iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert L. Cavnar

GET UPDATES FROM Robert L. Cavnar

Using the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Is Not the Answer to High Gas Prices

Posted: 03/ 7/11 11:04 AM ET

All the buzz yesterday on the talk shows (besides Michele Bachmann repeating her talking point dozens of times on Meet the Press rather than actually answering questions) was tapping the Strategic Oil Reserve to somehow lower gasoline prices.  To even suggest such a move is not only a bad idea and bad policy, it won't help.

First, a little history.  The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, or SPR, made up primarily of salt dome storage along the Texas and Louisiana coasts, was created after the oil shock of 1973 - 1974, when OPEC flexed its muscles by embargoing oil exports to the US to punish us for our Israeli policies at the time.  The emargo had the desired effects; first it drove oil prices to historic levels and second, it scared the bejesus out of everyone, including our elected leaders.   Injections of crude oil began in 1977, and was not actually filled to it's working capacity of around 727 million barrels until the end of 2009.  The reserve was established to be used in emergencies such as wars and embargos, and it has been used for that a couple of times, notably Gulf War 1 and during the Gulf of Mexico production shut down during and after Hurricane Katrina.  About 30 million barrels were drawn down during each event.  It was used for political purposes in late 2000, when President Clinton arranged a "swap" of about 30 million barrels with private industry to help fuel prices during that year's Middle East tensions.  The swap moved government oil into the private sector, to be returned the following year.  After several re-negotiations of the deal, all the oil was finally returned to the SPR by 2004.  This use of the SPR certainly didn't meet the emergency or war standard, and some believe it was used to manipulate fuel oil prices downward during the price spikes in those years.

Which brings us to today.  White House Chief of Staff William Daley yesterday, coincidently, also on Meet the Press, suggested that the administration is considering tapping the reserve in response to rising crude prices due to the latest unrest in the MIddle East.  That idea is not only stupid, it just won't work.  Currently, the US is importing about 11 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products per day of which about 8.6 million barrels comes in as crude.  We currently consume about 19 to 20 million barrels per day of liquid petroleum products, making our import percentage about 60% of daily use.  With a 727 million barrel inventory in the SPR, that would give us about two months supply if all imports were cut off.  If only half was cut off, that still only give us 4 months, and we would be completely vulnerable to energy supply disruptions and unrest in the Middle East.

Which brings us to the real issue...the only way to reduce gasoline prices is to use less.  That is the only way.  Our elected leaders have been kicking the can down the road for over 40 years since the first oil shock, and continue to do that today, only fiddling around the edges of comprehensive energy policy. We must deal with this problem now, expanding our use of renewables, natural gas, and have an adult conversation about mass transit and nuclear power.

Until we do, we'll continue to be at risk for our own future, and will continue tossing around stupid ideas like drawing from the SPR before we really need it.
 

Bob Cavnar, a 30-year veteran of the oil and gas industry, is the author of Disaster on the Horizon: High Stakes, High Risks, and the Story Behind the Deepwater Well Blowout. He is CEO of Luca Technologies.

 

 
 
 

Follow Robert L. Cavnar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dailyhurricane

 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:05 PM on 03/08/2011
The government should sell off some of the SPR and take advantage of the current prices to make a profit for the taxpayers. This might drive prices for consumers down slightly. Then refill the reserve by purchasing biodiesel. This would help domestic production of alternative fuels. This would help the U.S. become less dependent on imports of foreign petroleum. This is directly related to the purpose of the SPR.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indiecratublican
I am what I am.
05:00 PM on 03/08/2011
You know what it's really sad that we've known about the problems associated with oil and gas for decades, yet this country does nothing. It complains when the gas prices are high, but does nothing. I guess they're simply waiting for when the oil is gone. This indulgent society- no world consistently rips this planet apart, pillaging it with no prospects of replenishment. Instead, we look for distant galaxies to move to after we've finished rping this one. I really wished Jimmy Carter had some backbone in the 70s and took serious measures to the push road least followed as mentioned in his "Crisis of Confidence Speech". But he didn't and instead allowed the public and the hopes of a 2nd term to cash in his soul. Unless a leader seriously tries to get this country off the crack that is fossil fuels, we will be vainly complaining about gas prices until it's all gone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Krow
03:54 PM on 03/08/2011
The Koch Brothers are refiners of gasoline. The best way to screw them is to not use any.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
03:34 PM on 03/08/2011
The typical scam by the hedge funds to keep oil prices high...this is easily the best article on this anywhere...if you can read...you can understand...like the author says "Why is no one in jail?

http://seekingalpha.com/article/242242-fake-out-thursday-oil-scam-continues-unabated
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:43 PM on 03/08/2011
Just a heads up about pricing of gasoline.

I drive a CNG Honda the price per gallon equivalent is between $2.20-$2.60/gallon! However if you but a Phill station for your home the price because of the Gas companies incentives drops below a $1.00/gallon.

It's a bit inconvenient because it is short legged 180 miles between fills and you have to have an app on your cell phone to find the stations but it is cheap!

