More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Naiman

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Naiman
 

War-Weary Republicans Rebuke Romney On Afghanistan

Posted: 12/01/11 03:03 PM ET

On Wednesday night, the Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment introduced by Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley calling on President Obama to speed up U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan. This was a watershed event towards ending the war. The previous high water mark of Senators calling for expedited withdrawal was 27; the previous high water mark on a vote was 18. The vote is a green light from the Senate to the White House for a faster military withdrawal that would save many American and Afghan lives and (at least) many tens of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Because it was a voice vote, there was no roll call. But, if you want to know who especially to thank, 21 Senators sponsored Merkley's amendment:

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR); Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT); Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM); Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY); Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH); Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT); Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK); Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM); Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA); Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD); Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND); Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL); Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY); Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA); Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT); Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV); Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) ; Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV); Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT); Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY); Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

The Senate vote -- which saw John McCain standing alone in vocal opposition -- is more evidence that on key issues of war and military spending, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Buck McKeon haven't been speaking for Republicans generally. Big media should take note, and make more room on their playlists for Republicans like Rand Paul, Walter Jones, Justin Amash, Tim Johnson and Grover Norquist who want to turn a corner on a decade of endless war and unchecked military spending.

In the Republican Presidential debates, on Iraq, Afghanistan, and military spending, Romney, Gingrich and most of the other Republicans -- not Ron Paul, of course -- have mostly sung from the old-time Republican hymnal. On the Sunday talk shows, on Iraq, Afghanistan, and military spending, McCain and Graham and McKeon -- the go-to Republicans for big media on military issues -- have sung from the old-time Republican hymnal.

But meanwhile, on Iraq, Afghanistan, and military spending, the great sea of Republicans has been doing Vatican II.

On Iraq, Romney, Gingrich (Gingrich was for it before he was against it) and the other Republican candidates -- not Ron Paul -- slammed President Obama for withdrawing U.S. troops in compliance with President Bush's Status of Forces Agreement. But 63 percent of Republicans told CBS that they agreed with President Obama's decision.

On military spending, Romney has demanded that President Obama block cuts to projected military spending. (Gingrich, to his credit, has dodged the neocon loyalty oath on opposition to cuts in military spending.) But when Congress passed the Budget Control Act, and when the "Super Committee" failed to reach agreement on a deficit-reduction deal that would block half a trillion dollars in automatic cuts to projected military spending over ten years from taking effect, that reflected the majority of Republicans in Congress saying: we prefer military cuts to increased taxes.

(For a recent taste of how overripe the military budget is for cuts, read Ben Freeman's account for the Project on Government Oversight on how Defense Secretary Gates' efforts to stop the wasteful and expensive over-promotion of generals have been reversed under former "budget hawk" Defense Secretary Panetta.)

On Afghanistan, Romney and McCain have slammed President Obama for pulling U.S. troops out faster than the Pentagon wants. But Wednesday night, the Senate said: "We think you aren't pulling out the troops fast enough." (Note that a new Rasmussen poll says that 3 in 5 Americans want U.S. troops out of Afghanistan immediately or within a year.)

It's time for big media to recognize that on Iraq, Afghanistan, and military spending, Romney, Gingrich, McCain, Graham and McKeon are generals who have lost their Republican army. They rage like King Lear. But they have lost their kingdom.

And it's time for President Obama to bring our boys and girls home from Afghanistan.

 

Follow Robert Naiman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/naiman

On Wednesday night, the Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment introduced by Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley calling on President Obama to speed up U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan. This was ...
On Wednesday night, the Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment introduced by Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley calling on President Obama to speed up U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan. This was ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
10:25 AM on 12/02/2011
The worm has indeed turned, the Republicans are well on thier way to begging for the Afghan war to stop or at least scale back. Sweet! The party that loves to call the Dems "weak on defense" now finds it's self wanting to get the hell out, John "The War Lover" McCain excepted. But it's all good, now cut "defense" spending and make a real attempt to balance the budget. As if that will ever happen.
01:36 AM on 12/02/2011
The people need to make their voice heard by voting against warmongers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
10:26 AM on 12/02/2011
I've been saying that since 'Nam, but I'm more than willing to lend my voice and vote.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
12:08 AM on 12/02/2011
If that is how most Republicans and most Democrats feel about Afghanistan, then I am glad I am not a Republican or a Democrat. But Iraq is different, that was a mistake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim1478
11:54 PM on 12/01/2011
This article seems to sell the idea that Republicans are getting tired of making a fortune from defense company shares that are bought and sold every day on Wall Street. What they say with their lesser developed head is not what they actually act on when theirs money involved.
06:21 PM on 12/01/2011
Bravo. And one can only be saddened by Panetta's selling out to those who favor a bloated Pentagon and endless war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
05:58 PM on 12/01/2011
I can understans them.The government has already said that we my as well plan on being in afghanastan for many years to come.Why?Who knows why,I sure as hell don't see the point myself.Pakistan is still running their mouths but at the sametime started working with us again.Their always going to be trouble no matter what we do.They want to go after afghan militants and they want us to do it or lead the so called charfe and we won't do it.The syarted that mess that got 25 of them killed .I still say it was no accident either.It was meant to happen
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
12:12 AM on 12/02/2011
Thanks to our involvement in Afghanistan, al-Qaida has been weakened a lot. If we withdraw before we can persuade the Taliban to abandon their alliance with al-Qaida, then al-Qaida will become strong again, and we can see more terrorism here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 AM on 12/02/2011
The Taliban and Al Qaida have already parted ways.
05:50 PM on 12/01/2011
Bravo. But still years overdue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trismegistus22
Crescat virtus per certaminem.
05:32 PM on 12/01/2011
I don't quite get the reference to Vatican II; but yes it is time to call it quits in the longest war in our history. It is time for the killing to stop. It is time for the dying to stop.
There are american children who have never known a time of peace. What kind of value system are they going to bring to their world when all they have known is war? Can we bring an end or at least a slowing down of our dependance on war and war making?
05:57 PM on 12/01/2011
It's not just children. I'm 55 years old and I can count the years when the U.S. was not involved in some military adventure somewhere on the fingers of one hand.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
RobertNaiman
Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy
08:11 PM on 12/01/2011
Sorry. It was a metaphor that I thought everyone would understand. Vatican II was a modernizing reform of the Catholic Church. Abandoning support for endless war and unchecked military spending is a modernizing reform of the Republican Party. It was parallel to the "hymnal" metaphor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trismegistus22
Crescat virtus per certaminem.
08:41 AM on 12/02/2011
I understand, thanks. Probably needed a little more context. The analogy is interesting because Vatican II did usher in a modernizing effort (aggioriamento sp?) but currently the RCC seems to be returning to pre- Vatican II practices. The newly translated mass is but one example. All the while the papacy has cemented its control by electing very conservative bishops and raising to the college of cardinals only the most traditional.