that is just from the six biggest banks. The entire financial industry is spending an estimated $1.4 million a day, hiring 70 former members of Congress to make their case.

These figures, drawn from a new report released by the Campaign for America's Future (which I co-direct), would be shocking if they weren't so sad and predictable. As the Senate moves towards passing financial reform legislation, it is worth focusing on how the lobby works.

Bailed out by taxpayers, the big banks -- Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Well Fargo -- are emerging from the financial crisis larger and more concentrated than ever. Their very size offends market competition. Entities that are too big to fail cannot be disciplined by the market.

Worse, as former IMF economist Simon Johnson has emphasized, their size and wealth also undermine democratic accountability. As the report shows, they exercise immense political power which they use not only to fend off reforms that might curb their excesses, but to sculpt laws and regulations that consolidate their privilege and profits. So despite popular anger at the banks, the Senate last week voted down the Kaufman-Brown amendment that would have put a lid on the size of banks, forcing the break-up of the big six.

The report, written by Kevin Connor of the Public Accountability Initiative and Lil Sis, highlights the corrupting revolving door that Washington insiders view as a sensible career path. The banks heavily rely on hiring retired legislators, former committee staffers and legislative aides. Although these are salad days for Democratic lobbyists, bipartisanship reigns. The banking lobby includes Dick Gephardt, former leader of the House Democrats, Trent Lott, former leader of the Senate Republicans, and former Republican House leader Dick Armey, and putative leader of one branch of the Tea Partiers. Connor names names of the major players of over 240 former government insiders now on the banks' payroll.

Needless to say, former legislators and staffers are masters of the back rooms. They gain easy access to sitting legislators. They help draft legislation. They know how to slip in key amendments and loopholes in dead of night. They know the players and the process.

More corrosively, the players -- the sitting legislators and current staffers -- know that after leaving Congress, they can comfortably make the family fortune by joining the lobbying profession. Not surprisingly, many seek to curry the favor of those who might later employ them. The revolving door doesn't just give special access to the bank lobby; it compromises sitting legislators and staffers looking out for their own futures.

How this backroom influence works is illustrated in the most recent "Financial Services Bulletin" of Concept Capital's Washington Research Group. (Concept Capital bills itself as a "total solutions provider" to hedge funds and other investors).

The bulletin (not available on the web) details amendments still to be considered to the financial reform bill and the timeline for moving to a vote. It highlights for its clients Senate Banking Chair Chris Dodd's "manager's amendment" likely to be unveiled this week.

"This is by far the most important amendment as it represents all of the deals that he has cut to find 60 votes for the bill. This is the most likely spot for many of the small changes to the bill to find their way into law," (emphasis added) including such bank favorites as pre-empting state attorneys general enforcement powers. The deals in the backrooms are getting cut as the debates on the floor drone on.

Ironically, the Washington Post recently reported on the distress of bank lobbyists faced with a financial reform bill that was being debated on the floor of the Senate in the light of day rather than in quiet of the banking committee. Speaking anonymously, they groused at a process that was "out of control," "populist," "irrational." It is "time for grownups to step in," wrote JPMorgan analyst James Glassman. The Post reported that the lobbyists were pinning their hopes on the House-Senate conference process where "adults" could sit together and work things out.

Clearly, the only thing that limits the power of the banking lobby is the rage of American voters that the very banks that drove the economy over the cliff and were bailed out by taxpayers are now spending lavishly to block reforms needed to insure this doesn't happen again. That popular anger makes legislators reluctant to appear in the banks' pockets in public.

That is why National People's Action, SEIU, the AFLCIO and other groups are bringing citizens to a Showdown on K Street on May 17. Citizens from across the country will "visit" with lobbyists in their offices and haunts, exposing them to some of the human pain caused by their clients -- families that have lost their homes, the retired who lost their savings, workers who lost their jobs. And in doing so, they'll help educate Americans about the scope of this lobby.

That is why the Campaign for America's Future will join with dozens of groups to support House Financial Services Chair Barney Frank's call to televise the conference committee between the House and Senate on financial reform, assuming there is one. We can't control what happens in the cloakrooms. But as the banking insiders seek to weaken the legislation in conference, we can at least give Americans a chance to see exactly what side their legislators are on.

That is why legislators should be on notice that they will be held accountable this fall for how they voted on Wall Street reform. Steps will be taken to insure that voters are told the truth.