Oh and by the way you get to use the car pool lane - that's handy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Krow
03:50 PM on 03/08/2011
Don't forget the tax credit for buying the car.
01:20 PM on 03/08/2011
I agree with the author on everything but the mass tranist option... the more efficiently we use a fuel, such as oil, the more inclined we are inclined to use more of it (i.e., Jevons paradox), so we don't really wind up with a net savings. Diversity in energy is key, along with personal responsibility. In other words, don't whine when a certain commodity goes up, find an alternative. Make long term investments of 10, 20, or 30 years for things like new nuclear, EVs and associated infrastructure, personal solar and wind if that's your thing, and use science and economics, not politics, to determine energy policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Krow
03:52 PM on 03/08/2011
If we don't use gasoline or diesel as transportation fuel, we do not need to import oil, thereby screwing our enemies and helping ourselves balance trade.
05:36 PM on 03/08/2011
Heck yeah! Why do you think there's been such a push for nuclear power in the middle east? So they can use less oil themselves, and sell more to us poor addicted saps that live in countries where nuclear is a dirty word. Which is fine. The higher the prices go, the better the business case for the alternatives.
01:22 AM on 03/08/2011
The price of gas is controlled by the commodies market. And we know how much Wall Street and Washington DC sleep together so we'll never see a real solution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
11:21 PM on 03/08/2011
Thanks for the URL!
10:34 PM on 03/07/2011
"Which brings us to the real issue...the only way to reduce gasoline prices is to use less."

Not buying that. When we use less OPEC just cuts production and Wall St. continues to speculate and inflate the price.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
09:55 AM on 03/08/2011
That's all much easier when there's no slack in the system. Give saving gas a try - you might even save some money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 PM on 03/07/2011
The price of gas needs to go up to $10/gal to get americans off the oil habbit. Only if the price of gas goes up will people give up their SUV's and gas guzzlers and start riding mass transit and demand high speed light rail. Obama shouldn't touch the oil reserves to lower the price of gas. We need to take advantage of these high prices to make the people learn.
10:37 PM on 03/07/2011
And what by chance is going to power high speed light rail? And will it makes stops at my workplace? And in my part of the world there is no mass transit. Make the people learn??? I am betting you benefitted from the extended tax cuts. You think the peons need to learn another lesson.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
09:56 AM on 03/08/2011
What powers trains? Rather less fuel, since trains tend to use less fuel per passenger than cars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
09:46 AM on 03/08/2011
IMO, creating high-speed rail first is the wrong way to go about it. Instead, we first need to fund trolley systems to move commuters around local cities and towns, Sixty years ago, 90% of all trips within town was by trolley, before National City Lines (a GM-funded front company) bought the trolley systems up and ran them to the ground. Rebuilding trolley systems will positively impact the most lives and build support for expanded rail travel. After the trolley systems are up and running, then we can start working on interurban high-speed rail. Pushing high-speed interurban lines first is putting the cart before the horse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
incognito-ergo-sum
ProgLibFemHumanist. Thanks tax payers for paying
06:36 PM on 03/08/2011
I live in a valley that has two stations, between 5 towns. Only when the canyon was full of a mudslide did people watch the train go passing by and say, "what the he ll."

With the Interstate shut tight and no side road, the trains just slid by on the other side of the river. People in the town at the head of the slide took the train home then rode by bus 40 miles back along the same way to their home.

This is insanity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cool Bam
09:11 PM on 03/07/2011
I agree with the author for a couple reasons. First, although releasing some of the oil does affect the price disproportionally to the size of the release (the market economics due to a "sense of stability"); I think we can live with the current bump. It does make alt-energy more competitive, and lets face it they need help. Secondly, with the way things are in the Middle East, we might REALLY NEED that oil for it's intended purpose.
07:54 PM on 03/07/2011
immediate regulations and tax's on market speculators would work but the Republicans would never support the attempt. The price of gas has nothing to do with supply and demand, it is mostly market speculators.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leggs67
07:12 PM on 03/07/2011
Maybe it's time the US stops exporting oil. That's right exporting. We are the worlds 13th largest exporter. Follow the link and look for oil exports. 1.7 million bbl/day.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
11:51 PM on 03/07/2011
When they built the Alaska Pipeline in the '70s, it was understood that this oil was only for US consumption. But Washington eventually yielded to the big oil companies and let them export it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:06 PM on 03/07/2011
"Which brings us to the real issue...the only way to reduce gasoline prices is to use less."

Yep - Mass transit is the way to do this. Build a system so that anyone who lives in a city of 50,000 or more does not need to own a car. That is 85% of the American population.

Where to get the money for this? Simple - cut the defense budget by 2/3. That would give us some $400 billion per year for construction. The money would go into working class paychecks and the resulting system would pay dividends far into the future.

But we won't do it because our "representative" government is owned by those who benefit from the status quo - oil companies, auto companies and the MIC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
07:36 PM on 03/07/2011
Excellent post. Isn't it sad that our refusal to face reality will possibly cost millions of lives down the road, when oil is no longer available and there is no replacement transportation available - to move us, our foodstuffs, or anything else. It's coming, maybe sooner than we know.
photo
HeevenSteven
20 Minutes into the future.
06:55 PM on 03/07/2011
"..the only way to reduce gasoline prices is to use less. That is the only way. "

That's good! But you didn't get into how we do it. I'd like to hear where you are on that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Krow
03:56 PM on 03/08/2011
We are stamping out abortions and unions.
06:46 PM on 03/07/2011
There is little better illustration about the stupidity and delusion of the American people than spending down the bank account to ease whatever pain one is feeling at this moment. The only solution to our energy problem is to need less energy, as in sustainability, but Americans are incapable of living responsibly.