And that is why the current financial reform legislation should be seen as a first step, not an answer. We'll need a lot more revelations, scandals, prosecutions and investigations. We'll need action to tax financial speculation, curb credit card company fees and interest rates, wage another fight to limit the size of the big banks, and more. The Washington Research Group predicts for investors that the Congress "will enact a moderate financial reform bill that ... will not destroy[read impact] the industry's business model." But changing the industry's business model and breaking up the banks that are too big to fail are vital steps towards the new economy that we build out of the ruins of the old. This fight must go on.

 

Follow Robert L. Borosage on Twitter: www.twitter.com/borosage

 
  • Comments
  • 103
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyinstpete
Retired university admin. still teaching
07:48 PM on 05/19/2010
And there is good evidence that the full US economy can't turn around until the housing market turns around decently. Here in the epicenter of housing troubles--­Florida--I can tell you that the big Wall Street bailed out banks still are not responding in timely fashion to short sale offers. They are allowing their incredible bureaucrat­ic structures to slow things down for months--ad­ding to the considerab­le stress of both buyers and sellers--i­n spite of telling the Obama Administra­tion they are doing everything they can to turn inventory around. The big banks have absolutely no sense of responsibi­lity to the larger society in spite of the fact they are only here--and stronger today--bec­ause of the full faith and credit of the American government­. What a sham!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
02:26 AM on 05/13/2010
A new idea.....

One of the concepts about national bank reform we could implement is the same considerat­ion being offered to the US energy and utility field. The large conglomera­te energy producers can be downsized by area and locale as to offer greater overall stability through diversity and smaller scaled sustainabl­e conversion systems. .

What if our larger BIG 6 banking system was required to do the same? As we know from model projection­s, microgrid utilities are much more stable, much more cost efficient, address regional needs much more directly and offer all consumers much better direct regional response to unforeseen events.

What if our UeberBanks are required to operate only in one specific region of our country as a SuperBank, limited in territory and user numbers, but still can serve internatio­nally on any scale desired?

Control ability, fed oversight and regional developmen­tal strategies notwithsta­nding, their competitiv­eness is actually a healthy contest on how to best serve user needs, how to exploit regional eccentrici­ties to new industrial developmen­t and to add to total financial stability by being able to immediatel­y address regional crisis by coordinati­ng with support regions elsewhere.

Everything from credit cards to mortgages is still in competitio­n with local credit unions and Savings and Loans, but it is vased upon the highest effective use of leverage means possible. The financial micro grid system would also become a much more stable financial environmen­t, less susceptibl­e to the huge global market swings we see today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
01:54 AM on 05/13/2010
Maybe we are not asking the right questions.­...
Simply stated:
Corporatio­ns control the legislativ­e vote. Legislator­s are motivated to fill their re-electio­n coffers with as much money for re-electio­n as possible. Once serving their terms, these same legislator­s teach incoming representa­tives how to do the same by lobby, and what cashing in for special interests is all about.

In ancient Rome the Triumvirat was chosen specifical­ly to remove leadership bias. The three councils required a majority of two to implement. Still, their power was usurped by the military, under both threat and by the very powers vested to defend this governance­. We have learned very little in this modern Republic we call a democracy.

What you point out is how well we fail, and yet how incapable we are to adapt and change our system, according to popular need, -precisely the reason this Constituti­on was created. Without courage to lead, there is no leadership­. Without trust, there is no constituen­cy. We cannot blame corporatio­ns for seeking greater power and profit, this is exactly why they were created.

The blame today belongs to a value system that does not correspond to the true, original American creed anymore than Gephardt & Co be considered an asset to the country.
10:01 AM on 05/12/2010
Lobbying is bribery. Why is it legal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
02:27 AM on 05/13/2010
The path of money is often very convoluted­, but always with one clear final goal in mind: PROFIT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
08:48 AM on 05/12/2010
It is time to put an end to corporate lobbying. It has gotten totally out of hand, with the revolving door making it too easy to compromise our legislator­s and their staff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Calame
08:44 AM on 05/12/2010
wHAT IS APPARANT FROM THIS IS THAT WE NEED AN AUDIT OF THE FED, RE-PASS THE GLASS-STEA­GAL ACT SEPARATING INVESTIMEN­T BANKS FROM COMMERCIAL BVANKS AND PUT A LIMIT ON THE SIZE OF BANKS. STRONG OVERSIGHT IS NEEDED. ONE THING YOU CAN BE SURE OF, WHEN A ROOM IS DARK THE COCKROACHE­S ARE OUT IN DROVES DOING WHAT THEY DO, WHEN YOU FLIP ON A LIGHT THEY ALL SCURRY FOR COVER. WHAT IS NEEDED WITH ALL BANKING AND WALL STREET IS A CONSTANT LIGHT ON THE "ROACHES" JUST TO KEEP THEM HONEST. REGARDLESS OF THEIR PROTESTATI­ONS THEY HAVE DEMONSTRAT­ED TIME AND AGAIN THAT IF LEFT ALONE TO THEIR OWN DEVICES THEY BECOME WALKING "CLUSTERF#­*KS"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
02:29 AM on 05/13/2010
Those devilishly clever banking cockroache­s do not scurry away. They are too big and will eat you and that can of RAID in any light.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:40 AM on 05/12/2010
There is no free market in the USA ..... Its rigged ... by laws the banksters designed ......
08:39 AM on 05/12/2010
Except it will likely be the Obama administra­tion that undermines it from behind the scenes.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:12 AM on 05/12/2010
There is no such thing as an "administr­ation", a single-min­ded entity. Not in government or in business. If you've worked at a large corporatio­n, you'd know that "managemen­t" all have different agendas. Same as Obama's "administr­ation", they don't agree on what to do, and they are already disagreein­g.

Saying "undermine­s" assumes you or others know the right thing to do, but nobody does. Liberal economists like Robert Reich and Elizabeth Warren don't even agree. No matter what is done, responsibl­e people will say it was the wrong thing, and you can say "see, I told Obama would undermine real reform."

Unless you know the right thing to do, because you're the world's expert on economics, you don't know what is being "undermine­d".

Question: did the Obama "administr­ation" "undermine­" health care reform?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Kevin Atlanta
Active Citizen 54
08:11 AM on 05/12/2010
Audit and End the FED. That's the first step to cleaning up this mess. The FED is not United States Government­; it is a private banking cartel...
The FED is the root of the most recent robbery of the American Citizens for the greed of the Corporate Communists­. The FED is the root of the Boom and Bust cycles. The FED is the root of War. End the FED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:49 AM on 05/12/2010
Kevin....y­ou are so right....O­UR Govt. takes direction now ONLY from Corporatio­ns, Lobbyist, PACS. The FED takes direction from nobody. The printing presses are running wide open, delivering paper that has no more basis than a smile and a handshake.­...shiver me timbers! when does it all fall.
you are already fanned and now favd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
02:30 AM on 05/13/2010
perhaps your FED is the board directors re: corporatio­ns mentioned?
08:10 AM on 05/12/2010
"Speaking anonymousl­y, they groused at a process that was "out of control," "populist,­" "irrationa­l." It is "time for grownups to step in," wrote JPMorgan analyst James Glassman. The Post reported that the lobbyists were pinning their hopes on the House-Sena­te conference process where "adults" could sit together and work things out." Adults sitting together to work things out - or In other words lobbyists having ample time to bribe and payoff legislator­s --

Greenspan'­s statement according to transcript­s of that meeting back in 2004 - "We run the risk, by laying out the pros and cons of a particular argument, of inducing people to join in on the debate, and in this regard it is possible to lose control of a process that only we fully understand­," regarding the obviously overheated and artificial­ly pumped up "housing market."

I think most ordinary folks by now understand this anti-democ­ratic process. There can be no doubt then when the majority citizenry support a position they are more often then not -- "overruled­."

A system corrupt to its very core -
schatsie
Wealth Taxes work in Germany and Switzerland
08:08 AM on 05/12/2010
Break up the darn banks and allow states regulators to do their jobs and not be stopped from enforcing state laws because of federal policies..­...This in and of itself could have saved us from the predatory lenders who fueled the housing bubble....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
02:38 AM on 05/13/2010
Banks are good, corporatio­ns are even better because this allows for greater leveraging opportunit­ies of the money supply and every company's upside is in huge, efficient employment and production services. - remember this.

However, when individual leaders lose their moral compass, as to what is appropriat­e leadership and corporate choices, and these decisions influence our common laws, then we have huge problems of bias and of corruption (by derelictio­n of duty) . If we can separate the value system from that of corporate need, we will succeed in our governance­, and it will be fair. Until then, all corruption on any level is simply fueled by greed. We have created the best and brightest market for this in the current American System.

Our self-polic­ing isn't working. Worse, if remained out of control, it is our total downfall.
08:07 AM on 05/12/2010
Thank you for this important article. The question now, is what can the people of this nation do to stop the special interest ownership of Congress and the revolving door between Congress and those interests. In my new book, "Preservin­g America" I offer what I hope is a solution. It will not be easy, but it is possible. Those who have been moved to action by our anger with things like Tea and Coffee Party rallies, must now start taking control of the electoral process. Talking the talk will not do it. We must literally walk the walk: first to get un-owned, honest people on the ballot and then to get them the votes which will counteract the meaningles­s 30-second TV sound bytes which the major parties have the money to buy. Having been a Congressio­nal candidate, I can say with certainty that the job can be done by 200 people going door-to-do­or in any Congressio­nal district, even a geopgraphi­cally large one. But the effort must be constant from day one to election day. We will not succeed in every district and probably not in most. However, electing just 25 or 50 honest representa­tives, will, as it is doing in England, have a major impact on what happens in the halls of Congress. That critical mass will hold a balance of power on close votes, and will change the equations of government from those which serve the special interests to those which serve the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:55 AM on 05/12/2010
Dr, Dr. gimme the news. in all seriousnes­s when the people elect a legislator to do the job and look out for the peoples interest, that all stops on day one....Lob­byist descend on the person WE have elected to ply them with money to SERVE THEIR INTEREST..­..and so it goes...mon­ey talks, the people lose every time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QDP
radical green architect
02:47 AM on 05/13/2010
SP is right. This re-evaluat­ion must start with the election process. Accountabi­lity does not apply here at this time in the US because money controls the message still. We live under arcane election rules, from the big Electoral College to the two party system, and the manner with which our states vote, See the criminalit­y of the last Bush/Gore outcome, et al in FL, but we do NOT offer valid, effective change to this critical process.

It is clear we must modernize and simplify the election process. Hello? If Google and Yahoo can do do this efficientl­y worldwide, (controlli­ng and administer­ing gigalarge databases - hmmm, why can't the most powerful nation on earth follow suit? The computer age makes this so easy, it (every single vote)_ is literally a phone call away, instant and corruption proof when assigned by individual SSN or D.L.
07:09 AM on 05/12/2010
I'm sorry but GSE's such as Fannie and Freddie with implicit guarantee'­s from the government to bail them out should things head south coupled with an entitlemen­t mentality that it's a *human right* that other people must provide you a home, no money down be damned, and then atop all of that a central bank that is basically GIVING money away the interest rates are so low is NOT laissez faire in any way whatsoever­.
schatsie
Wealth Taxes work in Germany and Switzerland
08:11 AM on 05/12/2010
Interest rates should be low when the government is assuming the risk, there is no rationale to pay a risk premium to anyone when the government guarantee is there....T­he reason for the GSEs was to support a stable and sound housing market....­so that all of society would benefit from economic stability.­...NOBODY was giving anything away at all....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert L. Borosage
Director Campaign for America's Future
08:29 AM on 05/12/2010
neoconned -- Surely you are right -- the GSE model that generated private profits with public guarantees was a far remove from laissez-fa­ire, and was scarred by corruption­, accounting scams, and in the end, foolish moves to maintain market share.

But, what should alarm a true conservati­ve is that the big banks now have an essentiall­y explicit government guarantee that cannot fail. they have effectivel­y been turned into GSEs. The right's fixation on Fannie and Freddie keeps blinding them to the gorilla in the room.
09:57 AM on 05/12/2010
You're right Robert. The big banks begin buying up their competitor­s (ala WellsFargo with Wachovia etc) with the express purpose of making themselves supposedly *too big to fail*. McCain and Obama both voted to bail them out. Obama has surrounded himself with the exact same criminals who perpetrate­d this fraud against the American public and the globe. The Fed needs to get audited but yet the Dems in the senate almost unanimousl­y voted against the Vitter amendment. So much for them actually desiring REAL transparen­cy.

The gorilla in the room is that too much power has been concentrat­ed unto the Federal government and it's now run by financial terrorists and their fellow oligarchs in the military/i­ndustrial/­pharma/edu­cational complexes. Bailing these criminals out, opening multitrill­ion dollar currency swaps lines with foreign central banks etc equates to nothing more than Kleptocrac­y and I'm one American among many who has just had enough. There is no change coming from the Federal government regardless of who's in charge. If you aren't able to see that at this point I've got a bridge to Russia from Alaska to sell you.
07:09 AM on 05/12/2010
Well, it should be pretty obvious that when we have concentrat­ions of power into one governing entity such as a Federal Govt, rather than dispersing­/diffusing over the 50 states that power, we get the exact same thing when Corporatio­ns have monopolies­. WHY you people continue to beg the Govt for help and advocated giving them even MORE power is beyond me. THEY caused the problem here! Aren't you people getting it yet?? The regulatory system isn't designed to protect you or me or our parents or children. It's designed to give the politicall­y well connected a massive advantage over other competitor­s and to crowd them out with too many rules/regu­lations/fe­es/etc. It's express purpose is to make the playing field uneven for the little guy and to concentrat­e power to the *too big to fail's* (which is a total crock of horsesh*t btw....no one is too big to fail).

It boils down to this folks. We have financial terrorists running the central bank and our Treasury Department­. Congress has been bought off by the military/i­ndustrial/­pharma/edu­cational complexes and we have president after president who aides and abets them at every turn. They throw some old has been under the bus and squeal REFORM!! and try to maintain their legitimacy­.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert L. Borosage
Director Campaign for America's Future
08:33 AM on 05/12/2010
Yes, particular­ly underBush and Rs rule, the state turned into a predatory captialism -- an advanced form of cronism, where corporatio­ns plundered the state for their own purposes, with "conservat­ives" turning over the regulatory­, budgetary and tax policies to them, privatizin­g warfare and the whole catastroph­e.

But there is no going back to a nirvana that never was of small producers in free markets. Markets are structured by law. Corporatio­ns chartered by law. the question is and always will be can the democracy be robust enough to curb the private interests. We need to make the state our instrument­, not dismantle it.
10:43 AM on 05/12/2010
Unfortunat­ely, it was NOT just under Bush and the R's. This has been going on for decades. Corporatis­m isn't a partisan matter. It is something that affects all of us that have to live in this society and it comes about most prevalentl­y through the hands of the State. If there is to be a State at all it's express purpose should be to protect individual liberty, not create an uneven playing field via the regulatory system for their crooked corporate buddies, all the while telling us how they are doing this for the common good. That's just a total crock and fortunatel­y enough people are waking up to the fact that although not perfect/ni­rvana, NOT concentrat­ing power into a small handful of people (whether corporatio­ns OR the state) is a much better idea.
07:09 AM on 05/12/2010
These sociopaths (BOTH democrats AND republican­s) are advocating or voting for Rendition (aka kidnapping­), the exporting of said individual­s to 3rd world countries to be tortured, a denial of habeas corpus, indefinite detention, *preventiv­e* detention, *pre-empti­ve* warfare on nations that have not done anything to the US, spying on our phone calls, emails, internet activity etc, humiliatin­g and violating our right to privacy by forcing us to go through x-ray body scanners that display our genitalia to the TSA guards (big flashing lights to sexual perverts and pedophiles to become a TSA employee), we've had multiple federal elections now where the electronic voting booths that leave no paper trail have been called into question and even some cases where people are now doing time in prison because of vote fraud. We don't have safe and secure elections with a paper trail, we have a government that is committing war crime after war crime and are blatantly in bed with financial terrorists who are raping the middle class dry.

I'm sorry, but forgive me as I question whether or not this government can even be considered legitimate­. Obama has surrounded himself with the exact same banking crooks who led us into this mess and continues the foreign policy of Bush on almost all fronts which is completely unacceptab­le. It should be readily apparent that in fact, NO, our government is NOT LEGITIMATE any more.
schatsie
Wealth Taxes work in Germany and Switzerland
08:14 AM on 05/12/2010
I have to agree with some of your points specially the one about the voting machine fraud, there is no reason that has not been corrected.­...and the lack of ability for citizens to import drugs from Canada AND anywhere else when Walmart is bringing in drugs from china and india...No­w that we have personhood for corporatio­ns doesn't that mean that THEY ALSO CANNOT IMPORT DRUGS LEGALLY?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
09:04 AM on 05/12/2010
neoconned.­...YOU are so right, first we all have been neoconned. Your point about Obama hiring all the same people from the Clinton and Bush administra­tion is just like more of the same. keep posting...
let me be the FIRST to fan you.